CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02246946Updated Jan 18, 2017

Positive Airway Pressure on Pleural Effusion After Drainage

An interventional study of Positive Airway Pressure and Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in Pleural Effusion, sponsored by Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-18.

Sponsored by Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
156
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of intermittent positive airway pressure breathing (specific lung expansion technique) to conventional chest physiotherapy chest drainage is effective to accelerate the reabsorption of pleural effusion and consequently decrease the duration of chest tube drainage and respiratory system impairment. These effects would decrease hospital stay lengths and the incidence of pulmonary complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pleural Effusion

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pleural effusion
  • chest tube
  • respiratory therapy
  • intermittent positive-pressure breathing
  • lung function
  • pulmonary complications
03

In context

Pleural Effusion

324 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Effusion; 62 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 156 is above the median of 63 across 212 interventional studies indexed under Pleural Effusion.

Browse Pleural Effusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age over 18 years
  • presence of pleural effusion
  • have undergone chest drain for fewer than 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication to the use of non-invasive equipment that generates positive airway pressure (such as: intolerance, phobia, drowsiness, restlessness, confusion, hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressor therapy, systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg, facial trauma, ineffective cough or inability to swallow, nausea or vomiting, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, acute myocardial infarction within the last 48 hours, pneumothorax or bullous emphysema)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
156 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Positive Airway Pressure group

    The patients allocated to this group will undergo bronchial hygiene treatments administered with a high-frequency oscillator for 5 sets of 10 repetitions, lung expansion exercises using flow oriented incentive spirometry for 5 sets of 20 repetitions and walking for 100 meters (i.e., the same treatment that will be administered to the Conventional Chest Physiotherapy group). Additionally, this group will receive positive airway pressure breathing with 15 mmHg by a device via a rubber facial mask for 30 minutes in a sitting position.

    Device: Positive Airway Pressure

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Chest Physiotherapy group

    In the sitting position, the patients allocated to this group will undergo bronchial hygiene treatments administered with a high-frequency oscillator for 5 sets of 10 repetitions, lung expansion exercises using flow oriented incentive spirometry for 5 sets of 20 repetitions and positive airway pressure breathing with 4 mmHg via a rubber facial mask for 5 minutes in a sitting position. These patients will also walk for 100 meters. The use of positive pressure breathing with 4 mmHg has no therapeutic value, but will help keep the blinding of assessors by the presence of the equipment in the room and mark the patient's skin.

    Other: Conventional Chest Physiotherapy

  • Placebo comparator
    Control group

    The patients allocated to this group will receive positive airway pressure breathing with 4 mmHg (without therapeutic value) via a rubber facial mask for 30 minutes in a sitting position. The use of positive pressure breathing with 4 mmHg has no therapeutic value, but will help keep the blinding of assessors by the presence of the complete kit of equipment in the room.

    Procedure: Control group

Interventions

  • DevicePositive Airway Pressure

    To this group, Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure Breathing with 15 mmHg by Muller Reanimatior (Engemed, Brazil) device with a rubber facial mask will be provide

  • OtherConventional Chest Physiotherapy

    To this group, routine physiotherapy exercises will be conducted plus Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure Breathing with 4 mmHg by Muller Reanimatior (Engemed, Brazil) device with a rubber facial mask will be provide

  • ProcedureControl group

    to this group, Airway Pressure Breathing with 4 mmHg by Muller Reanimatior (Engemed, Brazil) device with a rubber facial mask will be provide

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of chest tube drainage

    The criteria for the removal the chest drain will an output of transudative fluid over 24h ≤ 200 ml and full lung expansion on chest radiography

    Time frame: All patients will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days of chest drainage

Secondary outcomes

  1. Spirometry

    The blind assessor will use a portable spirometer according previously established implementation and acceptability criteria. The following variables will be considered: forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in the 1st second, and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the curve. The predictive values for the Brazilian population will be used

    Time frame: On the 4th and 8th days after the beginning of the intervention protocol. Or on the day of hospital discharge if it occurs prior to the 8th day of protocol

  2. Peripheral Oxygen Saturation

    The patients will be required to breath room air (without supplemental oxygen) for at least 10 minutes prior to the assessments. The blind assessor will use a portable pulse oximeter.

    Time frame: On the 4th and 8th days after the beginning of the intervention protocol. Or on the day of hospital discharge if it occurs prior to the 8th day of protocol

  3. Pulmonary complications

    The occurrence of the following complications will be monitored until the day of hospital discharge by a physician blinded to the intervention groups: pneumonia (chest radiography with pulmonary infiltrate associated with two of the following signs: purulent expectoration, temperature above 38.3°C and a greater than 25% increase in baseline leukocyte count with hyperthermia); atelectasis (RX associated with abnormal chest acute respiratory symptoms); and hypoxemia (peripheral oxygen saturation associated with respiratory symptoms below 85%)

    Time frame: All patients will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

  4. Length of hospital stay

    The number of days in the hospital after chest drainage until discharge will be counted for each patient

    Time frame: All patients will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital das Clínicas Dr. Alberto Lima
    Macapá, Amapá 68900073, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dos Santos EDC, da Silva JS, de Assis Filho MTT, Vidal MB, Monte MC, Lunardi AC. Adding positive airway pressure to mobilisation and respiratory techniques hastens pleural drainage: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2020 Jan;66(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Dec 13. PubMed 31843426 ↗
  • da Conceicao Dos Santos E, Lunardi AC. Efficacy of the addition of positive airway pressure to conventional chest physiotherapy in resolution of pleural effusion after drainage: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. J Physiother. 2015 Apr;61(2):93. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.11.016. Epub 2015 Mar 3. PubMed 25744852 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02246946
Lead sponsor
Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
Collaborators
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Responsible party
Adriana Claudia Lunardi (Professor on Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy of Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 23, 2014
Start date
Dec 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Dec 2016
Last update
Jan 18, 2017

Study contacts

Adriana C Lunardi, PhD
study director · Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
Elinaldo C Santos, MSc
principal investigator · Hospital das Clínicas Dr. Alberto Lima

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion