CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01996904Updated Mar 12, 2014Results posted

Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of Outcome of Subscapularis Tear

An interventional study of arthroscopic repair and arthroscopic debridement in Rotator Cuff Syndrome, sponsored by CM Chungmu Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 44 Years to 83 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-03-12.

Sponsored by CM Chungmu Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
191
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
44 Years to 83 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to report actual percentage of subscapularis tear in concomitant with supraspinatus tendon tear (with or without infraspinatus tear) and investigate the amount of contribution of subscapularis repair as to the outcome of whole rotator cuff repair in terms of its clinical and radiologic aspects.

Read the detailed description

Prospective randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate subscapularis repair in anterosuperior rotator cuff tear compared with debridement of the subscapularis tear. After identification of the subscapularis tear arthroscopically, final eligibility of participants for the study was established on the basis of intra-operative arthroscopic inspection of the subscapularis using 70 degrees arthroscope. Once eligibility was confirmed, patients were randomized to one of two arthroscopic methods; repair (group A) or debridement (group B) of the subscapularis tear. The treatment allocations were decided through an interphone by "Research Coordinator". Block randomization was performed and no stratification was performed. Random Sequence Generator (Random.org) was used for the randomization process by given number whose digit was residue of modulo 2 (0 - group A, 1 - group B). Sequence Boundaries was 1 (smallest value) to 300 (largest value) based on the number calculated from power analysis. After randomization, patients underwent arthroscopic repair or debridement of the subscapularis tear. Size of the rotator cuff tear was also determined by the arthroscopic finding (small-to-medium, medium-to-large, large-to-massive). When full-thickness tear was confined to supraspinatus, the tear was called small-to-medium size tear. Medium-to-Large size tear was defined as complete full-thickness supraspinatus tear combined with incomplete full-thickness infraspinatus tear. Large-to-massive tear consisted of complete full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus or complete full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and subscapularis or complete 3-tendon tears. Postoperatively, rehabilitation was identical for both groups and consisted of sling immobilization for six weeks. Pulley exercises were performed during this time period. After six weeks from the surgery, active-assisted exercise including stick exercise to achieve full range of motion was performed. After 9 weeks from the surgery, Theraband exercise was initiated to strengthen repaired rotator cuff muscles. All patients underwent ultrasound at 24 months follow-up to evaluate integrity of supraspinatus tendon. The evaluation of integrity of supraspinatus tendon was performed and compared between two groups to evaluate the contribution of the subscapularis tendon to rotator cuff integrity. Re-tear of the supraspinatus was carefully evaluated through ultrasound by musculoskeletal radiologists who were experienced in ultrasound-diagnosis of shoulder more than 10 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Syndrome

Keywords

  • subscapularis tear
  • arthroscopic tendon repair
  • arthroscopic tendon debridement
  • ASES
03

In context

Lead sponsor

CM Chungmu Hospital is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
44 Years to 83 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Full-thickness supraspinatus tear confirmed by preoperative MRI
  • Willingness to be enrolled into the study and understanding the whole design of the study
  • Patients who is undergoing arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff repair

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • An irreparable massive rotator cuff tear which shows Stage-3 or 4 fatty infiltration inside the muscle of supraspinatus and subscapularis by MRI
  • Cuff tear arthropathy
  • Osteoarthritis with joint space narrowing or any joint spur identified in simple radiographs
  • A Workers' compensation claim
  • Major trauma or rotator cuff tear after shoulder dislocation
  • Previous surgery or fracture on ipsilateral extremity
  • Intact subscapularis tendon identified during arthroscopic surgery with 70 degrees arthroscope
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
191 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    arthroscopic repair

    Lateral-anterosuperior portal ("Miracle Portal") was used to repair subscapularis tendon. Bursa anterior to the subscapularis tendon was usually removed for the accurate positioning of the suture-hook. Subscapularis tendon was released, pulled and sutured with suture-hook. One or two suture anchors of Modified Mason-Allen technique was used to secure the tendon.

    Procedure: arthroscopic repair

  • Active comparator
    arthroscopic debridement

    Open and arthroscopic cuff debridement procedures have been described in the literatures for management of massive rotator cuff tears; these generally result in decreased pain and overall improvement in patient's function.

    Procedure: arthroscopic debridement

Interventions

  • Procedurearthroscopic repair

    If the subscapularis tendon was not sufficiently mobile, further anterior interval release between subscapularis and scapula was performed. LHB (long head of biceps tendon) was either treated with a biceps tenodesis or by tenotomy when there was tear or subluxation of it. The footprint area of the subscapularis tendon, which is trapezoidal in shape on the proximal part of the lesser tuberosity, was thoroughly cleaned of soft tissue and meticulous bone preparation was done prior to placement of anchor sutures.

  • Procedurearthroscopic debridement

    Anterosuperior portal was made initially for debridement (capsulectomy and anterior bursectomy). A systematic release of the glenohumeral ligaments and the overlying subscapularis bursa was performed.The superior aspect of the tendon was freed from the surrounding structures (the coracohumeral and superior glenohumeral ligaments). The middle glenohumeral ligament was always released to identify the upper border of the subscapularis tendon.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ASES Score

    The ASES is a 100-point scale which is divided in two sections. Fifty points of which are derived from patient self-report of pain and the other 50 points of which are computed from a formula using the cumulative score of 10 activities of daily living .The item related to pain is evaluated by a VAS (10 cm) that ranges from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (pain as bad as it can be). The ten activities of daily living include skills such as putting on a coat, sleeping on the affected side, wash back/do up bra in back, manage toileting, combing one's hair, reach a high shelf, lift 10lbs above shoulder,throw a ball overhand,do usual work and do usual sport.The items related to function are evaluated by a four-point Likert scale. The scores of the pain and function subsections are transformed in percentages and each one represents 50% of the final score, which can range from 0 (absence of function) to 100 (normal function).

    Time frame: 24th month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ultrasound Diagnosis

    US is a diagnostic imaging technique used to visualise deep structures of the body by recording the echoes of pulsed ultrasonic waves directed into the tissues and reflected by tissue planes to the transducer. These echoes are converted into 'pictures' of the tissues under examination. It consists of a non-invasive examination that has practically no adverse effects and allows dynamic visualisation of the tendons during movement of the shoulder.

    Time frame: every three months after the surgery until the 24th month

07

Results

Posted Mar 12, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Limitation of this study was the low retention of patients during follow-up period. Our cases only yielded 75% retention of patients after twenty-four-months follow-up and this might act as a bias in our study.

Participant flow

* March 2009 to October 2010 * Out-patient department * Consecutive patients diagnosed with full thickness supraspinatus tear preoperative thru MRI * Underwent arthroscopic repair or debridement for rotator cuff tear

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArthroscopic RepairArthroscopic Debridement
Started139117
Completed10190
Not completed3827
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3827

Outcome measures

PrimaryASES Score

The ASES is a 100-point scale which is divided in two sections. Fifty points of which are derived from patient self-report of pain and the other 50 points of which are computed from a formula using the cumulative score of 10 activities of daily living .The item related to pain is evaluated by a VAS (10 cm) that ranges from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (pain as bad as it can be). The ten activities of daily living include skills such as putting on a coat, sleeping on the affected side, wash back/do up bra in back, manage toileting, combing one's hair, reach a high shelf, lift 10lbs above shoulder,throw a ball overhand,do usual work and do usual sport.The items related to function are evaluated by a four-point Likert scale. The scores of the pain and function subsections are transformed in percentages and each one represents 50% of the final score, which can range from 0 (absence of function) to 100 (normal function).

Time frame:
24th month
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
ASES Score
units on a scaleArthroscopic RepairArthroscopic Debridement
ASES Score93.3 ± 4.589.0 ± 7.3
SecondaryUltrasound Diagnosis

US is a diagnostic imaging technique used to visualise deep structures of the body by recording the echoes of pulsed ultrasonic waves directed into the tissues and reflected by tissue planes to the transducer. These echoes are converted into 'pictures' of the tissues under examination. It consists of a non-invasive examination that has practically no adverse effects and allows dynamic visualisation of the tendons during movement of the shoulder.

Time frame:
every three months after the surgery until the 24th month

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arthroscopic Repair—0/101 (0%)0/101 (0%)
Arthroscopic Debridement—0/90 (0%)0/90 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

One goal of the power analysis study design that was conducted was to test the null hypothesis, that the ASES score of two groups would be equal after undergoing treatment. The primary outcome measure was the ASES score and the secondary outcome measure includes ultrasound diagnosis until 24 months follow-up to evaluate subscapularis integrity.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arthroscopic RepairArthroscopic DebridementTotal
Mean61.0 ± 5.361.6 ± 4.661.3 ± 4.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arthroscopic RepairArthroscopic DebridementTotal
Female6658124
Male353267
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arthroscopic RepairArthroscopic DebridementTotal
Korea, Republic of10190191
08

Study locations

1 site
  • CM Chungmu Hospital
    Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu 150-034, Korea, Republic of
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01996904
Lead sponsor
CM Chungmu Hospital
Responsible party
Sang-Hoon Lhee (Director of CM Chungmu Hospital, CM Chungmu Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 27, 2013
Start date
Mar 2009
Primary completion
Oct 2010
Completion
Oct 2010
Results posted
Mar 12, 2014
Last update
Mar 12, 2014

Study contacts

Sang-Hoon Lhee, MD, PhD
principal investigator · CM Chungmu Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion