CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02106078MoodSwings 2Updated Sep 10, 2015

Internet-Based Interventions for Bipolar Disorder

An interventional study of Moderated Discussion Board and Psychoeducation in Bipolar Disorder, sponsored by VA Palo Alto Health Care System. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-09-10.

Sponsored by VA Palo Alto Health Care System · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2015), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators hope to learn whether access to online support and education can help people with Bipolar Disorder (BD) better manage their symptoms of depression.

Read the detailed description

This study will examine if there is a benefit of an online intervention for persons with bipolar diagnoses, and what components appear to be useful. Specifically, the study will examine (1) whether exposure to the MoodSwings 2.0 intervention results in decreased depressive symptoms as measured by the Montgomery Asberg Rating Scale for Depression (MADRS) and (2) whether there is an association between graduated levels of involvement (Level I, 2, or 3) and resulting improvement? We expect that those participants assigned to the control condition (Level 1, peer discussion board only), will have fewer positive outcomes than those in Level 2 (discussion board and psychoeducation) or 3 (discussion board, psychoeducation, and interactive psychosocial tools) conditions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bipolar Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Bipolar
  • Online Intervention
  • Internet intervention
  • Self-Help
03

In context

Bipolar Disorder

1,601 studies on the registry are indexed under Bipolar Disorder; 254 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 64 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Bipolar Disorder.

Browse Bipolar Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Palo Alto Health Care System is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Current diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, or bipolar disorder NOS verified with the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (SCID) Mood disorder module.
  • Age 21-65.
  • Access to a computer with internet access. Access to a printer is preferable, but not required.
  • Able to speak and read English proficiently.
  • Some degree of medical supervision of bipolar disorder (sees a health professional at least twice a year to discuss symptoms and treatment needs) and local access to emergency care.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current psychosis, as assessed in screening phone interview with the SCID psychosis module.
  • Acutely suicidal (defined as having a HAM-D item 3, score of ≥3).
  • Current mania, assessed using mania module of the SCID mood disorders module.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Level 1

    Moderated discussion board only

    Behavioral: Moderated Discussion Board

  • Active comparator
    Level 2

    Moderated discussion board plus psychoeducation

    Behavioral: Moderated Discussion Board · Behavioral: Psychoeducation

  • Active comparator
    Level 3

    Moderated discussion board plus psychoeducation plus interactive psychosocial tools

    Behavioral: Moderated Discussion Board · Behavioral: Psychoeducation · Behavioral: Interactive Psychosocial Tools

Interventions

  • BehavioralModerated Discussion Board

    All groups will have access to asynchronous, moderated discussion boards. Assignment to discussion board will be stratified by randomization group (Level 1, 2 or 3). Level 1 access to the discussion board will serve as our "peer support" control condition, although we do expect some modest benefit from this intervention alone (Mead et al., 2010). The discussion boards will be moderated by trained clinicians (masters level or higher). Discussion boards will be asynchronous, with all posts screened by the moderator(s) before appearing to the group.

    Also known as: discussion board, online discussion, online posts, online discussion boards, forum, discussion forum, support group, discussion group

  • BehavioralPsychoeducation

    Online psychoeducation is only available to those randomized to Levels 2 and 3. The core modules of MoodSwings 2.0 will use videos and improved organization of content based on feedback from previous pilot work. Module topic areas include: 1. What is bipolar disorder? - Content about symptoms and diagnosis 2. Stress and triggers of illness 3. Medication and the biological basis of bipolar disorder 4. Depression - Symptoms, early detection and helpful strategies 5. Mania and hypomania - Symptoms, early detection and helpful strategies

    Also known as: Online psychoeducation, Online education, Education

  • BehavioralInteractive Psychosocial Tools

    Online psychosocial tools are only available to those randomized to Level 3. They include structured mood monitoring, medication monitoring, and life charting visual tools. There are also interactive worksheets that encourage awareness of negative thoughts and strategies to challenge them, help participants weight the costs and benefits of different behaviors, problem solving and goal setting, and reinforcing self-affirmation. Participants have the opportunity to build a record of personal triggers of illness and illness profile - including early warning signs, and symptoms typically experienced during an episode of illness, as well as a personal "relapse prevention plan."

    Also known as: Interactive tools, Online tools, Online interactive tools

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Montgomery Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS) for Depression

    The MADRS is a 10-item scale, completed by the clinician to assess symptoms of depression. It is particularly sensitive to changes in depression over time. Joint reliability for the total score across several studies ranged from 0.76 to 0.95, and it is viewed as a reliable and valid measure of depression symptoms.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  2. Young Mania Rating Scale

    The YMRS is an 11-item scale, completed by the clinician to assess symptoms of mania. This scale is viewed as a reliable and valid measure of manic symptoms, and is sensitive to changes in mania over time.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Intervention for Mood Episode( TIME)

    Relapse or time to intervention will be assessed using Time Scale , with intervention defined as initiation, discontinuation, or dose adjustment of a treatment, initiation of psychotherapy or ECT, visit to an emergency provider or hospitalization in response to new mood symptoms.

    Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  2. SF-12

    The SF-12 is a short, multipurpose measure of perceived impairment due to health problems. It is widely used as a short version of the SF-36, and has good validity. The SF-12 yields two risk-adjusted summary scores, impairment perceived as due to physical illness and impairment perceived as due to emotional problems (Ware et al., 1996)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  3. Cornell Service Index (CSI)

    Use of general medical and psychiatric health services will be collected via the Cornell Service Index (CSI; Sirey et al., 2005). The CSI is a brief assessment of health service use. It has good inter-rater and test-retest reliability and assesses four types of services: outpatient psychiatric or psychological services (e.g., psychotropic medication visits or psychotherapy), outpatient medical services (e.g., visits to medical providers), professional support services (e.g., home health nurse visits, meal delivery), and intensive services (e.g., emergency department visits or hospitalization).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  4. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q)

    The Quality of Life, Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) assesses subjective quality of life(i.e. physical health, subjective feelings, leisure activities and and social relationships). The 16 item short form is designated to measure satisfaction with various areas of daily functioning, such as social relationships, living/housing, physical heath, medication and global satisfaction.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  5. Medication Adherence rating Scale( MARS)

    When applicable, adherence to prescribed medication will be assessed with the Medication Adherence Rating Scale(MARS). This 10-item scale has acceptable reliability, with Cronbach's alpha.75, and test re-test reliability 0.72. It is seen as a valid measure with significant correlations with other measures of medication adherence(p\<.01) and with serum blood levels at p\< .05.

    Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3 months, 6months, 9 months and 12 months

  6. Patient satisfaction Questionnaire 18( PSQ-18)

    The Patient satisfaction Questionnaire 18 assesses the overall satisfaction of each participant with their current medical care. This 18-item scale is a short form version of the 50-item Patient satisfaction Questionnaire. The PSQ sub-scales show acceptable internal consistency reliability. Furthermore, corresponding PSQ 18 and PSQIII subscales are substantially correlated with one another.

    Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  7. Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire- Modified

    For the purposes of this study, the Treatment satisfaction Questionnaire- Modified was revised to suit the bipolar disorder and the MoodSwings 2.0 Program. This questionnaire was originally a modified version of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  8. Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey( MOS-SSS)

    Social support will be assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. This 18-item scale has acceptable reliability( alpha \> 0.91) and construct validity, and was specifically developed for people with chronic conditions.

    Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Inventory Of Stigma Experiences

    This scale will be used to measure both the self reported experiences of stigma and the impact of stigma

    Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  2. Motivation for Treatment Questionnaire - 8 item ( MTQ 8)

    The motivation for Treatment Questionnaire( MTQ-8) consists of eight questions to assess motivational reasons to seek treatment.

    Time frame: Changes from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months,9months and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Palo Alto Healthcare System
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gliddon E, Cosgrove V, Berk L, Lauder S, Mohebbi M, Grimm D, Dodd S, Coulson C, Raju K, Suppes T, Berk M. A randomized controlled trial of MoodSwings 2.0: An internet-based self-management program for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2019 Feb;21(1):28-39. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12669. Epub 2018 Jun 21. PubMed 29931798 ↗
  • Gliddon E, Lauder S, Berk L, Cosgrove V, Grimm D, Dodd S, Suppes T, Berk M. Evaluating discussion board engagement in the MoodSwings online self-help program for bipolar disorder: protocol for an observational prospective cohort study. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 14;15:243. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0630-7. PubMed 26462799 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02106078
Lead sponsor
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Collaborators
University of Melbourne
Responsible party
patricia suppes (Director, Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 7, 2014
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2015 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2015

Study contacts

Patricia Suppes, MD, PhD
principal investigator · VA Palo Alto Health Care System & Stanford University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion