ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02012270АНЕУРИЗМАUpdated Apr 10, 2018

Aneurysma Hernia Study - Incidence of Incisional Hernias After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

An observational study in Incisional Hernia and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, sponsored by Igor Koncar. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-10.

Sponsored by Igor Koncar · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
240
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Principles= Prevention of incision hernias by primary closure of mid line laparotomies with the best-evidenced suture techniques.

Background:

Surgical practice of abdominal wall closure continues to rely largely on tradition rather than high-quality level I evidence. Incisional hernia after laparotomy for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has a high incidence.

At this moment the best results in a prospective randomised clinical trial considering incision hernia rates and wound infections, have been reported by the surgeons from the Sundsvall clinic in Sweden. Their technique using a suture to wound length ratio of at least 4/1 and using many small stitches will be described in the protocol as the "Principles Technique". We want to explore if these results can indeed prevent incision hernias significantly if implemented with training and tutoring.

Methodology:Vascular surgeons,who are not using the principles yet, but show an interest to learn the Principles, will be asked to monitor a cohort of AAA patients using their current sutures and surgical techniques. Some of the vascular surgeons will undergo training and if wanted, proctoring during the first procedures using the Principles. A cohort of 120 AAA patients will be closed according to the Principles and monitored. The results of these 120 patients will be compared to the control group consisting of patients closed with the conventional technique by non---trained surgeons. Primary endpoint:The incidence of incision hernias at 12 months will be determined by clinical examination.

Data management and ownership:

The data will be collected on a paper form and will be introduced is a database (SPSS Statistics, IBM) from which statistical analysis will be made.

Read the detailed description

Principles= Prevention of incision hernias by primary closure of mid line laparotomies with the best-evidenced suture techniques.

Background:

Although many data from prospective studies have set some evidence-based principles to be adopted when closing mid line laparotomy incisions, these principles have not found a widespread implementation in the surgical community. Surgical practice continues to rely largely on tradition rather than high-quality level I evidence. Incision hernia after laparotomy for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has a high incidence of 10% to 37% depending on the method of follow up (clinically, with ultrasound or with CT scan) and the duration of follow up.

It is known that the surgical technique used to close the fascia in mid line laparotomies is an important parameter with regard to wound complications like wound infections and incision hernias. At this moment the best results in a prospective randomised clinical trial considering incisional hernia rates and wound infections, have been reported by the surgeons from the Sundsvall clinic in Sweden. Their technique using a suture to wound length ratio of at least 4/1 and using many small stitches will be described in the protocol as the "Principles Technique". We want to explore if these results can indeed prevent incision hernias significantly if implemented with training and tutoring.

Methodology:Vascular surgeons,who are not using the principles yet, but show an interest to learn the Principles, will be asked to monitor a cohort of AAA patients using their current sutures and surgical techniques. Some of the vascular surgeons will undergo training and if wanted, proctoring during the first procedures using the Principles. A cohort of 120 AAA patients will be closed according to the Principles and monitored. The results of these 120 patients will be compared to the control group consisting of patients closed with the conventional technique by non---trained surgeons. Study hypothesis and sample size calculation: Investigators might improve the incision hernia rate after AAA treatment through a mid line incision at 12 months by using the Principles from an estimated 25% in the conventionally closed patients to 10% in the patients closed using the Principles.

Calculation:

To show a decrease of 60% in the incision hernia rate at 12 months(25% vs 10% incision hernias at 12 months)with a power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, investigators need 100 evaluable patients at 12 months in each arm. To compensate a 20% lost to follow up, we have to include at least 120 patients before the "principles training" and 120 patients afterwards. So the trial will end inclusions when 120 AAA patients have been entered using the Principles. Most likely the control group will be larger than these 120 patients,depending on the number of vascular surgeons participating in the teaching course and the timing of this course.

Primary endpoint:The incidence of incision hernias at 12 months will be determined by clinical examination.

Data management and ownership:

The data will be collected on a paper form and will be introduced in a database (SPSS Statistics, IBM) from which statistical analysis will be made.

02

Conditions studied

  • Incisional Hernia
  • Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Keywords

  • Aortic Aneurysm
  • Hernia
  • Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques
03

In context

Incisional Hernia

212 studies on the registry are indexed under Incisional Hernia; 58 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 240 is above the median of 150 across 75 observational studies indexed under Incisional Hernia.

Browse Incisional Hernia studies →

Lead sponsor

Igor Koncar is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patient operated due to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with open repair through laparotomy.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:All patients undergoing treatment for an abdominal aortic aneurysm in the department of vascular surgery at the Serbian Clinical Centre in Beograd, Serbia, through midline laparotomies are eligible for the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

patients not willing to take part in the follow up visits after no other exclusion criteria will be used (emergency, previous laparotomy or hernia repair)

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
240 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Conventional Group

    Group of patients in whom after open AAA repair abdominal wall will be closed by conventional technique by the operating surgeons. There will be a great variation in sutures and techniques used

    Procedure: Conventional group

  • PRINCIPLES Group

    Group of patients in whom after open AAA repair abdominal wall will be closed by PRINCIPLES technique by the operating surgeons.

    Procedure: PRINCIPLES technique

Interventions

  • ProcedurePRINCIPLES technique

    Principles technique for closure of midline laparotomy incisions * closure with a running suture of a slowly absorbable monofilament suture- Monomax 2/0 of 150 cm length with a taper needle point ((1/2 circle, size: 30mm) (B.Braun, reference 0041453) * the suture is started and ended with a self-locking knot, if more than one suture is used sutures are knotted separately, only the fascia will be sutured with small stitches close to each other * the SL/WL ratio should be at least 4/1 * SL/WL = (150cm x number of sutures used) - (the suture remnants) * the mean stitch length should be less than 4 cm (suture length / number of stitches placed)

  • ProcedureConventional group

    the fascia will be closed with the current method by the surgeons. There will be a great variation in sutures and techniques used. Study group: the fascia will be closed according

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of incisional hernias

    Incidence of incisional hernia after AAA repair after 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Medical University of Gdansk Dept. of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery
    Gdansk, Poland
  • Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Serbian Clinical Centre
    Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2012, a primary completion of Dec 2015 and a completion of Dec 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 10, 2013
First posted
Dec 16, 2013
Start
Feb 2012
Primary completionActual
Dec 2015
CompletionActual
Dec 2015
Last update
Apr 10, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02012270
Lead sponsor
Igor Koncar
Responsible party
Igor Koncar (Igor Koncar, University of Belgrade) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 16, 2013
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Last update
Apr 10, 2018

Study contacts

Lazar Davidovic, Prof
principal investigator · University of Belgrade
Zivan Maksimovic, Prof
principal investigator · University of Belgrade
Filip Muysoms, MD
principal investigator · University Ghent

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion