ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02074787Updated Feb 28, 2014

Imaging of Adult Burn Injuries

An observational study in Thermography, Laser Doppler Blood Flow and Spectrophotometric Intracutaneous Analysis, sponsored by Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-02-28.

Sponsored by Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2014), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Burn injuries are a common presentation to A\&E in the UK (175,000 per year) of whom 13,000 require hospital admission. Treatment of a single burn can cost more than £63,000, and is ultimately dependent on the depth. Most burns are assessed by experienced clinicians within a few days of injury. Accurate evaluation of burn depth can be very difficult with the naked eye. Inaccuracy can lead to longer hospital stays, worse scarring and greater financial costs for the NHS. Where the burn depth (and the degree of damage to the underlying blood supply of the skin) is not clear by visual inspection, adjuncts may be used to aid clinical decision-making. Currently, the "gold standard" method of assessing skin blood flow in order to help burn specialists in their assessment of burn depth is Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI). However, LDI machines can be very large, slow to collect the images, and a single imaging unit costs roughly £50,000. Consequently their use is restricted to the assessment of small burns in compliant patients treated in specialist units. Thermal imaging (thermography) has evolved rapidly as a useful diagnostic tool in many medical disciplines. Previous studies have shown that there are significant changes in skin physiology (such as temperature and pigmentation) depending on the depth of the burn. Portable, high-resolution thermal cameras are now affordable, easy to use and can provide numerical results in under a second. Similarly, measurement of skin pigment levels can be achieved using portable devices such as the Spectrophotometric Intracutaneous analysis scope (SIAscope). The aim of this study is to determine if alternative measures such as thermography or SIAscope can be as useful in the assessment of adult burns as LDI currently is. If this study demonstrates this then these results will inform further studies that would investigate these alternative imaging methods as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the management of burns not only in adults but also in children presenting to non-specialised units such as A\&E.

Read the detailed description

Adult acute burn injuries are currently "read" by experienced clinicians at 2-3 days post injury in order to determine the necessary treatment and likely clinical outcome. Adjuncts to this process aim to inform the clinician of structural damage to the sub dermal vasculature. The current gold standard investigation is laser doppler imaging (LDI) of dermal blood flow. However, due to time and resource constraints, this technique is often only applied to dermal burns of indeterminate thickness. Thermography and the SIAscope potential offer quicker, quantitative analysis with equipment currently in routine medical use in other clinical disciplines.

To validate its use against the current gold standard (LDI)burns of variable thicknesses will need to be assessed and compared with clinical outcome. Consequently, in this study, patients with superficial burns that would not usually require LDI will be included for comparison. All patients will be reassured that thermography, the SIAscope and LDI are non-invasive, non-harmful, quick and will not affect their burn management in any way. Images will be labelled by an anonymised study number and stored in on secure hospital servers according to the Trust's information governance policy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thermography
  • Laser Doppler Blood Flow
  • Spectrophotometric Intracutaneous Analysis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with burns injuries attending the regional burns unit at Chelsea \& Westminster hospital between 48 and 72 hours post burn will be invited to take part in the study at the time of presentation to the unit.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • adults burn injury within 72 hours of presentation able to undergo all three imaging modalities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children patients not consenting
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Adult burn injuries

    Adult patients with burns injuries attending the regional burns unit at Chelsea \& Westminster hospital between 48 and 72 hours post burn will be invited to take part in the study at the time of presentation to the unit.

    Device: Thermography · Device: Laser Doppler · Device: Spectrophotometric Intracutaneous analysis

Interventions

  • DeviceThermography

    Standard thermographic images

    Also known as: FLIR E50mx

  • DeviceLaser Doppler

    standard laser doppler analysis

    Also known as: Moor systems laser doppler blood flow analysis

  • DeviceSpectrophotometric Intracutaneous analysis

    standard SIA scope imaging

    Also known as: SIA scope

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 95% healing

    The time to 95% epithelial healing of adult burn injuries as assessed by experienced burns clinicians

    Time frame: within 4 weeks of presentation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
    London, London SW10 9NS, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02074787
Lead sponsor
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
Royal College of Surgeons of England
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 28, 2014
Start date
Mar 2014
Primary completion
May 2014 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2014 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 28, 2014

Study contacts

Jonathan M Collier, MA MFDS FRCS(OMFS) PHD
Contact
jcollier@nhs.net
07957 332966
isobel Jones, MA FRCS(Plast)
Contact
isobel.jones@chelwest.nhs.uk

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion