CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02020876DECIDEUpdated Dec 25, 2013

Decision Impact Study to Measure the Influence of DECIPHER on Treatment Recommendations

An observational study in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by GenomeDx Biosciences Corp. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-12-25.

Sponsored by GenomeDx Biosciences Corp · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
21
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This clinical utility study pilot is based on a review of real but de-identified and randomized patient cases and aims to evaluate Urologists' treatment recommendations before and after reviewing the results provided by the Decipher test. This is a pilot study and the primary intent is to help guide development and design of future clinical utility studies for Decipher

Read the detailed description

The primary and secondary objectives will be assessed in retrospectively selected prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy with one or more adverse pathological features (APFs)

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 200 across 1,181 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

GenomeDx Biosciences Corp is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This is an exploratory study utilizing archived tumor specimens and demographic and pathologic characteristics derived from the patient's medical charts. The study participants are the urologists who review the selected case files.

Eligibility criteria

Criteria (Participant enrollment)

Inclusion Criteria Study participants:

  1. Practicing board-certified urologic surgeons
  2. Performing at least 40 radical prostate surgeries annually

Exclusion Criteria Study Participants:

(1) Did not meet the inclusion criteria

Criteria (Case selection)

Inclusion Criteria Case File:

Patient cases eligible for this study were treated with radical prostatectomy and have one or more adverse pathological features present defined as:

Pathological Gleason score >= 8 or Gleason score 7 with primary pattern 4; Pathological stage T3A (= Extraprostatic extension) or T3B (=Seminal vesicle invasion); Positive surgical margins Gleason grade upgrade from biopsy to surgery

Exclusion Criteria Case File:

Metastatic disease (M+) prior to surgery Received any neo-adjuvant prostate cancer treatment with radical prostatectomy (radiation, hormone, chemotherapy)

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Practicing urologic surgeons

    Performing at least 60 radical prostate surgeries annually

    Other: DECIPHER Questionnaire

Interventions

  • OtherDECIPHER Questionnaire

    Participants are asked to complete a questionnaire to assess the impact of Decipher on physicians' treatment recommendation. All participants use the same data collection instrument. Each participant opinion is collected based on a random selection of cases.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in treatment recommendation

    To determine the extent to which the use of the Decipher test influences treatment recommendations by physicians post radical prostatectomy (RP). This decision impact study aims to evaluate Urologists' treatment recommendations before and after reviewing the results provided by the Decipher test.

    Time frame: 1.5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Urologist's perception regarding the utility of the Decipher

    * Changes in Urologists expressed level of confidence in the treatment recommendation as measured by the response to item 4a in the eCRF survey. * Urologist's perception regarding the utility of the Decipher test as measured by the responses to question 4b and 38b and 38c in the eCRF survey. * Agreement in treatment recommendation

    Time frame: 1.5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • GenomeDx Bioscience Inc.
    San Diego, California 92121, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Badani K, Thompson DJ, Buerki C, Davicioni E, Garrison J, Ghadessi M, Mitra AP, Wood PJ, Hornberger J. Impact of a genomic classifier of metastatic risk on postoperative treatment recommendations for prostate cancer patients: a report from the DECIDE study group. Oncotarget. 2013 Apr;4(4):600-9. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.918. PubMed 23592338 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 25, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02020876
Lead sponsor
GenomeDx Biosciences Corp
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 25, 2013
Start date
Aug 2012
Primary completion
Jan 2013
Completion
Dec 2013
Last update
Dec 25, 2013

Study contacts

Elai Davicioni, pHd
principal investigator · GenomeDx Biosciences Inc.
Badani Ketan, MD
principal investigator · Department of Urology, Columbia University, New York, NY USA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion