CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02077322SYNECHIAEUpdated Apr 20, 2018

Rates of Middle Meatal Synechia Formation Following Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

An interventional study of Silastic Spacer and Merocel Spacer in Sinusitis, sponsored by St. Paul's Hospital, Canada. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-20.

Sponsored by St. Paul's Hospital, Canada · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is the best method of surgically treating patients who suffer from sinus disease. Synechiae formation in the nose is the most common complication after sinus surgery. Synechiae describes the adhesion of two opposing mucosal surfaces in the nasal cavity that can cause scarring and obstruction of the nasal passage. Spacers are often inserted during surgery between nasal mucosal surfaces to prevent synechiae. The aim of this study is to see if a silastic spacer is more effective at reducing the formation of synechiae after sinus surgery than a merocel spacer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sinusitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Merocel Middle Meatus Spacers
  • Silastic Middle Meatus Spacers
  • Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
03

In context

Sinusitis

415 studies on the registry are indexed under Sinusitis; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 60 across 313 interventional studies indexed under Sinusitis.

Browse Sinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Paul's Hospital, Canada is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over the age of 19 years, currently receiving sinus-related care at the St Paul's Sinus Centre for chronic rhinosinusitis and who undergo primary bilateral complete endoscopic sinus surgery will be approached to participate in this clinical trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with sino-nasal tumors
  • Patients solely undergoing nasal septal reconstruction
  • Patients with previous history of endoscopic sinus surgery
  • Cystic fibrosis or syndromic patients
  • Patients with autoimmune diseases
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Silastic Spacer

    This study arm receives the experimental treatment, a Silastic spacer.

    Device: Silastic Spacer

  • Active comparator
    Merocel Spacer

    Merocel spacers are actively being used as the standard of care.

    Device: Merocel Spacer

Interventions

  • DeviceSilastic Spacer

    The Silastic spacer will be inserted into the middle meatal space after surgery. The spacer will be left in the middle meatus for a period of 6 to 14 days following surgery.

    Also known as: Experimental Arm

  • DeviceMerocel Spacer

    The Merocel spacer will be inserted into the middle meatal space after surgery. The spacer will be left in the middle meatus for a period of 6 to 14 days following surgery.

    Also known as: Control Arm

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of middle meatal synechiae after functional endoscopic sinus surgery in silastic versus merocel groups.

    The existence of postoperative synechiae will be considered as a categorical, dichotomous outcome variable (presence or absence). A senior Rhinologist will endoscopically assess each nasal cavity independently to determine if synechiae exists between the middle turbinate and lateral nasal wall. Count and absolute percentages will be reported. Incidence of postoperative synechiae will be compared between right and left nasal cavities receiving either silastic or glove finger spacers.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post op standard of care, an expected average of 90 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of postoperative synechiae in 6-day versus 14-day postoperative spacer removal groups.

    The existence of postoperative synechiae will be considered as a categorical, dichotomous outcome variable (presence or absence). A senior Rhinologist will endoscopically assess each nasal cavity independently to determine if synechiae exists between the middle turbinate and lateral nasal wall. Count and absolute percentages will be reported. Secondary comparisons of postoperative synechiae will be compared between subjects in the 6-day vs 14-day spacer removal groups.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post op standard of care, an expected average of 90 days.

Other outcomes

  1. Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22 (SNOT- 22) score.

    The SNOT-22 is a sinus-specific questionnaire that evaluates subjective symptoms for patients suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis. SNOT-22 is scored out of 110 (22 questions, up to 5-points each) has demonstrated internal consistency, reliability, discriminate and concurrent validity and responsiveness to change12. Responses will be summated and considered as a continuous, numerical variable. Mean, median, standard deviation and inter-quartile range will be reported. SNOT-22 change between baseline (preoperative score) and 90-days (postoperative score) will be compared between groups having middle meatal spacers removed at 14 days versus 6 days postoperatively.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post op standard of care, an expected average of 90 days.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Paul's Hospital Sinus Centre
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Miller RS, Steward DL, Tami TA, Sillars MJ, Seiden AM, Shete M, Paskowski C, Welge J. The clinical effects of hyaluronic acid ester nasal dressing (Merogel) on intranasal wound healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jun;128(6):862-9. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59980300460-1. PubMed 12825038 ↗
  • Catalano PJ, Roffman EJ. Evaluation of middle meatal stenting after minimally invasive sinus techniques (MIST). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jun;128(6):875-81. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59980300469-8. PubMed 12825040 ↗
  • Lee JM, Grewal A. Middle meatal spacers for the prevention of synechiae following endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012 Nov;2(6):477-86. doi: 10.1002/alr.21052. Epub 2012 May 30. PubMed 22648984 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02077322
Lead sponsor
St. Paul's Hospital, Canada
Responsible party
Amin Javer (Director, St. Paul's Sinus Centre, St. Paul's Hospital, Canada) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 4, 2014
Start date
Mar 2014
Primary completion
May 2017
Completion
May 2017
Last update
Apr 20, 2018

Study contacts

Amin R Javer, MD, FRCSC, FARS
principal investigator · St. Paul's Hospital, Canada

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion