CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02149472TeMpOH-2Updated May 1, 2018

Towards Better Prognostic and Diagnostic Strategies for Haemostatic Changes During Major Obstetric Haemorrhage

An observational study in Postpartum Haemorrhage, sponsored by Sanquin-LUMC J.J van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion Research. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-01.

Sponsored by Sanquin-LUMC J.J van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion Research · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,649
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Major obstetric haemorrhage (MOH) remains a cause of significant maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. By identifying women with a higher a priori risk of major haemorrhage during their pregnancy or early during postpartum haemorrhage extra measures to prevent MOH can be taken.

In this study the investigators aim to identify haemostatic parameters that during the course of haemorrhage are responsible for the on-going towards major bleeding. By doing this, cut-off points can be defined for future interventions aiming to stop this bleeding process in an early stage. Traditional coagulation parameters are currently not useful for clinical decision making, because of long turn around times. Therefore the added value of available coagulation 'point of care' tests will be evaluated during obstetric haemorrhage.These Point-of-Care (POC) tests could lead to a goal-directed haemostatic therapy for obstetric haemorrhage.

A cohort of 9.500 pregnant women will be followed during their pregnancy and delivery. From all women a bleeding score will be obtained during their pregnancy by means of a validated questionnaire. The predictive value of this bleeding score for the occurrence of major obstetric haemorrhage will be evaluated.

If postpartum haemorrhage develops (blood loss) > 1000 cc, blood samples will be drawn for conventional haemostatic parameters and ROTEM profiles. The pathway between minor bleeding and major bleeding will be elucidated. Interchangeability and comparability of conventional haemostatic parameters and ROTEM profiles will also be evaluated.

The overall goal of the investigators is becoming more able to predict major obstetric haemorrhage in an early stage of postpartum haemorrhage and define thresholds for goal-directed hemostatic therapies.

Read the detailed description

See 'brief summary'

02

Conditions studied

  • Postpartum Haemorrhage
03

In context

Postpartum Hemorrhage

445 studies on the registry are indexed under Postpartum Hemorrhage; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,649 is above the median of 152 across 91 observational studies indexed under Postpartum Hemorrhage.

Browse Postpartum Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanquin-LUMC J.J van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion Research is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All pregnant women in participating hospitals are asked for their informed consent (n = 9.500). All women will complete a bleeding score generating questionnaire duing their pregnancy. Only from women developing postpartum haemorrhage > 1000 cc blood samples will be drawn (n = 600) during the course of postpartum haemorrhage for evaluation of changes in haemostatic parameters and ROTEM profiles.

3 months postpartum a nested case cohort study will be performed to compare the incidences of underlying bleeding disorders in the haemorrhage and non-haemorrhage group. This outcome will also be related to the obtained bleeding scores during pregnancy.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy, gestation age > 24 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18
  • Adults incapable of giving informed consent
  • Gestational age \< 24 weeks
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,649 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Pregnant women with PPH

    All pregnant women in participating hospitals are asked for their informed consent (n = 9.500). All women will complete a bleeding score generating questionnaire during their pregnancy. Only from women developing postpartum haemorrhage \> 1000 cc blood samples will be drawn (n = 600).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Early haemostatic predictors of major obstetric haemorrhage

    During early postpartum haemorrhage changes in hemostatic parameters leading to major obstetric haemorrhage will be identified. Conventional hemostatic parameters and ROTEM profiles will be studied.

    Time frame: Postpartum haemorrhage within the 24 hrs hours after childbirth

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of ROTEM-based MOH prediction scores as alternative to traditional haemostatic parameters

    Time frame: Postpartum haemorrhage within first 24 hrs after childbirth

  2. Incidence of underlying bleeding disorders in patients with MOH

    Time frame: 3 months postpartum

  3. Predictive value bleeding score in pregnancy for MOH

    Time frame: Third trimester of pregnancy - 24 hours postpartum

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
    Leiden, Zuid-Holland 2300RC, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tahitu M, Ramler PI, Gillissen A, Caram-Deelder C, Henriquez DDCA, de Maat MPM, Duvekot JJ, Eikenboom J, Bloemenkamp KWM, van den Akker T, van der Bom JG. Clinical value of early assessment of hyperfibrinolysis by rotational thromboelastometry during postpartum hemorrhage for the prediction of severity of bleeding: A multicenter prospective cohort study in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jan;101(1):145-152. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14279. Epub 2021 Nov 3. PubMed 34729767 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02149472
Lead sponsor
Sanquin-LUMC J.J van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion Research
Collaborators
Leiden University Medical Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Isala
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 29, 2014
Start date
Feb 4, 2015
Primary completion
Apr 18, 2018
Completion
Apr 18, 2018
Last update
May 1, 2018

Study contacts

J G van der Bom, Prof, MD,PhD
principal investigator · LUMC and Center for Clinical Transufion Research Sanquin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion