CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02023970TRANSLINKUpdated Sep 14, 2026

TRANSLINK: Defining the Role of Xeno-directed and Immune Events (SVD) in Patients Receiving Animal-derived Bioprosthetic Heart Valves

An interventional study of Patients receiving animal-derived bioprosthetic heart valves. and Echocardiography (1) in Patients Receiving Animal-derived Bioprosthetic Heart Valves, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Completed at 5 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,668
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cardiac valve disorders are widely spread in the general population and represents the third most frequent cardiovascular illness after coronary disease and arterial hypertension. In this context, aortic valve stenosis (the central pathology in this project) is the most common form of valve disease. Cardiac valve replacement is in the vast majority of cases the first line therapy for degenerative heart-valve diseases. These are represented by mechanical and bioprosthetic valve (BHV). In the vast majority of cases, BHV are derived from animals and from a biological standpoint are classified as xenografts. BHV are severely penalised by a premature structural damage, with ultimate valve failure occurring around 10 years after surgery in 5 to 30% of cases, depending on the type of BHV used. Several factors [including dyslipidaemia, gender, valve position] may contribute to the ultimate failure of the BHV and there has been increasing evidence recently of a substantial immune reaction elicited by the implanted BHV. This immune response is still poorly understood. It may lead to adverse immune reactions and this will be thoroughly investigated by the TRANSLINK team. In this light, the TRANSLINK project aims to provide the necessary data to demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt the central role of the anti-BHV immune response in the premature failure of BHV and to provide efficient strategies to enable safe implantation of BHV valves in currently unsuitable candidates

02

Conditions studied

  • Patients Receiving Animal-derived Bioprosthetic Heart Valves

Keywords

  • Bioprosthetic heart valves, immune response, structural valve deterioration, valvular disease
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 825 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

To be enrolled, the following criteria have to be fulfilled:

*Phase A: Diagnostic Study

Inclusion criteria for SVD-patients:

  • Patient age: 18 to 85 years old at the time of surgery
  • Echographic signs of SVD (Mean trans-valvular gradient ≥ 30 mm Hg AND Effective Orifice Area ≤ 1 cm2 worsen over time OR Aortic Insufficiency > grade 2/4)
  • Single aortic valve replacement +/- associated to CABG, Bental, Mitral or Tricuspid repair, aortic surgery, Radiofrequency.
  • First cardiac surgery (no multiple cardiac surgeries)
  • No immunosuppressive regimen any time within the 6 months prior surgery.
  • - No use of other allo or xenogenic tissue than aortic valve prosthesis during cardiac surgery
  • Patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has signed the informed consent form prior to any study related procedure
  • Patient agrees to undergo all protocol required follow-up examinations and requirements at the investigational site

Non-SVD patients (control-patients):

  • Patients will be defined as patients operated on with an aortic BHV without echographic signs of SVD and matched for: Age at surgery (±2 years), type of BHV and follow-up time (± 6 months).
  • Patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has signed the informed consent form prior to any study related procedure
  • Patient agrees to undergo all protocol required follow-up examinations and requirements at the investigational site

To increase the statistical power (which cannot be calculated according to the novelty of the project), two controls will be matches with each SVD-Case.

*Phase B: Prospective Study

B1: Cohort of prevalent patients

  • Patient age: 18 - 85 years old at the time of surgery
  • Patient scheduled for single aortic valve replacement with a BHV (surgical or percutaneous valve) +/- associated to CABG, Bental, Mitral or Tricuspid repair, aortic surgery, Radiofrequency.
  • First cardiac surgery (no multiple cardiac surgeries)
  • No immunosuppressive regimen any time within the 6 months prior surgery and no immunosuppressive regimen after surgery.
  • No use of other allo or xenogenic tissue than aortic valve prosthesis during cardiac surgery
  • Patient is affiliated to the Social Security or equivalent system
  • Patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has signed the informed consent form prior to any study related procedure
  • Patient agrees to undergo all protocol required follow-up examinations and requirements at the investigational site Eight of the most frequently implanted BHV worldwide will be assessed: 1 surgical porcine valve: Mosaic (Medtronic); 4 surgical bovine pericardium valves: Perimount-Carpentier (Edwards), Magna ease (Edwards), Trifecta (St. Jude Medical) and the Mitroflow PRT valve (Sorin); 1 surgical equine valve: 3F-valve or Enable (Medtronic) and 2 percutaneous pericardium valves (TAVI): Corevalve (porcine pericardium - Medtronic) and Sapien valve (bovine pericardium - Edwards).

Fifty patients per type of BHV will be included. When 50 patients were included in one of the eight groups, we will stop the inclusions in this group.

Additionally, a control group of heart operated patients without biological valve will be included in the study (patients operated on with a mechanical valve (n=50) or for CABG without BHV (n=50).

Control group (CABG or aortic mechanical valve)

  • Patient age: >65 years old for CABG and 18-85 years old for mechanical valve replacement
  • Patient operated on coronary artery bypass (for CABG group)
  • Patient with valve aortic replacement following aortic valve stenosis (for mechanical valve group)
  • No immunosuppressive regimen any time within the 6 months prior surgery and no immunosuppressive regimen after surgery.
  • No use of other allo or xenogenic tissue than aortic valve prosthesis during cardiac surgery.

B2: Cohort of incident patients

  • Patient age: 18 to 85 years old (at the time of surgery) who underwent a single isolated aortic valve replacement with a BHV +/- associated to CABG, Bental, Mitral or Tricuspid repair, aortic surgery, Radiofrequency. more than 5 years ago.
  • First cardiac surgery (no multiple cardiac surgeries)
  • No immunosuppressive regimen any time within the 6 months before inclusion and no immunosuppressive regimen after inclusion.
  • Patient is affiliated to the Social Security or equivalent system
  • Patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has signed the informed consent form prior to any study related procedure
  • Patient agrees to undergo all protocol required follow-up examinations and requirements at the investigational site

As control, patients who underwent isolated CABG (n=50) or aortic mechanical valve replacement more than 5 years ago (n=50) will be enrolled.

Control group (CABG or aortic mechanical valve)

  • Patient age (at the time of surgery): > 65 years old for CABG and 18-85 years old for mechanical valve replacement
  • Patient operated on coronary artery bypass (for CABG group) more than 5 years ago
  • Patient with valve aortic replacement following aortic valve stenosis (for mechanical valve group) more than 5 years ago
  • No immunosuppressive regimen any time within the 6 months prior inclusion and no immunosuppressive regimen after inclusion.
  • No use of other allo or xenogenic tissue than aortic valve prosthesis during cardiac surgery

Exclusion criteria

Any of the following is regarded as criteria for exclusion from the study:

  • Female of child bearing potential
  • Severe renal insufficiency: GFR \<=30 ml/min/
  • Severe dyslipidemia: total cholesterol >350 mg/dl, triglycerides >750 mg/dl
  • Ongoing infection (patient may be evaluated for enrolment after resolution)
  • HIV infection
  • Active autoimmune disease
  • Multiple cardiac surgeries
  • Patient with immunosuppression regimen
  • Presence of any condition (medical, psychological, social, or geographical), actual or anticipated, that the Investigator feels would restrict or limit the patient's successful participation for the inclusion or duration of the study
  • Presence of any severe medical condition such that the patient is not expected to survive for the planned study follow-up period.
  • Patient is not able to give informed consent
  • Patient under trusteeship or under guardianship
  • No affiliation to a social security or equivalent system
  • Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or device study that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,668 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Phase A: Diagnostic Study

    Objective: to assess the differential immune response in patients with or without SVD (given the low rate of SVD) a matched cases-controls study allows a powerful statistical analysis avoiding main confounding factors for a first discovery of a SVD-specific immune response. Results will be validated in prospective Phase B.

    Device: Patients receiving animal-derived bioprosthetic heart valves. · Other: Echocardiography (1) · Biological: Blood sample (1)

  • Other
    Phase B1 (Prospective Study): Cohort of prevalent patients

    This cohort is specifically designed to study the kinetics of the immune response before and after implantation of an aortic BHV. Eight of the most frequently implanted BHV worldwide will be assessed:

    Device: Patients receiving animal-derived bioprosthetic heart valves. · Other: Echocardiography (2) · Biological: Blood sample (2)

  • Other
    Phase B2 (Prospective Study): Cohort of incident patients

    Due to the low incidence of SVD during the first 4 post-operative years, a second cohort will be constituted by patients undergone biological aortic valve replacement at least 5 years before. The objective of this second cohort is to cover a period of time where risk of SVD occurrence is potentially high.

    Device: Patients receiving animal-derived bioprosthetic heart valves. · Other: Echocardiography (3) · Biological: Blood sample (3)

Interventions

  • DevicePatients receiving animal-derived bioprosthetic heart valves.
  • OtherEchocardiography (1)

    Also known as: Echocardiography at the baseline (inclusion visit)

  • OtherEchocardiography (2)

    Also known as: Echocardiography will be performed at visits before surgery, 6, 24 and 42 months at inclusion site.

  • OtherEchocardiography (3)

    Also known as: At inclusion visit and:, - If normal echocardiographic parameters (without SVD signs): echocardiography at 42 months., - If subnormal echocardiographic parameters (SVD signs): echocardiographic follow-up will be performed on site at 1 year and 42 months.

  • BiologicalBlood sample (1)

    Also known as: Blood sample will be collected at the time of SVD diagnosis in SVD patients and non -SVD control patients.

  • BiologicalBlood sample (2)

    Also known as: Blood samples will be harvested the day before the surgery and then at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 42 months, representing 6 samples per patient.

  • BiologicalBlood sample (3)

    Also known as: At inclusion visit and:, - If normal echocardiographic parameters (without SVD signs): blood samples at 2 year and 42 months, - If subnormal echocardiographic parameters (SVD signs): blood samples at 1 year and 42 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Echocardiography data to assess the structural valve deterioration

    The primary endpoint to be analyzed in the study is assessment by echocardiography of structural valve deterioration after implantation of pig valve or bovine pericardium valve or equine pericardium valve. TRANSLINK project aims primarily at establishing the possible role of recipient immune response against biological prosthetic heart valves as a major cause to mid-long-term structural valve deterioration and clinical dysfunction.

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Process of valve degeneration according to the type of BHV

    To study the process of valve degeneration according to the type of BHV (porcine, bovine or equine BHV or type of industrial process) and BHV clinical outcome.

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Large international and prospective patient's cohort and clinical database with a biocollection

    To implement a large international and prospective patient's cohort and clinical database with a biocollection (biobank) of patients receiving an aortic BHV to identify immune biomarkers following aortic valve replacement.

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. Clinic-biological correlations

    To analyse clinic-biological correlations prospectively following BHV.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • University of Manitoba
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Nantes University Hospital
    Nantes, France
  • University of Padova Medical School, Italy
    Padova, Italy
  • University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
    Barcelona, Spain
  • University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
    Barcelona, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Senage T, Paul A, Le Tourneau T, Fellah-Hebia I, Vadori M, Bashir S, Galinanes M, Bottio T, Gerosa G, Evangelista A, Badano LP, Nassi A, Costa C, Cesare G, Manji RA, Cueff de Monchy C, Piriou N, Capoulade R, Serfaty JM, Guimbretiere G, Dantan E, Ruiz-Majoral A, Coste du Fou G, Leviatan Ben-Arye S, Govani L, Yehuda S, Bachar Abramovitch S, Amon R, Reuven EM, Atiya-Nasagi Y, Yu H, Iop L, Casos K, Kuguel SG, Blasco-Lucas A, Permanyer E, Sbraga F, Llatjos R, Moreno-Gonzalez G, Sanchez-Martinez M, Breimer ME, Holgersson J, Teneberg S, Pascual-Gilabert M, Nonell-Canals A, Takeuchi Y, Chen X, Manez R, Roussel JC, Soulillou JP, Cozzi E, Padler-Karavani V. The role of antibody responses against glycans in bioprosthetic heart valve calcification and deterioration. Nat Med. 2022 Feb;28(2):283-294. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01682-w. Epub 2022 Feb 17. PubMed 35177855 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02023970
Lead sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 30, 2013
Start date
Jan 6, 2014
Primary completion
Jan 10, 2018
Completion
Jan 10, 2018
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Jean-christian ROUSSEL, Professor
study chair · Nantes University Hospital
Gino GEROSA, Professor
principal investigator · University of Padova Medical School, Italy
Rafael MAÑEZ, Professor
principal investigator · University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
Manuel GALIÑANES, Professor
principal investigator · University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion