CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02166034HGHYUpdated Jun 18, 2014

Effects of School Gardens on Children's Diet, Nutritional Knowledge, Etc.

An interventional study of garden intervention in Dietary Habits, sponsored by Cornell University. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-18.

Sponsored by Cornell University · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,531
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether school gardens influence children's dietary intake, nutritional knowledge, and other outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Schools in New York, Washington State, Iowa, and Arkansas were randomly assigned to receive school gardens and associated curriculum or to serve on the wait list control group that received gardens and curriculum at the end of the 2-year study. Baseline data were collected in Fall 2011. Garden interventions began in Spring 2012. Follow-up data were collected at 6, 12, 18 months following baseline data collection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dietary Habits

Keywords

  • children
  • fruit
  • vegetable
  • diet
  • school
  • garden
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cornell University is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Schools had at least 50% of enrolled children qualifying for free + reduced price meals (FRPM)
  • Schools did not already have a school garden.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

none.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,531 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    garden intervention

    Schools assigned to the garden intervention receive raised bed garden kits and access to a toolkit of garden-based curriculum

    Behavioral: garden intervention

  • No intervention
    Control

    Wait-list control (no garden intervention + lessons) until end of the study.

Interventions

  • Behavioralgarden intervention

    The intervention includes raised bed garden kits for participating classes as well as access to garden-based curriculum.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change in fruit + vegetable intake at school

    Children's lunch trays are photographed before and after lunch for 3 days at each wave of data collection. Digital Food Image Analysis software computes grams of fruit and grams of vegetables consumed for each pair of lunch tray photos.

    Time frame: change from baseline to follow-up at 6, 12, 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Garden Intervention Fidelity

    fruit + vegetables planted, harvested; methods of fruit and vegetable distribution; and garden-based lessons delivered to the class are measures at each wave of data collection from Fall 2011 to Spring 2013.

    Time frame: At 3 garden intervention time points -- 6, 12, 18 months after baseline

  2. change fruit & vegetable consumption at home

    Time frame: change from baseline (Fall 2011) to follow-up at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months.

  3. change in Nutritional Knowledge

    In the classroom, children complete a 7-item multiple choice questionnaire developed by the Healthy Gardens, Healthy Youth curriculum development team. The questionnaire includes items about plant science (e.g., Which part of the plant uses the sun's energy to make food? root, stem, leaf, flower) and nutrition (e.g., Which nutrient supplies our bodies with energy? fiber, carbohydrates, water, vitamins). Data represent the number of correct answers.

    Time frame: change from baseline to follow-up at 6, 12, 18 months

  4. change in Science Technology Engineering Math (STEM) self efficacy

    In the classroom, children complete a 15-item questionnaire, derived from the Science Process Skills Inventory (SPSI) (Arnold \& Bourdeau, 2009) and the Iowa 4-H Science Youth Self-Assessment (Staker, 2011). Items include, for example: "I can do an experiment to answer a question" and "I can develop a plan for a good garden I want to plant" with response options "Disagree." "Not Sure." or "Agree" denoted 1, 2, or 3 respectively. The STEM self-efficacy score range is thus 15-45, with higher scores indicating that participant has stronger positive beliefs in their abilities to use STEM to solve problems.

    Time frame: change from baseline (Fall 2011) to follow-up at 6, 12, 18 months.

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Schools in Arkansas
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States
  • Schools in Iowa
    Osceola, Iowa 50213, United States
  • Schools in New York State
    Ithaca, New York 14850, United States
  • Schools in Washington State
    Tacoma, Washington 98418, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wells NM, Meyers BM, Todd LE, Henderson CR Jr, Barale K, Gaolach B, Ferenz G, Aitken M, Tse CC, Pattison KO, Hendrix L, Carson JB, Taylor C, Franz NK. The carry-over effects of school gardens on fruit and vegetable availability at home: A randomized controlled trial with low-income elementary schools. Prev Med. 2018 Jul;112:152-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Apr 5. PubMed 29627512 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02166034
Lead sponsor
Cornell University
Collaborators
Washington State University, University of Arkansas, Iowa State University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 18, 2014
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Jun 2013
Last update
Jun 18, 2014

Study contacts

Nancy M Wells, PhD
study director · Cornell University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion