ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02077790PASPUpdated Mar 4, 2014

To Investigate the Precision and Agreement of SS-1000 and Pentacam in a Repeatability and Reproducibility Trial

An interventional study of CASIA Cornea/Anterior Segment OCT SS-1000 in Evaluate the Agreement and Precision of Device SS-1000 and the Predicate Device the Pentacam in a Reproducibility and Repeatability Trial, sponsored by Tomey Corporation. Completed at 1 site in Japan. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-03-04.

Sponsored by Tomey Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is to support the substantial equivalence of the SS-1000 to the predicate device Pentacam.

Primary Objective -The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the precision of the SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye, including Corneal Curvature, Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth and Cornea Volume.

Secondary Objectives

  • To investigate the repeatability (intra-instrument) of SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye
  • To investigate the reproducibility (inter-instrument) of SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye
  • To investigate the agreement between SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye

Study design

-The trial design is a prospective precision trial with the following factors: The trial will be conducted at one investigational site. The site will have three SS-1000 devices and three Pentacam devices available. Three certified operators (#1, #2 and #3) will be randomly assigned to one set of devices (one SS-1000 and one Pentacam), such that operator effect are confounded with instrument effect. All participants will have one visit and undergo the same set of assessments. Each assessment will consist of 2 consecutive readings (M1, M2).

Read the detailed description
  1. Nonsignificant Risk (NSR) Devices

    The two devices SS-1000 and Pentacam are considered non-significant risk devices and the conduct of the trial will adhere to the abbreviated requirements of Investigational Device Exemption (21CFR812.2, 2011).

  2. Overall Trial Design

    The trial design is a prospective precision trial with the following factors:

    The trial will be conducted at one investigational site. The site will have three SS-1000 devices and three Pentacam devices available. Three certified operators (#1, #2 and #3) will be randomly assigned to one set of devices (one SS-1000 and one Pentacam), such that operator effect are confounded with instrument effect. All participants will have one visit and undergo the same set of assessments. Each assessment will consist of 2 consecutive readings (M1, M2).

    To ensure the highest physiological stability of the eyes all measurements will be done at least 3 hours after subject awake (Lattimore MR, 1999). To decrease the diurnal variation each subject will have, all measurements excluding screening measurements are performed within a 2 hour window. All measurements are performed in constant dim lighting conditions.

    Subject will be advised to keep eyes closed between scans to prevent eye dryness. If subject experience eye dryness subject will be allowed extra time to recover between measurements.

  3. Randomization

    3.1 Trial eye

    If subject has one eligible eye with pathology, that eye will be selected as the trial eye.

    If subject has two eligible eyes, with or without pathology, the trial eye will be randomly selected by tossing a coin (Head=right eye, Tail=left eye).

    The same eye will be used for all measurements.

    3.2 Order of examination

    Randomization schedule will be generated using a computer and will be used to determine the order of the devices (SS-1000 vs. Pentacam) and the order of the instruments/operators (instrument set #1, instrument set #2 or instrument set #3).

  4. Masking

    The corneal condition (thin, normal and thick) will not be available to the operators while obtaining data for determination of repeatability and reproducibility.

  5. Discussion of Design

    The trial design serves the purpose to evaluate the agreement and precision (total precision / repeatability / reproducibility) performance characteristics for SS-1000 and Pentacam. The precision results will be used for the evaluation of substantial equivalence between SS-1000 and Pentacam.

    This trial is designed to use the same cohort of subjects to minimize between subject variability. Each subject undergoes examination by 3 operators with 3 instruments each and 2 replicates in each condition. This design will provide a head-to head comparison in total precision, agreement, repeatability and reproducibility.

    The between-operators will be confounded but all assessments in the trial are objective and automatically assessed by both investigational devices. Hence, potential biases should be at a minimum in terms of interpretation of trial results. Potential biases may occur due to the fatigue of subjects and/or the operators. Thus, to minimize biases the order of the devices will be randomly assigned.

    To avoid other confounding factors (e.g. visit) subjects will have all assessments done at one visit, each subject undergoes 12 measurements. The duration of the tests are estimated to last at least 1 hour which we considered as the upper limit for a subject before fatigue and eye irritation due to dryness. Once a subject starts to experience dryness in the eyes, subject will not be able to fixate and keep the eye open without blinking while the measurement takes place. To prevent eye dryness subject should have his eyes closed between measurements.

    All devices are evaluated using the same set of subjects and allows for direct comparison of the investigational device and the predicate device.

  6. Trial Population

A total of 66 eyes from 66 subjects meeting all of the following inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be recruited:

6.1 Inclusion Criteria

Subjects/eyes who meet each of the following criteria are eligible for the trial:

  • Subject Inclusion Criteria

    1. Female or male age 22 years or older at time of screening
    2. Able to fixate at the internal fixation
    3. Able to open eyes sufficiently to enable a full image area
    4. Written informed consent obtained from subject before any investigational assessment
  • Eye Inclusion Criteria

    5.Eyes with one of the following cornea conditions (Francis BA, 2008):

    1. Normal cornea (CCT between 511-580 µm with or without pathology)
    2. Thin cornea, i.e. previous refractive surgery, corneal ectasia, keratoconus (CCT ≤510 µm with or without pathology)
    3. Thick cornea, i.e. Fuchs' dystrophy, bullous keratopathy, corneal edema (CCT >580 µm with or without pathology)

      6.2 Exclusion Criteria

      Eyes who meet one or more of the following criteria are excluded from the trial:

      1. Use of rigid contact lenses within one week from start of trial 2. Use of soft contact lenses within 24 hours of any trial measurement 3. Aphakic eyes 4. Eyes with a history of intraocular, corneal surgery, except refractive surgery 5. Currently on mydriatic and/or miotic medication that can affect ocular physiology 6. Seriously ill or unconscious subject, mentally ill person, mentally handicapped person, person who is unable to read or write

      When both eyes of a subject are eligible, one eye will be randomly selected.

      To ensure recruitment of eyes with a range of corneal thicknesses, inclusion criterion no. 5 will be controlled:

      1. Normal cornea (22 eyes)
      2. Thin cornea (22 eyes)
      3. Thick cornea (22 eyes).

        6.3 Subject identification

        All subjects enrolled must be identifiable throughout the trial. This will be done by using a 3-digit subject number starting at 001 allocated to the subject when enrollment is determine by the investigator.

        6.4 Subject Withdrawal

        The subject will be advised in the informed consent form that he/she has the right to withdraw from the trial at any time without reason. The subject may also be withdrawn from the trial at the investigator's or Tomey's discretion at any time. In case a subject drops out of the trial or is withdrawn from the trial, the withdrawal page in the case report form (CRF) should be completed. On the withdrawal page the investigator should record the date of the withdrawal, the person initiating the withdrawal and the primary reason for withdrawal.

        Subjects withdrawn during trial will not be replaced.

      1. Visit Schedule and Assessments

      7.1 Visit

      The following procedures will be performed at the visit:

      • Obtain written informed consent before any trial procedures are performed
      • Obtain demographic data (age, race, and sex).
      • Obtain corneal characteristics and pathology.
      • Screening with SS-1000 and Pentacam.
      • Recording of concomitant medication.
      • Assess compliance with inclusion and exclusion criteria.
      • Imaging by 3 devices and 3 instruments/operators in a random order o Two readings with SS-1000 (1) by Operator #1 o Two readings with Pentacam (1) by Operator #1

        o Two readings with SS-1000 (2) by Operator #2

        • Two readings with Pentacam (2) by Operator #2
        • Two readings with SS-1000 (3) by Operator #3
        • Two readings with Pentacam (3) by Operator #3
      • AE recording if any has occurred in relation to trial procedures.
02

Conditions studied

  • Evaluate the Agreement and Precision of Device SS-1000 and the Predicate Device the Pentacam in a Reproducibility and Repeatability Trial
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tomey Corporation is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female or male age 22 years or older at time of screening
  • Able to fixate at the internal fixation
  • Able to open eyes sufficiently to enable a full image area
  • Written obtained from subject before any assessment

Eyes with one of the following cornea conditions (Francis BA, 2008):

  1. Normal cornea (CCT between 511-580 µm with or without pathology)
  2. Thin cornea, i.e. previous refractive surgery, corneal ectasia, keratoconus (CCT ≤510 µm with or without pathology)
  3. Thick cornea, i.e. Fuchs' dystrophy, bullous keratopathy, corneal edema (CCT >580 µm with or without pathology)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of rigid contact lenses within one week from start of trial
  • Use of soft contact lenses within 24 hours of any trial measurement
  • Aphakic eyes
  • Eyes with a history of intraocular, corneal surgery, except refractive surgery
  • Currently on mydriatic and/or miotic medication that can affect ocular physiology
  • Seriously ill or unconscious subject, mentally ill person, mentally handicapped person, person who is unable to read or write
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Substantial Equivalence

    The CASIA Cornea/Anterior Segment OCT SS-1000 was used on all subjects for this study.

    Device: CASIA Cornea/Anterior Segment OCT SS-1000

Interventions

  • DeviceCASIA Cornea/Anterior Segment OCT SS-1000

    The SS-1000 is a three-dimensional, non-contact, non-invasive high resolution optical coherence tomography imaging device based on the principal of "Swept Source" OCT. The system achieves high resolution imaging of 10 μm (Axial) and 30 μm (Transverse) and high speed scanning of 30,000 A-scans per second.

    Also known as: OCULUS Pentacam Scheimpflug Camera

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Precision

    Corneal Curvature 1. AKf: axial power value of the flattest meridian \[Anterior\] (mm) 2. AKs: axial power value of the steepest meridian \[Anterior\] (mm) 3. PKf: axial power value of the flattest meridian \[Posterior\] (mm) 4. PKs: axial power value of the steepest meridian \[Posterior\] (mm) Corneal thickness 1. CCT: thickness value of central cornea (µm) 2. PCT2: thickness value of peripheral cornea at intersection between the 2-mm diameter circle and the nasal horizontal meridian (µm) 3. PCT4: thickness value of peripheral cornea at intersection between the 4-mm diameter circle and the nasal horizontal meridian (µm) 4. PCT6: thickness value of peripheral cornea at intersection between the 6-mm diameter circle and the nasal horizontal meridian (µm) ACD: Anterior Chamber Depth (mm) Cornea Volume (mm3)

    Time frame: within 2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement

    1. To investigate the repeatability (intra-instrument) of SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye 2. To investigate the reproducibility (inter-instrument) of SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye 3. To investigate the agreement between SS-1000 and Pentacam in measuring the anterior segment parameters in an eye

    Time frame: within 2 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ehime University Hospital
    Shizukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2013, a primary completion of Dec 2013 and a completion of Dec 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 21, 2014
First posted
Mar 4, 2014
Start
Sep 2013
Primary completionActual
Dec 2013
CompletionActual
Dec 2013
Last update
Mar 4, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02077790
Lead sponsor
Tomey Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 4, 2014
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Dec 2013
Last update
Mar 4, 2014

Study contacts

Atsushi Shiraishi, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · Ehime University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion