ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02145182Updated Dec 17, 2018Results posted

Prevention of Delayed Graft Function Using Eculizumab Therapy (PROTECT Study)

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Eculizumab and Placebo in Delayed Graft Function, sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 78 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-17.

Sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (part of AstraZeneca) · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
288
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to determine if eculizumab is safe and could be used to prevent delayed graft function (DGF) following kidney transplantation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Delayed Graft Function

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • DGF
  • Dialysis
  • Kidney
  • Kidney Transplantation
  • eGFR
  • Complement
  • Eculizumab
03

In context

Delayed Graft Function

83 studies on the registry are indexed under Delayed Graft Function; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 288 is above the median of 90 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Delayed Graft Function.

Browse Delayed Graft Function studies →

Lead sponsor

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 255 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Of its 101 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 75 (74%) have results posted.

First submitted before Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. became part of AstraZeneca.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, 18 years or older
  • Has dialysis-dependent renal failure (initiated more than 2 months prior to transplant)
  • Participant is to receive a first kidney transplant from a standard criteria donor or expanded criteria donor deceased donor with a DGF risk score using the Irish scale of ≥25% (to be determined prior to surgery and before randomization)
  • Able to provide written
  • Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study protocol
  • Female participants of must have a negative serum pregnancy test (serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin) and must be practicing an effective, reliable, and medically approved regimen at the time of consent and for up to 5 months following discontinuation of treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant to receive a multi-organ transplant
  • Participant to receive kidney(s) from donors \<6 years of age
  • Participant to receive a dual kidney transplant (from same donor, including en bloc)
  • Participant to receive a living donor kidney
  • Participant is highly sensitized (high risk to develop acute antibody-mediated rejection) to the donor (as determined by local center practice). Testing to determine high risk may include but is not limited to flow cytometric cross match, single antigen bead testing and/or complement dependent cytotoxicity
  • Participant has received a previous transplant
  • Participant is participating in another study
  • Participant has a >40 kilograms/square meter at screening
  • Participant will be the recipient of an A, B, O Blood Glycoproteins (ABO) (blood type) incompatible kidney (A2 donors to B and O recipients will be allowed if the site has the ability to confirm A2 subtype)
  • Participant will receive a kidney from a donation after cardiac death donor
  • Participant has a predicted Irish model risk of DGF \<25%
  • Female participants who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Female participants of child bearing potential who are unable or unwilling to use a medically acceptable form of
  • Participants with a history of , or active virus or virus infection
  • Participants with active bacterial or other infection which is in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Participants with a history of splenectomy
  • Participants with unresolved meningococcal disease
  • Participants with an unresolved systemic bacterial or fungal infection
  • Participants with known or suspected hereditary complement deficiency (for example, but not limited to: atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria)
  • Participant has a current or a history of any malignancy (within the past 5 years), except non- basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix that has been treated appropriately
  • Participant has a history of or is believed by the Investigator to have used an illicit drug(s) and/or abused alcohol within 3 months prior to screening
  • Participant has a psychiatric or physical illness that in the opinion of the Investigator would interfere with the ability of the participant to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
288 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active

    Eculizumab was administered by intravenous (IV) infusion over 25-45 minutes (min) for 2 doses (on the day of transplant then 18-24 hours \[h\] later).

    Drug: Eculizumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo was administered by IV infusion over 25-45 min for 2 doses (on the day of transplant then 18-24 h later).

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Eculizumab is a complement component 5 inhibitor.

    Also known as: Soliris

  • DrugPlacebo

    0.9% sodium chloride

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Of Participants With Delayed Graft Function (DGF) In The First Seven Days Post-transplant

    Results are reported for the DGF composite endpoint, defined as the occurrence of DGF (dialysis for any reason in the first 7 days post transplantation), graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up (including discontinuation) in the first 7 days post transplantation and for each item of the composite endpoint. Loss to follow-up included withdrawal due to any reason other than death. The sum of the counts in the events that make up the DGF composite may be greater than the composite count, because a participant who experienced multiple events was only counted once in the composite.

    Time frame: First 7 days post transplantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage Of Participants With DGF, Functional DGF, And Immediate Graft Function

    DGF was defined as a requirement for dialysis for any reason in the first 7 days post transplantation; functional DGF was defined as no need for dialysis during the first 7 days post transplantation and either (1) a \<70% reduction in serum creatinine during the first 7 days post transplantation, or (2) failure of serum creatinine to decrease by at least 10% daily on 3 consecutive days, both measured during the first 7 days post transplantation. Blood and urine samples were collected, but because the study failed to demonstrate a treatment effect and the program subsequently lost funding, the collected data from the samples could not be analyzed to generate summary level data. As such, the data set for this secondary outcome measure cannot be summarized.

    Time frame: First 7 days post transplantation

  2. Percentage Of Participants Who Required Dialysis Post Transplantation

    The need for dialysis was assessed by evaluation of renal function; this included urine volume, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and, starting on Day 2, the creatinine reduction ratio. Blood and urine samples were collected, but because the study failed to demonstrate a treatment effect and the program subsequently lost funding, the collected data from the samples could not be analyzed to generate summary level data. As such, the data set for this secondary outcome measure cannot be summarized.

    Time frame: First 30 days post transplantation

  3. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

    The eGFR was calculated by using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 7 equation at Day 28 post transplantation. The equation requires serum creatinine, age, ethnicity, gender, blood urea nitrogen, and albumin. The eGFR was calculated retrospectively from participant demographics and laboratory chemistries and is reported in mL/min/square meter (m\^2).

    Time frame: Day 28 post transplantation

  4. Percentage Of Participants With Rejection-free Graft Survival

    Graft survival was defined as not having biopsy-proven acute rejection per Banff criteria, graft loss, or participant death. Participants who did not experience graft loss or death were censored at 365 days or the day they withdrew, whichever came first. There were no time-specific protocol mandated biopsies. Kidney biopsy would have been performed for cause at the discretion of the Investigator to assess poor graft function and would have been obtained prior to initiating treatment of suspected allograft rejection. Only summaries of Kaplan-Meier estimates of graft survival at Week 26 (Month 6) and Week 52 (Month 12) are reported.

    Time frame: Week 26 and 52 post transplantation

07

Results

Posted Dec 17, 2018
Limitations and caveats
Because the study failed to demonstrate a treatment effect and the program subsequently lost funding, all collected data could not be analyzed to generate summary level data.

Participant flow

Fifty-nine centers in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United States of America participated in this study. The study recruited participants who had been receiving dialysis for a median of approximately 50 months before undergoing transplantation and received a kidney from a deceased donor.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEculizumabPlacebo
Started142146
Received at least 1 dose of study drug142146
Completed124130
Not completed1816
Withdrew: Adverse event41
Withdrew: Death77
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up22
Withdrew: Pre-transplant withdrawal02
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject54

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage Of Participants With Delayed Graft Function (DGF) In The First Seven Days Post-transplant

Results are reported for the DGF composite endpoint, defined as the occurrence of DGF (dialysis for any reason in the first 7 days post transplantation), graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up (including discontinuation) in the first 7 days post transplantation and for each item of the composite endpoint. Loss to follow-up included withdrawal due to any reason other than death. The sum of the counts in the events that make up the DGF composite may be greater than the composite count, because a participant who experienced multiple events was only counted once in the composite.

Time frame:
First 7 days post transplantation
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants With Delayed Graft Function (DGF) In The First Seven Days Post-transplant
percentage of participantsEculizumabPlacebo
DGF Composite35.941.7
DGF33.839.6
Death0.01.4
Graft Loss0.73.5
Lost to Follow-up (including discontinuation)3.51.4
Statistical analysis
  • Eculizumab vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.3983 · Odds ratio (or): 0.81 · 95% CI 0.49 to 1.33Calculated using the logistic regression model.
SecondaryPercentage Of Participants With DGF, Functional DGF, And Immediate Graft Function

DGF was defined as a requirement for dialysis for any reason in the first 7 days post transplantation; functional DGF was defined as no need for dialysis during the first 7 days post transplantation and either (1) a \<70% reduction in serum creatinine during the first 7 days post transplantation, or (2) failure of serum creatinine to decrease by at least 10% daily on 3 consecutive days, both measured during the first 7 days post transplantation. Blood and urine samples were collected, but because the study failed to demonstrate a treatment effect and the program subsequently lost funding, the collected data from the samples could not be analyzed to generate summary level data. As such, the data set for this secondary outcome measure cannot be summarized.

Time frame:
First 7 days post transplantation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPercentage Of Participants Who Required Dialysis Post Transplantation

The need for dialysis was assessed by evaluation of renal function; this included urine volume, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and, starting on Day 2, the creatinine reduction ratio. Blood and urine samples were collected, but because the study failed to demonstrate a treatment effect and the program subsequently lost funding, the collected data from the samples could not be analyzed to generate summary level data. As such, the data set for this secondary outcome measure cannot be summarized.

Time frame:
First 30 days post transplantation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryEstimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

The eGFR was calculated by using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 7 equation at Day 28 post transplantation. The equation requires serum creatinine, age, ethnicity, gender, blood urea nitrogen, and albumin. The eGFR was calculated retrospectively from participant demographics and laboratory chemistries and is reported in mL/min/square meter (m\^2).

Time frame:
Day 28 post transplantation
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/1.73 m^2
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
mL/min/1.73 m^2EculizumabPlacebo
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)42.640 ± 20.749139.954 ± 20.3288
SecondaryPercentage Of Participants With Rejection-free Graft Survival

Graft survival was defined as not having biopsy-proven acute rejection per Banff criteria, graft loss, or participant death. Participants who did not experience graft loss or death were censored at 365 days or the day they withdrew, whichever came first. There were no time-specific protocol mandated biopsies. Kidney biopsy would have been performed for cause at the discretion of the Investigator to assess poor graft function and would have been obtained prior to initiating treatment of suspected allograft rejection. Only summaries of Kaplan-Meier estimates of graft survival at Week 26 (Month 6) and Week 52 (Month 12) are reported.

Time frame:
Week 26 and 52 post transplantation
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants With Rejection-free Graft Survival
percentage of participantsEculizumabPlacebo
Graft Survival at Month 694.89 (89.58 to 97.53)90.96 (84.94 to 94.65)
Graft Survival at Month 1292.66 (86.78 to 95.98)88.69 (82.17 to 92.92)

Adverse events

Collected over Non-serious adverse events were required to be reported during the study up to 60 days after the last dose of study drug and serious adverse events were required to be reported during the study through 12 months of follow-up.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Eculizumab8/142 (5.6%)92/142 (64.8%)139/142 (97.9%)
Placebo7/146 (4.8%)102/146 (69.9%)142/146 (97.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 238
Most frequent serious events
EventEculizumabPlacebo
HyperkalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders9/1425/146
PneumoniaInfections and infestations7/1428/146
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations7/1424/146
Deep vein thrombosisVascular disorders1/1427/146
UrosepsisInfections and infestations6/1423/146
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders3/1426/146
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders5/1423/146
PyrexiaGeneral disorders4/1424/146
Kidney transplant rejectionImmune system disorders4/1423/146
Septic shockInfections and infestations4/1421/146
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 63
Most frequent other events
EventEculizumabPlacebo
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders77/14275/146
HyperkalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders59/14267/146
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders41/14257/146
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders40/14240/146
HypomagnesaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders40/14228/146
HypertensionVascular disorders34/14239/146
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders37/14230/146
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders37/14235/146
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders36/14232/146
AcidosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders35/14224/146

Baseline characteristics

Safety Set: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (placebo or eculizumab).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)EculizumabPlaceboTotal
Mean57.5 ± 12.2957.1 ± 13.0357.3 ± 12.65
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)EculizumabPlaceboTotal
Female474592
Male95101196
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)EculizumabPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino232346
Not Hispanic or Latino108113221
Unknown or Not Reported111021
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)EculizumabPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaskan Native123
Asian044
Black or African American383775
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
White8892180
Other9716
Multiple112
Unknown437
08

Study locations

78 sites
  • Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
  • Los Angeles, California 90024, United States
  • Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
  • San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States
  • Washington, District of Columbia 20007, United States
  • Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Augusta, Georgia 30912, United States
  • Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
  • New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Livingston, New Jersey 07039, United States
  • Bronx, New York 10467, United States
  • New York, New York 10032, United States
  • New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States
  • Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
  • Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
  • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
  • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
  • Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
    São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
  • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Prague, 14000, Czechia
  • Bordeaux, 33076, France
  • Créteil, 94010, France
  • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
  • Lyon, 69003, France
  • Nantes, 44093, France
  • Paris, 75010, France
  • Paris, 75743, France
  • Strasbourg, 67091, France
  • Suresnes, 92150, France
  • Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Tours, 37044, France
  • Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Essen, 45147, Germany
  • Hamburg, 20246, Germany
  • Hannoversch Münden, 34346, Germany
  • Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Kiel, 24105, Germany
  • Bari, 70124, Italy
  • Brescia, 25123, Italy
  • Milano, 20162, Italy
  • Padova, 35128, Italy
  • Torino, 10126, Italy
  • Verona, 37126, Italy
  • Badalona, 08916, Spain
  • Barcelona, 08003, Spain
  • Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Barcelona, 08907, Spain
  • Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • Santander, 39008, Spain
  • Sevilla, 41013, Spain
  • Valencia, 46017, Spain
  • Valencia, 46026, Spain
  • Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 17, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02145182
Collaborators
CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2014
Start date
Aug 21, 2014
Primary completion
Nov 22, 2016
Completion
Nov 22, 2016
Results posted
Dec 17, 2018
Last update
Dec 17, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Eculizumab

Start the discussion