CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02115685Updated May 6, 2021

Sympathetic-Somatomotor Coupling in Human Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of Treadmill Training in Spinal Cord Injury, sponsored by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-06.

Sponsored by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Significance: The long term objective of this study is to improve physical therapy and fitness programs in people with spinal cord injury. The results of the study will demonstrate the importance of matching blood flow to a muscle with exercise of that same muscle.

Scientific Objective: The objective of the study is to measure how the body regulates bloodflow to a muscle during exercise. We intend to study these effects by triggering blood flow changes during movement, and measuring bloodflow changes during exercise in people with spinal cord injury. We will also look at the long term effects of different exercise programs on bloodflow during exercise.

Study Populations: This study will involve people with partial spinal cord injury and age and sex matched controls without injury.

Specific Aims: Aim 1 will be to measure bloodflow during exercise of the legs (below the injury). This aim will examine the control of bloodflow and muscle contractions and how it changes after spinal cord injury. Aim 2 will then look at changes in bloodflow during exercise after training. Three different eight week exercise training programs will be tested including 1) upper body ergometry, 2) treadmill training with exertion level matched to the upper body ergometry and 3) treadmill training with heart rate matched to an initial test of upper body ergometry.

Read the detailed description

The regulation of cardiovascular systems during muscle activity is poorly understood in people with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). In the past, disruptions in somatomotor and sympathetic control have been investigated separately in SCI. We propose to investigate the coupling of sympathetic and somatomotor control because it is relevant to exercise training paradigms that are designed to improve somatomotor function or enhance physical fitness. Our approach will be to measure tendon tap reflexes, voluntary muscle activation, and blood flow of the knee (below injury) and elbow (above injury) before and after sympathetic stimuli consisting of cold pressor tests, mental math and an acute bout of exercise. These data will provide information about sympathetic control of blood flow during muscle activity. Plasticity of the sympatheticsomatomotor coupling will also be investigated by making measurements before and after a treadmill training exercise program. These experiments will enable us to address three aims. Aim 1 will be to characterize coupling of sympathetic and somatomotor systems below the level of spinal injury. This aim will examine spinal sympathetic and motor reflexes and their interactions. It will also examine how descending somatomotor coupling is disrupted by the spinal injury. In Aim 2, we will identify changes in the interactions of sympathetic and somatomotor systems above a spinal injury. Because of the injury and the changes that occur below the injury, the sympathetic-somatomotor coupling is also likely to be disrupted in the arm. Aim 3 will then demonstrate plasticity of sympathetic-somatomotor coupling after exercise training. Three different eight week exercise training programs will be tested including 1) treadmill training with exertion level matched to 70-80% of HRR 2)treadmill training with 30-40% HRR. The exercise training will be tested in a randomized crossover study design with one month between exercise training paradigms. We anticipate that there will be plasticity of sympathetic-somatomotor coupling and that the exercise training effects will normalize control of these systems. However, because of the injury, we anticipate that adaptations will differ from non-injured controls.

This study has implications for exercise training in human SCI. The coupling of sympathetic and somatomotor systems is expected to depend on whether exercise targets the upper or lower body. The recovery of function requires both the improvement in the control of movement as well as in the regulation of blood flow to active muscle groups. In addition, this study is important for understanding the potential impact of treadmill exercise training on cardiovascular fitness, a topic of increasing interest in people with limitations to physical activity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

  • spinal cord injury
  • sympathetic nervous system
  • locomotor training
  • exercise
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is above the median of 24 across 1,566 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab is the lead sponsor of 177 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (40%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • incomplete SCI
  • subjects will be over age 18
  • to fit in the apparatus and to assure a mature gait pattern
  • at least 6 months post injury, and medically stable with an incomplete lesion between levels T1-T10
  • lower extremity motor score of 10 or greater
  • presence of intact stretch reflexes, detected clinically
  • no previous history or evidence of peripheral nerve damage in the lower extremities
  • Subjects must be able to step on a treadmill with no more than 40% body weight support.

Healthy controls will be age and sex matched to the subjects with spinal cord injury.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unhealed decubiti,
  • bladder or other infection
  • severe contracture or osteoporosis
  • heterotopic ossification
  • cardiac arrhythmia
  • inability to give informed consent
  • an episode of autonomic dysreflexia in the past year
  • use of spasticity or cardiovascular medications (e.g. baclofen)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    One day testing

    Aim 1 will be to measure bloodflow during exercise of the legs (below the injury). This aim will examine the control of bloodflow and muscle contractions and how it changes after spinal cord injury.

  • Experimental
    Effects of long term training

    Aim 3 will then look at changes in bloodflow during exercise after training. Three different eight week exercise training programs will be tested including 1) treadmill training at high intensity as defined by 70-80% of HRR or 15-17 RPE 2) treadmill training at low intensity as defined by 30-40% of HRR or \<13 RPE

    Other: Treadmill Training

Interventions

  • OtherTreadmill Training

    Subjects will be randomized to a high intensity and low intensity group. The high intensity group will train at 70-80% of their HRR and the low intensity group will train at 30-40% of their HRR.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Arterial blood flow

    Subject will be tested with doppler ultrasonography immediately pre and post sympathetic stressor. Testing sessions will take anywhere between 3-6 hours.

    Time frame: 6 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Graded Treadmill Exercise Test

    Graded treadmill exercise test will be tested at multiple intervals pre and post training paradigms.

    Time frame: 15 months

  2. Heart rate

    Heart rate will be tested continuously during sympathetic stressors and at multiple intervals pre and post training paradigms with a Finapres.

    Time frame: 15 months

  3. Knee torque

    Knee torque will be tested with the Biodex both pre and post sympathetic stressors.

    Time frame: 8 hours

  4. Tendon tap reflexes

    Tendon tap reflexes will be tested during one day testing pre and post sympathetic stressors.

    Time frame: 8 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lotter JK, Henderson CE, Plawecki A, Holthus ME, Lucas EH, Ardestani MM, Schmit BD, Hornby TG. Task-Specific Versus Impairment-Based Training on Locomotor Performance in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Crossover Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 Jul;34(7):627-639. doi: 10.1177/1545968320927384. Epub 2020 Jun 1. PubMed 32476619 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02115685
Lead sponsor
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Collaborators
Marquette University
Responsible party
Thomas G Hornby (PT, PhD, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 16, 2014
Start date
Apr 2014
Primary completion
Apr 2020
Completion
Apr 2020
Last update
May 6, 2021

Study contacts

Brian D Schmidt, MD
principal investigator · Marquette University
George Hornby, PT, PhD
principal investigator · University of Illinois at Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion