CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02138981Updated Aug 2, 2018

Hepatectomy Versus Chemoembolization for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria

A Phase 4 interventional study of Chemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection and Immediate Resection in Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-02.

Sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
436
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the survival outcomes between hepatic resection and transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) used as the initial treatment in patients with Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria.

Read the detailed description

For patients with large/multiple, and resectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread, the choice of treatment remains largely controversial. For these patients, transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as a palliative therapy.

On the other hand, many authors still believe that hepatic resection is the only potential curative treatment in these patients because it is still feasible to remove all macroscopic tumors safely at surgery. With advances in surgical techniques, more large/multiple HCCs are now resectable, and long-term results have been reported that ranged from 30% to 58% at 5 years; even patients with large bilobar multiple HCC could reach a survival rate of more than 20% at 5 years after hepatic resection.

Until now, there have been only a few studies that compared the outcomes of hepatic resection and TACE in the treatment of multiple HCCs, and these have reported controversial results. Some studies showed that hepatic resection had survival benefi t over TACE, but other studies showed the opposite result ( 11-15 ). Therefore, the investigators performed this prospective study in consecutive patients with large/multiple, and resectable HCCs to compare the outcomes in patients who underwent hepatic resection or TACE as the initial treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Milan Criteria
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,745 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,163 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 436 is above the median of 45 across 5,174 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 1,644 studies on the registry; 602 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A diagnosis of HCC based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL).
  • The patient has not been previously treated with surgery, radiation therapy, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection, or cryoablation.
  • The tumor beyound milan criteria.
  • The tumor was evaluated to be resectable by a same group of surgeon.
  • Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured according to EASL criteria
  • No serious concurrent medical illness
  • Not pregnant or breast-feeding patients
  • Cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only
  • The following laboratory parameters:

    • Platelet count ≥ 80,000/µL
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL Serum albumin ≥ 35 g/L
    • ASL and AST ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal
    • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal
    • INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits
    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3
  • Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tumor vascular invasion or distant metastases
  • Significant renal impairment (creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/minute) or patients on dialysis
  • On anticoagulation or suffering from a known bleeding disorder
  • Unstable coronary artery disease or recent MI
  • Known history of HIV
  • History of organ allograft
  • Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.
  • Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy
  • Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
  • Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event > CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
  • Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
  • Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease
  • severe Arterioportal Shunts or Arteriavein Shunts
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
436 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Immediate Resection

    patients received immediate surgical hepatic resection

    Procedure: Immediate Resection

  • Experimental
    Chemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection

    patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatments, and only patients who showed good response were subjected to surgical resection.

    Procedure: Chemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection

Interventions

  • ProcedureChemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection

    patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatments, and only patients who showed good response were subjected to surgical resection.

  • ProcedureImmediate Resection

    patients received immediate surgical resection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. overall survival time

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. disease free survival

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Number of Adverse Events

    All severe adverse events for the entire course of treatment, including treatment for primary tumor and recurrent tumor.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Cancer Center Sun Yat-sen University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02138981
Lead sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
Collaborators
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaiping Central Hospital, First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Dongguan Shi People's Hospital
Responsible party
Shi Ming (Professor, Sun Yat-sen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 15, 2014
Start date
May 1, 2014
Primary completion
Aug 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 2, 2018

Study contacts

Ming Shi, MD
Contact
shiming@mail.sysu.edu.cn
86-2087343154
Rong Ping Guo, MD
Contact
guorongp@mail.sysu.edu.cn
86-2087342266
Ming Shi, MD
principal investigator · Sun Yat-sen University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion