CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02083016Updated Feb 27, 2017

Ultra-high Density Mapping With Multielectrode Catheter vs Conventional Point by Point Mapping for Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate Ablation

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ablation guided by conventional mapping. and Ablation guided by ultra-high density mapping with multielectrode catheter. in Ventricular Tachycardia, sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-27.

Sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ultra-high density mapping with multielectrode catheter may improve slow conduction channels identification in ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation procedures compared to conventional point by point mapping.

This study compares the ability of both mapping catheters to detect slow conduction channels in areas of myocardial scar and their utility to assess substrate modification after ablation.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized controlled study. Twenty patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and structurally abnormal ventricle(s) will be prospectively enrolled. In all patients a detailed pre and post-ablation electroanatomical mapping will be performed, and these maps will be merged with CT and/or MRI images. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups. In Group A patients both pre and post-ablation mapping will be performed firstly by conventional point by point mapping using a Navistar Thermocool catheter, and secondly by multielectrode contact mapping using a Pentaray catheter. In this group, target ablation sites will be guided by point by point map. In Group B patients, both pre and post-ablation mapping will be performed firstly by multielectrode contact mapping using a Pentaray catheter, and secondly by conventional point by point mapping using a Navistar Thermocool catheter. In this group target ablation sites will be guided by multielectrode contact mapping.

Slow conduction channels will be identified by color-coded voltage map adjustment of the lower and upper thresholds and also the presence of fractioned electrograms with the delayed component showing sequential orthodromic activation. The entrances of these channels will be the target of the ablation sites (scar dechanneling technique).

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventricular Tachycardia
03

In context

Tachycardia

623 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 64 across 379 interventional studies indexed under Tachycardia.

Browse Tachycardia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona is the lead sponsor of 319 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with indication for ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant woman.
  • Reduced expectancy of life (less than 12 months)
  • Patient participating in another clinical study that investigates a drug or device
  • Psychologically unstable patient or denies to give informed consent
  • Any cause that contraindicate ablation procedure or antiarrhythmic drug
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Conventional Mapping

    Both pre and post-ablation mapping will be performed firstly by conventional point by point mapping using a Navistar Thermocool catheter, and secondly by multielectrode contact mapping using a Pentaray catheter. In this group, ablation will be guided by conventional mapping.

    Device: Ablation guided by conventional mapping.

  • Other
    Multielectrode mapping.

    Both pre and post-ablation mapping will be performed firstly by multielectrode contact mapping using a Pentaray catheter, and secondly by conventional point by point mapping using a Navistar Thermocool catheter. In this group ablation will be guided by multielectrode contact mapping.

    Device: Ablation guided by ultra-high density mapping with multielectrode catheter.

Interventions

  • DeviceAblation guided by conventional mapping.

    Substrate mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

  • DeviceAblation guided by ultra-high density mapping with multielectrode catheter.

    Substrate mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mapping and ablation times

    Mapping and ablation times with each mapping system (point by point vs multielectrode mapping).

    Time frame: During procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Scar area correlation with MRI.

    To assess the correlation between the values of scar area obtained from both electroanatomical mapping systems and those resulting from the analysis of MRI.

    Time frame: Immediately after intervention.

  2. Radiofrequency delivery time.

    Time frame: During procedure.

  3. Reduction of residual electrograms with delayed component.

    Reduction of residual electrograms with delayed component after ablation.

    Time frame: Immediately after intervention.

  4. Ventricular tachycardia inducibility after ablation.

    Time frame: Immediately after intervention.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Clinic Universitari
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02083016
Lead sponsor
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Responsible party
Antonio Berruezo, MD, PhD (MD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 11, 2014
Start date
Apr 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Jan 2017
Last update
Feb 27, 2017

Study contacts

Juan Acosta, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Diego Penela, MD
principal investigator · Hosptial Clínic de Barcelona

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion