CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02226172Updated Jan 17, 2019Results posted

Single-Agent Glasdegib In Patients With Myelofibrosis Previously Treated With Ruxolitinib

A Phase 2 interventional study of Glasdegib (PF-04449913) and Placebo in Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, sponsored by Pfizer. Terminated at 19 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-17.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A lead-in cohort of \~20 patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis previously treated with 1 or more Janus kinase inhibitors enrolled to single-agent glasdegib to evaluate safety and tolerability. Following the lead-in, a phase 2, double blind, 2-arm study, randomized 2:1 to oral single-agent glasdegib versus placebo in 201 patients resistant or intolerant to ruxolitinib.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis

Keywords

  • Primary myelofibrosis
  • Secondary myelofibrosis
  • PMF
  • PET-MF
  • PPV-MF
  • Ruxolitinib resistant or intolerant
  • previously treated myelofibrosis
  • smoothened inhibitor
  • oral
  • single agent.
03

In context

Polycythemia Vera

229 studies on the registry are indexed under Polycythemia Vera; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 55 across 174 interventional studies indexed under Polycythemia Vera.

Browse Polycythemia Vera studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of primary MF (PMF) or secondary MF (PET-MF and PPV-MF) as per WHO 2008 criteria.
  • Lead-in cohort: resistant or intolerant to 1 or more Janus kinase inhibitors (licensed or experimental).
  • Randomized cohort: resistant or intolerant to prior ruxolitinib therapy. Documentation by the Investigator that the patient has exhausted available treatment options (eg, resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea, etc).
  • Spleen 5 cm below the inferior left costal margin as measured by manual palpation.
  • Active symptomatic MF as defined by the screening MPN-SAD patient-reported instrument requiring a severity score of at least 5 on one symptom, or a severity score of ≥ 3 on at least two of the symptoms (on a 0 to 10 scale).
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Adequate organ function, demonstrated by the following laboratory values:

    1. Absolute Neutrophil Count 75 x 10(9)/L;
    2. Platelet count >50 x 10(9)/L with no evidence of bleeding and not requiring platelet transfusions;
    3. Serum creatinine \<1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or estimated creatinine clearance 60 mL/min (as calculated using the standard method of the institution);
    4. Serum amylase or lipase \<1.5 x ULN;
    5. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase values 3.0 x ULN (or 5x ULN in the case of patients with MF accompanied by hepatic extramedullary hematopoiesis, as manifested by any degree of hepatomegaly).
    6. Total bilirubin values \<1.5 x ULN unless the bilirubin is principally unconjugated (in the context of hemolysis) or there is documented Gilbert's disease.
    7. Serum electrolyte values \< Grade 2 (sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorous and magnesium), per CTCAE v.4.03.
  • Recovery to Grade 1 from all clinically significant adverse events related to prior MF therapy, including transplant-related toxicities.
  • More than 2 months out from allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant prior to randomization.
  • Must be able to undergo MRI of abdomen (spleen and liver). Patients who are contra indicated for MRI may be enrolled and evaluated by CT scan at the discretion of the Sponsor.
  • 18 years of age.
  • Male subjects able to father children and female patients of childbearing potential and at risk for pregnancy must agree to use two highly effective methods of contraception throughout the study and for 90 days after the last dose of assigned treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Prior treatment with a licensed or experimental smoothened inhibitor.
  • Randomized cohort only: Prior treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor other than ruxolitinib.
  • Other anti-cancer therapy up to 14 days prior to enrollment, with the exception of hydroxyurea, which can be given up to 4 days prior to enrollment.
  • Splenic irradiation 3 months prior to enrollment.
  • History of congenital long QT syndrome, or a baseline >470 msec QTcF abnormality (average of the triplicate reading).
  • Evidence of significant cardiac disease, for example: symptomatic cardiac heart failure (CHF, NYHA class 3), complete bundle branch block, significant atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmias and any unstable cardiac arrhythmias requiring medication.
  • History of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months prior to enrollment.
  • Uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease, peptic ulcer disease or history of significant gastro intestinal bleeding within 6 months of enrollment.
  • Any condition requiring chronic use of moderate/high dose steroids (equivalent to 10 mg QD prednisone).
  • Hematopoietic growth factor receptor agonists (eg, erythropoietin (Epo), granulocyte colony stimulating factor, romiplostim, eltrombopag within 28 days of enrollment.
  • Currently active malignancy (other than MF). Prior malignancies are allowed so long as there is no evidence of disease recurrence within the last 2 years (with the exception of fully excised, non-complicated basal cell carcinoma which can have been active within the prior 2 years, and certain localized, non-invasive fully excised skin, cervical, breast, prostate or bladder tumors).
  • Prior history of chronic liver disease (eg, chronic alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, hemachromatosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH]).
  • Active, uncontrolled bacterial, fungal or viral infection, including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, known human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome related illness.
  • Active graft versus host disease (GVHD) with other than grade 1 skin involvement or GVHD requiring immunosuppressive treatment.
  • Uncontrolled disseminated intravascular coagulation.
  • Current (including their administration within 3 days prior to study entry) use or anticipated need for food or drugs that are strong CYP3A4 inhibitors.
  • Current use or anticipated requirement for drugs that are known strong CYP3A4/5 inducers.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A

    Oral daily dose of glasdegib (PF-04449913) 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles.

    Drug: Glasdegib (PF-04449913)

  • Placebo comparator
    Arm B

    Oral daily dose of placebo 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugGlasdegib (PF-04449913)

    Oral daily dose of glasdegib (PF-04449913) 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Oral daily dose of placebo 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Spleen Volume Reduction (SVR) ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/Computed Tomography (CT) Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort

    The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

  3. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort

    Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse event.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03: Lead-in Cohort

    AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability; congenital anomaly.Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death. Only categories with at least 1 participant with event were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

  5. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort

    Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets \<0.5\*LLN greater than (\>)1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) \<0.6\* LLN \>1.5\* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils\<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes \>1.2\*ULN, blast cells \>1.0\*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio \>1.1\* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, protein,albumin \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine \>1.3\*ULN,uric acid \>1.2\*ULN.Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \<0.9\* LLN \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN.Chemistry: glucose \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN,creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN, amylase,lipase \>1.5\*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood \>1.0\*ULN,red blood cells,WBC \>=20,epithelial cells \>=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline \>1,cellular casts,crystals\>=1,bacteria \>20.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

  6. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort

    Anemia (grade \[g\]1:\< LLN to 10 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\],g2:\<10 to 8g/dL,g3:\<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:\<LLN to 75\*10\^3/millimeter\[mm\]\^3, g2:\<75\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 50\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<50\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 25\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<25\*10\^3/mm\^3); lymphopenia (g1:\<LLN to 8\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<8\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<5\*10\^2 to 2\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<2\*10\^2/mm\^3);neutrophil (Absolute) (g1:\<LLN to 15\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<15\*10\^2 to 10\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<10\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<5\*10\^2/mm\^3); white blood cell count(g1:\<LLN to 3\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<3\*10\^3 to 2\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<2\*10\^3 to 1\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<1\*10\^3/mm\^3); hemoglobin (g1:increase in hemoglobin level \>0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2:increase in hemoglobin level\>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN,g3: increase in hemoglobin level\>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

  7. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort

    ALT/AST g1:\>ULN 3\*ULN, g2:\>3-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:\>ULN 2.5\*ULN,g2:\>2.5-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Creatinine (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN,g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 6\*ULN, g4:\>6\*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:\>ULN-160,g2:\>160 250, g3:\>250 500, g4:\>500mg/dL);bilirubin(total) (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 10\*ULN,g4:\>10\*ULN);hypoglycaemia (g1:\<LLN-55,g2:\<55-40, g3:\<40 30,g4:\<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:\>ULN-5.5,g2:\>5.5-6, g3:\>6 7,g4:\>7mmol/L);hypokalemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<LLN-3, g3:\<3 2.5, g4:\<2.5mmol/L);hypermagnesemia (g1:\>ULN-3,g3:\>3 8, g4:\>8mg/dL);hypocalcemia (g1:\<LLN-8,g2:\<8-7, g3:\<7-6, g4:\<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:\>ULN-11.5,g2:\>11.5-12.5, g3:\>12.5-13.5, g4:\>13.5mg/dL); hypomagnesemia (g1:\<LLN-1.2,g2:\<1.2-0.9,g3:\<0.9-0.7, g4:\<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:\<LLN-130,g3:\<130-120, g4:\<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<3 2,g3:\<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:\<LLN-2.5,g2:\<2.5-2, g3:\<2-1, g4:\<1mg/dL).

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Scan at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort

    MRI (CT scan may have been permitted if MRI was contraindicated) of the spleen and the liver was performed at baseline, then every 12 weeks while the participant was on treatment. The same method of assessment used at baseline was used for the duration of the trial to ensure consistency. Spleen volume was assessed by a central, independent blinded reader.

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SAD) at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort

    The MPN-SAD assessed the impact of 9 myelofibrosis symptoms, at their worst, over the past 7 days and over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 9 symptoms are early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, night sweats, pruritus, bone pain, pain below the ribs on the left-hand side, fatigue and shortness of breath. The TSS is the sum of the individual scores, excluding inactivity and shortness of breath. The TSS at Week 24 is the average of the daily total scores from the last 28 days of symptom scores immediately prior to Week 24. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 24

  3. Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in Cohort

    The MPN-SAD assessed the impact of 9 myelofibrosis symptoms, at their worst, over the past 7 days and over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 9 symptoms are early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, night sweats, pruritus, bone pain, pain below the ribs on the left-hand side, fatigue and shortness of breath. The TSS is the sum of the individual scores, excluding inactivity and shortness of breath. The TSS at Week 24 is the average of the daily total scores from the last 28 days of symptom scores immediately prior to Week 24. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.

    Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Lead-in Cohort

    Anemia response was defined as transfusion-independent participants with a ≥20 gram per liter (g/L) increase in hemoglobin (Hb) level where baseline Hb level was \<100 g/L, or baseline transfusion-dependent patients becoming transfusion-independent post-baseline. Transfusion dependency before the start of study treatment was defined as transfusions of ≥6 units of packed red blood cells in the 12 weeks prior to start of study treatment, for a final pre-treatment Hb of \<85 g/L. In addition, the most recent transfusion episode must have occurred in the 28 days prior to study enrollment. Response in transfusion-dependent patients required absence of any packed red blood cell transfusions during any consecutive rolling 12-week interval during the treatment phase, capped by a Hb level of ≥85 g/L.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

  5. Maximum Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cmax), Minimum Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Observed Prior to the Next Dose (Cmin), and Average Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cavg) in the Lead-in Cohort

    Cmax was the highest plasma concentration of glasdegib observed directly from the plasma concentration data. Cmin was the lowest plasma concentration of glasdegib observed directly from the plasma concentration data. Cavg was the average concentration at steady state estimated using non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis.

    Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15

  6. Area Under the Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Profile at the End of a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) in the Lead-in Cohort

    AUCtau was the area under the glasdegib plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) estimated by non-compartmental PK analysis using the linear/log trapezoidal method.

    Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15

  7. Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) in the Lead-in Cohort

    Tmax was the time of the first occurrence of Cmax observed directly from the plasma concentration data.

    Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥50% as Measured by MRI/CT Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort

    The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

    Time frame: Week 24

  9. Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall TSS in the Randomized Cohort

    The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

    Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Randomized Cohort

    The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

  11. Participant Reported Outcomes of Health Related Quality of Life and Health Status in the Randomised Cohort

    The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

  12. Median Duration of SVR in the Randomized Cohort

    The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

  13. Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival in the Randomized Cohort

    The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

  14. Glasdegib PK Parameters in the Randomized Cohort

    The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

    Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15

  15. Psychometric Validation of the MPN-SAD in the Randomised Cohort

    The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

  16. Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized Cohort

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

  17. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized Cohort

    Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

  18. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to Maximum Severity: Randomized Cohort

    AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

  19. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort

    Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets \<0.5\*LLN \>1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) \<0.6\* LLN greater than (\>)1.5\* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils\<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes \>1.2\*ULN, blast cells \>1.0\*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio \>1.1\* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, protein,albumin \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine \>1.3\* ULN,uric acid \>1.2\* ULN.Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \<0.9\* LLN \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN.Chemistry: glucose \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN,creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN, amylase,lipase \>1.5\*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood \>1.0\*ULN,red blood cells,WBC \>=20,epithelial cells \>=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline \>1,cellular casts,crystals\>=1,bacteria \>20.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

  20. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort

    Anemia g1:\< LLN to 10 g/dL, g2:\<10 to 8g/dL, g3:\<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:\<LLN to 75\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<75\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 50\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<50\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 25\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<25\*10\^3/mm\^3); lymphopenia (g1:\<LLN to 8\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<8\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<5\*10\^2 to 2\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<2\*10\^2/mm\^3);neutrophil (absolute) (g1:\<LLN to 15\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<15\*10\^2 to 10\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<10\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<5\*10\^2/mm\^3); white blood cell count (g1:\<LLN to 3\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<3\*10\^3 to 2\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3: \<2\*10\^3 to 1\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<1\*10\^3/mm\^3); hemoglobin(g1:increase in hemoglobin level\>0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2: increase in hemoglobin level\>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g3:increase in hemoglobin level\>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

  21. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort

    ALT/AST g1:\>ULN 3\*ULN, g2:\>3-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:\>ULN 2.5\*ULN, g2:\>2.5-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN);Creatinine (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 6\*ULN, g4:\>6\*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:\>ULN-160,g2:\>160 250, g3:\>250 500,g4:\>500mg/dL); bilirubin(total) (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 10\*ULN,g4:\>10\*ULN); hypoglycaemia (g1:\<LLN-55, g2:\<55-40, g3:\<40 30, g4:\<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:\>ULN-5.5,g2:\>5.5-6, g3:\>6 7,g4:\>7mmol/L); hypokalemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<LLN-3,g3:\<3 2.5, g4:\<2.5mmol/L); hypermagnesemia (g1:\>ULN-3,g3:\>3 8,g4:\>8mg/dL); hypocalcemia (g1:\<LLN-8,g2:\<8-7, g3:\<7-6, g4:\<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:\>ULN-11.5,g2:\>11.5-12.5, g3:\>12.5-13.5, g4:\>13.5mg/dL);hypomagnesemia (g1:\<LLN-1.2,g2:\<1.2-0.9, g3:\<0.9-0.7,g4:\<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:\<LLN-130,g3:\<130-120, g4:\<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<3-2, g3:\<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:\<LLN-2.5,g2:\<2.5-2,g3:\<2-1,g4:\<1mg/dL).

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

07

Results

Posted Apr 2, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGlasdegib Lead-in
Started21
Completed4
Not completed17
Withdrew: Participant refused further follow-up4
Withdrew: Other5
Withdrew: Death1
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor1
Withdrew: Adverse event6

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Spleen Volume Reduction (SVR) ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/Computed Tomography (CT) Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame:
Week 24

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort
ParticipantsGlasdegib Lead-in
AEs21
SAEs5
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort

Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse event.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort
ParticipantsGlasdegib Lead-in
AEs19
SAEs5
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03: Lead-in Cohort

AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability; congenital anomaly.Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death. Only categories with at least 1 participant with event were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03: Lead-in Cohort
ParticipantsGlasdegib Lead-in
Grade 3 or 414
Grade 51
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort

Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets \<0.5\*LLN greater than (\>)1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) \<0.6\* LLN \>1.5\* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils\<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes \>1.2\*ULN, blast cells \>1.0\*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio \>1.1\* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, protein,albumin \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine \>1.3\*ULN,uric acid \>1.2\*ULN.Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \<0.9\* LLN \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN.Chemistry: glucose \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN,creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN, amylase,lipase \>1.5\*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood \>1.0\*ULN,red blood cells,WBC \>=20,epithelial cells \>=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline \>1,cellular casts,crystals\>=1,bacteria \>20.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort
ParticipantsGlasdegib Lead-in
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort21
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort

Anemia (grade \[g\]1:\< LLN to 10 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\],g2:\<10 to 8g/dL,g3:\<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:\<LLN to 75\*10\^3/millimeter\[mm\]\^3, g2:\<75\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 50\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<50\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 25\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<25\*10\^3/mm\^3); lymphopenia (g1:\<LLN to 8\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<8\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<5\*10\^2 to 2\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<2\*10\^2/mm\^3);neutrophil (Absolute) (g1:\<LLN to 15\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<15\*10\^2 to 10\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<10\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<5\*10\^2/mm\^3); white blood cell count(g1:\<LLN to 3\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<3\*10\^3 to 2\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<2\*10\^3 to 1\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<1\*10\^3/mm\^3); hemoglobin (g1:increase in hemoglobin level \>0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2:increase in hemoglobin level\>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN,g3: increase in hemoglobin level\>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort
ParticipantsGlasdegib Lead-in
Grade 33
Grade 42
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Scan at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort

MRI (CT scan may have been permitted if MRI was contraindicated) of the spleen and the liver was performed at baseline, then every 12 weeks while the participant was on treatment. The same method of assessment used at baseline was used for the duration of the trial to ensure consistency. Spleen volume was assessed by a central, independent blinded reader.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Scan at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort
Percentage of participantsGlasdegib Lead-in
Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Scan at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort0
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SAD) at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort

The MPN-SAD assessed the impact of 9 myelofibrosis symptoms, at their worst, over the past 7 days and over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 9 symptoms are early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, night sweats, pruritus, bone pain, pain below the ribs on the left-hand side, fatigue and shortness of breath. The TSS is the sum of the individual scores, excluding inactivity and shortness of breath. The TSS at Week 24 is the average of the daily total scores from the last 28 days of symptom scores immediately prior to Week 24. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SAD) at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort
Percentage of participantsGlasdegib Lead-in
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SAD) at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort4.8 (1.2 to 30.4)
SecondaryMonthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in Cohort

The MPN-SAD assessed the impact of 9 myelofibrosis symptoms, at their worst, over the past 7 days and over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 9 symptoms are early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, night sweats, pruritus, bone pain, pain below the ribs on the left-hand side, fatigue and shortness of breath. The TSS is the sum of the individual scores, excluding inactivity and shortness of breath. The TSS at Week 24 is the average of the daily total scores from the last 28 days of symptom scores immediately prior to Week 24. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.

Time frame:
Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in Cohort
Score on a scaleGlasdegib Lead-in
Monthly mean change at Week 12-2.74 ± 14.07
Monthly mean change at Week 24-4.95 ± 5.78
Monthly mean change at Week 36-4.11 ± NA
Monthly mean change at Week 48-8.39 ± 11.52
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Lead-in Cohort

Anemia response was defined as transfusion-independent participants with a ≥20 gram per liter (g/L) increase in hemoglobin (Hb) level where baseline Hb level was \<100 g/L, or baseline transfusion-dependent patients becoming transfusion-independent post-baseline. Transfusion dependency before the start of study treatment was defined as transfusions of ≥6 units of packed red blood cells in the 12 weeks prior to start of study treatment, for a final pre-treatment Hb of \<85 g/L. In addition, the most recent transfusion episode must have occurred in the 28 days prior to study enrollment. Response in transfusion-dependent patients required absence of any packed red blood cell transfusions during any consecutive rolling 12-week interval during the treatment phase, capped by a Hb level of ≥85 g/L.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of treatment
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Lead-in Cohort
Percentage of participantsGlasdegib Lead-in
Transfusion independent ≥20 g/L Hb increase5.9
Transfusion dependent0
SecondaryMaximum Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cmax), Minimum Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Observed Prior to the Next Dose (Cmin), and Average Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cavg) in the Lead-in Cohort

Cmax was the highest plasma concentration of glasdegib observed directly from the plasma concentration data. Cmin was the lowest plasma concentration of glasdegib observed directly from the plasma concentration data. Cavg was the average concentration at steady state estimated using non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis.

Time frame:
Cycle 1, Day 15
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Maximum Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cmax), Minimum Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Observed Prior to the Next Dose (Cmin), and Average Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cavg) in the Lead-in Cohort
nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Glasdegib Lead-in
Cmax996.8 ± 45
Cmin191.9 ± 68
Cav548.0 ± 50
SecondaryArea Under the Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Profile at the End of a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) in the Lead-in Cohort

AUCtau was the area under the glasdegib plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) estimated by non-compartmental PK analysis using the linear/log trapezoidal method.

Time frame:
Cycle 1, Day 15
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng·hr/mL
Area Under the Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Profile at the End of a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) in the Lead-in Cohort
ng·hr/mLGlasdegib Lead-in
Area Under the Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Profile at the End of a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) in the Lead-in Cohort13150 ± 50
SecondaryTime to Reach Cmax (Tmax) in the Lead-in Cohort

Tmax was the time of the first occurrence of Cmax observed directly from the plasma concentration data.

Time frame:
Cycle 1, Day 15
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) in the Lead-in Cohort
HoursGlasdegib Lead-in
Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) in the Lead-in Cohort1.02 (0.483 to 4.00)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥50% as Measured by MRI/CT Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame:
Week 24

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMonthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall TSS in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame:
Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryParticipant Reported Outcomes of Health Related Quality of Life and Health Status in the Randomised Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMedian Duration of SVR in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryGlasdegib PK Parameters in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame:
Cycle 1, Day 15

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPsychometric Validation of the MPN-SAD in the Randomised Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized Cohort

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized Cohort

Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to Maximum Severity: Randomized Cohort

AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort

Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets \<0.5\*LLN \>1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) \<0.6\* LLN greater than (\>)1.5\* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils\<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes \>1.2\*ULN, blast cells \>1.0\*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio \>1.1\* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, protein,albumin \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine \>1.3\* ULN,uric acid \>1.2\* ULN.Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \<0.9\* LLN \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN.Chemistry: glucose \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN,creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN, amylase,lipase \>1.5\*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood \>1.0\*ULN,red blood cells,WBC \>=20,epithelial cells \>=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline \>1,cellular casts,crystals\>=1,bacteria \>20.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort

ALT/AST g1:\>ULN 3\*ULN, g2:\>3-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:\>ULN 2.5\*ULN,g2:\>2.5-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Creatinine (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN,g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 6\*ULN, g4:\>6\*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:\>ULN-160,g2:\>160 250, g3:\>250 500, g4:\>500mg/dL);bilirubin(total) (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 10\*ULN,g4:\>10\*ULN);hypoglycaemia (g1:\<LLN-55,g2:\<55-40, g3:\<40 30,g4:\<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:\>ULN-5.5,g2:\>5.5-6, g3:\>6 7,g4:\>7mmol/L);hypokalemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<LLN-3, g3:\<3 2.5, g4:\<2.5mmol/L);hypermagnesemia (g1:\>ULN-3,g3:\>3 8, g4:\>8mg/dL);hypocalcemia (g1:\<LLN-8,g2:\<8-7, g3:\<7-6, g4:\<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:\>ULN-11.5,g2:\>11.5-12.5, g3:\>12.5-13.5, g4:\>13.5mg/dL); hypomagnesemia (g1:\<LLN-1.2,g2:\<1.2-0.9,g3:\<0.9-0.7, g4:\<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:\<LLN-130,g3:\<130-120, g4:\<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<3 2,g3:\<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:\<LLN-2.5,g2:\<2.5-2, g3:\<2-1, g4:\<1mg/dL).

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort
ParticipantsGlasdegib Lead-in
Grade 35
Grade 41
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort

Anemia g1:\< LLN to 10 g/dL, g2:\<10 to 8g/dL, g3:\<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:\<LLN to 75\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<75\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 50\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<50\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 25\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<25\*10\^3/mm\^3); lymphopenia (g1:\<LLN to 8\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<8\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<5\*10\^2 to 2\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<2\*10\^2/mm\^3);neutrophil (absolute) (g1:\<LLN to 15\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<15\*10\^2 to 10\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<10\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<5\*10\^2/mm\^3); white blood cell count (g1:\<LLN to 3\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<3\*10\^3 to 2\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3: \<2\*10\^3 to 1\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<1\*10\^3/mm\^3); hemoglobin(g1:increase in hemoglobin level\>0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2: increase in hemoglobin level\>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g3:increase in hemoglobin level\>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort

ALT/AST g1:\>ULN 3\*ULN, g2:\>3-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:\>ULN 2.5\*ULN, g2:\>2.5-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN);Creatinine (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 6\*ULN, g4:\>6\*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:\>ULN-160,g2:\>160 250, g3:\>250 500,g4:\>500mg/dL); bilirubin(total) (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 10\*ULN,g4:\>10\*ULN); hypoglycaemia (g1:\<LLN-55, g2:\<55-40, g3:\<40 30, g4:\<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:\>ULN-5.5,g2:\>5.5-6, g3:\>6 7,g4:\>7mmol/L); hypokalemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<LLN-3,g3:\<3 2.5, g4:\<2.5mmol/L); hypermagnesemia (g1:\>ULN-3,g3:\>3 8,g4:\>8mg/dL); hypocalcemia (g1:\<LLN-8,g2:\<8-7, g3:\<7-6, g4:\<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:\>ULN-11.5,g2:\>11.5-12.5, g3:\>12.5-13.5, g4:\>13.5mg/dL);hypomagnesemia (g1:\<LLN-1.2,g2:\<1.2-0.9, g3:\<0.9-0.7,g4:\<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:\<LLN-130,g3:\<130-120, g4:\<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<3-2, g3:\<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:\<LLN-2.5,g2:\<2.5-2,g3:\<2-1,g4:\<1mg/dL).

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 131

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline up to Week 131. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Glasdegib Lead-in1/21 (4.8%)5/21 (23.8%)20/21 (95.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent serious events
EventGlasdegib Lead-in
Gastric varices haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/21
Varices oesophagealGastrointestinal disorders1/21
Disease progressionGeneral disorders1/21
FatigueGeneral disorders1/21
Portal hypertensionHepatobiliary disorders1/21
Failure to thriveMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/21
Memory impairmentNervous system disorders1/21
Mental status changesPsychiatric disorders1/21
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/21
Confusional statePsychiatric disorders1/21
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 35
Most frequent other events
EventGlasdegib Lead-in
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders13/21
Muscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders12/21
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders8/21
FatigueGeneral disorders7/21
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders7/21
Weight decreasedInvestigations6/21
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders5/21
Lipase increasedInvestigations5/21
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/21
PyrexiaGeneral disorders4/21

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Glasdegib Lead-in
Mean69.3 ± 7.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Glasdegib Lead-in
Female8
Male13
08

Study locations

19 sites
  • Mayo Clinic Building - Phoenix
    Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Hospital
    Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, United States
  • UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center - Investigational Drug Services
    La Jolla, California 92037-0845, United States
  • UCSD Medical Center Clinical Laboratory - La Jolla
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • University of California San Diego (UCSD) Moores Cancer Center
    La Jolla, California 92093-0698, United States
  • UC San Diego Medical Center- Hillcrest
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical College - New York-Presbyterian Hospital
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center-Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic - Taussig Cancer Institute
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute-University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
  • University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Hospital
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
  • Froedtert Hospital and Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226-3522, United States
  • Kobe University Hospital
    Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
  • Osaka University Hopsital
    Suita-Shi, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • Juntendo University Hospital
    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital
    Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 17, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02226172
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2014
Start date
Oct 6, 2014
Primary completion
Dec 14, 2016
Completion
Jan 31, 2018
Results posted
Apr 2, 2018
Last update
Jan 17, 2019

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion