ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02250339Updated Jan 19, 2023

A Prospective Observational Study of Family-based Interventions for Children With Neuropsychiatric and/or Psychiatric Disorders

An observational study in ADHD, Asperger Syndrome and Child Behavior Disorders, sponsored by Social Insurance Institution, Finland. Completed at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-19.

Sponsored by Social Insurance Institution, Finland · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
230
Ages
5 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and the effects of family-based interventions for children (aged 5-12) with neuropsychiatric and psychiatric disorders in Finnish health care settings.

Read the detailed description
  1. Introduction

    The role of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela) is to complement publicly funded Finnish health care delivery system. In 2003, the Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health further defined that Kela fund mental health services for children under 16 years old should incorporate family oriented psychological counselling and multicomponent rehabilitation. The purpose of the present prospective observational study is to examine the feasibility and tentative effectiveness of a multi-systemic and multicomponent family interventions for 5-12 year-old children with neuropsychiatric symptoms. The present study design is defined by the following key characteristics: (a) it comprises the comparison of three clinically relevant interventions based on family therapeutic activities; (b) it involves a diverse population of participants from heterogeneous practice settings; and (c) intervention outcomes are defined relatively broadly. All study participants will be recruited in Finland. The research is also conducted in Finland by the Finnish research consortium. The research project is funded by the Health department of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland.

  2. Effectiveness of family-systemic interventions for children with mental health problems

    Empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of family-systemic and family-based interventions for children who may suffer from, for example, socio-emotional and developmental problems that relate to neuropsychiatric disorders such as ADHD and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Family-systemic interventions may, firstly, refer to a more traditional and distinct method of psychotherapy (i.e. family therapy) provided by a licensed therapist. Secondly, the family systemic and therapeutic approach has further influenced the development and implementation of specific licensed family-focused and empirically supported treatment program protocols (e.g. MST and MDFT). Thirdly, there are also specific behavioral and cognitive-behavioral parent training protocols available (e.g. PMTO and Triple P), which are considered a form of family-based approach. However, the rationale in parent training protocols stems more solely from social learning theory and interventions are typically delivered in a parent group format. It could be further argued that family-focused treatment protocols and parent training programs reflect the emergence of a so-called third-generation family therapeutic perspective by enhancing the need to establish evidence-based interventions through randomized controlled clinical trials. In addition to discussions above, family therapy is the most popular therapy approach among licensed psychotherapists working in the health care system in Finland. However, there is very little research on the effects of family-systemic interventions on the well-being of children with mental health problems and their families in Finnish health care settings.

  3. Description of the interventions

    The multi-systemic and multicomponent family intervention for 5-12 year-old children with neuropsychiatric symptoms is based on the intervention program developed by the Health department of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland. In order to incorporate the best current practices and delivery formats, an independent expert panel of child psychiatry specialists from the Finnish University Hospitals was recruited in intervention development. Intervention feasibility and acceptability were further assessed by piloting work. At the present project, time-limited services (12 to 24 months) are provided in two different arms (i.e. separate intervention programs) referred to as LAKU and Etä-LAKU family intervention programs. Aims of the family intervention are to help children to strengthen their socio-emotional skills at home and in everyday life settings, help children and families to cope with their experiences, and strengthen interpersonal interaction among family members to overcome possibly difficult life situations, thoughts and emotions.

    The family therapeutic approach is the key intervention component. Family sessions are provided by a licensed family therapist and a co-worker who is also an experienced mental health care professional. Multi-systemic approach addresses the importance of individualized needs of children and families. This includes the work with other important social systems (e.g. child daycare and school). The multi-systemic approach also includes both visiting and monitoring the child in his/hers social environment as well as collaborative meetings together with the family and the child's significant others from daycare and school. The collaborative stance further requires that family workers attach assigned family consultants from the health care delivery system as part of the therapeutic system too. The multicomponent approach, for its part, is designed to provide different delivery formats for the families involved such as group meetings for parents. Other important delivery formats include one-to-one sessions with the child. The families are also given an opportunity to attend family weekends where they can meet other families who share similar life situations.

    LAKU and Etä-LAKU family intervention programs have some pertinent differences. The prior intervention program is provided in an 'urban' context and therapeutic sessions may take place flexibly both at a clinic and in the family's home. Etä-LAKU, however, is strictly an ecosystem-based family intervention program. It is tailored for families who live in rural parts of Finland with very limited health services available. The Etä-LAKU family intervention program does not include the delivery of parent group sessions either. The LAKU family program involves service providers and child mental health clinics in the Finnish towns of Helsinki, Kotka, Tampere and Oulu as well as their environs. The Etä-LAKU intervention program is provided in Lapland and Kainuu/Ylä-Savo environs.

  4. Prospective observational clinical study

The centerpiece of the project will be a prospective observational study of 5-12 year-old children and their parents who attend family-systemic interventions in different practical settings. The observational study is further based on multisource (i.e. child, parent and teacher report) assessment design. The study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Southwest Finland and the Research Ethics Committee of the Kela research department. Study approval from the Hospital District of Southwest Finland is in process.

The control group consists of children and families attending family therapy. Time-limited family therapy (12 to 24 months) is provided via the Hospital District of Southwest Finland/Turku University Hospital's Child Psychiatry clinic (TYKS) and takes place in the town of Turku environs. All data will be collected in Finland and stored at the Research department of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, located in Helsinki. Study measures will be administered in Finnish only.

The study design does not include randomization. However, it provides an opportunity to compare possible changes in child and parent well-being within and between three different and clinically relevant family intervention programs. Beyond this, key outcome variables are determined by giving the possibility to scrutinize intervention effectiveness more closely. The study design enables comparing the results from primary and secondary outcomes to those from nationally representative school- and population-based surveys conducted in Finland.

02

Conditions studied

  • ADHD
  • Asperger Syndrome
  • Child Behavior Disorders

Keywords

  • Child Mental Health
  • Parenting
  • Family Issues
03

In context

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

1,817 studies on the registry are indexed under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 230 is above the median of 127 across 329 observational studies indexed under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity.

Browse Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Social Insurance Institution, Finland is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The LAKU family program service is provided in Helsinki, Kotka, Tampere and Oulu environs. The Etä-LAKU intervention program is provided in Lapland and Kainuu/Ylä-Savo environs. Families are admitted to the programs by the child mental health clinics in the respective localities. The control group (treatment as usual) consists of children and families attending the family therapy fund by the Hospital District of Southwest Finland/Turku University Hospital's Child Psychiatry clinic (TYKS) and takes place in the Hospital District of Southwest Finland environs. Potential participants (i.e. the families admitted to the family-based intervention) will receive both oral and written information about the study and an invitation to volunteer. Both parents (when applicable) and child are advised to participate independently. Power analysis is utilized to ensure minimum necessary number of study participants. Anticipated sample sizes are: n=125 (LAKU), n=72 (Etä-LAKU), and n=33 (TAU group).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Child is 5-12 year-old at time of recruitment
  • Child meets screening criteria for neuropsychiatric disorder (i.e. ADHD \& Asperger Syndrome)
  • Child may also meet screening criteria for co-existing condition such as Behavior Disorder
  • Family situation is assessed by the health care professional (child psychiatrist) and an intensive family-based intervention is further recommended

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child's psychiatric condition requires acute inpatient care
  • Child's parent's alcohol and/or substance abuse requires acute treatment
  • The progress is going on to correct the conditions that may lead to the child's placement in out-of-home care
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
230 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • LAKU family program

    Time-limited (12 or 24 months) intervention program for children (aged 5-12) with neuropsychiatric/psychiatric disorder(s). LAKU family program (12 month program) includes 35 family-based meetings. Families are also given an opportunity to attend two separate family weekends. In addition to this, parent group format may include 10 meetings at maximum. A 24-month-program will include 15 additional family-based meetings.

    Other: LAKU family program

  • Etä-LAKU family program

    Time-limited (18 or 24 months) intervention program for children (aged 5-12) with neuropsychiatric/psychiatric disorder(s). Etä-LAKU family program (18 months) includes 35 family-based meetings and two separate family weekends. A 24-month-program will include 10 additional family-based meetings.

    Other: Etä-LAKU family program

  • Family therapy

    Time-limited (12 or 24 months) family therapeutic intervention for children (aged 5-12) with neuropsychiatric/psychiatric disorder(s). Family therapy intervention includes 15 (1-year program) or 30 (2-year program) family meetings.

    Other: Family therapy

Interventions

  • OtherLAKU family program

    Multi-systemic and multicomponent family-based intervention program

  • OtherEtä-LAKU family program

    Ecosystem-based intervention for families living in rural parts of Finland

  • OtherFamily therapy

    Treatment as usual (TAU)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Child's Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire (HRQOL) - (KINDL-R)

    KINDL-R is a generic instrument, which involves both child and parent reports.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed to measure change from baseline to an expected average of 12-18 months & 24 months (when applicable) + 6 months post-intervention follow-up

  2. Multisource Assessment of Children's Socioemotional Competence Scale (MASCS)

    The MASCS is developed on the of The School Social Behavior Scales (SSBS), and it measures child's prosocial and antisocial behaviour. Multisource assessment includes child, parent and teacher reports.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed to measure change from baseline to an expected average of 12-18 months & 24 months (when applicable) + 6 months post-intervention follow-up

  3. Parenting Self-Efficacy (PSE)

    The PSE is a Finnish modification version of the Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index (SEPTI).

    Time frame: Participants will be followed to measure change from baseline to an expected average of 12-18 months & 24 months (when applicable) + 6 months post-intervention follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Finnish version of the Peer Network and Dyadic Loneliness Scale (PNDL)

    PNDL measures lack of involvement in a social network and the absence of close dyadic friendships. Child report only.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed to measure change from baseline to an expected average of 12-18 months & 24 months (when applicable) + 6 months post-intervention follow-up

  2. Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5)

    To measure for Parent's Psychological Stress

    Time frame: Participants will be followed to measure change from baseline to an expected average of 12-18 months & 24 months (when applicable) + 6 months post-intervention follow-up

Other outcomes

  1. Parenting and Family Life Related Stress Measures

    Participants will be followed to measure psychological stress that stems from family related issues. Items are derived from Finnish family surveys conducted by the National Institute for Health and Welfare.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed to measure change from baseline to an expected average of 12-18 months & 24 months (when applicable)+ 6 months post-intervention follow-up

  2. Satisfaction measures

    To measure intervention acceptability and feasibility

    Time frame: Satisfaction will be measured at the end of an expected program average of 12-18 months & 24 months (when applicable)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Social Insurance Institution
    Helsinki, 00381, Finland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Littell JH, Popa M, Forsythe B. Multisystemic Therapy for social, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth aged 10-17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD004797. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004797.pub3. PubMed 16034952 ↗
  • Barlow J, Smailagic N, Huband N, Roloff V, Bennett C. Group-based parent training programmes for improving parental psychosocial health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 17;2014(5):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.pub4. PubMed 24838729 ↗
  • Gross DA, Belcher HM, Ofonedu ME, Breitenstein S, Frick KD, Chakra B. Study protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial of two parent training programs in a fee-for-service mental health clinic: can we improve mental health services to low-income families? Trials. 2014 Mar 1;15:70. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-70. PubMed 24581245 ↗
  • Lee PC, Niew WI, Yang HJ, Chen VC, Lin KC. A meta-analysis of behavioral parent training for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):2040-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 29. PubMed 22750360 ↗
  • Charach A, Carson P, Fox S, Ali MU, Beckett J, Lim CG. Interventions for preschool children at high risk for ADHD: a comparative effectiveness review. Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):e1584-604. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0974. Epub 2013 Apr 1. PubMed 23545375 ↗
  • Zwi M, Jones H, Thorgaard C, York A, Dennis JA. Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3. PubMed 22161373 ↗
  • Reyno SM, McGrath PJ. Predictors of parent training efficacy for child externalizing behavior problems--a meta-analytic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;47(1):99-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01544.x. PubMed 16405646 ↗
  • Lundahl B, Risser HJ, Lovejoy MC. A meta-analysis of parent training: moderators and follow-up effects. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Jan;26(1):86-104. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Nov 8. PubMed 16280191 ↗
  • Shepperd S, Doll H, Gowers S, James A, Fazel M, Fitzpatrick R, Pollock J. Alternatives to inpatient mental health care for children and young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD006410. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006410.pub2. PubMed 19370634 ↗
  • Carr, A. (2014), The evidence base for family therapy and systemic interventions for child-focused problems. Journal of Family Therapy, 36: 107-157. doi: 10.1111/1467-6427.12032
  • Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Hamby DW. Meta-analysis of family-centered helpgiving practices research. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007;13(4):370-8. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20176. PubMed 17979208 ↗
  • Robin AL. Family therapy for adolescents with ADHD. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2014 Oct;23(4):747-56. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Aug 8. PubMed 25220084 ↗
  • Kolko DJ, Campo J, Kilbourne AM, Hart J, Sakolsky D, Wisniewski S. Collaborative care outcomes for pediatric behavioral health problems: a cluster randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):e981-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2516. Epub 2014 Mar 24. PubMed 24664093 ↗
  • Karst JS, Van Hecke AV. Parent and family impact of autism spectrum disorders: a review and proposed model for intervention evaluation. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2012 Sep;15(3):247-77. doi: 10.1007/s10567-012-0119-6. PubMed 22869324 ↗
  • Matson JL, Mahan S, LoVullo SV. Parent training: a review of methods for children with developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):961-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Feb 25. PubMed 19246176 ↗
  • Patterson SY, Smith V, Mirenda P. A systematic review of training programs for parents of children with autism spectrum disorders: single subject contributions. Autism. 2012 Sep;16(5):498-522. doi: 10.1177/1362361311413398. Epub 2012 Jan 16. PubMed 22250194 ↗
  • Danckaerts M, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Banaschewski T, Buitelaar J, Dopfner M, Hollis C, Santosh P, Rothenberger A, Sergeant J, Steinhausen HC, Taylor E, Zuddas A, Coghill D. The quality of life of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;19(2):83-105. doi: 10.1007/s00787-009-0046-3. Epub 2009 Jul 26. PubMed 19633992 ↗
  • Cappe E, Wolff M, Bobet R, Adrien JL. Quality of life: a key variable to consider in the evaluation of adjustment in parents of children with autism spectrum disorders and in the development of relevant support and assistance programmes. Qual Life Res. 2011 Oct;20(8):1279-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9861-3. Epub 2011 Feb 12. PubMed 21312064 ↗
  • Rambo A, West C, Schooley AL, Boyd TV. (Eds). Family therapy review: Contrasting contemporary models. New York: Taylor and Francis. 2013.
  • Rasheed JM, Rasheed MN, Marley JA. Family Therapy: Models and Techniques. London: SAGE.
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 2013, a primary completion of Jun 2018 and a completion of Jun 2018. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 18, 2014
First posted
Sep 26, 2014
Start
Dec 2013
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2018
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2018
Last update
Jan 19, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 19, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02250339
Lead sponsor
Social Insurance Institution, Finland
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 26, 2014
Start date
Dec 2013
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2018
Completion
Jun 30, 2018
Last update
Jan 19, 2023

Study contacts

Miika Vuori, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Research Department, Social Insurance Institution of Finland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion