ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02145832TINNUpdated Sep 4, 2025

Fluconazole Versus Micafungin in Neonates With Candidiasis

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Fluconazole and Micafungin in Candidiasis, sponsored by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France. Completed at 5 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 24 Weeks to 42 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-04.

Sponsored by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
24 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to determine whether micafungin is as efficacious as the current standard of fluconazole, to compare the safety of the two drugs in the treatment of proven neonatal candidiasis.

It is also designed to further elucidate the pharmacokinetics of the two products in the growing and developing neonate and premature infant.

Read the detailed description

The epidemiology of candidiasis is rapidly changing; recent estimates are that nearly 50% of Candida bloodstream isolates are non-albicans Candida species requiring the use of treatments active against them.

Because of the high risk associated with candida infection in premature babies and fluconazole prophylaxis is now recommended in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) with a high incidence in fungal infections. As candida infection is difficult to prove and requires an urgent treatment, in particular to avoid central nervous system (CNS) infection, treatment is often started in high risk patients when the infection is only suspected, i.e. on clinical arguments without waiting for positive cultures (10% of cases).

Fluconazole has not been approved for use in the treatment of neonatal candidiasis. In contrast, the efficacy of echinocandins for the treatment of invasive candidiasis has been suggested by pre-clinical and clinical studies.

Related to Micafungin, the available data suggest that only dosages that are greater than what currently recommended in infants (2 to 4 mg/kg/day) may ensure adequate coverage of the CNS, given that ability of low dosages of micafungin to penetrate the cerebrospinal compartment and to diffuse in the cerebrospinal fluid is deemed suboptimal.

The doses that will be administered are higher that currently used in order to optimize efficacy, and the concept of a loading dose that will be used for both drugs in this project, is present in antifungal treatment strategies for adults, but it has never been applied to infants and preterm neonates.

02

Conditions studied

  • Candidiasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • TINN
  • Pharmacokinetic
  • Neonates
  • Antifungal
  • Fluconazole
  • Micafungin
03

In context

Candidiasis

132 studies on the registry are indexed under Candidiasis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 91 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Candidiasis.

Browse Candidiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France is the lead sponsor of 378 studies on the registry; 81 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
24 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Neonates and infants between 24 up to 42 weeks gestational age AND with a post-natal age of 48 hours of life up to day of life (DOL) 120 at the time of culture acquisition.
  2. Requiring antifungal therapy according to medical decision by the attending physician for microbiologically documented or clinically suspected candida infection independently from the availability of any positive culture for Candida spp
  3. Written from the parents or the legally authorized representative must be obtained prior to entry.
  4. Infant must have sufficient venous access to permit administration of study medication and monitoring of safety variables.
  5. And specifically for the French participants: infant shall be insured (Health Insurance) - able to understand and accept the study constraints

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Infant exposed to fluconazole or micafungin prophylaxis prior to inclusion
  2. Infant who has received more than 48 hours of systemic antifungal therapy (any product) prior to the first dose of study drug for treatment of the current Candida infection.
  3. Infant with a concomitant medical condition, whose participation, in the opinion of the Investigator and/or medical advisor, may create an unacceptable additional risk.
  4. Infant previously enrolled in this study.
  5. Infant who is co-infected with a non-Candida fungal organism.
  6. Neonates with isolated candiduria
  7. Infant with any history of a or severe vasomotor reaction to any echinocandin or fluconazole product
  8. Infant with pre-existing hepatic or renal disease
  9. Infants with baseline Candida spp. isolate resistant to fluconazole or micafungin according to "EUropean Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing" and "Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute" (EUCAST/CLSI) clinical breakpoints or with an isolate for which treatment with an alternative antifungal agent is indicated, i.e. there is insufficient evidence that the species in question is a good target for therapy with either fluconazole or micafungin.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fluconazole

    Fluconazole Kabi, Fresenius 2mg/ml Fluconazole will be administered at a loading dose of 25 mg/kg on the first day and followed by a maintenance dose of 12 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg once daily, depending of corrected gestational age (GA) at the beginning of treatment: * 12 mg/kg/day for neonates corrected GA (GA + postnatal age) \< 30 weeks * 20 mg/kg/day for neonates corrected GA (GA + postnatal age) ≥ 30 weeks The infusion will last two hours.

    Drug: Fluconazole

  • Experimental
    Micafungin

    Mycamine 50mg - 10 mg/mL of micafungin Micafungin will be administered as a loading dose of 15 mg/kg on the first day of treatment and followed by a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg once daily. The infusion will last two hours.

    Drug: Micafungin

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Concentration / Minimal Inhibitory Concentration ratio (AUC/MIC ratio)

    AUC/MIC ratio in the two treated groups (both fluconazole and micafungin) is used as primary outcome. The theoretical "Minimum Inhibitory Concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of organisms" (MIC90s) against the common pathogens responsible for the infection to be treated will be used by opposition with the "real MIC90" of the agent really involved that is rarely isolated.

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Antwerp, Rocourt, Liège, Louvain, Namur, Belgium
  • Paris, Lyon, Saint-Pierre de La Réunion, France
  • Roma, Torino, Catania, Foggia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
  • Rotterdam, Amsterdam, Utrecht, Isala, Netherlands
  • Malaga, Salamanca, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Leroux S, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Elie V, Legrand F, Barin-Le Guellec C, Aurich B, Biran V, Dusang B, Goudjil S, Coopman S, Garcia Sanchez R, Zhao W, Manzoni P; FP7 TINN (Treat Infections in NeoNates) consortium. Pharmacokinetics and safety of fluconazole and micafungin in neonates with systemic candidiasis: a randomized, open-label clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Sep;84(9):1989-1999. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13628. Epub 2018 Jun 21. PubMed 29744900 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02145832
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 23, 2014
Start date
Oct 2014
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Last update
Sep 4, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Fluconazole · Micafungin

Start the discussion