An interventional study of Dynamic Stabilization and Discectomy in Lumbar Disc Herniation, sponsored by Third Military Medical University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-04-10.
Sponsored by Third Military Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to compare safety and outcomes of the following treatments of lumbar disc herniation: (1) discectomy with posterior dynamic stabilization with those of (2) discectomy alone or (3) discectomy with internal fixation and fusion.
Discectomy with posterior dynamic stabilization is proposed as the most effective treatment to improve range of motion, and to be similarly effective to discectomy alone and discectomy with internal fixation and fusion for other functional outcomes after surgery.
The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of (1) discectomy with posterior dynamic stabilization with those of (2) discectomy alone or (3) discectomy with internal fixation and fusion.
Study aims are:
478 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement; 104 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 195 is above the median of 63 across 344 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement.
Browse Intervertebral Disc Displacement studies →Third Military Medical University is the lead sponsor of 81 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Clinical symptoms consistent with lumbar disc herniation determined by history or physical exam:
Exclusion Criteria:
Discectomy with posterior dynamic stabilization
Device: Dynamic Stabilization · Procedure: Discectomy
Discectomy
Procedure: Discectomy
Discectomy with internal fixation and fusion
Procedure: Discectomy · Device: Instrumentation and fusion
Range of motion in sagittal plane at the operated level
Time frame: 24 months
Mean Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time frame: Baseline, 24 months
Change in Lumbar Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: Baseline, 24 months
Change in Leg Pain NRS
Time frame: Baseline, 24 months
Change in SF-36 dimensions
Time frame: Baseline, 24 Months
Radiographic Evaluations
Time frame: 24 months
Time to occurrence and relationship to surgery of adverse events
Time frame: up to 24 months
This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Intervertebral Disc Displacement→
Third Military Medical University