CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02239978Updated Feb 23, 2017Results posted

Effect of Levodopa on Postural Motor Learning in Parkinson Disease

An observational study in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-23.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
42
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary goal of this project is to gain a better understanding of whether and how levodopa (a common anti-Parkinson disease medication) alters postural motor learning in people with Parkinson disease. A secondary goal is to assess whether motor cortical excitability, measured via Transcranial magnetic stimulation, is related to postural motor learning.

Participants with Parkinson disease will complete between 50 and 100 postural perturbations (via support surface translations), ON and OFF their dopamine replacement therapy (i.e. levodopa). Adaptation of responses to these perturbations will be tracked. Participants will also undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation to capture cortical excitability of the brain (in particular the motor cortex). Cortical excitability will be correlated to adaptation of stepping (i.e. postural motor learning) ON and OFF levodopa. Investigators will also capture postural motor learning and cortical excitability in age-matched healthy adults.

Investigators hypothesize that dopamine will have a negative effect on postural motor learning, and the cortical excitability will be correlated to postural motor learning.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Parkinson Disease
  • Posture Balance
  • Learning
  • Dopamine
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 96 across 1,057 observational studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Individuals with Parkinson Disease or age-matched healthy adults in the north west United States (Oregon and Washington state).

Inclusion criteria

  • Between 18 and 90 years of age.
  • Individuals with Parkinson Disease
  • Healthy adults age-matched to PD participants
  • Participants with PD will be currently taking dopamine replacement (i.e. Levodopa)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

All subjects exclusion criteria:

  • Deep brain stimulation
  • Recent (within 6 months) orthopedic injuries influencing standing or balance
  • Inability to stand independently

Transcranial magnetic stimulation exclusion criteria (for the subset of individuals taking part in the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation portion of the study):

  • History of epilepsy or currently taking any epileptic medication,
  • History of seizures
  • Family history of epilepsy or seizures
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
None retained

Groups and cohorts

  • Parkinsons disease

    Individuals with Parkinsons disease

    Behavioral: Postural perturbation

  • Control

    Age-matched healthy adults

    Behavioral: Postural perturbation

Interventions

  • BehavioralPostural perturbation

    Participants will undergo between 50 and 100 postural perturbations (quick movements of the support surface) in multiple directions. These perturbations will be between 9 and 24cm, and between 18 and 56 cm/s depending on participant tolerance.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Movement of Center of Mass (COM) After Postural Perturbation

    Investigators will assess (via automated and custom Matlab software) the magnitude of COM movement after a postural perturbation is delivered via motion of the support surface. This will be measured throughout the intervention, as well as at follow up (24 hour later).

    Time frame: Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication

  2. Change in Steps After Postural Perturbation

    Investigators will assess (via automated and custom Matlab software) the number of steps taken after a postural perturbation is delivered via motion of the support surface. This will be measured throughout the intervention, as well as at follow up (24 hour later).

    Time frame: Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in First Step Length

    Investigators will assess (via automated and custom Matlab software) the length of the first step after a postural perturbation is delivered via motion of the support surface. This will be measured throughout the intervention, as well as at follow up (24 hour later).

    Time frame: Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication

  2. Cortical Excitability

    Investigators will assess the cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex in a subset of participants both ON and OFF levodopa. Specifically, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to stimulate the motor cortex, where we measure muscular activity of the arm (i.e. motor evoked potentials; MEPs). The primary outcome variable noted below is the lowest stimulation setting (measured as a percentage) which results in an MEP in 5 of 10 trials.

    Time frame: TMS data was collected ON and OFF medication during one visit. This visit occurred within 3 weeks of the initial postural control assessments.

07

Results

Posted Feb 23, 2017

Participant flow

A total of 42 individuals were enrolled in the study (30 people with Parkinson's disease and 12 healthy older adults)

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParkinsons DiseaseControl
Started3012
Completed2812
Not completed20
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Movement of Center of Mass (COM) After Postural Perturbation

Investigators will assess (via automated and custom Matlab software) the magnitude of COM movement after a postural perturbation is delivered via motion of the support surface. This will be measured throughout the intervention, as well as at follow up (24 hour later).

Time frame:
Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication
Reported as:
Mean · meters
Change in Movement of Center of Mass (COM) After Postural Perturbation
metersParkinsons DiseaseControlParkinson's Disease Off Medication
Start Train0.31 ± 0.110.28 ± 0.050.32 ± 0.13
End Train0.26 ± 0.100.23 ± 0.030.31 ± 0.12
PrimaryChange in Steps After Postural Perturbation

Investigators will assess (via automated and custom Matlab software) the number of steps taken after a postural perturbation is delivered via motion of the support surface. This will be measured throughout the intervention, as well as at follow up (24 hour later).

Time frame:
Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication
Reported as:
Mean · Number of steps
Change in Steps After Postural Perturbation
Number of stepsParkinsons DiseaseControlParkinson's Disease Off Medication
Start Train2.22 ± 0.92.03 ± 0.632.09 ± 0.77
End Train1.92 ± 1.151.15 ± 0.282.05 ± 1.12
SecondaryChange in First Step Length

Investigators will assess (via automated and custom Matlab software) the length of the first step after a postural perturbation is delivered via motion of the support surface. This will be measured throughout the intervention, as well as at follow up (24 hour later).

Time frame:
Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication
Reported as:
Mean · meters
Change in First Step Length
metersParkinsons DiseaseControlParkinson's Disease Off Medication
Start of Training0.18 ± 0.060.25 ± 0.110.21 ± 0.08
End of Training0.20 ± 0.080.27 ± 0.080.21 ± 0.08
SecondaryCortical Excitability

Investigators will assess the cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex in a subset of participants both ON and OFF levodopa. Specifically, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to stimulate the motor cortex, where we measure muscular activity of the arm (i.e. motor evoked potentials; MEPs). The primary outcome variable noted below is the lowest stimulation setting (measured as a percentage) which results in an MEP in 5 of 10 trials.

Time frame:
TMS data was collected ON and OFF medication during one visit. This visit occurred within 3 weeks of the initial postural control assessments.
Reported as:
Mean · % max stim output
Cortical Excitability
% max stim outputParkinsons DiseaseParkinson's Disease Off Medication
Cortical Excitability40.57 ± 8.7340.71 ± 9.97

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Parkinsons Disease—0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Control—0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Parkinsons DiseaseControlTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years11314
>=65 years19928
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Parkinsons DiseaseControlTotal
Mean66.05 ± 9.6768.04 ± 6.6267.16 ± 7.10
Gender
Gender(Participants)Parkinsons DiseaseControlTotal
Female10616
Male20626
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Parkinsons DiseaseControlTotal
United States301242
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97210, United States
  • VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84148, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02239978
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
Oregon Health and Science University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2014
Start date
Aug 2014
Primary completion
Jan 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Results posted
Feb 23, 2017
Last update
Feb 23, 2017

Study contacts

Daniel S Peterson, PhD MS BS
principal investigator · VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion