CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02237664Updated Mar 20, 2019

Patient-Controlled Thoracic Paravertebral Block After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Continuous paravertebral analgesia (C-PVB) and Patient-controlled paravertebral analgesia (PC-PVB) in Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery, sponsored by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. Status unknown at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-20.

Sponsored by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Thoracic surgery is commonly associated with severe postoperative pain and marked impairment of respiratory function.1 Minimally invasive video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is assumed to result in better quality of life and less postoperative pain compared with standard open thoracotomy, other investigators have reported comparable patient-reported physical component summary and pain scores after VATS and thoracotomy during the first 12 months after lung resection.2 That study was non-randomized and 41% of the included patients did not complete the follow-up period.2 VATS has recently been increasing in popularity as a fast-track surgery with potential enhanced recovery after surgery.

Variety of approaches exist to manage pain after thoracotomy which could attenuate post-thoracotomy pulmonary dysfunction. Epidural analgesia has been considered for many decades to be the best method of pain relief after major thoracic surgery. In previous meta-analyses,3-5 many investigators have reported that thoracic paravertebral blockade (PVB) has comparable analgesic effects to thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in patients undergoing thoracotomy.

Additionally, PVB has a better side-effect profile, lower rates of failed block and is associated with a reduction in pulmonary complications.3-5 This could be extended to VATS to enhance recovery after surgery owing to effective analgesia and fewer side effects.6-7

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been advocated as a favourable model for postoperative analgesia, that allows a perfect match between intensity of pain and analgesic delivery, improves the quality of analgesia and decreases the cumulative analgesic consumption. Furthermore, the introduction of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with background infusion during labour gave patients a sense of control over their analgesia, reduced the total dose of local anesthetic administered, and had less motor block than those who receive continuous epidural analgesia.8-9Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has become increasingly popular for pain control after thoracotomy.10-12 In a previous preliminary study, McElwain et al.13 have reported satisfactory analgesia after breast cancer surgery with the use of PC-PVB, using either 15-min or 30-min lockout, that study did not include a comparative arm with a continuous paravertebral infusion. Furthermore, Abou Zeid et al. have reported comparable analgesia after thoracic surgery with the use of either patient-controlled PVB had with the use of intrathecal morphine, that study was not controlled and included few patients.14

The efficacy of the patient-controlled paravertebral blockade (PC-PVB) on the quality of postoperative analgesia and pulmonary function after VATS has not yet been studied.

Read the detailed description

We hypothesizes that the use of patient-controlled paravertebral blockade (PC-PVB) after VATS will be associated with lower pain scores and less pulmonary dysfunction than continuous paravertebral blockade (PVB).

Following obtaining of the Local Ethics Committee approval and informed patient consent, 62 patients, aged 18 -70 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-III, undergoing elective VATS using postoperative thoracic paravertebral analgesia will be included in this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study.

Before operation, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), were measured. On the morning before surgery, the patients will be instructed in the use of the PCA pump and a VAS. The patients will be asked to rate their experienced pain using the VAS from 0 to 100 mm with 0 representing no pain and 100 representing the worst imaginable pain.

Prior to the procedure an 18 to 20 G intravenous access will be established. Patient monitors includes electrocardiograph, non-invasive blood pressure, and pulse oximeter. All patients will be premedicated with iv midazolam 0.01-0.03 mg kg-1.

Before the induction of general anesthesia, paravertebral space ipsilateral to the thoracostomy will be identified 3 cm lateral to the spinous process of T5-8 with ultrasound-guidance (USG) using a high-frequency linear array probe of a Sonosite MTurbo ultrasound machine (MicroMaxxs ultrasound system, Sonosite Inc, Bothell, WA). After the probe was placed at the level of the T5-6 interspace, the apex of the paravertebral space will be visualized as a wedge-shaped hypoechoic space surrounded by the hyperechoic line of the pleura below and the internal intercostal membrane above. An 18 G Tuohy needle (B. Braun, Germany) will be inserted in a lateral-to-medial direction using an in-plane approach and will be kept advancing until the needle tip penetrates the internal intercostal membrane.7 A 20-G epidural catheter (B. Braun, Germany) will be introduced through Tuohy needle and advanced 3 cm into the paravertebral space. After gentle aspiration, a test dose of 3 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 µg mL-1 will be administered through the catheter. If no significant rise in heart rate or arterial pressure will be observed, a bolus of 0.3 mL kg-1 of bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine (5 µg mL-1), followed by continuous paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine 0.25% and fentanyl 2 µg mL-1 at 0.1 mL kg-1 h-1 intraoperatively.15

In all patients, standard monitors and state and response entropy (SE and RE, respectively, GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland) based-depth of anesthesia will be applied. The radial artery will be catheterized. Anesthetic technique will be standardized in all studied patients. After preoxygenation, general anesthesia will be induced with propofol 1.5-3 mg kg-1 and target-controlled infusion (TCI) of remifentanil at an effect-site concentration (Ce) of 4 ng mL-1, to achieve the SE values below 50 and the difference between RE and SE below 10. Rocuronium (0.5 mg kg-1) will be given to facilitate the endobronchial intubation with a left-double lumen endobronchial tube and the correct position of its tip will be confirmed with a fiberoptic bronchoscope.

Anaesthesia will be maintained with 0.7-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane and remifentanil Ce of 2-4 ng mL-1 to maintain the SE values below 50, the difference between RE and SE below 10 and the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate \<20% of baseline values. Rocuronium increments will be used to maintain surgical relaxation.

Two lung ventilation (TLV) will be instituted using fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.4 in air, tidal volume (VT) of 8 mL kg-1, inspiratory to expiratory (I: E) ratio of 1:2.5 and PEEP of 5 cm H2O, and respiratory rate will be adjusted to achieve an arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) of 4.7-6 kPa. During one-lung ventilation (OLV), the dependent lung will be ventilated with a FiO2 of 1.0, VT of 6 mL kg-1 and I: E ratio, PEEP, and respiratory rate, will be maintained as during TLV. The dependent lung will be recruited at 30-minute intervals by increasing the inspiratory pressure to 40 cmH2O for 10 seconds.

All surgical procedures will be performed by the same surgeons who will be blinded for the study group. The VATS procedure will begin with the exploration of the pleural cavity using a 30° video thoracoscopic camera through 1.5 cm single skin incision with the use of 1-3 trocars which enables the thoracoscopic instruments to move the lung.

At the end of surgery, the nondependent lung will be re-expanded, the remifentanil and sevoflurane will be discontinued after chest closure and skin closure, respectively, and the residual neuromuscular blockade will be antagonized.

During working hours of the first 48 hours, the patients will be visited by an acute pain nurse and/or a consultant anesthesiologist, who will interview each patient regarding satisfaction with postoperative analgesia. After hours, an anesthetic registrar will be available to review analgesia management. All patients will receive multimodal analgesia consisting of regular IV paracetamol (1 g four times a day) and IV lornoxicam (8 mg two times a day) for postoperative pain relief.

Breakthrough pain, defined as pain VAS > 30 mm, will be treated with a bolus of 0.1 mL kg-1 of paravertebral medication administered through the pump. No additional medication will be given if the pain VAS \< 30 mm. If after 15 minutes pain VAS persists greater than 30, additional 0.1 mL kg-1 of the paravertebral medication will be given. If the patient still has a pain VAS > 30 despite breakthrough pain intervention, then the patient will be connected to PCA with intravenous morphine 1 mg, with a lockout interval of 8 minutes and a maximum 4-hourly limit of 30 mg.5

02

Conditions studied

  • Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Keywords

  • Thoracoscopy
  • Patient-controlled analgesia
  • Paravertebral analgesia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University is the lead sponsor of 88 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-III.
  • Use of postoperative thoracic paravertebral analgesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac disease
  • Pulmonary disease
  • Renal disease
  • Hepatic disease
  • Neuropsychiatric disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Bleeding disorder
  • Severe anatomical abnormalities of the vertebral column or ribs
  • Allergy to study medications
  • Other contraindications to paravertebral analgesia
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg m-2
  • Body weight less than 50 kg
  • Emergency surgery
  • Preoperative pain score > 70 mm on visual analogue scale (VAS)
  • Drug or alcohol abuse
  • Chronic pain condition requiring daily intake of analgesics
  • Language or mental disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Patient-controlled paravertebral analgesia (PC-PVB)

    Patient-controlled paravertebral analgesia

    Procedure: Patient-controlled paravertebral analgesia (PC-PVB)

  • Placebo comparator
    Continuous paravertebral analgesia (C-PVB)

    Continuous paravertebral analgesia

    Procedure: Continuous paravertebral analgesia (C-PVB)

Interventions

  • ProcedureContinuous paravertebral analgesia (C-PVB)

    Patients will receive continuous paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine 0.2% and fentanyl 2 μg mL-1 at rate of 8 mL h-1

  • ProcedurePatient-controlled paravertebral analgesia (PC-PVB)

    Patients will receive background continuous paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine 0.2% and fentanyl 2 μg mL-1 at rate of 8 mL h-1 with patient demand bolus dose of 3 mL and lockout time of 15 min with a 20 mL h-1 maximum dose, irrespective of their age

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain scores

    Pain scores on a 100-mm-long visual analog score (VAS) at rest and on cough

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hemodynamic variables

    Heart rate

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  2. Number of bolus demands

    The number of bolus demands

    Time frame: 48 after surgery

  3. Actual number of boluses

    the actual number of on demand boluses of the patient-controlled analgesia received by the patient

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  4. Total volume of administered bupivacaine

    total volume of bupivacaine administered during the first 48 hours after surgery

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  5. Rescue analgesic requirements

    rescue analgesic requirements

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  6. Requirement for antiemetic medication

    Requirement for antiemetic medications

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  7. Overall patient satisfaction

    Overall patient satisfaction will be recorded on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) (0 mm = completely dissatisfied, 100 mm = completely satisfied) after catheter removal.

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  8. Sedation scores

    Patient sedation will be assessed 4 hourly on a five-point sedation score (1, wide awake; 2, drowsy or dozing intermittently; 3, mostly sleeping but easily awakened; 4, asleep, difficulty responding to verbal commands; 5, awakened only by shaking).

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  9. Pulmonary function tests

    , forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) will be recorded

    Time frame: 24 hours before surgery, 72 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • King Fahd Hospital of the University
    Khobar, Eastern 31952, Saudi Arabia
    • Abdulmohsen A Al Ghamdi, MD · Contact · mohsenkfu@hotmail.com · +966 13 8966666
    • Alaa M Khidr, MD · Sub investigator
    • Abdulmohsen A Al Ghamdi, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02237664
Lead sponsor
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2014
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Feb 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 20, 2019

Study contacts

Mohamed R El Tahan, MD
Contact
mohamedrefaateltahan@yahoo.com
+966 13 865 1193
Abdulmohsin A Al Ghamdi, MD
Contact
mohsenkfu@hotmail.com
+966 50 581 4737
Yasser Al Jehani, MD
principal investigator · Chairman of Surgery Dept
Mohamed R El Tahan, MD
study director · Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion