CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02118623Updated Oct 26, 2017

Internet-Based Interventions for Bipolar Disorder (MoodSwings 2)

An interventional study of Moderated discussion board and Psychoeducation in Bipolar Disorder, sponsored by University of Melbourne. Completed at 1 site in Australia. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-26.

Sponsored by University of Melbourne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
304
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine if there is a benefit of an online intervention for persons with bipolar diagnoses, and what components appear to be most useful.

Read the detailed description

This study will examine whether exposure to the three different components of the MoodSwings 2.0 intervention results in decreased depressive symptoms as measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and decreased manic symptoms as measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). The three components of the MoodSwings 2.0 intervention are:

  • Moderated peer discussion board
  • Psychoeducation learning modules
  • Interactive psychosocial tools

This study will also examine whether there is an association between graduated levels of involvement and resulting improvement. These graduated levels are:

  • Moderated peer discussion board only (Level 1)
  • Moderated peer discussion board and psychoeducation learning modules (Level 2)
  • Moderated peer discussion board, psychoeducation learning modules and interactive psychosocial tools (Level 3).

We expect that those participants assigned to the control condition (Level 1), will have fewer positive outcomes than those in Level 2 or Level 3 conditions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bipolar Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Bipolar
  • Online intervention
  • Internet intervention
  • Self help
03

In context

Bipolar Disorder

1,601 studies on the registry are indexed under Bipolar Disorder; 254 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 304 is above the median of 64 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Bipolar Disorder.

Browse Bipolar Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Melbourne is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Current diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) verified with the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic Manual for Mental Disorders (SCID) mood disorders module.
  • Age 21 to 65
  • Access to a computer with internet access. Access to a printer is preferable, but not required.
  • Able to speak and read English proficiently.
  • Some degree of medical supervision of bipolar disorder (sees a health professional at least twice a year to discuss symptoms and treatment needs).
  • Local access to emergency care.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current psychosis, as assessed in screening phone interview with the SCID psychotic screening module.
  • Acutely suicidal (defined as having a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] item 3 scores of ≥ 3)
  • Current mania, assessed using the SCID mood disorder module.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
304 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Level 1

    Moderated discussion board only

    Behavioral: Moderated discussion board

  • Active comparator
    Level 2

    Moderated discussion board plus psychoeducation

    Behavioral: Moderated discussion board · Behavioral: Psychoeducation

  • Active comparator
    Level 3

    Moderated discussion board plus psychoeducation plus interactive psychosocial tools.

    Behavioral: Moderated discussion board · Behavioral: Psychoeducation · Behavioral: Interactive Psychosocial Tools

Interventions

  • BehavioralModerated discussion board

    All groups will have access to asynchronous, moderated discussion boards. Assignment to discussion board will be stratified by randomization group (Level 1, 2 or 3). Level 1 access to the discussion board will serve as our "peer support" control condition, although we do expect some modest benefit from this intervention alone. The discussion boards will be moderated by research staff, who will be supervised by a trained clinician (masters levels or higher). Discussion boards will be asynchronous, with all posts screened by the moderator(s) before appearing to the group.

    Also known as: discussion board, online discussion, online posts, online discussion boards, forum, discussion forum, support group, discussion group

  • BehavioralPsychoeducation

    Online psychoeducation is only available to those randomized to Levels 2 and 3. The core modules of MoodSwings 2.0 will use videos and improved organization of content based on feedback from previous pilot work. Module topic areas include: 1. What is bipolar disorder? - Content about symptoms and diagnosis 2. Stress and triggers of illness 3. Medication and the biological basis of bipolar disorder 4. Depression - Symptoms, early detection and helpful strategies 5. Mania and hypomania - Symptoms, early detection and helpful strategies.

    Also known as: Online psychoeducation, Online education, Education

  • BehavioralInteractive Psychosocial Tools

    Online psychosocial tools are only available to those randomized to Level 3. They include structured mood monitoring, medication monitoring, and life charting visual tools. There are also interactive worksheets that encourage awareness of negative thoughts and strategies to challenge them, help participants weight the costs and benefits of different behaviours, problem solving and goal setting, and reinforcing self-affirmation. Participants have the opportunity to build a record of personal triggers of illness and illness profile - including early warning signs, and symptoms typically experienced during an episode of illness, as well as a personal "relapse prevention plan".

    Also known as: Interactive tools, Online tools, Online interactive tools

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    The MADRS is a 10-item scale, completed by the clinician to assess symptoms of depression. It is particularly sensitive to changes in depression over time. Joint reliability for the total score across several studies ranged from 0.76 to 0.95, and it is viewed as a reliable and valid measure of depression symptoms.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  2. Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

    The YMRS is an 11-item scale, completed by the clinician to assess symptoms of mania. This scale is viewed as a reliable and valid measure of manic symptoms, and is sensitive to changes in mania over time.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Intervention for Mood Episode (TIME)

    Relapse or time to invention will be assessed using the TIME scale, with intervention defined as initiation, discontinuation, or dose adjustment of a treatment, initiation of psychotherapy or ECT, visit to an emergency provider or hospitalization in response to new mood symptoms.

    Time frame: Change from 3 months to 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  2. SF-12

    The SF-12 is a short, multipurpose measure of perceived impairment due to health problems. It is widely used as a short version of the SF-36, and has good validity. The SF-12 yields two risk-adjusted summary scores, impairment perceived as due to physical illness, and impairment perceived due to emotional problems.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  3. Cornell Service Index (CSI)

    Use of general medical and psychiatric health services will be collected via the Cornell Service Index (CSI). The CSI is a brief assessment of health service use. It has good inter-rater and test-retest reliability and assesses four types of services: outpatient psychiatric or psychological services (e.g. psychotropic medication visits or psychotherapy), outpatient medical services (e.g. visits to medical providers), professional support services (e.g. home health nurse visits, meal delivery), and intensive services (e.g. emergency department visits or hospitalization).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  4. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q)

    The Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) assesses subjective quality of life (i.e. physical health, subjective feelings, leisure activities and social relationships). The 16-item short form is designed to measure satisfaction with various areas of daily functioning, such as social relationships, living/housing, physical health, medication, and global satisfaction.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  5. Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)

    When applicable, adherence to prescribed medication will be assessed with the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS). This 10-item scale has acceptable reliability, with Cronbach's alpha 0.75, and test re-test reliability 0.72. It is seen as a valid measure with significant correlations with other measures of medication adherence (p\<.01) and with serum blood levels at p\<.05.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  6. Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire 18 (PSQ-18)

    The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire 18 (PSQ-18) assesses the overall satisfaction of each participant with their current medical care. This 18-item scale is a short form version of the 50-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. The PSQ sub-scales show acceptable internal consistency reliability. Furthermore, corresponding PSQ-18 and PSQ-III subscales are substantially correlated with one another.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  7. Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-Modified

    For the purposes of this study, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-Modified was revised to suit bipolar disorder and the MoodSwings 2.0 program. This questionnaire was originally a modified version of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  8. Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS)

    Social support will be assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. This 18-item scale has acceptable reliability (alpha \>0.91) and construct validity, and was specifically developed for people with chronic conditions.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Inventory of Stigma Experiences

    This scale will be used to measure both the self-reported experiences of stigma and the impact of stigma.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  2. Motivation for Treatment Questionnaire - 8 item (MTQ-8)

    The Motivation for Treatment Questionnaire (MTQ-8) consists of eight questions to assess motivational reasons to seek treatment.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Melbourne - Barwon Health
    Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gliddon E, Cosgrove V, Berk L, Lauder S, Mohebbi M, Grimm D, Dodd S, Coulson C, Raju K, Suppes T, Berk M. A randomized controlled trial of MoodSwings 2.0: An internet-based self-management program for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2019 Feb;21(1):28-39. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12669. Epub 2018 Jun 21. PubMed 29931798 ↗
  • Gliddon E, Lauder S, Berk L, Cosgrove V, Grimm D, Dodd S, Suppes T, Berk M. Evaluating discussion board engagement in the MoodSwings online self-help program for bipolar disorder: protocol for an observational prospective cohort study. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 14;15:243. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0630-7. PubMed 26462799 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 26, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02118623
Lead sponsor
University of Melbourne
Collaborators
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Responsible party
Michael Berk (Honorary Adjunct Professor, University of Melbourne) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 21, 2014
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
May 2016
Last update
Oct 26, 2017

Study contacts

Michael Berk, FFPsych, PhD
principal investigator · Deakin University and University of Melbourne

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion