CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02114255Updated Nov 10, 2015

Effects of BCG on Influenza Induced Immune Response

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Placebo and BCG in Influenza Virus Infection and Trained Immunity, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-10.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

In the present study, the investigators want to investigate whether prior BCG-vaccination improves the efficacy of influenza ("the flu") vaccination in young and/or old healthy volunteers and consequently could protect against influenza virus infection.

Read the detailed description

Influenza virus infection leads to millions of cases of severe illnesses worldwide and up to an estimated 500.000 deaths annually. The potential for the sudden emergence of pandemic influenza strains represents an incessant threat on even a larger scale. seasonal influenza vaccination is the backbone of influenza management. However, antibodies generated by vaccination, most often do not effectively neutralize emergent strains due to the high mutation rate of the influenza viral genome. In addition, although vaccination is effective in up to 85% of healthy adults, only 40-60% of the elderly are able to mount an protective antibody response due to an agerelated decline in immune function (so-called immunoscenescence). As a result, the protective effects of influenza vaccination are limited, and strategies to improve host immune defenses against influenza virus infection per se, and following influenza vaccination, are highly warranted.

It is suggested that prior vaccination with Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) could enhance resistance to other infectious diseases in addition to protection to tuberculosis (TBC) and, in mice, protection of prior BCGvaccination against influenza infection was demonstrated long ago. However, only recently substantial evidence for these nonspecific beneficial effects of BCG-vaccination in humans has been provided by several randomized clinical trials. Considering these potentiating effects of BCG-vaccination, it could be a viable strategy to improve efficacy of influenza vaccination, and/or enhance immune defenses against influenza virus infection per se. If so, this would have an enormous impact on clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Influenza Virus Infection
  • Trained Immunity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Influenza
  • Trained immunity
  • BCG
03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,214 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 238 across 1,853 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 959 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 and ≤35 yrs
  • Male
  • Healthy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of influenza vaccination within the year prior to study entry
  • History of BCG vaccination within 5 years prior to study entry
  • History of Mantoux testing within the year prior to study entry
  • Vaccination other than BCG or influenza, within 3 months prior to study or within study period
  • Medical history of any disease associated with immune deficiency
  • Clinically significant acute illness, including infections, within 4 weeks before vaccination
  • Participation in a drug trial or donation of blood 3 months prior to study entry
  • Use of recreational drugs within 21 days prior to experiment day
  • Recent hospital admission or surgery with general anaesthesia (\<3 months)
  • Known chronic kidney or liver disease
  • Latent or active tuberculosis infection
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BCG vaccination

    BCG vaccination

    Biological: BCG

  • Placebo comparator
    NaCl 0.9%

    administration of NaCl 0.9%.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • OtherPlacebo

    Administration of 0.9% NaCl.

  • BiologicalBCG

    Vaccination with the live attenuated BCG vaccine.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in influenza antibody titres between BCG-vaccinated subjects and subjects in the control group

    Time frame: Day 14, day 21, day 28, day 42 (±2 days)

  2. Difference in Thrombocyte function between BCG-vaccinated subjects and subjects in the control group

    Time frame: Day 0, day 14, day 21, day 28, day 42 (±2 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants in each group who achieved seroprotection (defined by antibody titre ≥1:40).

    Time frame: day 21, day 28, day 42 (±2 days)

  2. Proportion of participants in each group who achieved seroconversion (defined by a ≥4-fold rise in antibody titre).

    Time frame: day 21, day 28, day 42 (±2 days)

  3. IFN-gamma/IL-10 production of leukocytes ex vivo stimulated with inactivated/live influenza virus (0.1ug HA/ml).

    Time frame: Day 0, day 14, day 28, day 42 (±2 days)

  4. Production of Type 1 IFNs, IL-17 and IL-22 by leukocytes ex vivo stimulated with inactivated/live influenza virus (0.1ug HA/ml).

    Time frame: Day 0, day 14, day 28, day 42 (±2 days)

  5. Production of other inflammatory mediators (including TNFα, IL-1β, IFN-gamma, IL-10, IL-17, IL-22) by leukocytes ex vivo stimulated with different not-related stimuli (including m. tuberculosis, s. aureus, c. albicans, and inactivated influenza).

    Time frame: Day 0, day 21, day 28, day 42 (±2 days)

  6. Inflammatory transcriptional pathways (by use of qPCR/microarrays) .

    Time frame: Day 0, day 14, day 28, day 42 (±2 days)

  7. Granzyme B production of leukocytes ex vivo stimulated with inactivated/live influenza virus (0.1ug HA/ml).

    Time frame: Day 0, day 14, day 28, day 42 (±2 days)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
    Nijmegen, Gelderland 6525 GA, Netherlands
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 10, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02114255
Lead sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2014
Start date
May 2014
Primary completion
Sep 2014
Completion
Sep 2014
Last update
Nov 10, 2015

Study contacts

Mihai Netea, PhD
principal investigator · Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion