CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02132832Updated Jun 2, 2017Results posted

Buspirone, Stress, and Attentional Bias to Marijuana Cues

A Phase 2 interventional study of Buspirone and Placebo in Cannabis Use Disorder, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-02.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Phase 2, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project has two primary goals. The first goal is to further scientific understanding about marijuana abuse by examining two recognized factors in marijuana use and relapse: (1) stress/anxiety and (2) atypical reactivity to marijuana-related stimuli (e.g., attentional bias). The second goal is to attenuate the influence of stress/anxiety and attentional bias to marijuana stimuli via administration of buspirone.

Buspirone is uniquely suited to this project because it has effects on neurotransmitter systems known to modulate both stress/anxiety and attentional bias.

Read the detailed description

For nearly 40 years marijuana has remained the most widely used illicit drug in the US, with more than 50% of first-time users \< age 18. Marijuana accounts for ≈ 60% of illicit substance use disorders (SUD) in the US, bearing by percent the largest US public health burden among illicit substances. Across preclinical, human laboratory, and clinical interview data, there is compelling evidence that the phenomenon of cue reactivity is related to drug seeking and relapse. Attentional bias is a measurable component of cue reactivity, and can be operationally defined as differential attention (e.g., reaction time difference) towards drug-related stimuli vs. neutral stimuli. This phenomenon has been demonstrated in SUD populations across many classes of abused drugs, including alcohol, nicotine, stimulants, opiates, and - importantly - marijuana. Cue reactivity and attentional bias are exacerbated by acute and chronic stress and anxiety. Notably, stress is a well-documented predictor of marijuana abuse and marijuana relapse. Therapeutic interventions that attenuate attentional bias to marijuana cues are a potentially important component in the treatment of marijuana SUD. Due to the well-documented association with stress, an intervention that simultaneously addresses both stress and attentional bias could be uniquely efficacious. Currently, few pharmacotherapies exist for marijuana SUD, and none are presently known to address attentional bias to marijuana cues. This application will explore the potential of the anxiolytic buspirone to modify attentional bias and stress. Buspirone is a unique compound marked by modulation of both serotonin (5-HT1A) and dopamine D3 receptors. Importantly, the 5-HT1A receptor is known to play a key role in stress related anxiety, and preclinical work indicates that D3 antagonists significantly decrease cue reactivity to a number of abused drugs. This combination of effects suggests buspirone may be advantageous in targeting both stress and attentional bias as factors that contribute to problem marijuana use.

Accordingly, this project seeks to examine the effects of chronic buspirone administration on attentional bias and stress/anxiety in marijuana SUD. Using laboratory-based methodologies sensitive to attentional bias towards marijuana cues and well validated measures of stress and anxiety, we will examine if buspirone's unique mechanism of action will (a) produce an attenuation of attentional bias to marijuana cues, and (b) be most pronounced under conditions in which attentional bias is related to high levels of stress and anxiety.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cannabis Use Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • marijuana
  • attentional bias
  • stress
  • buspirone
03

In context

Marijuana Abuse

517 studies on the registry are indexed under Marijuana Abuse; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 60 across 421 interventional studies indexed under Marijuana Abuse.

Browse Marijuana Abuse studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston is the lead sponsor of 880 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Marijuana substance use disorder based on a score of ≥ 13 on the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test - Revised (CUDIT-R)
  • a score of ≥ 4 on the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test (CAST)
  • meeting criteria for a marijuana substance use disorder based on the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current DSM-IV Axis I disorder other than marijuana use disorder
  • serious medical illness requiring ongoing medical treatment, which could affect the central nervous system, or any other medical contraindication (e.g., renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, blood) as determined by medical screening
  • a positive pregnancy test or breast feeding (females)
  • concomitant use of prescription medications that could affect the central nervous system
  • active suicidal ideation or Beck Depression Inventory II score greater than 19
  • positive urine drug screen for drugs other than marijuana or positive breath alcohol screen
  • Shipley-2 test of cognitive aptitude score outside 2 SD units of the published composite score average
  • smoking > 10 nicotine cigarettes per day / Fagerstrom Score > 4
  • taking meds known to have significant drug interactions with buspirone.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Buspirone

    Buspirone is administered orally twice per day (9:00 AM and 6:00 PM) for 3 weeks. 10 mg buspirone is administered on days 1-4, then the dose is increased by 10 mg every 3 days to a maximum of 40 mg buspirone on days 10-19.

    Drug: Buspirone

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo is administered orally twice per day (9:00 AM and 6:00 PM) for 3 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugBuspirone

    Buspirone is an anxiolytic compound marked by modulation of both 5-HT1A and D3 receptors. Buspirone is administered orally twice per day (9:00 AM and 6:00 PM) for 3 weeks. 10 mg buspirone is administered on days 1-4, then the dose is increased by 10 mg every 3 days to a maximum of 40 mg buspirone on days 10-19.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo is administered orally twice per day (9:00 AM and 6:00 PM) for 3 weeks.

    Also known as: corn starch

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Attentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements

    Eye movements are analyzed using a MiraMetrix S2 Eyetracker. This outcome measure reports a ratio: \[(number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images) divided by (total number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images or neutral images)\]. Anti-saccade errors are when the subject fails to inhibit fixation onto the image.

    Time frame: week 1

  2. Attentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements

    Eye movements are analyzed using a MiraMetrix S2 Eyetracker. This outcome measure reports a ratio: \[(number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images) divided by (total number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images or neutral images)\]. Anti-saccade errors are when the subject fails to inhibit fixation onto the image.

    Time frame: week 2

  3. Attentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements

    Eye movements are analyzed using a MiraMetrix S2 Eyetracker. This outcome measure reports a ratio: \[(number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images) divided by (total number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images or neutral images)\]. Anti-saccade errors are when the subject fails to inhibit fixation onto the image.

    Time frame: week 3

  4. Stress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale

    The Perceived Stress Scale is a 10 item scale that was developed to measure the degree to which individuals appraise their life as stressful and has been widely used in health studies. The scale has a 5-point Likert response format. The total score is calculated by summing responses. The questions are general in nature and relatively content free with regard to specific population groups. The range of scores is 0-40, with 40 indicating the most stress.

    Time frame: week 1

  5. Stress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale

    The Perceived Stress Scale is a 10 item scale that was developed to measure the degree to which individuals appraise their life as stressful and has been widely used in health studies. The scale has a 5-point Likert response format. The total score is calculated by summing responses. The questions are general in nature and relatively content free with regard to specific population groups. The range of scores is 0-40, with 40 indicating the most stress.

    Time frame: week 2

  6. Stress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale

    The Perceived Stress Scale is a 10 item scale that was developed to measure the degree to which individuals appraise their life as stressful and has been widely used in health studies. The scale has a 5-point Likert response format. The total score is calculated by summing responses. The questions are general in nature and relatively content free with regard to specific population groups. The range of scores is 0-40, with 40 indicating the most stress.

    Time frame: week 3

  7. Anxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale

    The Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale is a widely-used 20 item scale that is scored on a Likert-type scale of 1-4, with 15 questions concerning increasing anxiety levels and five questions concerning decreasing anxiety levels. The scale focuses on the most common general anxiety symptoms and means of coping with stressors that produce anxiety. The range of scores is 20-80: * 20-44 Normal Range * 45-59 Mild to Moderate Anxiety Levels * 60-74 Marked to Severe Anxiety Levels * 75-80 Extreme Anxiety Levels

    Time frame: week 1

  8. Anxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale

    The Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale is a widely-used 20 item scale that is scored on a Likert-type scale of 1-4, with 15 questions concerning increasing anxiety levels and five questions concerning decreasing anxiety levels. The scale focuses on the most common general anxiety symptoms and means of coping with stressors that produce anxiety. The range of scores is 20-80: * 20-44 Normal Range * 45-59 Mild to Moderate Anxiety Levels * 60-74 Marked to Severe Anxiety Levels * 75-80 Extreme Anxiety Levels

    Time frame: week 2

  9. Anxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale

    The Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale is a widely-used 20 item scale that is scored on a Likert-type scale of 1-4, with 15 questions concerning increasing anxiety levels and five questions concerning decreasing anxiety levels. The scale focuses on the most common general anxiety symptoms and means of coping with stressors that produce anxiety. The range of scores is 20-80: * 20-44 Normal Range * 45-59 Mild to Moderate Anxiety Levels * 60-74 Marked to Severe Anxiety Levels * 75-80 Extreme Anxiety Levels

    Time frame: week 3

  10. Stress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)

    With the Visual Analogue Stress Scale - Current (VASS-C), current stress level is ranked on a 0 - 10 visual analog scale, with 0 as no stress and 10 as extreme stress, cued by the question "Please rate your current stress level."

    Time frame: week 1

  11. Stress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)

    With the Visual Analogue Stress Scale - Current (VASS-C), current stress level is ranked on a 0 - 10 visual analog scale, with 0 as no stress and 10 as extreme stress, cued by the question "Please rate your current stress level."

    Time frame: week 2

  12. Stress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)

    With the Visual Analogue Stress Scale - Current (VASS-C), current stress level is ranked on a 0 - 10 visual analog scale, with 0 as no stress and 10 as extreme stress, cued by the question "Please rate your current stress level."

    Time frame: week 3

07

Results

Posted Apr 7, 2017
Limitations and caveats
The study intends to evaluate reduction of attentional-bias in non-treatment seekers, and it is not designed or powered to address treatment effects on marijuana use.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBuspironePlacebo
Started1923
Completed1616
Not completed37

Outcome measures

PrimaryAttentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements

Eye movements are analyzed using a MiraMetrix S2 Eyetracker. This outcome measure reports a ratio: \[(number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images) divided by (total number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images or neutral images)\]. Anti-saccade errors are when the subject fails to inhibit fixation onto the image.

Time frame:
week 1
Reported as:
Mean · ratio of errors (see OM description)
Attentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements
ratio of errors (see OM description)BuspironePlacebo
Attentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements0.5795019 ± 0.16095110.5539831 ± 0.1442601
PrimaryAttentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements

Eye movements are analyzed using a MiraMetrix S2 Eyetracker. This outcome measure reports a ratio: \[(number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images) divided by (total number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images or neutral images)\]. Anti-saccade errors are when the subject fails to inhibit fixation onto the image.

Time frame:
week 2
Reported as:
Mean · ratio of errors (see OM description)
Attentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements
ratio of errors (see OM description)BuspironePlacebo
Attentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements0.5517691 ± 0.13199680.4979594 ± 0.1486691
PrimaryAttentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements

Eye movements are analyzed using a MiraMetrix S2 Eyetracker. This outcome measure reports a ratio: \[(number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images) divided by (total number of anti-saccade errors with marijuana-related images or neutral images)\]. Anti-saccade errors are when the subject fails to inhibit fixation onto the image.

Time frame:
week 3
Reported as:
Mean · ratio of errors (see OM description)
Attentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements
ratio of errors (see OM description)BuspironePlacebo
Attentional Bias to Marijuana Specific Stimuli Measured Via Analysis of Eye Movements0.5503957 ± 0.11334070.531073 ± 0.1991689
PrimaryStress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale

The Perceived Stress Scale is a 10 item scale that was developed to measure the degree to which individuals appraise their life as stressful and has been widely used in health studies. The scale has a 5-point Likert response format. The total score is calculated by summing responses. The questions are general in nature and relatively content free with regard to specific population groups. The range of scores is 0-40, with 40 indicating the most stress.

Time frame:
week 1
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Stress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
Stress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale15.05556 ± 5.88589818.57895 ± 6.551639
PrimaryStress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale

The Perceived Stress Scale is a 10 item scale that was developed to measure the degree to which individuals appraise their life as stressful and has been widely used in health studies. The scale has a 5-point Likert response format. The total score is calculated by summing responses. The questions are general in nature and relatively content free with regard to specific population groups. The range of scores is 0-40, with 40 indicating the most stress.

Time frame:
week 2
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Stress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
Stress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale13.88889 ± 6.43418216.42105 ± 5.708822
PrimaryStress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale

The Perceived Stress Scale is a 10 item scale that was developed to measure the degree to which individuals appraise their life as stressful and has been widely used in health studies. The scale has a 5-point Likert response format. The total score is calculated by summing responses. The questions are general in nature and relatively content free with regard to specific population groups. The range of scores is 0-40, with 40 indicating the most stress.

Time frame:
week 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Stress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
Stress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale10.38889 ± 6.43646714.05263 ± 7.799385
PrimaryAnxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale

The Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale is a widely-used 20 item scale that is scored on a Likert-type scale of 1-4, with 15 questions concerning increasing anxiety levels and five questions concerning decreasing anxiety levels. The scale focuses on the most common general anxiety symptoms and means of coping with stressors that produce anxiety. The range of scores is 20-80: * 20-44 Normal Range * 45-59 Mild to Moderate Anxiety Levels * 60-74 Marked to Severe Anxiety Levels * 75-80 Extreme Anxiety Levels

Time frame:
week 1
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Anxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
Anxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale32.44444 ± 2.95532.52632 ± 4.880442
PrimaryAnxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale

The Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale is a widely-used 20 item scale that is scored on a Likert-type scale of 1-4, with 15 questions concerning increasing anxiety levels and five questions concerning decreasing anxiety levels. The scale focuses on the most common general anxiety symptoms and means of coping with stressors that produce anxiety. The range of scores is 20-80: * 20-44 Normal Range * 45-59 Mild to Moderate Anxiety Levels * 60-74 Marked to Severe Anxiety Levels * 75-80 Extreme Anxiety Levels

Time frame:
week 2
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Anxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
Anxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale31.5 ± 3.71404331.57895 ± 3.79057
PrimaryAnxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale

The Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale is a widely-used 20 item scale that is scored on a Likert-type scale of 1-4, with 15 questions concerning increasing anxiety levels and five questions concerning decreasing anxiety levels. The scale focuses on the most common general anxiety symptoms and means of coping with stressors that produce anxiety. The range of scores is 20-80: * 20-44 Normal Range * 45-59 Mild to Moderate Anxiety Levels * 60-74 Marked to Severe Anxiety Levels * 75-80 Extreme Anxiety Levels

Time frame:
week 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Anxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
Anxiety as Assessed by the Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale33.27778 ± 4.88461631.63158 ± 4.125941
PrimaryStress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)

With the Visual Analogue Stress Scale - Current (VASS-C), current stress level is ranked on a 0 - 10 visual analog scale, with 0 as no stress and 10 as extreme stress, cued by the question "Please rate your current stress level."

Time frame:
week 1
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Stress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
Stress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)3.888889 ± 2.3736023.631579 ± 3.515213
PrimaryStress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)

With the Visual Analogue Stress Scale - Current (VASS-C), current stress level is ranked on a 0 - 10 visual analog scale, with 0 as no stress and 10 as extreme stress, cued by the question "Please rate your current stress level."

Time frame:
week 2
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Stress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
Stress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)3 ± 2.449492.789474 ± 2.636895
PrimaryStress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)

With the Visual Analogue Stress Scale - Current (VASS-C), current stress level is ranked on a 0 - 10 visual analog scale, with 0 as no stress and 10 as extreme stress, cued by the question "Please rate your current stress level."

Time frame:
week 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Stress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
Stress as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Stress Scale-Current (VASS-C)1.944444 ± 1.8620742.526316 ± 2.50263

Adverse events

Collected over 3 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Buspirone—0/19 (0%)1/19 (5.3%)
Placebo—0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBuspironePlacebo
light-headed, dizzinessNervous system disorders1/190/23

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)BuspironePlaceboTotal
Mean29.16 ± 7.1529.52 ± 6.8929.34 ± 7.02
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BuspironePlaceboTotal
Female81018
Male111324
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)BuspironePlaceboTotal
United States192342
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Texas Health Science Center - Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02132832
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Scott Lane (Professor, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2014
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Mar 2016
Completion
Mar 2016
Results posted
Apr 7, 2017
Last update
Jun 2, 2017

Study contacts

Scott D. Lane, PhD
principal investigator · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion