CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02052102Updated Jan 6, 2017

Study to See Whether Breath-Hold Techniques During RT Are Effective in Helping to Improve Sparing of the Heart

A Phase 2 interventional study of Radiation therapy in Breast Cancer and Adverse Effect of Radiation Therapy, sponsored by AHS Cancer Control Alberta. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-06.

Sponsored by AHS Cancer Control Alberta · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The study hopes to determine whether patients with left-sided breast cancer are at an increased risk of cardiac changes due to radiation to the breast +/- Anthracycline-based chemotherapy +/- Herceptin and whether a deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique during radiotherapy treatments would further reduce dosimetric dose to the heart as compared to the conventional free breathing (FB) technique thus reducing cardiac toxicity as measured by cardiac MRI using left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) as a metric. Bio fluid samples will also be collected to investigate specific biomarkers of breast cancer: BNP, PIIINP and CITP

Read the detailed description

Patients with left-sided breast cancer who receive adjuvant breast or chest wall radiation have increased risk of treatment related cardiovascular morbidity. The risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality is increased when a patient receives radiation following adjuvant chemotherapy and Herceptin. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters associated with increased cardiac toxicity include volume of heart irradiated, total radiation dose received by the left ventricle (LV), V25 and mean cardiac dose. Even though modern RT treatments like 3DCRT and IMRT can reduce the mean dose to the heart, the maximum dose to the left side of the heart/LV may not be reduced if the target is close to the heart. The hypothesis is that DIBH RT can safely and effectively reduce the heart dose, especially the dose to the LV, that could lead to reduction in the incidence of radiation induced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Radiotherapy has detrimental effects on cardiac function due to remodeling of the cardiac tissue that receive radiation. We believe that the radiation related acute effects on heart tissue can be detected with cardiac functional MRI. The study will quantify the acute RT related effects. To our knowledge, cardiac MRI has not been explored as a non invasive technique to quantify RT +/- chemotherapy related effects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Adverse Effect of Radiation Therapy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Deep inspiration breath hold
  • radiation therapy
  • Cardiac toxicity
  • Left-sided breast cancer
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,543 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 63 is below the median of 72 across 9,302 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

AHS Cancer Control Alberta is the lead sponsor of 182 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients with pathologically confirmed left sided breast cancer eligible for adjuvant breast/chest wall plus or minus regional nodal radiotherapy
  • Women patients with age group between 18 and 70 years old
  • Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70
  • Ability to hold breath for at least 20 sec (for DIBH cohorts only)
  • Life expectancy >10 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For patients with prior Anthracycline based chemotherapy or Herceptin, if there is \< 1.0 cm of heart on at least 3 slices ( 3 mm slices) on the FB scan, the patient will be considered a screen failure.
  • Previously irradiated or recurrent breast/chest wall tumours or previous malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer unless disease free for a minimum of 5 years prior to study entry
  • Patients that require a shell for breast immobilization
  • Patients requiring a boost
  • Stage IV disease
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
63 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    No prior therapy, DIBH irradiation

    Cohort 1 - No prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy or herceptin, deep inspiration breath hold breast radiation therapy

    Radiation: Radiation therapy

  • Active comparator
    No prior therapy, FB technique

    Cohort II - no prior Anthracycline based chemotherapy or Herceptin and (ii) to receive FB RT (not able to hold breath for at least 20 seconds or does not have a minimum of 1.0 cm of heart on at least 3 slices (3mm slices) on the FB scan)

    Radiation: Radiation therapy

  • Active comparator
    Prior therapy, DIBH irradiation

    Cohort III - Prior Anthracycline-based chemotherapy or Herceptin, and (ii) eligible to receive DIBH RT. (Patient has a minimum of 1.0 cm of heart on at least 3 slices (3mm slices) on the FB scan)

    Radiation: Radiation therapy

Interventions

  • RadiationRadiation therapy
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiation related acute and long term functional changes in patients treated with deep-inspiration breath hold compared to free-breathing technique

    Using MRI-based cardiac functional imaging to measure radiation-related acute and long term cardiac functional changes in patients treated with deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) compared to free breathing (FB) treatment

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Radiation dosimetric comparison

    Radiation dosimetry is the accurate calculation and measurement of radiation doses received by tissue resulting from the exposure to radiation. A radiation dosimetric comparison will be performed between the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique treatment plan and the free breathing (FB) technique treatment plan to explore sparing of cardiac sub-structures from radiation, if any

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Cross Cancer Institute
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z2, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02052102
Lead sponsor
AHS Cancer Control Alberta
Collaborators
Cross Cancer Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2014
Start date
Oct 2014
Primary completion
Feb 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 6, 2017

Study contacts

Kurian Joseph, MB, FFRRCSI, FRCR, FRCPC
Contact
kurian.joseph@albertahealthservices.ca
780-432-8755
Kurian Joseph, MB, FFRRCSI, FRCR, FRCPC
principal investigator · Cross Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion