ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02115217Updated Jan 31, 2019

Effect of Kinesiotaping on Ankle Stability

An interventional study of Leukotape K and Sham kinesiotape in Sprain and Strain of Ankle, sponsored by Clinique Romande de Readaptation. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-31.

Sponsored by Clinique Romande de Readaptation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ankles sprains are the most popular injuries in basketball players. They are traumatic injuries, which happen most of the time in specific situations, like landing on another player's foot, or during changes of direction.

Neuromuscular exercises are very important to improve ankle stability and reduce risks of sprains. However various external support such as ankles braces and rigid tape, are also used in order to prevent injury.

The kinesiotape (KT) is a new but broadly used method in the world of athletes. Created by KenzoKase, in 1980, this kind of tape has a tremendous success with athletes and is today commonly used during practices and/or competitions. The main property of this tape is its elasticity, which is supposed to improve proprioception and, thus ankle stability, but these aspects have not been investigated yet.

Read the detailed description

Aim: Compare the effects of a kinesiotape (KT) with a sham treatment (KT put with no effects) and a control condition (absence of tape) in basketball players from the Swiss national league through balance tests on an unstable surface.

Hypotheses: A KT positioned on the lateral side of the leg improves ankle stability in basketball players while balancing on an unstable surface.

Method: 30 subjects will be recruited from different basketball teams affiliated to the Swiss national league. They will have to perform some postural stability tests on both unstable ("Delos") and stable surfaces ("Single Les Stance", "Star Excursion Balance Test", "Cross Over Hop Test for Distance") under three different conditions. The three condition will be as followed : with a KT positioned on the lateral side of the leg, with a sham tape or without tape. The three sessions will be spaced in time (7 days of wash out). The order of the three interventions (KT, Sham tape, no tape) will be randomized (cross over) to avoid the bias of learning processes. Neither the subjects nor the examiner will be aware of the "tape condition" (double blind); a physiotherapist will be in charge of positioning the tape according to the tested condition.

The sequence of the tests will be the same for all subjects and breaks are scheduled to avoid the effect of the fatigue. An anamnesis of all subjects will be done in order to evaluate history of injuries. At the end of each session, a visual analogical scale will be completed by the athlete to obtain a personal feeling of stability . The subject will be also asked to determine which condition was tested.

Expected results: the application of a KT on the lateral side of the leg improves postural stability on instable surfaces in elite basketball players.

Field's importance: the application of KT may reduce the risk of ankle sprains and the recurrence of sprains in a population of athletes at risk.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sprain and Strain of Ankle

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Kinestiotaping
  • Basketball players
  • Effect of kinesiotaping
  • on postural stability
03

In context

Sprains and Strains

246 studies on the registry are indexed under Sprains and Strains; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 162 interventional studies indexed under Sprains and Strains.

Browse Sprains and Strains studies →

Lead sponsor

Clinique Romande de Readaptation is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • active elite basketball players

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no history of ankle sprain in the last 6 weeks
  • no history of any other lower limbs lesion in the last 6 weeks
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Leukotape K, basketball training

    Use of Leukotape K to ensure stability of the ankle in basketball players

    Device: Leukotape K

  • Placebo comparator
    Sham, basketball training

    Use of sham tape

    Device: Sham kinesiotape

Interventions

  • DeviceLeukotape K

    All interventions will be performed by a qualified physiotherapist in a standardized manner. Tape will be extended to the recommended length (120%) and applied along the outer side of the leg, along the path of the peroneal muscle. Starting in the middle of the foot arch, the tape ends 1 cm below tibial head.

    Also known as: Leukotape K, Johnson & Johnson

  • DeviceSham kinesiotape

    KT put with no effects

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effect of kinesiotaping on postural stability

    To assess postural stability, the following parameters will be measured: Autonomy: This measure represents the time the subject can stay on the mobile board without the use of his hand to maintain equilibrium. Mean axis spacing: This measure will be performed using an accelerometer localized on the sternum of the subjects. This device will allow us to calculate displacement of the chest (degrees of inclination). Mean error of the board: This parameter represents numerically the inclination of the board during the test. It allows to estimate the stability of the subjects' ankle (unit=degrees). The larger this value is the lower the stability will be. An estimation of total equilibrium between each subject will be assessed using the two parameters listed here above (mean axis spacing + mean error of the board) following recommendation of the manufacturer.

    Time frame: For each subject outcome will be assessed in the 3 weeks following the beginning of the study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. EVA scale to evaluate the sensation of postural stability

    Time frame: Assessment will be performed within 3 weeks after the beginning of the study

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinique Romande de Réadaptation
    Sion, Valais 1951, Switzerland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02115217
Lead sponsor
Clinique Romande de Readaptation
Collaborators
University of Lausanne
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2014
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
Nov 2014
Completion
Jun 2015
Last update
Jan 31, 2019

Study contacts

Yan Eggel, MD
principal investigator · Clinique Romande de Readaptation
Lia Volpe, Student
principal investigator · Institut des Sciences du Sport de l'Université de Lausanne
Olivier Dériaz, Md, PhD
study director · Institut de Recherche en Readaptation
Jérôme Barral, PhD
study director · Institut des Sciences du Sport de l'Université de Lausanne
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion