ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02019264CAMELLIA-TIMIUpdated Jul 16, 2019Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Long-term Treatment With BELVIQ (Lorcaserin HCl) on the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Conversion to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obese and Overweight Subjects With Cardiovascular Disease or Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factors

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lorcaserin hydrochloride and Placebo in Cardiovascular Disease, High Cardiovascular Risk and Obesity, sponsored by Eisai Inc.. Completed at 499 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-16.

Sponsored by Eisai Inc. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14,673
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in overweight and obese subjects with cardiovascular (CV) disease and/or multiple CV risk factors.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 12,000 subjects will be randomized to two treatment groups in a ratio of 1:1, stratified by the presence of established CV disease (approximately 80%) or CV risk factors without established CV disease (approximately 20%). Subjects will receive lorcaserin HCl 10 mg BID or placebo BID. The study will consist of 2 phases: Prerandomization and Randomization. The Prerandomization Phase will last up to 30 days and consist of one visit during which subjects will be screened for eligibility. The Randomization Phase will consist of two periods: Treatment and Follow-up. The Treatment Period will last for approximately 5 years with approximately 18 visits and Follow-up period is 30 (+ or - 10 days) from the end of treatment visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Disease
  • High Cardiovascular Risk
  • Obesity
  • Overweight
  • Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Cardiovascular Disease
  • Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factors
  • Obesity
  • Overweight
  • MACE
  • Conversion to Diabetes
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

5,368 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 939 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14,673 is above the median of 100 across 3,084 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Eisai Inc. is the lead sponsor of 368 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Of its 83 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. greater than or equal (>=) to 27 kilogram per meter square (kg/m\^2)
  2. Subjects able and willing to comply with a reduced-calorie diet and an increased physical activity program
  3. Age >= to 40 years with established CV disease as defined by one of the following:

    1. History of documented MI or ischemic stroke
    2. History of peripheral artery disease
    3. History of revascularization (coronary, carotid, or peripheral artery)
    4. Significant unrevascularized coronary arterial stenosis

OR

Age >= to 55 years for women or >= to 50 years for men who have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) without established CV disease plus at least one of the following CV risk factors:

  1. Hypertension, or currently receiving therapy for documented hypertension
  2. Dyslipidemia, or currently taking prescription lipid-lowering therapy for documented dyslipidemia
  3. Estimated >= to 30 to less than equal (\<=) to 60 mililitre per minute per 1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73 m\^) per the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation
  4. High high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)
  5. Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) >= 30 ug/mg

Subjects with T2DM may have a pre-existing or new diagnosis of T2DM. A new diagnosis of T2DM (ie, discovered at Screening) should be based on the 2013 American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines.

All T2DM subjects must have an HbA[1c] less (\<) than 10% at Screening. If subjects are being treated, or upon diagnosis need to be treated with antidiabetic agents, the T2DM treatment regimen must be stable for at least 3 months prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Moderate or greater symptoms of congestive cardiac failure ( [NYHA] class III or IV)
  2. Known left ventricular (LV) \< than 20%
  3. Moderate or greater symptoms of pulmonary hypertension (PH)
  4. Known severe valvular disease
  5. Moderate renal impairment, severe renal impairment (estimated \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^ per the CKD-EPI equation based on ideal body weight), or end stage renal disease (ESRD)
  6. Severe hepatic impairment
  7. Use of other products intended for weight loss including prescription drugs, over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, and herbal preparations
  8. Use of more than one other serotonergic drug
  9. Use of drugs known to increase the risk for cardiac valvulopathy within 6 months prior to Screening including, but not limited to: pergolide, ergotamine, methysergide, cabergoline
  10. History or evidence of disease (e.g., , cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal or psychiatric disease)
  11. Use of lorcaserin HCl prior to Screening or to lorcaserin HCl or any of the
  12. Planned bariatric surgery
  13. Females must not be breastfeeding or pregnant
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
14,673 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lorcaserin hydrochloride (HCL)10 mg

    APD356 10 mg twice daily

    Drug: Lorcaserin hydrochloride

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo twice daily

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time From Randomization to First Occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) at Interim Analysis

    The MACE events involved myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or cardiovascular (CV) death. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Month 42

  2. Time From Randomization to First Occurrence of MACE+

    The MACE+ events involved MI, stroke, or CV death or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure (HF), or any coronary revascularization. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time From Randomization to Conversion to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) for Participants With Prediabetes at Baseline

    Time from randomization to conversion to T2DM was defined as first occurrence of any component of the 2013 American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diagnostic Criteria (ADA, 2013) in participants with prediabetes at baseline. The diagnostic criteria were met if a participant had unequivocal hyperglycemia (random plasma glucose greater than or equal to (\>=) 200 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (11.1 millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis) or any of the following criteria were observed and subsequently confirmed on repeat laboratory testing such as: glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) \>=to 6.5%; fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \>=126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L); 2-hour plasma glucose \>=200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)

  2. Time From Randomization to First Occurrence of the Individual Components of MACE+

    The MACE+ events involved MI, stroke, or CV death or hospitalization for unstable angina or HF, or any coronary revascularization. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)

  3. Time From Randomization to Event of All-cause Mortality

    The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)

  4. Time From Randomization to Conversion to Normal Glucose Homeostasis in Participants With Prediabetes at Baseline

    Normal glucose homeostasis was defined as HbA1c less than or equal to (\<=) 5.6% and FPG \< 100 mg/dL without any antidiabetic treatment. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)

  5. Time From Randomization to Conversion to T2DM for Participants Without Any Type of Diabetes at Baseline

    The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)

  6. Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 6 in Participants With T2DM at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, and Month 6

  7. Time From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in All Participants

    New onset/worsening of existing renal impairment was first occurrence of any events: microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (albumin-to-creatinine ratio \[ACR\] \>=30mcg/mg and ACR\>=300 mcg/mg in spot urine), worsening albuminuria (microalbuminuria at Baseline developed macroalbuminuria, ACR increased \>=30% from Baseline during treatment), newly developed chronic kidney disease (CKD) (eGFR \>=90 milliliter per minute per 1.73 \[mL/min/1.73\]body surface area (BSA) and without kidney damage at Baseline changed to CKD Stage 1/higher as per National Kidney Foundation \[NKF\] Guidelines \[2002\]) or worsening of CKD (CKD Stage 1/higher as per NKF Guidelines \[2002\] worsened to higher CKD stages during treatment), or doubling of serum creatinine (creatinine value at least 2 times Baseline value and \>=1.5 mg/dL during treatment.), or any of the following: end-stage renal disease, renal transplant, renal death. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)

  8. Time From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in Participants With Prediabetes at Baseline

    New onset/worsening of existing renal impairment was first occurrence of any events: microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (ACR \>=30mcg/mg and ACR \>=300 mcg/mg in spot urine), worsening albuminuria (microalbuminuria at baseline developed macroalbuminuria, ACR increased \>=30% from baseline during treatment), CKD (eGFR \>=90 mL/min/1.73 BSA and without kidney damage at baseline changed to CKD Stage 1/higher as per NKF Guidelines \[2002\]) or worsening of CKD (CKD Stage 1/higher as per NKF Guidelines \[2002\] worsened to higher CKD stages during treatment), or doubling of serum creatinine (creatinine value at least 2 times baseline value and \>=1.5 mg/dL during treatment.), or any of the following: end-stage renal disease, renal transplant, renal death. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)

  9. Time From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in Participants With T2DM at Baseline

    New onset/worsening of existing renal impairment was first occurrence of any events: microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (ACR \>=30 mcg/mg and ACR \>=300 mcg/mg in spot urine), worsening albuminuria (microalbuminuria at baseline developed macroalbuminuria, ACR increased \>=30% from baseline during treatment), CKD (eGFR \>=90 mL/min/1.73 BSA and without kidney damage at baseline changed to CKD Stage 1/higher as per NKF Guidelines \[2002\]) or worsening of CKD (CKD Stage 1/higher as per NKF Guidelines \[2002\] worsened to higher CKD stages during treatment), or doubling of serum creatinine (creatinine value at least 2 times baseline value and \>=1.5 mg/dL during treatment.), or any of the following: end-stage renal disease, renal transplant, renal death. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)

  10. Time From Randomization to Event of Improvement in Renal Function in Participants With T2DM at Baseline

    Improvement in renal function was defined as first occurrence of regression of albuminuria or regression of CKD. Regression of albuminuria was defined as when participants with macroalbuminuria at baseline developed microalbuminuria or nonalbuminuria (ACR \<30 mcg/mg in spot urine), or participants with microalbuminuria at baseline became nonalbuminuric, and ACR value decreased \>= 30% from previous assessment during treatment. Regression of CKD defined as when participants with CKD Stage 1 or higher at baseline improved to normal or lower stages by NKF guidelines (eGFR \>=90 with albuminuria at baseline improved to eGFR \>=90 without albuminuria, or eGFR 60 to 89 at baseline became eGFR \>=90 with or without albuminuria, or eGFR between 30 to 59 at baseline improved to \>60 mL/min/1.73 BSA) during treatment. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

    Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Met FDA-Defined Valvulopathy in Echocardiographically Determined Heart Valve Changes

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  12. Percentage of Participants With FDA-Defined Valvulopathy at Baseline Who Demonstrated Worsened FDA-Defined Valvulopathy

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  13. Change From Baseline in Echocardiographically-Determined Pulmonary Arterial Systolic Pressure

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

07

Results

Posted Jul 16, 2019

Participant flow

Participants took part in the study at investigative sites in the United States, Bahamas, Canada, Mexico, Chile, New Zealand, Poland, and Australia from 24 Jan 2014 to 14 May 2018.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Started60006000
Safety analysis set59925995
Completed57525793
Not completed248207
Withdrew: Not treated64
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5047
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject142117
Withdrew: Administrative reason3628
Withdrew: Missing1411

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime From Randomization to First Occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) at Interim Analysis

The MACE events involved myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or cardiovascular (CV) death. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Month 42
Reported as:
Median · days
Time From Randomization to First Occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) at Interim Analysis
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Time From Randomization to First Occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) at Interim AnalysisNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.005 · 97.5% CI 0.842 to 1.198
PrimaryTime From Randomization to First Occurrence of MACE+

The MACE+ events involved MI, stroke, or CV death or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure (HF), or any coronary revascularization. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time From Randomization to First Occurrence of MACE+
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Time From Randomization to First Occurrence of MACE+NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.5464 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.969 · 95% CI 0.873 to 1.074
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Conversion to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) for Participants With Prediabetes at Baseline

Time from randomization to conversion to T2DM was defined as first occurrence of any component of the 2013 American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diagnostic Criteria (ADA, 2013) in participants with prediabetes at baseline. The diagnostic criteria were met if a participant had unequivocal hyperglycemia (random plasma glucose greater than or equal to (\>=) 200 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (11.1 millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis) or any of the following criteria were observed and subsequently confirmed on repeat laboratory testing such as: glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) \>=to 6.5%; fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \>=126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L); 2-hour plasma glucose \>=200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time From Randomization to Conversion to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) for Participants With Prediabetes at Baseline
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Time From Randomization to Conversion to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) for Participants With Prediabetes at BaselineNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.0380 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.807 · 95% CI 0.659 to 0.988
SecondaryTime From Randomization to First Occurrence of the Individual Components of MACE+

The MACE+ events involved MI, stroke, or CV death or hospitalization for unstable angina or HF, or any coronary revascularization. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time From Randomization to First Occurrence of the Individual Components of MACE+
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
MINA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
StrokeNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
CV deathNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Hospitalization for unstable anginaNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
HFNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Coronary revascularizationNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.991 · 97.5% CI 0.824 to 1.191
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.0005 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.856 · 97.5% CI 0.639 to 1.145
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.0262 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.045 · 97.5% CI 0.778 to 1.404
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.3243 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.163 · 95% CI 0.861 to 1.571
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.6758 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.952 · 95% CI 0.757 to 1.197
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.7817 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.981 · 95% CI 0.856 to 1.125
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Event of All-cause Mortality

The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time From Randomization to Event of All-cause Mortality
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Time From Randomization to Event of All-cause MortalityNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.4212 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.082 · 95% CI 0.893 to 1.310
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Conversion to Normal Glucose Homeostasis in Participants With Prediabetes at Baseline

Normal glucose homeostasis was defined as HbA1c less than or equal to (\<=) 5.6% and FPG \< 100 mg/dL without any antidiabetic treatment. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time From Randomization to Conversion to Normal Glucose Homeostasis in Participants With Prediabetes at Baseline
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Time From Randomization to Conversion to Normal Glucose Homeostasis in Participants With Prediabetes at BaselineNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.1810 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.124 · 95% CI 0.947 to 1.333
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Conversion to T2DM for Participants Without Any Type of Diabetes at Baseline

The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time From Randomization to Conversion to T2DM for Participants Without Any Type of Diabetes at Baseline
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Time From Randomization to Conversion to T2DM for Participants Without Any Type of Diabetes at BaselineNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.0116 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.773 · 95% CI 0.633 to 0.944
SecondaryChange From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 6 in Participants With T2DM at Baseline
Time frame:
Baseline, and Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of HbA1c
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 6 in Participants With T2DM at Baseline
percentage of HbA1cPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Baseline6.99 ± 1.0667.01 ± 1.082
Change at Month 60.06 ± 0.777-0.33 ± 0.785
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (P-value was based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and stratification variable (presence of established CV disease or CV risk factors without established CV disease) as factors, and baseline HbA1c, as a covariate.) · Least square (ls) mean difference (net): -0.39 · 95% CI -0.43 to -0.35
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in All Participants

New onset/worsening of existing renal impairment was first occurrence of any events: microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (albumin-to-creatinine ratio \[ACR\] \>=30mcg/mg and ACR\>=300 mcg/mg in spot urine), worsening albuminuria (microalbuminuria at Baseline developed macroalbuminuria, ACR increased \>=30% from Baseline during treatment), newly developed chronic kidney disease (CKD) (eGFR \>=90 milliliter per minute per 1.73 \[mL/min/1.73\]body surface area (BSA) and without kidney damage at Baseline changed to CKD Stage 1/higher as per National Kidney Foundation \[NKF\] Guidelines \[2002\]) or worsening of CKD (CKD Stage 1/higher as per NKF Guidelines \[2002\] worsened to higher CKD stages during treatment), or doubling of serum creatinine (creatinine value at least 2 times Baseline value and \>=1.5 mg/dL during treatment.), or any of the following: end-stage renal disease, renal transplant, renal death. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in All Participants
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Time From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in All ParticipantsNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.0054 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.869 · 95% CI 0.787 to 0.959
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in Participants With Prediabetes at Baseline

New onset/worsening of existing renal impairment was first occurrence of any events: microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (ACR \>=30mcg/mg and ACR \>=300 mcg/mg in spot urine), worsening albuminuria (microalbuminuria at baseline developed macroalbuminuria, ACR increased \>=30% from baseline during treatment), CKD (eGFR \>=90 mL/min/1.73 BSA and without kidney damage at baseline changed to CKD Stage 1/higher as per NKF Guidelines \[2002\]) or worsening of CKD (CKD Stage 1/higher as per NKF Guidelines \[2002\] worsened to higher CKD stages during treatment), or doubling of serum creatinine (creatinine value at least 2 times baseline value and \>=1.5 mg/dL during treatment.), or any of the following: end-stage renal disease, renal transplant, renal death. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in Participants With Prediabetes at Baseline
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Time From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in Participants With Prediabetes at BaselineNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.3661 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.904 · 95% CI 0.727 to 1.125
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in Participants With T2DM at Baseline

New onset/worsening of existing renal impairment was first occurrence of any events: microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (ACR \>=30 mcg/mg and ACR \>=300 mcg/mg in spot urine), worsening albuminuria (microalbuminuria at baseline developed macroalbuminuria, ACR increased \>=30% from baseline during treatment), CKD (eGFR \>=90 mL/min/1.73 BSA and without kidney damage at baseline changed to CKD Stage 1/higher as per NKF Guidelines \[2002\]) or worsening of CKD (CKD Stage 1/higher as per NKF Guidelines \[2002\] worsened to higher CKD stages during treatment), or doubling of serum creatinine (creatinine value at least 2 times baseline value and \>=1.5 mg/dL during treatment.), or any of the following: end-stage renal disease, renal transplant, renal death. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in Participants With T2DM at Baseline
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Time From Randomization to Event of New Onset Renal Impairment or Worsening Existing Renal Impairment in Participants With T2DM at BaselineNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.0082 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.855 · 95% CI 0.762 to 0.960
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Event of Improvement in Renal Function in Participants With T2DM at Baseline

Improvement in renal function was defined as first occurrence of regression of albuminuria or regression of CKD. Regression of albuminuria was defined as when participants with macroalbuminuria at baseline developed microalbuminuria or nonalbuminuria (ACR \<30 mcg/mg in spot urine), or participants with microalbuminuria at baseline became nonalbuminuric, and ACR value decreased \>= 30% from previous assessment during treatment. Regression of CKD defined as when participants with CKD Stage 1 or higher at baseline improved to normal or lower stages by NKF guidelines (eGFR \>=90 with albuminuria at baseline improved to eGFR \>=90 without albuminuria, or eGFR 60 to 89 at baseline became eGFR \>=90 with or without albuminuria, or eGFR between 30 to 59 at baseline improved to \>60 mL/min/1.73 BSA) during treatment. The outcome data was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame:
Baseline up to end of study (Month 56)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time From Randomization to Event of Improvement in Renal Function in Participants With T2DM at Baseline
daysPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Time From Randomization to Event of Improvement in Renal Function in Participants With T2DM at BaselineNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Primary Analytic Method · p = 0.0297 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.182 · 95% CI 1.017 to 1.375
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Met FDA-Defined Valvulopathy in Echocardiographically Determined Heart Valve Changes
Time frame:
Months 6 and 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Met FDA-Defined Valvulopathy in Echocardiographically Determined Heart Valve Changes
percentage of participantsPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Month 61.42.1
Month 121.51.8
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.5015 (P-value was based on logistic regression including treatment as a factor and baseline body mass index (BMI) as a covariate.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.21 · 95% CI 0.69 to 2.11
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With FDA-Defined Valvulopathy at Baseline Who Demonstrated Worsened FDA-Defined Valvulopathy
Time frame:
Months 6 and 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With FDA-Defined Valvulopathy at Baseline Who Demonstrated Worsened FDA-Defined Valvulopathy
percentage of participantsPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Month 62.13.5
Month 121.72.1
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.7249 (P-value was based on logistic regression including treatment as a factor and baseline BMI as a covariate.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.31 · 95% CI 0.29 to 5.98
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Echocardiographically-Determined Pulmonary Arterial Systolic Pressure
Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Change From Baseline in Echocardiographically-Determined Pulmonary Arterial Systolic Pressure
Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)PlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Baseline26.4354 ± 7.6631226.2029 ± 7.54123
Change at Month 12-0.6418 ± 6.81716-0.8223 ± 7.23770
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Lorcaserin 10 mg · Mixed-effects model · p = 0.2976 (P value was based on a mixed-effects model (unstructured covariance matrix) with repeated measures with treatment, month and treatment by month interaction as factors and baseline pulmonary arterial systolic pressure and baseline BMI as covariates.) · Least square (ls) mean difference (net): -0.9036 · 95% CI -1.2908 to -0.5163

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (approximately 56 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo202/5,992 (3.4%)2,021/5,992 (33.7%)4,788/5,992 (79.9%)
Lorcaserin 10 mg219/5,995 (3.7%)1,974/5,995 (32.9%)4,946/5,995 (82.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 1,185
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders123/5992142/5995
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders132/5992133/5995
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders117/5992105/5995
Angina unstableCardiac disorders106/5992113/5995
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders109/599293/5995
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders106/599291/5995
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders102/5992105/5995
PneumoniaInfections and infestations86/599292/5995
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders78/599287/5995
CellulitisInfections and infestations71/599248/5995
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboLorcaserin 10 mg
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations567/5992528/5995
DizzinessNervous system disorders340/5992537/5995
FatigueGeneral disorders302/5992496/5995
BronchitisInfections and infestations468/5992455/5995
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders452/5992457/5995
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders452/5992457/5995
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations400/5992440/5995
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders324/5992419/5995
HeadacheNervous system disorders274/5992383/5995
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders303/5992376/5995

Baseline characteristics

The full analysis (FA) set included all randomized participants regardless of whether they took study drug or not.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboLorcaserin 10 mgTotal
Mean63.7 ± 8.3163.5 ± 8.3363.6 ± 8.32
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboLorcaserin 10 mgTotal
Female218621124298
Male381438887702
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboLorcaserin 10 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino5365021038
Not Hispanic or Latino5464549810962
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboLorcaserin 10 mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native212647
Asian7485159
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander233053
Black or African American466454920
White5331530910640
More than one race8596181
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

499 sites
  • Advanced Cardiovascular, LLC
    Alexander City, Alabama 35010, United States
  • North Alabama Research Center, LLC
    Athens, Alabama 35611, United States
  • UAB Medical Center
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • Coastal Clinical Research, Inc.
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Mobile Heart Specialists, PC
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Alaska Heart Institute
    Anchorage, Alaska 99508, United States
  • Connect Clinical Research Center, LCC
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Arrowhead Health Centers
    Glendale, Arizona 85306, United States
  • Phoenix Heart, PLLC
    Glendale, Arizona 85306, United States
  • Eclipse Clinical Research
    Tucson, Arizona 85745, United States
  • NEA Baptist Clinic
    Jonesboro, Arkansas 72401, United States
  • Arkansas Cardiology Clinic
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Preferred Research Partners
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72211, United States
  • Clinical Research Alliance
    Alhambra, California 91801, United States
  • Central Cardiology
    Bakersfield, California 93308, United States
  • Cardiovascular Research Foundation of Southern Cal
    Beverly Hills, California 90210, United States
  • Capitol Interventional Cardiology
    Carmichael, California 95608, United States
  • San Diego Costal Endocrinology Group AMC
    Chula Vista, California 91911 3813, United States
  • John Muir Physician Network Clinical Research Cent
    Concord, California 94520, United States
  • Medical Group of Encino
    Encino, California 91436, United States
  • Marin Endocrine Care & Research, Inc.
    Greenbrae, California 94904, United States
  • California Heart Specialists
    Huntington Beach, California 92648, United States
  • Del Rosario Medical Clinic, Inc.
    Huntington Park, California 90255, United States
  • Diabetes and Endocrine Associates
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • La Mesa Cardiac Center
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Alliance Research Centers
    Laguna Hills, California 92653, United States
  • Torrance Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
    Lomita, California 90717, United States
  • Long Beach Center for Clinical Research
    Long Beach, California 90807, United States
  • Metabolic Clinic and Research Center
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Beverly Hills Cardiology
    Los Angeles, California 90067, United States
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System
    Los Angeles, California 90073, United States
  • Clinical Interventions Research Institute
    Mission Viejo, California 92692, United States
  • Brigid Freyne MD Inc
    Murrieta, California 92563, United States
  • Valley Clinical Trials Inc
    Northridge, California 91325, United States
  • Carr Cardiology
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • Northern California Clinical Research Center
    Redding, California 96001, United States
  • Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group, Inc.
    San Diego, California 92101, United States
  • University of California San Diego
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Ritchken and First MD's
    San Diego, California 92117, United States
  • West Coast Research LLC
    San Ramon, California 94582, United States
  • Coastal Multi-Specialty Research
    Santa Ana, California 92704, United States
  • Westlake Medical Research
    Thousand Oaks, California 91360, United States
  • Harbor - UCLA Medical Center
    Torrance, California 90509, United States
  • Ronald Chochinov, MD
    Ventura, California 93003, United States
  • Ventura Cardiology Consultants
    Ventura, California 93003, United States
  • Infosphere Clinical Research
    West Hills, California 91307, United States
  • UCH-MHS Cardiac Research
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80909, United States
  • Creekside Endocrine Associates PC
    Denver, Colorado 80209, United States
  • New West Physicians, PC
    Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
  • University of Colorado Health
    Loveland, Colorado 80538, United States
  • Connecticut Clinical Research, LLC
    Bridgeport, Connecticut 06606, United States
  • Bridgeport Hospital
    Bridgeport, Connecticut 06610, United States
  • Clinical Research Works, Bristol
    Bristol, Connecticut 06010-5103, United States
  • Cardiology Associates of Fairfield County, Norwalk
    Norwalk, Connecticut 06851, United States
  • Cardiology Associates of Fairfield County, P.C.
    Stamford, Connecticut 06905, United States
  • Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
    Stamford, Connecticut 06905, United States
  • Cardiology Associates of Fairfield County, P.C.
    Trumbull, Connecticut 06611, United States
  • Connecticut Heart and Vascular Center
    Trumbull, Connecticut 06611, United States
  • Chase Medical Research, LLC
    Waterbury, Connecticut 06708, United States
  • Red Clay Research
    Newark, Delaware 19713, United States
  • Alfieri Cardiology
    Wilmington, Delaware 19803-3733, United States
  • Aventura Heart Center
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Zasa Clinical Research
    Boynton Beach, Florida 33427, United States
  • Meridien Research
    Bradenton, Florida 34201, United States
  • NOVA Southeastern University
    Bradenton, Florida 34209, United States
  • Bay Area Cardiology
    Brandon, Florida 33511, United States
  • Meridien Research, Brooksville
    Brooksville, Florida 34601, United States
  • Clearwater Cardiovascular and Interventional Cons.
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Clinical Research of South Florida
    Coral Gables, Florida 33143, United States
  • Holy Cross Medical Group
    Coral Springs, Florida 33065, United States
  • Cardiology Research Associates
    Daytona Beach, Florida 32117, United States
  • International Medical Research
    Daytona Beach, Florida 32117, United States
  • Asclepius Medical Research
    Doral, Florida 33166, United States
  • Fleming Island Center for Clinical Research
    Fleming Island, Florida 32003, United States
  • Integrative Research Associates, Inc.
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312, United States
  • M & O Clinical Research, LLC
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316, United States
  • Primary Care Associates
    Fort Myers, Florida 33907, United States
  • Florida Research Network, LLC
    Gainesville, Florida 32605, United States
  • George E. Platt, M.D.
    Green Cove Springs, Florida 32043, United States
  • Eastern Research, Inc.
    Hialeah, Florida 33013, United States
  • Larry K. Levinson, D.O., P.A.
    Hollywood, Florida 33021, United States
  • Research Physicians Network Alliance
    Hollywood, Florida 33021, United States
  • Pasco Cardiology Center
    Hudson, Florida 34667, United States
  • Nature Coast Clinical Research
    Inverness, Florida 34452, United States
  • University of Florida- Jacksonville
    Jacksonville, Florida 32209, United States
  • Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Westside Center for Clinical Research
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Meridien Research
    Lakeland, Florida 33805, United States
  • Pharmax Research Clinic, Inc
    Miami, Florida 33126-2956, United States
  • Life Spring Research Foundation
    Miami, Florida 33134, United States
  • United Clinical Research Corp.
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Cardiovascular Research Center of South Florida
    Miami, Florida 33173, United States
  • South Florida Research Group LLC
    Miami, Florida 33176, United States
  • South Florida Research Solutions
    Miramar, Florida 33025, United States
  • Southwest Florida Research
    Naples, Florida 34102, United States
  • Ocala Research Institute, Inc
    Ocala, Florida 34471, United States
  • Oviedo Medical Research
    Oviedo, Florida 32765, United States
  • Cardiology Partners Clinical Research Institute
    Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410-4304, United States
  • Palm Beach Gardens Research Center
    Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410, United States

Showing the first 100 of 499 sites across 8 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Scirica BM, Bohula EA, Dwyer JP, Qamar A, Inzucchi SE, McGuire DK, Keech AC, Smith SR, Murphy SA, Im K, Leiter LA, Gupta M, Patel T, Miao W, Perdomo C, Bonaca MP, Ruff CT, Sabatine MS, Wiviott SD; CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 Steering Committee and Investigators. Lorcaserin and Renal Outcomes in Obese and Overweight Patients in the CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 Trial. Circulation. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):366-375. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038341. PubMed 30586726 ↗
  • Bohula EA, Scirica BM, Inzucchi SE, McGuire DK, Keech AC, Smith SR, Kanevsky E, Murphy SA, Leiter LA, Dwyer JP, Corbalan R, Hamm C, Kaplan L, Nicolau JC, Ophuis TO, Ray KK, Ruda M, Spinar J, Patel T, Miao W, Perdomo C, Francis B, Dhadda S, Bonaca MP, Ruff CT, Sabatine MS, Wiviott SD; CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 Steering Committee Investigators. Effect of lorcaserin on prevention and remission of type 2 diabetes in overweight and obese patients (CAMELLIA-TIMI 61): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Nov 24;392(10161):2269-2279. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32328-6. Epub 2018 Oct 4. PubMed 30293771 ↗
  • Bohula EA, Wiviott SD, McGuire DK, Inzucchi SE, Kuder J, Im K, Fanola CL, Qamar A, Brown C, Budaj A, Garcia-Castillo A, Gupta M, Leiter LA, Weissman NJ, White HD, Patel T, Francis B, Miao W, Perdomo C, Dhadda S, Bonaca MP, Ruff CT, Keech AC, Smith SR, Sabatine MS, Scirica BM; CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 Steering Committee and Investigators. Cardiovascular Safety of Lorcaserin in Overweight or Obese Patients. N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1107-1117. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808721. Epub 2018 Aug 26. PubMed 30145941 ↗
  • Bohula EA, Scirica BM, Fanola C, Inzucchi SE, Keech A, McGuire DK, Smith SR, Abrahamsen T, Francis BH, Miao W, Perdomo CA, Satlin A, Wiviott SD, Sabatine MS. Design and rationale for the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects of Lorcaserin in Overweight and Obese Patients-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 61 (CAMELLIA-TIMI 61) trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Aug;202:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 29. PubMed 29803985 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2014 to primary completion in May 2018, 51 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2019, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

Of 113 phase 4 interventional studies under Cardiovascular Diseases, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 64. This study's 51 months is above that.

Cardiovascular Diseases covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 18, 2013
First posted
Dec 24, 2013
StartActual
Jan 24, 2014
Primary completionActual
May 14, 2018
CompletionActual
May 14, 2018
Results first posted
Jul 16, 2019
Last update
Jul 16, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02019264
Lead sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
The TIMI Study Group
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 24, 2013
Start date
Jan 24, 2014
Primary completion
May 14, 2018
Completion
May 14, 2018
Results posted
Jul 16, 2019
Last update
Jul 16, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lorcaserin

Start the discussion