CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02027558Updated Jun 3, 2019Results posted

Novel Treatment of Comorbid Insomnia and Sleep Apnea in Older Veterans

An interventional study of Insomnia treatment & PAP adherence and General sleep education in Insomnia and Apnea, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-03.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a novel intervention combining cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia plus a positive airway pressure (PAP) behavioral adherence program provided by allied health personnel for older Veterans with obstructive sleep apnea and comorbid insomnia improves nighttime sleep and PAP adherence.

Read the detailed description

Sleep disturbance is common in older adults and is associated with increased healthcare utilization, more depressive symptoms, and other adverse effects on health-related quality of life. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a disorder characterized by repetitive episodes of complete or partial upper airway obstruction occurring during sleep. OSA increases in prevalence with age, and is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, decreased quality of life, and increased mortality. Insomnia also increases in prevalence with age, and is associated with numerous adverse outcomes, including cognitive decline, decreased quality of life, increased healthcare costs and increased mortality. The diagnostic criteria for insomnia include a decreased ability to fall asleep or stay asleep, frequent nighttime awakening or poor quality sleep that is associated with daytime impairment such as fatigue, impaired attention, or daytime sleepiness. Increasing evidence suggests that insomnia often coexists with OSA, particularly in older adults, and predicts worse outcomes of OSA. Both OSA and insomnia have a higher prevalence among Veterans, compared to the general population.

Little is known of the best approaches to manage the large number of patients with coexisting OSA and comorbid insomnia. Guidelines for best practice typically address these conditions separately, where positive airway pressure (PAP) is the standard for the treatment of OSA, and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is considered first-line treatment for chronic insomnia. CBT-I is particularly recommended for insomnia in older adults, where adverse effects of sleeping medications are most problematic. Early adherence to PAP therapy (i.e., within the first week of PAP therapy) is one of the strongest predictors of long-term PAP adherence. However, adherence rates to PAP therapy in patients with OSA are low. In addition, CBT-I has not been widely implemented for treatment of insomnia (in part due to limited access to mental health specialists able to provide CBT-I), untreated OSA limits response to treatment of insomnia, and untreated insomnia negatively impacts PAP adherence.

Based on this evidence and findings from the investigators' prior work, the investigators believe that an integrated, behavioral treatment approach which addresses both OSA and insomnia early in the course of PAP therapy is needed to maximize patient adherence and treatment success when these conditions coexist. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to test a novel, behavioral approach integrating best practices for management of both conditions among older Veterans with OSA who are prescribed PAP therapy and have comorbid insomnia. The purpose of this project is to determine whether this intervention improves nighttime sleep and PAP adherence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Insomnia
  • Apnea

Keywords

  • cognitive behavioral therapy
  • insomnia
  • apnea
03

In context

Apnea

1,423 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 160 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 125 is above the median of 51 across 966 interventional studies indexed under Apnea.

Browse Apnea studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Meets diagnostic criteria for insomnia
  • Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (AHI > or = 15) and prescription of PAP therapy
  • Age > or =50
  • Community-dwelling
  • Live within a 30-mile radius of VA GLAHS
  • Have transportation to VA GLAHS to attend the intervention/control programs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant cognitive impairment (MMSE \< 24)
  • History of mania, major psychopathology or a psychiatric hospitalization in prior two years
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
125 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Behavioral treatment

    Manual-based cognitive behavioral treatment focusing on sleep, sleep apnea, and PAP adherence provided by allied health personnel in individual sessions.

    Behavioral: Insomnia treatment & PAP adherence

  • Active comparator
    Active control

    Manual-based non-directive general sleep education program provided by allied health personnel in individual sessions.

    Behavioral: General sleep education

Interventions

  • BehavioralInsomnia treatment & PAP adherence

    Manual-based cognitive behavioral treatment focusing on sleep, sleep apnea, and PAP adherence provided by allied health personnel in individual sessions.

  • BehavioralGeneral sleep education

    Manual-based non-directive general sleep education program provided by allied health personnel in individual sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sleep Quality

    Total score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index will be used as a measure of sleep quality. Scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Time frame: Three months after randomization

  2. Sleep Onset Latency From Sleep Diary

    Sleep onset latency (minutes to fall asleep) will be calculated from 7 days of self-reported sleep diary. Minimum value is 0 minutes. Maximum possible value is 1,440 minutes (24 hours). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Time frame: Three months after randomization

  3. Wake After Sleep Onset From Sleep Diary

    Wake after sleep onset (minutes awake from sleep onset to get up time) will be calculated from 7 days of self-reported sleep diary. Minimum value is 0 minutes. Maximum possible value is 1,440 minutes (24 hours). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Time frame: Three months after randomization

  4. Sleep Efficiency From Sleep Diary

    Sleep efficiency (mean percent time asleep while in bed) will be calculated from 7 days of self-reported sleep diary. Scores range from 0 to 100 percent. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Time frame: Three months after randomization

  5. Sleep Efficiency From Wrist Actigraphy

    Sleep efficiency (mean percent time asleep while in bed) will be calculated from 7 days of wrist actigraphy. Scores range from 0 to 100 percent. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Time frame: Three months after randomization

  6. PAP Adherence

    Number of nights positive airway pressure (PAP) was used \>=4 hours during the first 90 days measured by remote monitoring. Scores range from 0 to 90 days. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Time frame: Three months after randomization

07

Results

Posted Jun 3, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBehavioral TreatmentActive Control
Started6263
Post-treatment4960
3-month follow-up5358
6-month follow-up5361
Completed5361
Not completed92
Withdrew: Death01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up41
Withdrew: Refused assessment30

Outcome measures

PrimarySleep Quality

Total score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index will be used as a measure of sleep quality. Scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame:
Three months after randomization
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Sleep Quality
score on a scaleBehavioral TreatmentActive Control
Sleep Quality6.25 ± 0.569.87 ± 0.53
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Treatment vs Active Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.001 · Mean difference (net): -3.21 · 95% CI -4.58 to -1.83The parameter estimate is the improvement in the outcome from baseline to 3-months for the treatment group versus the same improvement in respect to the control group.
PrimarySleep Onset Latency From Sleep Diary

Sleep onset latency (minutes to fall asleep) will be calculated from 7 days of self-reported sleep diary. Minimum value is 0 minutes. Maximum possible value is 1,440 minutes (24 hours). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame:
Three months after randomization
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Sleep Onset Latency From Sleep Diary
minutesBehavioral TreatmentActive Control
Sleep Onset Latency From Sleep Diary22.80 ± 3.8635.77 ± 3.74
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Treatment vs Active Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.013 · Mean difference (net): -16.23 · 95% CI -29.02 to -2.49The parameter estimate is the improvement in the outcome from baseline to 3-months for the treatment group versus the same improvement in respect to the control group.
PrimaryWake After Sleep Onset From Sleep Diary

Wake after sleep onset (minutes awake from sleep onset to get up time) will be calculated from 7 days of self-reported sleep diary. Minimum value is 0 minutes. Maximum possible value is 1,440 minutes (24 hours). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame:
Three months after randomization
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Wake After Sleep Onset From Sleep Diary
minutesBehavioral TreatmentActive Control
Wake After Sleep Onset From Sleep Diary20.42 ± 4.3140.67 ± 4.16
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Treatment vs Active Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.019 · Mean difference (net): -20.46 · 95% CI -37.63 to -3.29The parameter estimate is the improvement in the outcome from baseline to 3-months for the treatment group versus the same improvement in respect to the control group.
PrimarySleep Efficiency From Sleep Diary

Sleep efficiency (mean percent time asleep while in bed) will be calculated from 7 days of self-reported sleep diary. Scores range from 0 to 100 percent. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

Time frame:
Three months after randomization
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Sleep Efficiency From Sleep Diary
percentage of timeBehavioral TreatmentActive Control
Sleep Efficiency From Sleep Diary86.24 ± 1.6975.69 ± 1.64
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Treatment vs Active Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.001 · Mean difference (net): 10.49 · 95% CI 4.53 to 16.44The parameter estimate is the improvement in the outcome from baseline to 3-months for the treatment group versus the same improvement in respect to the control group.
PrimarySleep Efficiency From Wrist Actigraphy

Sleep efficiency (mean percent time asleep while in bed) will be calculated from 7 days of wrist actigraphy. Scores range from 0 to 100 percent. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

Time frame:
Three months after randomization
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Sleep Efficiency From Wrist Actigraphy
percentage of timeBehavioral TreatmentActive Control
Sleep Efficiency From Wrist Actigraphy81.70 ± 1.0778.51 ± 1.07
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Treatment vs Active Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.001 · Mean difference (net): 4.35 · 95% CI 1.87 to 6.83The parameter estimate is the improvement in the outcome from baseline to 3-months for the treatment group versus the same improvement in respect to the control group.
PrimaryPAP Adherence

Number of nights positive airway pressure (PAP) was used \>=4 hours during the first 90 days measured by remote monitoring. Scores range from 0 to 90 days. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

Time frame:
Three months after randomization
Reported as:
Mean · number of nights
PAP Adherence
number of nightsBehavioral TreatmentActive Control
PAP Adherence38.58 ± 3.8921.16 ± 3.14
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Treatment vs Active Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0007 · Mean difference (final values): -17.42 · 95% CI -27.29 to -7.55

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected for 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Behavioral Treatment0/62 (0%)0/62 (0%)1/62 (1.6%)
Active Control1/63 (1.6%)0/63 (0%)0/63 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBehavioral TreatmentActive Control
Skin irritationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/620/63

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Behavioral TreatmentActive ControlTotal
Mean62.8 ± 6.763.7 ± 7.663.2 ± 7.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Behavioral TreatmentActive ControlTotal
Female156
Male6158119
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Behavioral TreatmentActive ControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native213
Asian336
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American141731
White353469
More than one race4610
Unknown or Not Reported426
Sleep quality
Sleep quality(units on a scale)Behavioral TreatmentActive ControlTotal
Mean11.0 ± 3.911.4 ± 4.411.2 ± 4.1
Sleep onset latency from diary
Sleep onset latency from diary(minutes)Behavioral TreatmentActive ControlTotal
Mean40.9 ± 41.137.7 ± 27.339.3 ± 34.7
Wake after sleep onset from sleep diary
Wake after sleep onset from sleep diary(minutes)Behavioral TreatmentActive ControlTotal
Mean53.4 ± 49.658.5 ± 58.756.0 ± 54.2
Sleep efficiency from sleep diary
Sleep efficiency from sleep diary(percentage of time)Behavioral TreatmentActive ControlTotal
Mean70.1 ± 17.869.9 ± 14.070.0 ± 15.9
Sleep efficiency from wrist actigraphy
Sleep efficiency from wrist actigraphy(percentage of time)Behavioral TreatmentActive ControlTotal
Mean77.7 ± 9.078.1 ± 10.977.9 ± 10.0
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA
    Sepulveda, California 91343, United States
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
    West Los Angeles, California 90073, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fung CH, Martin JL, Josephson K, Fiorentino L, Dzierzewski JM, Jouldjian S, Tapia JC, Mitchell MN, Alessi C. Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Older Adults With Occult Sleep-Disordered Breathing. Psychosom Med. 2016 Jun;78(5):629-39. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000314. PubMed 27136498 ↗
  • Alessi CA, Fung CH, Dzierzewski JM, Fiorentino L, Stepnowsky C, Rodriguez Tapia JC, Song Y, Zeidler MR, Josephson K, Mitchell MN, Jouldjian S, Martin JL. Randomized controlled trial of an integrated approach to treating insomnia and improving the use of positive airway pressure therapy in veterans with comorbid insomnia disorder and obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 2021 Apr 9;44(4):zsaa235. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa235. PubMed 33221910 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 14, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02027558
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 6, 2014
Start date
Jan 1, 2014
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2017
Completion
Jan 31, 2018
Results posted
Jun 3, 2019
Last update
Jun 3, 2019

Study contacts

Cathy Alessi, MD
principal investigator · VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion