CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02052089Updated Jan 31, 2014

Comparative Study for the Optimal Treatment Method of Lateral Epicondylosis

An interventional study of physiotherapy and extracorporeal shockwave therapy in Tennis Elbow, sponsored by CM Chungmu Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-01-31.

Sponsored by CM Chungmu Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
231
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to find the optimal treatment method for chronic lateral epicondylosis, and focused on the 'healing mechanism' and 'pain modulation' of degenerated tendon.The hypothesis is that there will be significant difference between treatment groups and control group (physiotherapy) and also there will be significant difference among treatment groups.

Read the detailed description

231 patients were randomized using a Random Sequence Generator (Random.org) into 4 groups: Group A (physiotherapy as a control, n=58), Group B (ESWT, n=62), Group C (Prolotherapy, n=56) and Group D (PRP, n=55). In group A, patients were educated to do stretching and eccentric strengthening exercise of wrist extensor muscles. In group B patients were treated with 3 sessions of high-energy shock wave therapy ESWT (Evotron, Switech medical, Kreuzlingen, CH) in 2 weeks interval. Total energy flux density ranged from 0.1 to 0.14 mJ/mm2 (1500 impulses). Shockwave was targeted over lateral epicondyle where maximum tenderness was located. In group C, injection of 20% dextrose (3cc mixed with 0.3cc of lidocaine) to ECRB tendon was done under ultrasound guidance and in group D, 3 cc of PRP (Harvest SmartPReP 2 APC 30 Process Kit, Harvest Technologies, Plymouth, MA) was injected into ECRB tendon under ultrasound guidance. 22G needle was used for injection in group C and D. The primary outcome measure is DASH scoring system which is recorded on the initial, 3rd, 6th, 18th and 24th month. Secondary outcome measures were ultrasonography (measured on initial, 6th and 24th month) and SSS (Subjective Satisfaction Score) measured on initial and 24th month. After 24 months from the last procedure, all serial questionnaires and physician-filled-SSS sheets were gathered and analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance and Scheffe post-test. A value of p\<0.01 was considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tennis Elbow

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tennis Elbow
  • lateral epicondylosis
  • lateral epicondylitis
  • Platelet-Rich Plasma
  • Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy
  • Prolotherapy
  • Physiotherapy
03

In context

Tennis Elbow

284 studies on the registry are indexed under Tennis Elbow; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 231 is above the median of 50 across 253 interventional studies indexed under Tennis Elbow.

Browse Tennis Elbow studies →

Lead sponsor

CM Chungmu Hospital is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 35 to 80 years of age
  • history of elbow pain in the region of the lateral epicondyle for more than 6 months
  • more than 3 months of treatment for lateral epicondylosis before enrollment in the study with no subjective improvement
  • pain on resisted extension of wrist
  • local tenderness to palpation at the lateral epicondyle
  • confirmed as lateral epicondylosis on ultrasound imaging

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of steroid or botulinum injection(s) within 6 months before study enrollment
  • other elbow pathology including nerve compression, previous elbow fracture, limited elbow range of motion, abnormal simple radiographic findings, history of elbow surgery and inflammatory arthropathies
  • upper extremity pain or discomforts from shoulder or wrist or hand
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
231 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Physiotherapy

    patients were educated to do stretching and eccentric strengthening exercise of wrist extensor muscles

    Procedure: physiotherapy

  • Experimental
    extracorporeal shockwave therapy

    patients were treated with 3 sessions of high-energy shock wave therapy ESWT (Evotron, Switech medical, Kreuzlingen, CH) in 2 weeks interval. Total energy flux density ranged from 0.1 to 0.14 mJ/mm2 (1500 impulses). Shockwave was targeted over lateral epicondyle where maximum tenderness was located.

    Procedure: extracorporeal shockwave therapy

  • Experimental
    Prolotherapy

    injection of 20% dextrose (3cc mixed with 0.3cc of lidocaine) to ECRB tendon was done under ultrasound guidance

    Procedure: prolotherapy

  • Experimental
    Platelet-rich plasma

    3 cc of PRP (Harvest SmartPReP 2 APC 30 Process Kit, Harvest Technologies, Plymouth, MA) was injected into ECRB tendon under ultrasound guidance

    Procedure: platelet-rich plasma

Interventions

  • Procedurephysiotherapy

    Physiotherapy is the treatment of a wide range of conditions and injuries to the body through the use of various forms of passive mobilisation, massage, electrotherapy and exercises.

    Also known as: Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation

  • Procedureextracorporeal shockwave therapy

    Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is noninvasive procedure, and has been shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic tendon pathology in the elbow, shoulder and plantar fascia. Shock wave therapy is traditionally categorized as either low energy (\<0.2 mJ/mm2) or high energy (\>0.2 mJ/mm2). Rompe, et al have hypothesized that there is an overstimulation of nerve fibers, resulting in an immediate analgesic effect (hyperstimulation analgesia). Physical effects on cell permeability and induction of diffusible radicals have also been postulated to cause disruption of the tendon tissue, resulting in induction of a healing process.

    Also known as: ESWT

  • Procedureprolotherapy

    Prolotherapy has been defined as the iatrogenic stimulation of wound healing and tissue repair through the injection of an irritant solution into damaged ligaments and tendons. Prolotherapy solutions are purported to initiate an inflammatory cascade at the site of injection, which induces fibroblast proliferation and subsequent collagen synthesis, resulting in a tighter and stronger ligament or tendon. The primary mechanism of action of prolotherapy is to induce a small inflammatory response to promote adequate healing or more viable scar tissue formation that results in stronger fibrous tissue at the lateral epicondyle, which leads to improved function and reduced pain.

  • Procedureplatelet-rich plasma

    Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is defined as an autologous concentration of human platelets in a small volume of plasma which is mechanically treated to increase the concentration of platelets compared to whole blood. The supraphysiological concentration of platelets will provide a locally increased concentration of growth factors and cytokines that are contained within the platelets themselves.Based on these concepts, it is believed that PRP can augment or stimulate healing with the same biologic healing process that normally occurs in the human body after injury.

    Also known as: PRP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. DASH scoring system to measure the changes in the upper extremity function

    The DASH is intended to measure how much difficulty a subject has when performing common functional tasks and activities. The DASH consists of a 30-item questionnaire with 5 response options for each item with a scale ranging from 0, which indicates "least disability," to 100, which indicates "most disability." It incorporates questions related to functional limitations, symptoms, and psychosocial problems. The DASH has been well validated and has a smaller standard error of measurement and a validity comparable to that of joint-specific measures. Based on our preliminary study, grand mean of DASH score was set to 26.05, and we decided that 8 points difference of DASH score will be the minimum detectable change.

    Time frame: upon initial examination, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. SSS (Subjective Satisfaction Score)

    SSS (Subjective Satisfaction Score) which is answered by following question. " How do you feel now compared to the condition before treatment in terms of satisfaction" 0 - It is worse. Not satisfied at all 1. - There are no change and still it is as uncomfortable as before. Not satisfied at all 2. - Slightly improved but less than 50% of the pain is subsided. Not so satisfied. 3. - About 50% of the pain or discomfort is gone. Slightly satisfied, but not so much 4. - About 75% of the pain or discomfort is gone. Definitely better. Satisfied. 5. - More than 75% of the pain or discomfort is gone. Much better and very satisfied.

    Time frame: upon initial examination and on the 24th month

  2. ultrasonography to asses changes in tendon pathology

    In our study, we measure the changes in the hypoechogenicity of the tendon and via color doppler to determine the amount of vascularity noted in the tendon.Ultrasonography (US) is an important tool in sports medicine and rheumatology, and a common outcome measure in clinical trials. In general, US is a noninvasive, widely available, and inexpensive imaging technique for assessing tendon pathology. The high acoustic contrast with the surrounding tissue makes tendons particularly suitable for ultrasonographic examination. US findings in tendinopathy in general are characterized by increased tendon size, Doppler activity, irregularity of the fibrillar appearance, focal hypoechoic areas, and calcifications.

    Time frame: upon initial examination, 6th month and 24th month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CM Chungmu Hospital
    Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu 150-034, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Karjalainen TV, Silagy M, O'Bryan E, Johnston RV, Cyril S, Buchbinder R. Autologous blood and platelet-rich plasma injection therapy for lateral elbow pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 30;9(9):CD010951. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010951.pub2. PubMed 34590307 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02052089
Lead sponsor
CM Chungmu Hospital
Responsible party
Sang-Hoon Lhee (Director of CM Chungmu Hospital, CM Chungmu Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 31, 2014
Start date
Mar 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2012
Completion
Sep 2012
Last update
Jan 31, 2014

Study contacts

Sang-Hoon Lhee, MD PhD
principal investigator · CM Chungmu Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion