CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02153203Updated Oct 25, 2016

Using the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce Model to Reduce Problem Behaviors in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

An interventional study of Prevent-Teach-Reinforce Model and Individual Parent Training Session in Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, sponsored by Université de Montréal. Completed at 3 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged Up to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-25.

Sponsored by Université de Montréal · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Children with autism spectrum disorders often engage in problem behaviors such as self-injury, destruction, aggression, and stereotypy. Prior research has clearly shown that these problem behaviors may interfere with learning, daily functioning, and social participation. As such, engaging in problem behaviors has a negative impact on the health and quality of life of children with autism spectrum disorders and their families. One promising solution to reduce problem behaviors in this population is the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce (PTR) model, which relies on the evidence-based practices of positive behavior support. Although the use of PTR has been gaining considerably support in schools, the model has never been evaluated as part of a rigorous large-scale study using parents as interventionists. Thus, the purpose of the project is to conduct an assessment of the effectiveness of a home-based version of the PTR model in reducing problem behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorders and in improving families' quality of life. Our hypotheses are that implementing the PTR will (a) produce larger reductions in problem behaviors than participating in an individual parent training session, (b) increase engagement in prosocial behaviors, (c) decrease parental stress, and (c) improve the quality of life of the family. The results of the study will allow an examination of whether PTR is an effective and acceptable model to reduce problem behaviors at home in this population. Given that problem behaviors incur high societal costs when they persist into adolescence and adulthood, the study may potentially lead to large cost reductions in the treatment of difficulties associated with autism spectrum disorders. By reducing engagement in problem behaviors, the implementation of the model may also promote and facilitate the social participation as well as improve the quality of life and health of children with autism spectrum disorders and their families.

02

Conditions studied

  • Child Development Disorders, Pervasive

Keywords

  • Autism spectrum disorder
  • Problem behavior
03

In context

Autism Spectrum Disorder

1,727 studies on the registry are indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder; 504 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 52 across 1,370 interventional studies indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Browse Autism Spectrum Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Université de Montréal is the lead sponsor of 97 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
  • Must exhibit problem behavior

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Already receiving services to reduce problem behaviors at home
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Behavioral approach

    The Prevent-Teach-Reinforce Model will be implemented with families in their home settings.

    Behavioral: Prevent-Teach-Reinforce Model

  • Active comparator
    Educational approach

    Each child's parent will participate in one 2- to 3-hour individual parent training session on the assessment and treatment of problem behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders.

    Other: Individual Parent Training Session

Interventions

  • BehavioralPrevent-Teach-Reinforce Model

    Implementation of the model once to twice per week over a period of 8 weeks

  • OtherIndividual Parent Training Session

    One 2- to 3-hour individual parent training session on the assessment and treatment of problem behavior

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in parental report of problem behavior at 8 weeks

    Problem behavior scale of the Problem Behavior Inventory

    Time frame: Prior to the start of the intervention and 8 weeks later

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in quality of life at 8 weeks

    Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale

    Time frame: Prior to the start of the intervention and 8 weeks later

  2. Change from baseline in parental report of stress at 20 weeks

    Parenting Stress Index Short Form

    Time frame: Prior to the start of the intervention and 20 weeks later

  3. Change from baseline in parental report of stress at 8 weeks

    Parenting Stress Index Short Form

    Time frame: Prior to the start of the intervention and 8 weeks later

  4. Change from baseline in quality of life at 20 weeks

    Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale

    Time frame: Prior to the start of the intervention and 20 weeks later

  5. Social validity of the intervention

    Treatment Acceptability Rating Form - Revised

    Time frame: After 8 weeks of intervention

  6. Change from baseline in parental report of problem behavior at 20 weeks

    Problem behavior scale of the Problem Behavior Inventory

    Time frame: Prior to the start of the intervention and 20 weeks later

  7. Change from baseline in parental report of positive social behavior at 20 weeks

    Positive social behavior scale of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form

    Time frame: Prior to the start of the intervention and 20 weeks later

  8. Change from baseline in parental report of positive social behavior at 8 weeks

    Positive social behavior scale of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form

    Time frame: Prior to the start of the intervention and 8 weeks later

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • West Montreal Readaptation Centre
    Lachine, Quebec, Canada
  • Gold Centre
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • CRDITED de Montréal
    Montréal, Quebec H3L 3T1, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02153203
Lead sponsor
Université de Montréal
Responsible party
Marc Lanovaz (Assistant Professor, Université de Montréal) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 2, 2014
Start date
Oct 2014
Primary completion
Jun 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Last update
Oct 25, 2016

Study contacts

Marc Lanovaz
principal investigator · Université de Montréal

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion