CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02162446Updated Oct 2, 2019Results posted

68Ga-OPS202 Study for Diagnostic Imaging of GEP NET

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of satoreotide trizoxetan in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, sponsored by Ipsen. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-02.

Sponsored by Ipsen · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of 68Ga-OPS202 used for the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs).

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Browse trials for

03

In context

Neuroendocrine Tumors

676 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuroendocrine Tumors; 169 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 42 across 464 interventional studies indexed under Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Browse Neuroendocrine Tumors studies →

Lead sponsor

Ipsen is the lead sponsor of 282 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A diagnostic CT or MRI of the tumor region within the previous 6 months prior to dosing day is available.
  • A somatostatin receptor scan with results in the previous 6 months prior to dosing day.
  • At least 1 lesion detected by the previous somatostatin receptor scan.
  • Not exceeding 30 lesions / organ detected by the previous somatostatin receptor scan.
  • Blood test results as follows (WBC: ≥ 3*109/L, Hemoglobin: ≥ 8.0 g/dL, Platelets: ≥ 50x109/L, ALT, AST, AP: ≤ 5 times ULN, Bilirubin: ≤ 3 times ULN)
  • ECG: any abnormalities have to be clarified by a cardiologist.
  • Serum creatinine: within normal limits or \< 120 μmol/L for patients aged 60 years or older.
  • Calculated GFR ≥ 45 mL/min.
  • Negative pregnancy test in women capable of child-bearing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to 68Ga, to NODAGA, to JR11 or to any of the excipients of 68Ga-OPS202.
  • History of, or current active allergic or autoimmune disease, including asthma or any condition requiring long-term use of corticosteroids.
  • Presence of active infection at screening or history of serious infection within the previous 6 weeks.
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or positive serology for HIV, hepatitis B and C.
  • Any condition that precludes raised arms position for prolonged imaging purposes.
  • Neuroendocrine tumor specific treatment between last somatostatin receptor imaging and start of this study. Exception is the therapeutic use of any somatostatin analog (see below).
  • Therapeutic use of any somatostatin analog, including Sandostatin® LAR (within 28 days) and Sandostatin® (within 2 days) prior to study imaging. If a patient is on Sandostatin® LAR a wash-out phase of 28 days is required before the injection of the study drug. If a patient is on Sandostatin® a wash-out phase of 2 days is required before the injection of the study drug.
  • Administration of another investigational medicinal product within 30 days prior to entry.
  • Prior or planned administration of a radiopharmaceutical within 8 half-lives of the radionuclide used on such radiopharmaceutical including at any time during the current study.
  • Current > grade 2 toxicity from previous standard or investigational therapies, per US-NCI "Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0".
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
  • History of somatic or psychiatric disease/condition that may interfere with the objectives and assessments of the study.
  • Clinically significant illness or clinically relevant trauma within 2 weeks before the administration of the investigational product.
  • Current history of malignancy; patients with a secondary tumor in remission of > 5 years can be included.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    68Ga-OPS202

    Satoreotide trizoxetan will be administered in two sequentially ascending peptide doses

    Drug: satoreotide trizoxetan

Interventions

  • Drugsatoreotide trizoxetan

    Also known as: 68Ga-OPS202

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Reported With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a IP and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. For this study, all AEs were regarded as 'treatment emergent', i.e., not seen before administration of the IP or, if already present before administration, worsened after start of administration. An SAE was defined as an event that led to death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An ADR was defined as an AE with probable, possible or unlikely relationship to the administration of 68Ga-OPS202.

    Time frame: From start of IP administration to end of the study visit (approximately 28 to 36 days)

  2. Number of Participants With Clinical Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters, Vital Signs, Cardiac Safety, Physical Examination, and Required Concomitant Medication

    Laboratory assessments included hematology, blood biochemistry and urine analysis. Vital signs included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and axillary body temperature. Cardiac safety was assessed by 12-lead ECGs and physical examination included general appearance, head, neck, eyes, ears, nose, throat, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, neurological, endocrine, lymphatic, dermatological, psychological/psychiatric, abdomen, and genitourinary body systems. All medications (including herbal products) taken from visit 1 (Day 0) to visit 3 (7-15 days after visit 2 (3-4 weeks after visit 1), end of the study) were recorded in the participant's case report form.

    Time frame: From start of IP administration to end of the study visit (approximately 28 to 36 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Malignant and Benign Lesions Detected for Session 1

    At visit 1, after administration of 15 μg 68Ga-OPS202, a dynamic scan was performed in kidney region over first 30 minutes; static scans were performed from head to sub-inguinal region at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 h post-injection. At visit 2, after administration of 50 μg 68Ga-OPS202, a static scan was performed from head to sub-inguinal region at 1 h post-injection. A previous somatostatin receptor scan had been performed within 6 months prior to Day 0. Lesions were classified into malignant and benign by readers. Lesion matching was performed between somatostatin receptor scan and 1 h-68Ga-OPS202 receptor scans at visit 1 and visit 2. Number of lesions for each organ/tissue and overall were calculated and absolute numbers reported. Two different read sessions were held to generate data sets for evaluation of target variables. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

    Time frame: 6 months prior to Day 0; and 1 hour post-injection on Day 0 and Day 21

  2. Percentage of Participants With Lesion-Associated 68Ga-OPS202 Binding

    Tumor contrast in PET imaging was determined by qualitative visual analysis. 68Ga-OPS202 binding was present if at least one lesion, regardless of nature, was detected within respective tissue location. Percentages were based on number of participants with available scan at corresponding time point.

    Time frame: At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0 and 1 hour post-injection on Day 21

  3. Mean Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of Malignant and Benign Lesions for Session 1

    At visit 1, after administration of 15 μg 68Ga-OPS202, a dynamic scan was performed in kidney region over the first 30 minutes (0-0.5 h); static scans were performed from head to sub-inguinal region at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 h post-injection. At visit 2, after administration of 50 μg 68Ga-OPS202, a static scan was performed from head to sub-inguinal region at 1 h post-injection. A previous somatostatin receptor scan had been performed within 6 months prior to Day 0. Lesions were classified into malignant and benign lesion by the readers according to their experience. Lesion matching was performed between the somatostatin receptor scan and the 1 h-68Ga-OPS202 receptor scans at visit 1 and visit 2. The mean SUVmax of lesions (mean of all identified lesions in the lymph node and liver) was summarized by nature of the lesions (malignant, benign). Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

    Time frame: 6 months prior to Day 0; and 1 hour post-injection on Day 0 and Day 21

  4. Mean SUVmax of Malignant and Benign Lesions for Session 2

    The mean SUVmax of all identified lesions in the respective organ/tissue was determined. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

    Time frame: At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0 and 1 hour post-injection on Day 21

  5. Mean SUVmax of Reference Tissues (RT) Region of Interests (ROIs) for Session 1

    Lesion matching was performed between somatostatin receptor scan and 1 h-68Ga-OPS202 receptor scans at visit 1 and visit 2. Mean SUVmax of all selected ROIs in corresponding RT was determined. Corresponding RTs were adjacent healthy regions (1 to 3 healthy regions were identified for each lesion), i.e. located in same organ and/or region as lesion. RTs were determined in tissue locations with malignant lesions only. ROIs were also selected in muscle tissue, which was used as an additional reference region. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

    Time frame: 6 months prior to Day 0; and 1 hour post-injection on Day 0 and Day 21

  6. Mean SUVmax of RT for Session 2

    The mean SUVmax of all selected ROIs in the corresponding RT was determined. RTs were determined in tissue locations with malignant lesions only. ROIs were also selected in muscle tissue, which was used as an additional reference region. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

    Time frame: At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0 and 1 hour post-injection on Day 21

  7. Mean Tumor Contrast (3D-SUV-R) of Malignant Lesions Compared to Pre-dose Scans for Session 1

    The tumor contrast, i.e. the SUV ratio for tumor (malignant lesion)-to-background (3D-SUV-R) of a single lesion was defined as: 3D-SUV-R = SUVmax of lesion / mean of SUVmax of corresponding RTs. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

    Time frame: 6 months prior to Day 0; and 1 hour post-injection on Day 0 and Day 21

  8. The 3D-SUV-R of Malignant Lesions for Session 2

    The tumor contrast, i.e. the SUV ratio for 3D-SUV-R of a single lesion was defined as: 3D-SUV-R = SUVmax of lesion / mean of SUVmax of corresponding RTs. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

    Time frame: At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0 and 1 hour post-injection on Day 21

  9. Percent Change in 3D-SUV-R of Malignant Lesions

    The tumor contrast, i.e. the SUV ratio for 3D-SUV-R of a single lesion was defined as: 3D-SUV-R = SUVmax of lesion / mean of SUVmax of corresponding RT. For percent change, 68Ga-OPS202 receptor scan is compared to previous somatostatin receptor scan.

    Time frame: 6 months prior to Day 0; and 1 hour post-injection on Day 0 and Day 21

  10. Number of Participants at Each Time Point With the Highest Observed Lesion Number Per Tissue Location

    For determining a suitable time window for PET/CT with 68Ga-OPS202, the scans after administration of the 15 μg peptide dose were analyzed and the time point with the highest lesion number per tissue location and overall were determined. If the highest number of lesion was detected at more than one time point, the earliest time point was used.

    Time frame: At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0

  11. Number of Participants at Each Time Point With the Highest Mean 3D-SUV-R Tumor Value

    The time point with the highest mean 3D-SUV-R per tissue location were determined. If the highest mean 3D-SUV-R was detected at more than one time point, the earliest time point was used.

    Time frame: At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0

  12. Best Diagnostic Scan Assessment

    The assessment of every diagnostic 68Ga-OPS202 PET/CT scan of session 2 was rated by the reader from 1 to 5, where 1=worst diagnostic scan and 5=best diagnostic scan. Higher score indicates a better scan.

    Time frame: At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0 and 1 hour post-injection on Day 21

07

Results

Posted Oct 2, 2019

Participant flow

This open-label, micro-dosing study with 2 sequentially ascending single peptide doses was conducted in a single study center in Switzerland between 23 June 2014 and 14 January 2015.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Participants
Started12
Completed12
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Reported With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a IP and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. For this study, all AEs were regarded as 'treatment emergent', i.e., not seen before administration of the IP or, if already present before administration, worsened after start of administration. An SAE was defined as an event that led to death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An ADR was defined as an AE with probable, possible or unlikely relationship to the administration of 68Ga-OPS202.

Time frame:
From start of IP administration to end of the study visit (approximately 28 to 36 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reported With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
ParticipantsAll Participants
Any AE6
SAEs0
ADRs5
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters, Vital Signs, Cardiac Safety, Physical Examination, and Required Concomitant Medication

Laboratory assessments included hematology, blood biochemistry and urine analysis. Vital signs included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and axillary body temperature. Cardiac safety was assessed by 12-lead ECGs and physical examination included general appearance, head, neck, eyes, ears, nose, throat, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, neurological, endocrine, lymphatic, dermatological, psychological/psychiatric, abdomen, and genitourinary body systems. All medications (including herbal products) taken from visit 1 (Day 0) to visit 3 (7-15 days after visit 2 (3-4 weeks after visit 1), end of the study) were recorded in the participant's case report form.

Time frame:
From start of IP administration to end of the study visit (approximately 28 to 36 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters, Vital Signs, Cardiac Safety, Physical Examination, and Required Concomitant Medication
ParticipantsAll Participants
Laboratory parameters abnormalities8
Vital sign abnormalities7
12-Lead ECG abnormalities1
Physical examination abnormalities9
Concomitant medications required12
SecondaryNumber of Malignant and Benign Lesions Detected for Session 1

At visit 1, after administration of 15 μg 68Ga-OPS202, a dynamic scan was performed in kidney region over first 30 minutes; static scans were performed from head to sub-inguinal region at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 h post-injection. At visit 2, after administration of 50 μg 68Ga-OPS202, a static scan was performed from head to sub-inguinal region at 1 h post-injection. A previous somatostatin receptor scan had been performed within 6 months prior to Day 0. Lesions were classified into malignant and benign by readers. Lesion matching was performed between somatostatin receptor scan and 1 h-68Ga-OPS202 receptor scans at visit 1 and visit 2. Number of lesions for each organ/tissue and overall were calculated and absolute numbers reported. Two different read sessions were held to generate data sets for evaluation of target variables. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

Time frame:
6 months prior to Day 0; and 1 hour post-injection on Day 0 and Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · lesion
Number of Malignant and Benign Lesions Detected for Session 1
lesionITT Population (Pre-dose)ITT Population (Day 0)ITT Population (Day 21)
Malignant: Total9.3 ± 10.4917.0 ± 17.3120.1 ± 20.58
Malignant: Bone1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.00
Malignant: Liver8.6 ± 10.6217.4 ± 17.9821.7 ± 20.86
Malignant: Lymph node2.5 ± 2.562.9 ± 2.102.5 ± 2.27
Malignant: Peritoneum1.0 ± NA1.0 ± NA1.0 ± NA
Malignant: Small bowel1.0 ± 0.002.0 ± 1.411.5 ± 0.71
Benign: Total3.0 ± 1.831.8 ± 2.873.0 ± 3.16
Benign: Lung0.0 ± NA2.0 ± NA3.0 ± NA
Benign: Lymph node1.0 ± NA0.0 ± NA0.0 ± NA
Benign: Mamma2.0 ± NA2.0 ± NA2.0 ± NA
Benign: Mediastinum1.0 ± NA0.0 ± NA0.0 ± NA
Benign: Pancreas1.0 ± NA1.0 ± NA1.0 ± NA
Benign: Small bowel4.0 ± NA0.0 ± NA4.0 ± NA
Benign: Spleen1.0 ± NA1.0 ± NA1.0 ± NA
Benign: Stomach1.0 ± NA1.0 ± NA1.0 ± NA
Benign: Thyroid gland1.0 ± NA0.0 ± NA0.0 ± NA
Statistical analysis
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.016
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.004
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.012
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.004
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.500
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 1.000
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Lesion-Associated 68Ga-OPS202 Binding

Tumor contrast in PET imaging was determined by qualitative visual analysis. 68Ga-OPS202 binding was present if at least one lesion, regardless of nature, was detected within respective tissue location. Percentages were based on number of participants with available scan at corresponding time point.

Time frame:
At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0 and 1 hour post-injection on Day 21
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Lesion-Associated 68Ga-OPS202 Binding
percentage of participantsITT Population (Day 0)ITT Population (Day 21)
Total: At 0.5 hour100—
Total: At 1 hour100100
Total: At 2 hour100—
Total: At 4 hour100—
Bone: At 0.5 hour16.7—
Bone: At 1 hour16.716.7
Bone: At 2 hour16.7—
Bone: At 4 hour16.7—
Liver: At 0.5 hour75.0—
Liver: At 1 hour75.075.0
Liver: At 2 hour75.0—
Liver: At 4 hour75.0—
Lung: At 0.5 hour0—
Lung: At 1 hour00
Lung: At 2 hour0—
Lung: At 4 hour0—
Lymph node: At 0.5 hour58.3—
Lymph node: At 1 hour58.358.3
Lymph node: At 2 hour58.3—
Lymph node: At 4 hour58.3—
Mamma: At 0.5 hour0—
Mamma: At 1 hour00
Mamma: At 2 hour0—
Mamma: At 4 hour0—
Pancreas: At 0.5 hour8.3—
Pancreas: At 1 hour8.38.3
Pancreas: At 2 hour8.3—
Pancreas: At 4 hour8.3—
Peritoneum: At 0.5 hour8.3—
Peritoneum: At 1 hour8.38.3
Peritoneum: At 2 hour8.3—
Peritoneum: At 4 hour8.3—
Small bowel: At 0.5 hour25.0—
Small bowel: At 1 hour25.025.0
Small bowel: At 2 hour25.0—
Small bowel: At 4 hour16.7—
Thyroid gland: At 0.5 hour0—
Thyroid gland: At 1 hour00
Thyroid gland: At 2 hour0—
Thyroid gland: At 4 hour0—
SecondaryMean Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of Malignant and Benign Lesions for Session 1

At visit 1, after administration of 15 μg 68Ga-OPS202, a dynamic scan was performed in kidney region over the first 30 minutes (0-0.5 h); static scans were performed from head to sub-inguinal region at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 h post-injection. At visit 2, after administration of 50 μg 68Ga-OPS202, a static scan was performed from head to sub-inguinal region at 1 h post-injection. A previous somatostatin receptor scan had been performed within 6 months prior to Day 0. Lesions were classified into malignant and benign lesion by the readers according to their experience. Lesion matching was performed between the somatostatin receptor scan and the 1 h-68Ga-OPS202 receptor scans at visit 1 and visit 2. The mean SUVmax of lesions (mean of all identified lesions in the lymph node and liver) was summarized by nature of the lesions (malignant, benign). Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

Time frame:
6 months prior to Day 0; and 1 hour post-injection on Day 0 and Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · SUVmax
Mean Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of Malignant and Benign Lesions for Session 1
SUVmaxITT Population (Pre-dose)ITT Population (Day 0)ITT Population (Day 21)
Malignant: Bone4.394 ± 0.93964.153 ± 2.02704.455 ± 0.2425
Malignant: Liver12.135 ± 4.466010.468 ± 4.79708.458 ± 3.4840
Malignant: Lymph node15.192 ± 7.431816.289 ± 12.009114.602 ± 10.9725
Malignant: Peritoneum6.579 ± NA6.740 ± NA9.504 ± NA
Malignant: Small bowel14.049 ± 0.212411.140 ± 7.98289.156 ± 1.0674
Benign: Lung—3.410 ± NA3.131 ± NA
Benign: Lymph node3.093 ± NA——
Benign: Mamma2.353 ± NA2.907 ± NA2.538 ± NA
Benign: Mediastinum2.242 ± NA——
Benign: Pancreas14.086 ± NA8.693 ± NA6.659 ± NA
Benign: Small bowel8.264 ± NA—4.990 ± NA
Benign: Spleen16.343 ± NA15.997 ± NA14.308 ± NA
Benign: Stomach6.713 ± NA7.630 ± NA5.305 ± NA
Benign: Thyroid gland3.768 ± NA——
Statistical analysis
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.250
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.004
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.688
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.578
SecondaryMean SUVmax of Malignant and Benign Lesions for Session 2

The mean SUVmax of all identified lesions in the respective organ/tissue was determined. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

Time frame:
At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0 and 1 hour post-injection on Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · SUVmax
Mean SUVmax of Malignant and Benign Lesions for Session 2
SUVmaxITT Population (Day 0)ITT Population (Day 21)
Malignant: Bone: At 0.5 hour4.938 ± 1.1179—
Malignant: Bone: At 1 hour4.153 ± 2.02704.455 ± 0.2425
Malignant: Bone: At 2 hour4.601 ± 1.3164—
Malignant: Bone: At 4 hour4.564 ± 1.0832—
Malignant: Liver: At 0.5 hour10.086 ± 5.0229—
Malignant: Liver: At 1 hour11.485 ± 6.36919.037 ± 3.9033
Malignant: Liver: At 2 hour9.897 ± 4.3537—
Malignant: Liver: At 4 hour12.482 ± 5.9410—
Malignant: Lymph node: At 0.5 hour14.581 ± 9.7609—
Malignant: Lymph node: At 1 hour17.044 ± 11.622415.836 ± 10.9868
Malignant: Lymph node: At 2 hour18.166 ± 10.6940—
Malignant: Lymph node: At 4 hour17.985 ± 13.5368—
Malignant: Peritoneum: At 0.5 hour3.293 ± NA—
Malignant: Peritoneum: At 1 hour6.740 ± NA9.504 ± NA
Malignant: Peritoneum: At 2 hour7.484 ± NA—
Malignant: Peritoneum: At 4 hour7.216 ± NA—
Malignant: Small bowel: At 0.5 hour9.474 ± 5.8641—
Malignant: Small bowel: At 1 hour11.207 ± 4.53677.440 ± 2.8588
Malignant: Small bowel: At 2 hour9.075 ± 4.9059—
Malignant: Small bowel: At 4 hour14.695 ± 6.9926—
Benign: Pancreas: At 0.5 hour8.561 ± NA—
Benign: Pancreas: At 1 hour8.512 ± NA6.659 ± NA
Benign: Pancreas: At 2 hour8.734 ± NA—
Benign: Pancreas: At 4 hour5.759 ± NA—
Statistical analysis
  • ITT Population (Day 0) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.027
  • ITT Population (Day 0) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.219
SecondaryMean SUVmax of Reference Tissues (RT) Region of Interests (ROIs) for Session 1

Lesion matching was performed between somatostatin receptor scan and 1 h-68Ga-OPS202 receptor scans at visit 1 and visit 2. Mean SUVmax of all selected ROIs in corresponding RT was determined. Corresponding RTs were adjacent healthy regions (1 to 3 healthy regions were identified for each lesion), i.e. located in same organ and/or region as lesion. RTs were determined in tissue locations with malignant lesions only. ROIs were also selected in muscle tissue, which was used as an additional reference region. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

Time frame:
6 months prior to Day 0; and 1 hour post-injection on Day 0 and Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · SUVmax
Mean SUVmax of Reference Tissues (RT) Region of Interests (ROIs) for Session 1
SUVmaxITT Population (Pre-dose)ITT Population (Day 0)ITT Population (Day 21)
Bone0.610 ± 0.18010.739 ± 0.17800.636 ± 0.1207
Muscle1.020 ± 0.31410.883 ± 0.25300.896 ± 0.1812
Liver6.801 ± 1.96763.642 ± 1.63812.959 ± 0.8089
Lymph node2.229 ± 1.20171.870 ± 0.69672.368 ± 1.7112
Peritoneum0.776 ± NA0.927 ± NA1.401 ± NA
Small bowel4.180 ± 0.78932.080 ± 0.51621.707 ± 0.0636
Statistical analysis
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.064
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.339
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.001
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.000
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.297
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 1.000
SecondaryMean SUVmax of RT for Session 2

The mean SUVmax of all selected ROIs in the corresponding RT was determined. RTs were determined in tissue locations with malignant lesions only. ROIs were also selected in muscle tissue, which was used as an additional reference region. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

Time frame:
At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0 and 1 hour post-injection on Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · SUVmax
Mean SUVmax of RT for Session 2
SUVmaxITT Population (Day 0)ITT Population (Day 21)
Muscle: At 0.5 hour0.923 ± 0.2260—
Muscle: At 1 hour0.932 ± 0.23860.976 ± 0.2012
Muscle: At 2 hour1.127 ± 0.3343—
Muscle: At 4 hour2.013 ± 0.6884—
Bone: At 0.5 hour0.573 ± 0.3418—
Bone: At 1 hour0.605 ± 0.36810.765 ± 0.1409
Bone: At 2 hour0.731 ± 0.0550—
Bone: At 4 hour2.138 ± 0.7022—
Liver: At 0.5 hour4.201 ± 1.3697—
Liver: At 1 hour4.040 ± 1.52133.480 ± 1.1863
Liver: At 2 hour4.103 ± 1.2389—
Liver: At 4 hour6.101 ± 2.7773—
Lymph node: At 0.5 hour1.723 ± 0.9118—
Lymph node: At 1 hour2.049 ± 0.78051.757 ± 1.1486
Lymph node: At 2 hour2.467 ± 1.3033—
Lymph node: At 4 hour1.989 ± 0.6904—
Peritoneum: At 0.5 hour1.864 ± NA—
Peritoneum: At 1 hour1.038 ± NA1.163 ± NA
Peritoneum: At 2 hour0.856 ± NA—
Peritoneum: At 4 hour1.501 ± NA—
Small bowel: At 0.5 hour2.519 ± 0.2743—
Small bowel: At 1 hour2.571 ± 1.06441.608 ± 0.3677
Small bowel: At 2 hour2.124 ± 0.7382—
Small bowel: At 4 hour3.177 ± 0.7174—
Statistical analysis
  • ITT Population (Day 0) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.470
  • ITT Population (Day 0) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.233
  • ITT Population (Day 0) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.375
SecondaryMean Tumor Contrast (3D-SUV-R) of Malignant Lesions Compared to Pre-dose Scans for Session 1

The tumor contrast, i.e. the SUV ratio for tumor (malignant lesion)-to-background (3D-SUV-R) of a single lesion was defined as: 3D-SUV-R = SUVmax of lesion / mean of SUVmax of corresponding RTs. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

Time frame:
6 months prior to Day 0; and 1 hour post-injection on Day 0 and Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Mean Tumor Contrast (3D-SUV-R) of Malignant Lesions Compared to Pre-dose Scans for Session 1
ratioITT Population (Pre-dose)ITT Population (Day 0)ITT Population (Day 21)
Bone (RT: Bone)7.296 ± 0.61366.125 ± 4.21617.167 ± 1.7409
Bone (RT: Muscle)5.227 ± 1.70446.091 ± 2.13535.868 ± 0.4515
Liver (RT: Liver)2.066 ± 0.91633.234 ± 1.81303.215 ± 1.8160
Liver (RT: Muscle)13.434 ± 7.370312.605 ± 7.938310.318 ± 5.7811
Lymph node (RT: Lymph node)9.548 ± 7.15929.320 ± 5.259011.034 ± 13.3938
Lymph node (RT: Muscle)15.110 ± 7.428219.861 ± 16.049218.349 ± 15.9027
Peritoneum (RT: Peritoneum)8.475 ± NA7.268 ± NA6.783 ± NA
Peritoneum (RT: Muscle)8.366 ± NA9.170 ± NA11.399 ± NA
Small bowel (RT: Small bowel)3.427 ± 0.69786.017 ± 5.33035.355 ± 0.4256
Small bowel (RT: Muscle)15.353 ± 7.143012.585 ± 6.198111.352 ± 2.5753
Statistical analysis
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.004
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.004
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.426
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.098
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.813
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.813
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 0) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.297
  • ITT Population (Pre-dose) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.469
SecondaryThe 3D-SUV-R of Malignant Lesions for Session 2

The tumor contrast, i.e. the SUV ratio for 3D-SUV-R of a single lesion was defined as: 3D-SUV-R = SUVmax of lesion / mean of SUVmax of corresponding RTs. Statistical comparisons were only feasible for those organs/ tissues that had sufficient participants with lesions detected.

Time frame:
At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0 and 1 hour post-injection on Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
The 3D-SUV-R of Malignant Lesions for Session 2
ratioITT Population (Day 0)ITT Population (Day 21)
Bone (RT: Bone): At 0.5 hour11.191 ± 8.6266—
Bone (RT: Bone): At 1 hour9.679 ± 9.24265.891 ± 0.7682
Bone (RT: Bone): At 2 hour6.243 ± 1.3313—
Bone (RT: Bone): At 4 hour2.169 ± 0.2056—
Bone (RT: Muscle): At 0.5 hour6.716 ± 1.4013—
Bone (RT: Muscle): At 1 hour5.528 ± 2.15555.530 ± 0.8944
Bone (RT: Muscle): At 2 hour5.311 ± 2.1658—
Bone (RT: Muscle): At 4 hour2.331 ± 0.5535—
Liver (RT: Liver): At 0.5 hour2.547 ± 1.5468—
Liver (RT: Liver): At 1 hour3.071 ± 2.38582.514 ± 0.6087
Liver (RT: Liver): At 2 hour2.430 ± 0.9559—
Liver (RT: Liver): At 4 hour2.038 ± 0.6822—
Liver (RT: Muscle): At 0.5 hour11.534 ± 8.0671—
Liver (RT: Muscle): At 1 hour13.231 ± 10.48929.653 ± 5.1879
Liver (RT: Muscle): At 2 hour9.383 ± 6.1356—
Liver (RT: Muscle): At 4 hour6.974 ± 6.4729—
Lymph node (RT: Lymph node): At 0.5 hour13.448 ± 12.3973—
Lymph node (RT: Lymph node): At 1 hour10.109 ± 7.372214.166 ± 13.4067
Lymph node (RT: Lymph node): At 2 hour9.722 ± 7.1821—
Lymph node (RT: Lymph node): At 4 hour9.889 ± 5.8842—
Lymph node (RT: Muscle): At 0.5 hour16.362 ± 9.1362—
Lymph node (RT: Muscle): At 1 hour20.434 ± 13.606018.562 ± 15.1302
Lymph node (RT: Muscle): At 2 hour16.107 ± 9.5271—
Lymph node (RT: Muscle): At 4 hour8.619 ± 3.7444—
Peritoneum (RT: Peritoneum): At 0.5 hour1.767 ± NA—
Peritoneum (RT: Peritoneum): At 1 hour6.494 ± NA8.173 ± NA
Peritoneum (RT: Peritoneum): At 2 hour8.747 ± NA—
Peritoneum (RT: Peritoneum): At 4 hour4.809 ± NA—
Peritoneum (RT: Muscle): At 0.5 hour4.431 ± NA—
Peritoneum (RT: Muscle): At 1 hour8.508 ± NA10.060 ± NA
Peritoneum (RT: Muscle): At 2 hour7.709 ± NA—
Peritoneum (RT: Muscle): At 4 hour2.626 ± NA—
Small bowel (RT: Small bowel): At 0.5 hour3.759 ± 2.1690—
Small bowel (RT: Small bowel): At 1 hour5.644 ± 4.96194.956 ± 2.8311
Small bowel (RT: Small bowel): At 2 hour4.363 ± 2.5614—
Small bowel (RT: Small bowel): At 4 hour4.047 ± 1.6457—
Small bowel (RT: Muscle): At 0.5 hour9.404 ± 5.2820—
Small bowel (RT: Muscle): At 1 hour11.787 ± 5.80907.678 ± 3.9023
Small bowel (RT: Muscle): At 2 hour7.267 ± 3.8995—
Small bowel (RT: Muscle): At 4 hour6.686 ± 1.5046—
Statistical analysis
  • ITT Population (Day 0) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.910
  • ITT Population (Day 0) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.039
  • ITT Population (Day 0) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.375
  • ITT Population (Day 0) vs ITT Population (Day 21) · Wilcoxon signed rank test · p = 0.219
SecondaryPercent Change in 3D-SUV-R of Malignant Lesions

The tumor contrast, i.e. the SUV ratio for 3D-SUV-R of a single lesion was defined as: 3D-SUV-R = SUVmax of lesion / mean of SUVmax of corresponding RT. For percent change, 68Ga-OPS202 receptor scan is compared to previous somatostatin receptor scan.

Time frame:
6 months prior to Day 0; and 1 hour post-injection on Day 0 and Day 21
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Percent Change in 3D-SUV-R of Malignant Lesions
percent changeITT Population (Day 0)ITT Population (Day 21)
Bone (RT: Bone)-13.315 ± 65.0759-0.418 ± 32.2352
Bone (RT: Muscle)16.042 ± 3.013220.052 ± 47.7825
Liver (RT: Liver)51.938 ± 33.222150.766 ± 25.4179
Liver (RT: Muscle)-5.165 ± 32.3975-19.838 ± 37.5669
Lymph node (RT: Lymph node)56.044 ± 94.876838.530 ± 117.3139
Lymph node (RT: Muscle)46.569 ± 61.451536.864 ± 79.3287
Peritoneum (RT: Peritoneum)-14.239 ± NA-19.962 ± NA
Peritoneum (RT: Muscle)9.619 ± NA36.256 ± NA
Small bowel (RT: Small bowel)63.131 ± 122.337958.296 ± 19.8143
Small bowel (RT: Muscle)2.447 ± 88.0324-12.716 ± 57.3817
SecondaryNumber of Participants at Each Time Point With the Highest Observed Lesion Number Per Tissue Location

For determining a suitable time window for PET/CT with 68Ga-OPS202, the scans after administration of the 15 μg peptide dose were analyzed and the time point with the highest lesion number per tissue location and overall were determined. If the highest number of lesion was detected at more than one time point, the earliest time point was used.

Time frame:
At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants at Each Time Point With the Highest Observed Lesion Number Per Tissue Location
ParticipantsITT Population (Day 0)
Total — At 0.5 hour5
Total — At 1 hour3
Total — At 2 hour4
Total — At 4 hour0
Bone — At 0.5 hour2
Bone — At 1 hour0
Bone — At 2 hour0
Bone — At 4 hour0
Liver — At 0.5 hour2
Liver — At 1 hour3
Liver — At 2 hour4
Liver — At 4 hour0
Lung — At 0.5 hour—
Lung — At 1 hour—
Lung — At 2 hour—
Lung — At 4 hour—
Lymph node — At 0.5 hour7
Lymph node — At 1 hour0
Lymph node — At 2 hour0
Lymph node — At 4 hour0
Mamma — At 0.5 hour—
Mamma — At 1 hour—
Mamma — At 2 hour—
Mamma — At 4 hour—
Pancreas — At 0.5 hour1
Pancreas — At 1 hour0
Pancreas — At 2 hour0
Pancreas — At 4 hour0
Peritoneum — At 0.5 hour1
Peritoneum — At 1 hour0
Peritoneum — At 2 hour0
Peritoneum — At 4 hour0
Small bowel — At 0.5 hour3
Small bowel — At 1 hour0
Small bowel — At 2 hour0
Small bowel — At 4 hour0
Thyroid gland — At 0.5 hour—
Thyroid gland — At 1 hour—
Thyroid gland — At 2 hour—
Thyroid gland — At 4 hour—
SecondaryNumber of Participants at Each Time Point With the Highest Mean 3D-SUV-R Tumor Value

The time point with the highest mean 3D-SUV-R per tissue location were determined. If the highest mean 3D-SUV-R was detected at more than one time point, the earliest time point was used.

Time frame:
At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants at Each Time Point With the Highest Mean 3D-SUV-R Tumor Value
ParticipantsITT Population (Day 0)
Bone (RT: Bone) — At 0.5 hour1
Bone (RT: Bone) — At 1 hour0
Bone (RT: Bone) — At 2 hour1
Bone (RT: Bone) — At 4 hour0
Bone (RT: Muscle) — At 0.5 hour1
Bone (RT: Muscle) — At 1 hour0
Bone (RT: Muscle) — At 2 hour1
Bone (RT: Muscle) — At 4 hour0
Liver (RT: Liver) — At 0.5 hour0
Liver (RT: Liver) — At 1 hour4
Liver (RT: Liver) — At 2 hour2
Liver (RT: Liver) — At 4 hour3
Liver (RT: Muscle) — At 0.5 hour2
Liver (RT: Muscle) — At 1 hour5
Liver (RT: Muscle) — At 2 hour2
Liver (RT: Muscle) — At 4 hour0
Lymph node (RT: Lymph node) — At 0.5 hour2
Lymph node (RT: Lymph node) — At 1 hour1
Lymph node (RT: Lymph node) — At 2 hour2
Lymph node (RT: Lymph node) — At 4 hour2
Lymph node (RT: Muscle) — At 0.5 hour1
Lymph node (RT: Muscle) — At 1 hour5
Lymph node (RT: Muscle) — At 2 hour1
Lymph node (RT: Muscle) — At 4 hour0
Mamma (RT: Mamma) — At 0.5 hour—
Mamma (RT: Mamma) — At 1 hour—
Mamma (RT: Mamma) — At 2 hour—
Mamma (RT: Mamma) — At 4 hour—
Mamma (RT: Muscle) — At 0.5 hour—
Mamma (RT: Muscle) — At 1 hour—
Mamma (RT: Muscle) — At 2 hour—
Mamma (RT: Muscle) — At 4 hour—
Peritoneum (RT: Peritoneum) — At 0.5 hour0
Peritoneum (RT: Peritoneum) — At 1 hour0
Peritoneum (RT: Peritoneum) — At 2 hour1
Peritoneum (RT: Peritoneum) — At 4 hour0
Peritoneum (RT: Muscle) — At 0.5 hour0
Peritoneum (RT: Muscle) — At 1 hour1
Peritoneum (RT: Muscle) — At 2 hour0
Peritoneum (RT: Muscle) — At 4 hour0
Small bowel (RT: Small bowel) — At 0.5 hour1
Small bowel (RT: Small bowel) — At 1 hour2
Small bowel (RT: Small bowel) — At 2 hour0
Small bowel (RT: Small bowel) — At 4 hour0
Small bowel (RT: Muscle) — At 0.5 hour0
Small bowel (RT: Muscle) — At 1 hour3
Small bowel (RT: Muscle) — At 2 hour0
Small bowel (RT: Muscle) — At 4 hour0
SecondaryBest Diagnostic Scan Assessment

The assessment of every diagnostic 68Ga-OPS202 PET/CT scan of session 2 was rated by the reader from 1 to 5, where 1=worst diagnostic scan and 5=best diagnostic scan. Higher score indicates a better scan.

Time frame:
At 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hour post-injection on Day 0 and 1 hour post-injection on Day 21
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Best Diagnostic Scan Assessment
score on a scaleITT Population (Day 0)ITT Population (Day 21)
At 0.5 hour4.0 (2 to 5)—
At 1 hour5.0 (3 to 5)5.0 (3 to 5)
At 2 hour4.5 (3 to 5)—
At 4 hour2.0 (1 to 4)—

Adverse events

Collected over From start of IP administration to end of the study visit (approximately 28 to 36 days).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Participants0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)6/12 (50%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAll Participants
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations2/12
FatigueGeneral disorders2/12
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/12
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders1/12
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/12
EosinophiliaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/12
Liver function test abnormalInvestigations1/12
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/12
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/12

Baseline characteristics

Safety analysis set (SAF) included all participants of the full analysis set (FAS) who received the IP, regardless of any protocol deviations.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Participants
Mean54.8 ± 14.66
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Participants
Female5
Male7
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White11
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Basel
    Basel, CH-4031, Switzerland
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02162446
Lead sponsor
Ipsen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 12, 2014
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Jun 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
Results posted
Oct 2, 2019
Last update
Oct 2, 2019

Study contacts

Ipsen Medical Director
study director · Ipsen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion