An interventional study of CASIA Cornea/Anterior Segment OCT SS-1000 in Evaluate the Agreement and Precision of Device SS-1000 and the Predicate Device the Pentacam in a Reproducibility and Repeatability Trial, sponsored by Tomey Corporation. Completed at 1 site in Japan. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-03-04.
Sponsored by Tomey Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This study is to support the substantial equivalence of the SS-1000 to the predicate device Pentacam.
Primary Objective -The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the precision of the SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye, including Corneal Curvature, Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth and Cornea Volume.
Secondary Objectives
Study design
-The trial design is a prospective precision trial with the following factors: The trial will be conducted at one investigational site. The site will have three SS-1000 devices and three Pentacam devices available. Three certified operators (#1, #2 and #3) will be randomly assigned to one set of devices (one SS-1000 and one Pentacam), such that operator effect are confounded with instrument effect. All participants will have one visit and undergo the same set of assessments. Each assessment will consist of 2 consecutive readings (M1, M2).
Nonsignificant Risk (NSR) Devices
The two devices SS-1000 and Pentacam are considered non-significant risk devices and the conduct of the trial will adhere to the abbreviated requirements of Investigational Device Exemption (21CFR812.2, 2011).
Overall Trial Design
The trial design is a prospective precision trial with the following factors:
The trial will be conducted at one investigational site. The site will have three SS-1000 devices and three Pentacam devices available. Three certified operators (#1, #2 and #3) will be randomly assigned to one set of devices (one SS-1000 and one Pentacam), such that operator effect are confounded with instrument effect. All participants will have one visit and undergo the same set of assessments. Each assessment will consist of 2 consecutive readings (M1, M2).
To ensure the highest physiological stability of the eyes all measurements will be done at least 3 hours after subject awake (Lattimore MR, 1999). To decrease the diurnal variation each subject will have, all measurements excluding screening measurements are performed within a 2 hour window. All measurements are performed in constant dim lighting conditions.
Subject will be advised to keep eyes closed between scans to prevent eye dryness. If subject experience eye dryness subject will be allowed extra time to recover between measurements.
Randomization
3.1 Trial eye
If subject has one eligible eye with pathology, that eye will be selected as the trial eye.
If subject has two eligible eyes, with or without pathology, the trial eye will be randomly selected by tossing a coin (Head=right eye, Tail=left eye).
The same eye will be used for all measurements.
3.2 Order of examination
Randomization schedule will be generated using a computer and will be used to determine the order of the devices (SS-1000 vs. Pentacam) and the order of the instruments/operators (instrument set #1, instrument set #2 or instrument set #3).
Masking
The corneal condition (thin, normal and thick) will not be available to the operators while obtaining data for determination of repeatability and reproducibility.
Discussion of Design
The trial design serves the purpose to evaluate the agreement and precision (total precision / repeatability / reproducibility) performance characteristics for SS-1000 and Pentacam. The precision results will be used for the evaluation of substantial equivalence between SS-1000 and Pentacam.
This trial is designed to use the same cohort of subjects to minimize between subject variability. Each subject undergoes examination by 3 operators with 3 instruments each and 2 replicates in each condition. This design will provide a head-to head comparison in total precision, agreement, repeatability and reproducibility.
The between-operators will be confounded but all assessments in the trial are objective and automatically assessed by both investigational devices. Hence, potential biases should be at a minimum in terms of interpretation of trial results. Potential biases may occur due to the fatigue of subjects and/or the operators. Thus, to minimize biases the order of the devices will be randomly assigned.
To avoid other confounding factors (e.g. visit) subjects will have all assessments done at one visit, each subject undergoes 12 measurements. The duration of the tests are estimated to last at least 1 hour which we considered as the upper limit for a subject before fatigue and eye irritation due to dryness. Once a subject starts to experience dryness in the eyes, subject will not be able to fixate and keep the eye open without blinking while the measurement takes place. To prevent eye dryness subject should have his eyes closed between measurements.
All devices are evaluated using the same set of subjects and allows for direct comparison of the investigational device and the predicate device.
A total of 66 eyes from 66 subjects meeting all of the following inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be recruited:
6.1 Inclusion Criteria
Subjects/eyes who meet each of the following criteria are eligible for the trial:
Subject Inclusion Criteria
Eye Inclusion Criteria
5.Eyes with one of the following cornea conditions (Francis BA, 2008):
Thick cornea, i.e. Fuchs' dystrophy, bullous keratopathy, corneal edema (CCT >580 µm with or without pathology)
6.2 Exclusion Criteria
Eyes who meet one or more of the following criteria are excluded from the trial:
When both eyes of a subject are eligible, one eye will be randomly selected.
To ensure recruitment of eyes with a range of corneal thicknesses, inclusion criterion no. 5 will be controlled:
Thick cornea (22 eyes).
6.3 Subject identification
All subjects enrolled must be identifiable throughout the trial. This will be done by using a 3-digit subject number starting at 001 allocated to the subject when enrollment is determine by the investigator.
6.4 Subject Withdrawal
The subject will be advised in the informed consent form that he/she has the right to withdraw from the trial at any time without reason. The subject may also be withdrawn from the trial at the investigator's or Tomey's discretion at any time. In case a subject drops out of the trial or is withdrawn from the trial, the withdrawal page in the case report form (CRF) should be completed. On the withdrawal page the investigator should record the date of the withdrawal, the person initiating the withdrawal and the primary reason for withdrawal.
Subjects withdrawn during trial will not be replaced.
7.1 Visit
The following procedures will be performed at the visit:
Imaging by 3 devices and 3 instruments/operators in a random order o Two readings with SS-1000 (1) by Operator #1 o Two readings with Pentacam (1) by Operator #1
o Two readings with SS-1000 (2) by Operator #2
Tomey Corporation is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Eyes with one of the following cornea conditions (Francis BA, 2008):
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The CASIA Cornea/Anterior Segment OCT SS-1000 was used on all subjects for this study.
Device: CASIA Cornea/Anterior Segment OCT SS-1000
The SS-1000 is a three-dimensional, non-contact, non-invasive high resolution optical coherence tomography imaging device based on the principal of "Swept Source" OCT. The system achieves high resolution imaging of 10 μm (Axial) and 30 μm (Transverse) and high speed scanning of 30,000 A-scans per second.
Also known as: OCULUS Pentacam Scheimpflug Camera
Precision
Corneal Curvature 1. AKf: axial power value of the flattest meridian \[Anterior\] (mm) 2. AKs: axial power value of the steepest meridian \[Anterior\] (mm) 3. PKf: axial power value of the flattest meridian \[Posterior\] (mm) 4. PKs: axial power value of the steepest meridian \[Posterior\] (mm) Corneal thickness 1. CCT: thickness value of central cornea (µm) 2. PCT2: thickness value of peripheral cornea at intersection between the 2-mm diameter circle and the nasal horizontal meridian (µm) 3. PCT4: thickness value of peripheral cornea at intersection between the 4-mm diameter circle and the nasal horizontal meridian (µm) 4. PCT6: thickness value of peripheral cornea at intersection between the 6-mm diameter circle and the nasal horizontal meridian (µm) ACD: Anterior Chamber Depth (mm) Cornea Volume (mm3)
Time frame: within 2 hours
Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement
1. To investigate the repeatability (intra-instrument) of SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye 2. To investigate the reproducibility (inter-instrument) of SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye 3. To investigate the agreement between SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye
Time frame: within 2 hours
The record gives a start of Sep 2013, a primary completion of Dec 2013 and a completion of Dec 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Tomey Corporation