ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02052960RESGEXUpdated Nov 2, 2021Results posted

CetuGEX™ in Comparison to Cetuximab for the Treatment of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of CetuGEX™ and Cetuximab in Carcinoma, Squamous Cell of Head and Neck, sponsored by Glycotope GmbH. Completed at 34 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-02.

Sponsored by Glycotope GmbH · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
240
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 116 studies in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck with a site in Germany — 34 open to participants now, 50 under way, 14 of them phase 3. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck · Germany.

Enrollment
44th of 104
240 · median 178
Started
2014
with 4 others
Phase 2
40 of 116
6 open now
Registered
20th of 116
by date

Among the 116 studies in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck with a site in Germany, this one is the 44th largest by enrollment of the 104 interventional ones, is one of 5 that started in 2014, is one of 40 in phase 2, and was the 20th registered.

By phase

116 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 2this study40 · 6 open
Phase 324 · 7 open
Phase 117 · 2 open
Phase 1/213 · 6 open
Observational12 · 9 open
No phase5 · 2 open
Phase 2/35 · 2 open

By the year they started

First in 1999; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2014.

Size and results

Median enrollment 178 across the 104 interventional studies, 331 across the 12 observational. Of the 61 that completed or were terminated, 25 (41%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 116 studies in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck with a site in Germany, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of CetuGEX™ for the treatment of patients with stage III/IV recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN as compared to cetuximab (both in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS).

Read the detailed description

Indication: First line systemic treatment for stage III/IV recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of CetuGEX™ for the treatment of patients with stage III/IV recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN as compared to cetuximab (both in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS).

Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate further efficacy criteria, safety and quality of life (QoL) of patients with stage III/IV recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN treated with CetuGEX™ as compared to cetuximab (both in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy).

To assess pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and profiles of CetuGEX™. To assess efficacy and safety based on genetic markers for immune response (Fc-gamma receptor [FcγR] allotypes) and biomarkers (exploratory only).

03

Conditions studied

  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell of Head and Neck

Keywords

  • tomuzotuximab
  • cetuximab
  • SCCHN
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with confirmed recurrent and/or SCCHN not eligible for local treatment.
  2. Patients with according to 1.1.
  3. Patients aged at least 18 years at screening.
  4. (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  5. Minimum of 3 months.
  6. Tissue samples available for specific and therapy-related biological assessments.
  7. If female and of , was non-lactating and had negative pregnancy test results at screening and prior to randomization.
  8. If female, was either not of childbearing potential (defined as for at least 1 year or surgically sterile [bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy]) or willing to use highly effective during study participation until 6 months after last administration of any study medication, particularly cisplatin or carboplatin, with a failure rate \<1% according to the Note for Guidance on non-clinical safety studies for the conduct of human clinical trials and marketing authorization for pharmaceuticals (CPMP/ICH/286/95) of the European Medicines Agency. Male patients who had partners of childbearing potential had to confirm adequate use of highly effective contraceptives during study participation until 6 months after last administration of any study medication, particularly cisplatin or carboplatin, as well.
  9. Willing and able to comply with the protocol.
  10. Willing and able to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior systemic chemotherapy, except if given as part of a multimodal treatment for locally advanced disease which was completed more than 6 months prior to randomization.
  2. Cetuximab or other epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting agent treatment, except if given as part of a multimodal treatment for locally advanced disease which was completed more than 6 months prior to randomization.
  3. Surgery (other than minor interventions like diagnostic or intravenous port implantation) or irradiation within 30 days before randomization.
  4. Concomitant antitumor therapy or concomitant immunotherapy, including yellow fever vaccination (as per cisplatinum Summary of Product Characteristics [SmPC]).
  5. Concomitant treatment unless specified within the protocol.
  6. Clinical evidence of or .
  7. Patients with nasopharyngeal tumors.
  8. Concomitant malignant disease, except for adequately treated tumors with high likelihood of being cured (e.g., basal cell cancer of the skin, cervical cancer or breast cancer in situ). Patients with previous but without evidence of disease for at least 5 years were allowed to enter the study.
  9. Patients with renal or hepatic impairment (serum creatinine and >1.5 fold above the ranges, \<60 mL/min, and transaminase >5-fold above the upper limit of normal ranges) and patients with hematology parameters outside the normal ranges ( \<9 g/dL, \<1500/mm3 and count \<105/mm3) at screening as well as patients with impaired auditory function or platinum-related neuropathy.
  10. Clinically active infections ≥Grade 2 using National Cancer Institute (NCI) (CTCAE) version 4 and/or requiring intravenous antibiotics.
  11. Known active or C.
  12. Known (HIV) infection.
  13. Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to screening.
  14. Symptomatic congestive heart failure ( Grade 3 or 4), unstable angina pectoris within 6 months prior to screening, significant cardiac arrhythmia, history of stroke, or within 1 year prior to screening.
  15. History of keratitis requiring medical interventions within the last 5 years or interstitial lung disease.
  16. Patients with any other disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, might have interfered with the conduct of the study.
  17. Patients with an unstable condition (e.g., psychiatric disorder, a recent history of drug or alcohol abuse, interfering with study compliance, within 6 months prior to screening) or otherwise thought to be unreliable or incapable of complying with the requirements of the protocol.
  18. Patients institutionalized by official means or court order.
  19. Receipt of any other IMP within the last 30 days before randomization or any previous CetuGEX™ administration.
  20. Prior allergic reaction to a monoclonal antibody, grade 3 infusion related reaction (IRR) or any grade 4 reaction to a monoclonal antibody.
  21. Known sensitivity to any component of the IMP and medication used in this study.
  22. Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (France only).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(27)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Leptomeningeal disease

Cancer that has spread to the leptomeninges, the thin layers covering the brain and spinal cord, and the fluid between them. It is not the same as brain metastases.

Criteria often treat it separately, and many studies leave it out even where treated brain metastases are allowed.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
240 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CetuGEX™ plus chemotherapy

    720 mg weekly administration

    Drug: CetuGEX™ · Drug: Chemotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Cetuximab plus chemotherapy

    250 mg/m2 weekly administration

    Drug: Cetuximab · Drug: Chemotherapy

Interventions

  • DrugCetuGEX™

    60 mg/day 0, 930 mg/day 1, followed by 720 mg i.v. weekly administration

    Also known as: Tomuzotuximab

  • 400 mg/sqm body surface area (BSA) on day 1, followed by 250 mg/sqm BSA i.v. weekly administration

    Also known as: Erbitux®

  • DrugChemotherapy

    Combination of Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (Carboplatin may substitute Cisplatin following the 1st cycle of therapy in case of toxicity)

    Also known as: Combination of Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    The primary efficacy endpoint was PFS as assessed by the investigator. Date of disease progression was defined as the date of imaging (based on computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) showing disease progression, as assessed by the investigator according to adapted immune-related RECIST 1.1 (modified irRC). Disease progression was defined as a 20% increase in tumor burden, taking as reference the smallest tumor burden recorded since the treatment started; confirmation by a second scan was not required. The PFS time was censored at the time of the last tumor assessment if the patient was alive and without progression at the last time of observation.

    Time frame: The PFS was defined as time from randomization until disease progression or death of any cause, up to 24 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Objective response rate is the percentage of patients with a tumor size reduction of a predefined amount for a minimum time period and it is defined as the sum of complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR). CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\< 10 mm short axis). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the tumor burden (sum of the longest lesion diameter (LD) of target lesions (including the short axes of any target lymph nodes plus measurable new lesions), taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: Time from randomization until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first, up to 24 month.

  2. Clinical Benefit Rate

    The clinical benefit rate is the percentage of patients with an objective response or stable disease (SD). SD is defined as not meeting criteria of complete response and partial response, in absence of meeting criteria for disease progression. Follow-up measurements must have met the SD criteria at least once after randomization at a minimum interval of 8 weeks.

    Time frame: Time from randomization until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first, up to 24 month.

  3. Time to Treatment Failure

    Time to treatment failure is defined as the time from randomization to treatment discontinuation for any reason, including disease progression, treatment toxicity, patient preference, or death.

    Time frame: Time to treatment failure, defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of treatment discontinuation for any reason, up to 24 month.

  4. Overall Survival

    The overall survival is defined as the duration of time from randomization to the time of death.

    Time frame: Time from randomization to the time of death, up to 24 month.

  5. Time of Global Health Status Deterioration

    Quality of Life (QoL) scores as assessed by European Oncology Research Trials Committee (EORTC) QoL questionnaires (QLQ) EORTC-QLQ-C30. Scores are on a scale of 0 to 100, where 100 represents the highest possible QoL.Time to first deterioration of at least 10 points.

    Time frame: From randomization up to end-of study visit, up to 24 month

07

Results

Posted Nov 2, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCetuGEX in Combination With ChemotherapyCetuximab in Combination With Chemotherapy
Started117123
Treated patients115122
Completed6377
Not completed5446
Withdrew: Adverse event1917
Withdrew: Protocol violation43
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject611
Withdrew: Other2515

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

The primary efficacy endpoint was PFS as assessed by the investigator. Date of disease progression was defined as the date of imaging (based on computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) showing disease progression, as assessed by the investigator according to adapted immune-related RECIST 1.1 (modified irRC). Disease progression was defined as a 20% increase in tumor burden, taking as reference the smallest tumor burden recorded since the treatment started; confirmation by a second scan was not required. The PFS time was censored at the time of the last tumor assessment if the patient was alive and without progression at the last time of observation.

Time frame:
The PFS was defined as time from randomization until disease progression or death of any cause, up to 24 month
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
weeksCetuGEXCetuximab
Progression-free Survival (PFS)27.7 (25.3 to 33.7)26.4 (24.9 to 31.3)
Statistical analysis
  • CetuGEX vs Cetuximab · Log Rank · p = 0.86 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.000 · 95% CI 0.736 to 1.359
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective response rate is the percentage of patients with a tumor size reduction of a predefined amount for a minimum time period and it is defined as the sum of complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR). CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\< 10 mm short axis). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the tumor burden (sum of the longest lesion diameter (LD) of target lesions (including the short axes of any target lymph nodes plus measurable new lesions), taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
Time from randomization until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first, up to 24 month.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ParticipantsCetuGEXCetuximab
Objective Response Rate (ORR)5257
Statistical analysis
  • CetuGEX vs Cetuximab · Chi-squared · p = 0.77 · Mean difference (net): -1.9 · 95% CI -14.5 to 10.7
SecondaryClinical Benefit Rate

The clinical benefit rate is the percentage of patients with an objective response or stable disease (SD). SD is defined as not meeting criteria of complete response and partial response, in absence of meeting criteria for disease progression. Follow-up measurements must have met the SD criteria at least once after randomization at a minimum interval of 8 weeks.

Time frame:
Time from randomization until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first, up to 24 month.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Benefit Rate
ParticipantsCetuGEXCetuximab
Clinical Benefit Rate8894
Statistical analysis
  • CetuGEX vs Cetuximab · Chi-squared · p = 0.83 · Mean difference (net): -1.21 · 95% CI -12.05 to 9.63
SecondaryTime to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure is defined as the time from randomization to treatment discontinuation for any reason, including disease progression, treatment toxicity, patient preference, or death.

Time frame:
Time to treatment failure, defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of treatment discontinuation for any reason, up to 24 month.
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to Treatment Failure
weeksCetuGEXCetuximab
Time to Treatment Failure22.1 (17.0 to 25.7)23.3 (16.1 to 25.6)
Statistical analysis
  • CetuGEX vs Cetuximab · Log Rank · p = 0.70 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.057 · 95% CI 0.814 to 1.372
SecondaryOverall Survival

The overall survival is defined as the duration of time from randomization to the time of death.

Time frame:
Time from randomization to the time of death, up to 24 month.
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Overall Survival
weeksCetuGEXCetuximab
Overall Survival49.7 (40.7 to 73.9)59.0 (52.9 to 70.3)
Statistical analysis
  • CetuGEX vs Cetuximab · Log Rank · p = 0.96 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.012 · 95% CI 0.734 to 1.396
SecondaryTime of Global Health Status Deterioration

Quality of Life (QoL) scores as assessed by European Oncology Research Trials Committee (EORTC) QoL questionnaires (QLQ) EORTC-QLQ-C30. Scores are on a scale of 0 to 100, where 100 represents the highest possible QoL.Time to first deterioration of at least 10 points.

Time frame:
From randomization up to end-of study visit, up to 24 month
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time of Global Health Status Deterioration
weeksCetuGEX in Combination With ChemotherapyCetuximab in Combination With Chemotherapy
Time of Global Health Status Deterioration43.4 (14.0 to 61.4)31.3 (11.7 to 63.0)

Adverse events

Collected over up to 24 month. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CetuGEX20/115 (17.4%)70/115 (60.9%)114/115 (99.1%)
Cetuximab14/122 (11.5%)78/122 (63.9%)121/122 (99.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent serious events
EventCetuGEXCetuximab
PneumoniaInfections and infestations12/1159/122
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders9/1159/122
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders8/1157/122
SepsisInfections and infestations3/1157/122
Device related infectionInfections and infestations5/1154/122
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/1155/122
HypomagnesaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/1155/122
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/1154/122
LeucopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1154/122
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/1154/122
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 58
Most frequent other events
EventCetuGEXCetuximab
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders58/11563/122
HypomagnesaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders53/11551/122
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders44/11556/122
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders47/11551/122
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders44/11547/122
Weight decreasedInvestigations42/11539/122
FatigueGeneral disorders41/11538/122
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders38/11541/122
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders35/11541/122
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders36/11530/122

Baseline characteristics

The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized patients. The ITT population was the primary population for the efficacy analysis. The safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication (N=237). This population was used for safety analyses (adverse events).

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)CetuGEX™ Plus ChemotherapyCetuximab Plus ChemotherapyTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years8889177
>=65 years293463
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CetuGEX™ Plus ChemotherapyCetuximab Plus ChemotherapyTotal
Mean59.8 ± 7.5459.8 ± 7.9159.8 ± 7.72
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CetuGEX™ Plus ChemotherapyCetuximab Plus ChemotherapyTotal
Female181735
Male99106205
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)CetuGEX™ Plus ChemotherapyCetuximab Plus ChemotherapyTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CetuGEX™ Plus ChemotherapyCetuximab Plus ChemotherapyTotal
Romania241943
Belgium5813
Poland292958
Italy178
France192544
Germany332962
Spain6612
08

Study locations

34 sites
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Brussels, 1000, Belgium
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Brussels, 1200, Belgium
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Gent, 9000, Belgium
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Avignon, 84918, France
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Lille, 59020, France
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Lyon, 69008, France
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Nice, 06189, France
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    St Herblain, 44805, France
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Aachen, 52074, Germany
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Berlin, 12203, Germany
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Essen, 45122, Germany
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facillity
    Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
  • Gycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Milan, 20142, Italy
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Bydgoszcz, 85-796, Poland
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Krakow, Poland
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Lodz, 93-513, Poland
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Lublin, 20-090, Poland
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Warsaw, 2781, Poland
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Brasov, 500091, Romania
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Clui-Napoca, 400015, Romania
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Craiova, 200385, Romania
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Oradea, 410469, Romania
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Ploiesti, 100011, Romania
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Timisoara, 300167, Romania
  • Glycotope-contracteed Research Facility
    Timisoara, 300239, Romania
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Madrid, 28050, Spain
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Madrid, 28911, Spain
  • Glycotope-contracted Research Facility
    Valencia, 46009, Spain
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2014 to primary completion in Aug 2017, 42 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2021, 4 years 2 months after primary completion.

Of 68 industry-sponsored phase 2 interventional studies under Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 60. This study's 42 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 366 studies reached it within 53 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 82.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 27, 2014
First posted
Feb 3, 2014
StartActual
Feb 2014
Primary completionActual
Aug 28, 2017
CompletionActual
Oct 4, 2017
Results first posted
Nov 2, 2021
Last update
Nov 2, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 2, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02052960
Lead sponsor
Glycotope GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2014
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
Aug 28, 2017
Completion
Oct 4, 2017
Results posted
Nov 2, 2021
Last update
Nov 2, 2021

Study contacts

Ulrich Keilholz, Prof
principal investigator · Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion