CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02082587Updated Feb 8, 2017

Toronto BNB Pilot Study

An observational study in Brain Metastases, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Completed at 3 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-08.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
39
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As treatments improve and patients live longer with cancer, even after it has spread to the brain, efforts to improve quality of life are growing. Neurocognitive function (thinking ability and memory) is an area of particular concern for patients with brain metastases (cancer that can spread to the brain). Although there are established tests to measure neurocognitive function, these require a face-to-face assessment and can take a long time to complete. As a result, efforts to use these tests to measure changes in neurocognitive function in patients following treatment for brain metastases have resulted in a large proportion of patients who do not return for follow-up. This has limited the ability to evaluate the impact of current treatments on neurocognitive function. This study aims to evaluate a shorter, telephone-based neurocognitive assessment tool, which would make it easier for patients to complete these tests in follow-up. If this new tool is found to reliably measure neurocognitive function, it could be used for future studies evaluating new interventions that prevent or treat neurocognitive deterioration following treatment of brain metastases. This is the first prospective study to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of a novel telephone-based brief neurocognitive assessment battery (Toronto BNB) compared with the same battery delivered face-to-face in this population. The investigators hypothesize that telephone administration of this brief neurocognitive battery will reliably evaluate neurocognitive function and improve patient ability to complete follow-up assessments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Metastases

Keywords

  • brain metastases
  • brain mets
  • WBRT
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

3,517 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 885 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 121 across 594 observational studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,411 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases planned for whole brain radiotherapy

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (> 18 years old) with newly diagnosed brain metastases planned for whole brain radiotherapy
  • Performance status ECOG 0-2
  • English-speaking (due to small sample-size in this pilot study, only English testing will be completed)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior whole brain radiotherapy
  • Presence of any condition which can prevent completion of neurocognitive assessment, including:
  • Hearing impairment which is sufficient to prevent the patient from comprehending English instructions in a quiet environment
  • Major psychiatric diagnosis or neurological condition associated with cognitive impairment which, in the judgement of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for study participation (e.g., schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, prior ischemic stroke, dementia, traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness for greater than 30 minutes, expressive/receptive aphasia, developmental delay)
  • Patients with planned systemic therapy or additional radiotherapy within the interval between clinic and telephone Toronto BNB testing
  • Minimal English skills such that subjects would be unable to follow simple English instructions (either verbal or written) or be unable to read questionnaires of a grade 8 standard with the help of a research assistant.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • QOL Assessment
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate feasibility of utilizing a telephone assessment in patients with brain metastases

    The telephone-based tool will be considered feasible if the proportion of participants who complete baseline and follow-up telephone-based assessments is the same as or greater than the proportion of participants who complete the in-clinic assessments.

    Time frame: 1.5 years

  2. Evaluate the interprocedure (telephone vs. clinic) reliability

    Cronbach's alpha coefficient at each time point (baseline, 1 month, 4 months) will be calculated to assess the following z scores: Patient results from individual neurocognitive tests will be converted to a z score (the number of standard deviations above or below the mean). Overall averaged global z scores will be compared between the telephone and clinic assessments using the Toronto BNB. Cronbach's alpha coefficient will be evaluated as follows: 0-0.2 poor agreement; 0.3-0.4 fair agreement; 0.5-0.6 moderate agreement; 0.7-0.8 strong agreement; \>0.8 very strong agreement.

    Time frame: 1.5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the change in neurocognitive function before and after WBRT using the Toronto BNB

    Paired t-tests will be used to assess whether any statistically significant change is observed between neurocognitive scores obtained at 1 month and 4 months after WBRT as compared to baseline (before WBRT)

    Time frame: 1.5 years

  2. Evaluate sensitivity to change (responsiveness) of the Toronto BNB (in clinic and by telephone)

    Paired t-tests will be used to assess whether any statistically significant change is observed between 1 month and 4 months using the BNB obtained in clinic and then using the BNB obtained over the phone.

    Time frame: 1.5 years

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Southlake Regional Health Centre
    Newmarket, Ontario L3Y2P9, Canada
  • Sunnybrook Hospital - Odette Cancer Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M4N3M5, Canada
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M5G2M9, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 8, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02082587
Lead sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 10, 2014
Start date
Sep 2014
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2017
Completion
Feb 2, 2017
Last update
Feb 8, 2017

Study contacts

Caroline Chung, MD
principal investigator · University Health Network, Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion