ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02174848TIRCON-EXTUpdated Aug 25, 2020Results posted

Long-term Deferiprone Treatment in Patients With Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration

A Phase 3 interventional study of Deferiprone oral solution in Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration, sponsored by ApoPharma. Completed at 4 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 5 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-25.

Sponsored by ApoPharma (part of Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
5 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with PKAN will be treated with the iron chelator deferiprone for 18 months. Only patients who have completed the earlier study TIRCON2012V1 (NCT01741532), a double-blind placebo-controlled trial in which participants were randomized to receive either deferiprone or placebo for 18 months, are eligible to enroll.

Read the detailed description

TIRCON2012V1-EXT is a multi-center, single-arm, open-label study. All patients who completed the earlier study TIRCON2012V1 (NCT01741532) are eligible to take part. In the initial study, patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 18 months of treatment with either the iron chelator deferiprone or placebo, respectively. In this extension study, all participants will receive deferiprone for 18 months. Thus, depending on which product was received earlier, patients will be on deferiprone for a total of either 1.5 years or 3 years. As in the earlier study, assessments will be carried out every six months to look at the safety of the drug and to see if patients are showing any improvement in dystonia and other symptoms of PKAN.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration

Keywords

  • Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration
  • PKAN
  • Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation
  • NBIA
  • Deferiprone
  • Ferriprox
03

In context

Lead sponsor

ApoPharma is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Completed study TIRCON2012V1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Withdrew from the study TIRCON2012V1 for reasons of safety
  • Plan to participate in another clinical trial at any time from the day of enrolment until 30 days post-treatment in the current study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Deferiprone

    All patients will receive deferiprone oral solution.

    Drug: Deferiprone oral solution

Interventions

  • Deferiprone oral solution at a dosage of up to 15 mg per kilogram of body weight, twice a day

    Also known as: DFP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Safety and tolerability were assessed based on changes in: frequency of adverse events (AEs), frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs), and discontinuation due to AEs. No statistical comparison between the groups was conducted as all participants received the same study product.

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Treatment Groups Over Each Study

    The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of both the initial study (during which one group received placebo and the other received deferiprone) and the extension study (during which both groups received deferiprone).

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 18 of each study

  2. Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies

    The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of each study.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 18 of each study

  3. Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of DFP-DFP Patients Across Studies

    The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of the study.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 18 of each study

  4. Proportion of Patients With Improved or Unchanged BAD Score

    Patients were deemed to be responders if their BAD total score either improved or remained unchanged from baseline, with baseline being the start of each study for the placebo-DFP group and the start of the initial study for the DFP-DFP group

    Time frame: Month 18 of each study

  5. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies

    The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a global index used to rate the response of a condition to a therapy. Patients were asked at each post-baseline visit to rate their overall condition since the start of the extension study on a 7-point rating scale: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.

    Time frame: Month 18 of each study

07

Results

Posted Jul 17, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo-DFPDFP-DFP
Started2444
Provided post-baseline efficacy data1943
Completed1738
Not completed76
Withdrew: Adverse event21
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject33
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Worsening of disease11
Withdrew: Unable to comply with study requirements10

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events

Safety and tolerability were assessed based on changes in: frequency of adverse events (AEs), frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs), and discontinuation due to AEs. No statistical comparison between the groups was conducted as all participants received the same study product.

Time frame:
18 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
ParticipantsPlacebo-DFPDFP-DFP
Number of patients with at least one AE2242
Number of patients with at least one SAE1214
Number of patients who withdrew due to an AE21
SecondaryChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Treatment Groups Over Each Study

The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of both the initial study (during which one group received placebo and the other received deferiprone) and the extension study (during which both groups received deferiprone).

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 18 of each study
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Treatment Groups Over Each Study
score on a scalePlacebo-DFPDFP-DFP
Change in BAD score over initial study4.4 ± 4.81.9 ± 3.2
Change in BAD score over extension study1.4 ± 3.71.4 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo-DFP vs DFP-DFP · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0500
  • Placebo-DFP vs DFP-DFP · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.9781
SecondaryChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies

The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of each study.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 18 of each study
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies
score on a scalePlacebo-DFP in Initial StudyPlacebo-DFP in Extension Study
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies4.4 ± 4.81.4 ± 3.7
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo-DFP in Initial Study vs Placebo-DFP in Extension Study · paired t-test · p = 0.0206
SecondaryChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of DFP-DFP Patients Across Studies

The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of the study.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 18 of each study
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of DFP-DFP Patients Across Studies
score on a scaleDFP-DFP Group in Initial StudyDFP-DFP Group in Extension Study
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of DFP-DFP Patients Across Studies1.9 ± 3.21.4 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • DFP-DFP Group in Initial Study vs DFP-DFP Group in Extension Study · paired t-test · p = 0.2684
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Improved or Unchanged BAD Score

Patients were deemed to be responders if their BAD total score either improved or remained unchanged from baseline, with baseline being the start of each study for the placebo-DFP group and the start of the initial study for the DFP-DFP group

Time frame:
Month 18 of each study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Patients With Improved or Unchanged BAD Score
ParticipantsPlacebo-DFPDFP-DFP
Completion of initial study317
Completion of 18 months of deferiprone treatment917
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo-DFP vs DFP-DFP · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0821
  • Placebo-DFP vs DFP-DFP · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.5885
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a global index used to rate the response of a condition to a therapy. Patients were asked at each post-baseline visit to rate their overall condition since the start of the extension study on a 7-point rating scale: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.

Time frame:
Month 18 of each study
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies
score on a scalePlacebo-DFP in Initial StudyPlacebo-DFP in Extension Study
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies4.4 ± 1.54.7 ± 1.4
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo-DFP in Initial Study vs Placebo-DFP in Extension Study · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.3306

Adverse events

Collected over Safety data were collected from the time of first dose until the end of the study (up to 18 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Patients2/68 (2.9%)33/68 (48.5%)66/68 (97.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 68
Most frequent serious events
EventAll Patients
DystoniaNervous system disorders8/68
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/68
GastrostomySurgical and medical procedures4/68
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/68
Medical device implantationSurgical and medical procedures3/68
BronchitisInfections and infestations2/68
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/68
Wound infectionInfections and infestations2/68
Medical device battery replacementSurgical and medical procedures2/68
Medical device changeSurgical and medical procedures2/68
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventAll Patients
DystoniaNervous system disorders32/68
PyrexiaGeneral disorders20/68
HeadacheNervous system disorders19/68
Serum ferritin decreasedInvestigations18/68
Condition aggravatedGeneral disorders17/68
Pain in extremityMetabolism and nutrition disorders14/68
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations13/68
AnemiasBlood and lymphatic system disorders12/68
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders12/68
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations11/68

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo-DFPDFP-DFPTotal
Mean19.9 ± 13.022.4 ± 9.621.5 ± 10.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo-DFPDFP-DFPTotal
Female141630
Male102838
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo-DFPDFP-DFPTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian134
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White224163
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported000
BAD score at baseline
BAD score at baseline(units on a scale)Placebo-DFPDFP-DFPTotal
BAD score at baseline of initial study16.0 ± 8.019.4 ± 8.118.3 ± 8.2
BAD score at baseline of extension study20.4 ± 8.221.3 ± 7.621.0 ± 7.7
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland
    Oakland, California 94609, United States
  • Klinikum der Universität München
    Munich, 80336, Germany
  • Foundation Neurological Institute C. Besta
    Milan, 20133, Italy
  • Newcastle University Institute of Human Genetics
    Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2014, a primary completion of Mar 2018 and a completion of Mar 2018. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jul 2019, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 5, 2014
First posted
Jun 26, 2014
Start
Jun 2014
Primary completionActual
Mar 16, 2018
CompletionActual
Mar 16, 2018
Results first posted
Jul 17, 2019
Last update
Aug 25, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02174848
Lead sponsor
ApoPharma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 26, 2014
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Mar 16, 2018
Completion
Mar 16, 2018
Results posted
Jul 17, 2019
Last update
Aug 25, 2020

Study contacts

Elliott Vichinsky, MD
principal investigator · UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland
Thomas Klopstock, MD
principal investigator · Klinikum der Universität München
Nardo Nardocci, MD
principal investigator · Foundation Neurological Institute C. Besta
Patrick Chinnery, MD
principal investigator · Newcastle University Institute of Human Genetics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Deferiprone

Start the discussion