CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02161302tDCSUpdated Jan 15, 2026

THE EFFECT OF tDCS IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS

An interventional study of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Pain and Endometriosis, sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-15.

Sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain associated with endometriosis

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Endometriosis

Keywords

  • Endometriosis
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
  • tDCS
  • Near Infrared Spectroscopy
  • NIRS
  • Chronic Pelvic Pain
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre is the lead sponsor of 450 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age > 18 years old, non-menopausal, with the diagnosis of endometriosis by videolaparoscopy and biopsy, able to understand and write the Portuguese language, in treatment with isolated progestin for at least one month, who have the worst daily pain in the analogue visual scale > 4 cm on most of the days in the last month

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • left-handed women, endometriosis implantation in intestine, bladder or urether (surgical treatment indication), history of intense or frequent headache, chronic dermatologic disease, previous adverse effects to treatment with tDCS, seizures, severe cranial trauma with alteration of the cranial anatomy, metallic intracranial implants or pacemaker, history of pelvic inflammatory disease, non-compensated psychiatric disease, non-collaborative patients, history of neurologic, oncologic disease, heart, renal or hepatic failure.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active tDCS

    tDCS will be applied in the head of the patients in 20 minute sessions, daily from Monday to Friday for 2 weeks (10 sessions total). The stimulation will be administered with a pair of surface electrodes, sponge coated, soaked in saline. A battery-powered constant current stimulator will be used for this purpose (tDCS device Soterix 1X1). The stimulation is performed by placing the anodal electrode in the primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathodal one in the contralateral supraorbital area, and it will use a 2 mA current.

    Device: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

  • Sham comparator
    tDCS Sham

    The sham tDCS consists of the same montage of the active tDCS, but the device is turned off 30 seconds after initiating stimulation (without letting the patient notice it). Rest of the montage is kept identical as the active one during the 20 minutes that the session lasts.

    Device: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Interventions

  • Devicetranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    The stimulation will be administered with a pair of surface electrodes, sponge coated, soaked in saline. A battery-powered constant current stimulator will be used for this purpose (tDCS device Soterix 1X1). The stimulation is performed by placing the anodal electrode in the primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathodal one in the contralateral supraorbital area and it will use a 2 mA current.

    Also known as: tDCS

  • DeviceSham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

    The sham tDCS consists of the same montage of the active tDCS, but the device is turned off 30 seconds after initiating stimulation (without letting the patient notice it). Rest of the montage is kept identical as the active one during the 20 minutes that the session lasts.

    Also known as: Sham tDCS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in worst daily pain assessed with the visual analogue scale.

    Patients will be asked to write down their worst pain level (assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale, self-administered) in a paper diary with different scores: global pain, pain during menses, pain during sexual intercourse, pain during urination, pain during defecation. They will also be asked to daily write the analgesic drug intake. Total evaluations: 35 days.

    Time frame: Once Daily. Start 7 days before treatment, everyday during treatment period and every day during follow-up period (total = 35 days)

  2. Changes in motor cortex blood flow assessed by near infrared spectroscopy

    Motor cortex blood flow will be assessed before the first session of tDCS (on Treatment day 1), after the end of treatment period (Day 15) and after the follow-up period (Day 29). Total = 3 evaluations.

    Time frame: Treatment Day 1 (before receiving the 1st session of tDCS); Day 15 (at the end of treatment period) and Day 29 (at the end of follow-up period)

  3. Change in Functional Pain Scale

    The Functional Pain Scale will be assessed by the Brazilian Profile of Chronic Pain: Screen (B-PCP:S) once a week, as follows: on Treatment Day 1 (before the first session of tDCS, considered baseline), on Treatment Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, and Day 29. Total = 5 evaluations.

    Time frame: Once a week - Treatment Day 1, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29

  4. Change in the temperature pain threshold

    It will be assessed by the Quantitative Sensory Test (QST) in the dominant (right) forearm. The heat pain tolerance and pain threshold to the heat and the temperature defined as pain 6/10 by the participant. The temperature starts at 32°C, and it heat at a 1.0 °C/sec rate and cools down after a button is pressed or whenever it reaches the max temperature of 52°C. The participant will be asked to press the button at the first sensation of pain to determine the pain threshold; to press the button whenever she can not stand the heat anymore for the pain tolerance determination and, for last, to press the button at the temperature she fells pain equivalent to 6/10 in the numeric scale of pain. The pain threshold and the temperature of pain 6/10 will be determined by the arithmetic mean of 3 evaluations each. Total of 3 test days: Day 1 (before the first session of tDCS), after the end of the Treatment period (Day 15) and at the end of the follow-up period (Day 29).

    Time frame: up to Day 29

  5. Change in effect of the descendent modulator system of pain

    It will be assessed by the Conditioned Pain Modulation test (CPM). A nociceptive tonic conditioning stimulus - immersion of the non-dominant hand in cold water (0°C for 1 minute) - will be applied concomitant to the progressive thermal stimulus in the dominant forearm as applied in the QST pattern until it reaches the 6/10 pain temperature previously determined by the participant. It will be tested in Treatment Day 1 (before the first session of tDCS - considered baseline), after the end of the Treatment period (Day 15) and at the end of the follow-up period (Day 29) - Total = 3 evaluation.

    Time frame: up to Day 29

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in serum biomarkers level: The brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and interleukins

    A blood sample will be collected to measure BDNF and interleukins on Treatment Day 1 (right before the first tDCS session - considered baseline), after the end of the treatment period (day 15,) and after the end of the follow-up period (day 29). Total = 3 evaluations

    Time frame: up to Day 29

Other outcomes

  1. Depressive symptoms level

    Depression symptoms will be assessed by using the Beck II Inventory. It will be assessed before the first session of tDCS (on Treatment day 1), after the end of treatment period (Day 15) and after the follow-up period (Day 29). Total = 3 evaluations.

    Time frame: Treatment Day 1 (before receiving the 1st session of tDCS); Day 15 (at the end of treatment period) and Day 29 (at the end of follow-up period)

  2. Anxiety level

    Anxiety level will be assessed by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), adapted to Brazilian Portuguese Language. It will be assessed before the first session of tDCS (on Treatment day 1), after the end of treatment period (Day 15) and after the follow-up period (Day 29). Total = 3 evaluations.

    Time frame: Treatment Day 1 (before receiving the 1st session of tDCS); Day 15 (at the end of treatment period) and Day 29 (at the end of follow-up period)

  3. Psychiatric diseases

    Psychiatric diseases will be evaluated by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) in the patient screening. Total = 1 evaluation

    Time frame: 1day on patient screening

  4. Estradiol level

    Estradiol blood level will be measured on treatment Day 1 (before receiving the 1st session of tDCS). Total = 1 evaluation

    Time frame: Treatment Day 1 (before receiving the 1st session of tDCS)

  5. Adverse Effects

    At the end of each tDCS session, the incidence of any adverse effects - paresthesia, headache, dizziness, nausea, neck pain, burns, redness or pain in the scalp, insomnia, abrupt humor changes and lack of concentration - will be questioned to the participant. Total = 10 evaluations

    Time frame: up to Day 29

  6. Pain catastrophizing thoughts

    The level of catastrophic thinking will be assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale on Treatment Day 1 (before receiving the 1st session of tDCS), after the treatment period (Day 15) and at the end of the follow-up period (Day29). Total = 3 evaluations

    Time frame: Treatment Day 1 (before receiving the 1st session of tDCS); Day 15 (at the end of treatment period) and Day 29 (at the end of follow-up period)

  7. Demographic data and comorbidities

    Demographic data and comorbidities will be asked in the baseline (before the first session of tDCS). Total = 1 evaluation.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Change in quality of life

    Quality of life will be assessed by the WHOQOL (World Health Organization Quality of Life), in Treatment Day 1 (before the first session of tDCS - considered baseline) and after the treatment period (Day 15). Total = 2 evaluations

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90035-903, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Valle A, Roizenblatt S, Botte S, Zaghi S, Riberto M, Tufik S, Boggio PS, Fregni F. Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results of a randomized, sham-controlled longitudinal clinical trial. J Pain Manag. 2009;2(3):353-361. PubMed 21170277 ↗
  • Nacul AP, Spritzer PM. [Current aspects on diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010 Jun;32(6):298-307. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000600008. Portuguese. PubMed 20945016 ↗
  • Boros K, Poreisz C, Munchau A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Mar;27(5):1292-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06090.x. Epub 2008 Feb 29. PubMed 18312584 ↗
  • Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;56:255-76. doi: 10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70230-2. No abstract available. PubMed 14677403 ↗
  • Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1. PubMed 20633386 ↗
  • Fenton BW, Palmieri PA, Boggio P, Fanning J, Fregni F. A preliminary study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain. Brain Stimul. 2009 Apr;2(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.09.009. Epub 2009 Feb 28. PubMed 20633407 ↗
  • Caumo W, Ruehlman LS, Karoly P, Sehn F, Vidor LP, Dall-Agnol L, Chassot M, Torres IL. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the profile of chronic pain: screen for a Brazilian population. Pain Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):52-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01528.x. Epub 2012 Nov 21. PubMed 23171145 ↗
  • Sehn F, Chachamovich E, Vidor LP, Dall-Agnol L, de Souza IC, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the pain catastrophizing scale. Pain Med. 2012 Nov;13(11):1425-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01492.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4. PubMed 23036076 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02161302
Lead sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 11, 2014
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
May 2016
Last update
Jan 15, 2026

Study contacts

Wolnei Caumo, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion