CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01996813Updated Aug 31, 2018Results posted

Compression Stocking Use in Shoulder Arthroscopy in Beach Chair

An interventional study of Thigh-high compression stockings in Obesity and Shoulder Impingement, sponsored by Loyola University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-31.

Sponsored by Loyola University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2013, registered Nov 2013).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Shoulder arthroscopy is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures and it is often done with the patient in the upright, or beach chair position (BCP). There have been multiple reported complications associated with the BCP, including cerebral ischemia, loss of vision, ophthalmoplegia, stroke, and even death. It has been reported that patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 34 or greater are as much as 12 times more likely to experience cerebral desaturation events (CDEs) compared to non-obese controls. CDEs in the upright position are hypothesized to be partially related to reduced cardiac preload due to venous pooling in the lower extremities which is exaggerated in obese patients. This prospective observational study aims to determine if the use of compression stockings in obese patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the BCP can reduce the incidence, frequency, or magnitude of CDEs experienced by the patient

Read the detailed description

There have been numerous studies recently in the orthopaedic surgery and anesthesia literature related to both complications associated with arthroscopy in the BCP and ongoing efforts to improve patient safety. Advantages of this position when compared with the lateral decubitus position include easier anatomic orientation, lack of traction on the brachial plexus, ease of exam under anesthesia, and easier conversion to an open approach if needed. While extremely uncommon, complications such as ischemic brain and spinal cord injury as well as visual loss and ophthalmoplegia have been reported. A recent study reported that obesity increases the likelihood of having a CDE by as many as 12 times. CDEs were defined as intra-operative decreases in regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (rSO2) of 20% or greater from baseline as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Since obesity is so common, it was decided to investigate a measure to potentially help decrease CDEs in this population.

The exact etiology of CDEs has not been definitively demonstrated and it is felt to be multifactorial. The sympathetic nervous system normally increases systemic vascular resistance and heart rate to maintain mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) when a person sits up or stands upright. This response is blunted by the vasodilatory effects of intravenous and inhaled anesthetics used in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the BCP. The result is decreased MAP and cerebral perfusion pressure that can contribute to hypoxic brain injury. The use of sequential compression devices placed on the legs of patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the BCP has been shown to reduce the incidence of hypotension by increasing cardiac preload. This study excluded obese patients (BMI > 30) and did not directly monitor rSO2, but rather only monitored hemodynamic variables.

Compression stockings are often used in patients with venous insufficiency to help with pain and to control edema. The stockings compress the soft tissues and veins, and in conjunction with sequential compression devices (SCDs), may help to increase preload in an anesthetized patient in the BCP. To our knowledge, the effect of compression stockings on cerebral perfusion has not been studied. This study aims to determine if the use of compression stockings in obese patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the BCP can decrease the incidence, frequency or magnitude of CDEs as measured by NIRS. We hypothesize that the use of compression stockings will result in decreased incidence and frequency of CDEs in our population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Shoulder Impingement

Keywords

  • arthroscopy
  • shoulder
  • obesity
  • beach chair
  • compression hose
03

In context

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

304 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Impingement Syndrome; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is below the median of 54 across 261 interventional studies indexed under Shoulder Impingement Syndrome.

Browse Shoulder Impingement Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Loyola University is the lead sponsor of 132 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Of its 26 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m\^2
  • Capable of receiving an interscalene nerve block.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18
  • History of carotid artery stenosis equal to or greater than 90%
  • History of stroke
  • History of transient ischemic attack
  • History of syncope
  • History of vision loss
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prospective Case

    Patients with a BMI of 30 kg/m\^2 or greater who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position and were monitored intraoperatively using near-infrared spectroscopy while wearing thigh-high compression stockings.

    Device: Thigh-high compression stockings

  • No intervention
    Historical Control

    Patients with a BMI of 30 kg/m\^2 or greater who underwent elective shoulder arthroscopy in the beach-chair position and were monitored intraoperatively using near-infrared spectroscopy but without wearing compression stockings.

Interventions

  • DeviceThigh-high compression stockings

    The intervention in this study are thigh-high compression stockings manufactured by Covidien.

    Also known as: Thrombo-Embolic Deterrent (TED) Anti-Embolism Stockings

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cerebral Desaturation Event

    The prevalence of a cerebral desaturation event is compared between prospective patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position while wearing thigh-high compression stockings versus historical control patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position and did not wear thigh-high compression stockings.

    Time frame: Assessed intraoperatively, an average of 114 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operation Time

    The length of operation time (in minutes) is compared between prospective patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position while wearing thigh-high compression stockings versus historical control patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position and did not wear thigh-high compression stockings.

    Time frame: End of surgery

07

Results

Posted Jul 2, 2014
Limitations and caveats
There are no limitations or caveats to report

Participant flow

For the prospective case cohort, 23 participants were recruited from December 2013 through May 2014 (6 months) from a tertiary care practice. The remaining 24 participants were historical control participants

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneProspective CaseHistorical Control
Started2324
Completed2324
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryCerebral Desaturation Event

The prevalence of a cerebral desaturation event is compared between prospective patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position while wearing thigh-high compression stockings versus historical control patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position and did not wear thigh-high compression stockings.

Time frame:
Assessed intraoperatively, an average of 114 minutes
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cerebral Desaturation Event
ParticipantsHistorical ControlProspective Case
No Cerebral Desaturation Event1722
Cerebral desaturation event71
Statistical analysis
  • Historical Control vs Prospective Case · Regression, Logistic · p = .0553 (The exact p-value was estimated) · Odds ratio (or): 0.115 · 95% CI 0.002 to 1.034The method was exact logistic regression
SecondaryOperation Time

The length of operation time (in minutes) is compared between prospective patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position while wearing thigh-high compression stockings versus historical control patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position and did not wear thigh-high compression stockings.

Time frame:
End of surgery
Reported as:
Median · Minutes
Operation Time
MinutesHistorical ControlProspective Case
Operation Time94.08 ± 15.47134.40 ± 44.44
Statistical analysis
  • Historical Control vs Prospective Case · t-test, 2 sided · p = <.001 · Mean difference (final values): 40.31 · 95% CI 20.22 to 60.39A Satterthwaite correction was used to adjust the degrees of freedom

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected from December 2013 through May 2014 (6 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Historical Control———
Prospective Case0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The baseline analysis population comprises the 23 prospective cases who met inclusion criteria and were not excluded by the principal investigator as well as 24 historical control participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Historical ControlProspective CaseTotal
Mean53.33 ± 11.5352.96 ± 10.8253.15 ± 11.07
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Historical ControlProspective CaseTotal
Female81220
Male161127
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Historical ControlProspective CaseTotal
United States242347
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(kg/m^2)Historical ControlProspective CaseTotal
Median35.00 (32.55 to 37.90)33.40 (31.20 to 36.10)34.30 (31.30 to 37.60)
Comorbid Diabetes
Comorbid Diabetes(Participants)Historical ControlProspective CaseTotal
No191938
Yes549
Comorbid Peripheral Vascular Disease
Comorbid Peripheral Vascular Disease(Participants)Historical ControlProspective CaseTotal
No242246
Yes011
Comorbid Hypertension
Comorbid Hypertension(Participants)Historical ControlProspective CaseTotal
No101020
Yes141327
Comorbid Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Comorbid Obstructive Sleep Apnea(Participants)Historical ControlProspective CaseTotal
No161733
Yes8614

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Loyola University Medical Center
    Maywood, Illinois 60153, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS, Vaughn J, Nisman M. Cerebral oxygen desaturation events assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy during shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair and lateral decubitus positions. Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):496-505. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e33bd9. Epub 2010 May 27. PubMed 20508134 ↗
  • Pohl A, Cullen DJ. Cerebral ischemia during shoulder surgery in the upright position: a case series. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Sep;17(6):463-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.09.012. PubMed 16171668 ↗
  • Bhatti MT, Enneking FK. Visual loss and ophthalmoplegia after shoulder surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Mar;96(3):899-902. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000047272.31849.F9. PubMed 12598282 ↗
  • Papadonikolakis A, Wiesler ER, Olympio MA, Poehling GG. Avoiding catastrophic complications of stroke and death related to shoulder surgery in the sitting position. Arthroscopy. 2008 Apr;24(4):481-2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.02.005. PubMed 18375282 ↗
  • Fischer GW, Torrillo TM, Weiner MM, Rosenblatt MA. The use of cerebral oximetry as a monitor of the adequacy of cerebral perfusion in a patient undergoing shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. Pain Pract. 2009 Jul-Aug;9(4):304-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00282.x. Epub 2009 Mar 17. PubMed 19490464 ↗
  • Peruto CM, Ciccotti MG, Cohen SB. Shoulder arthroscopy positioning: lateral decubitus versus beach chair. Arthroscopy. 2009 Aug;25(8):891-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 28. PubMed 19664509 ↗
  • Salazar D, Sears BW, Aghdasi B, Only A, Francois A, Tonino P, Marra G. Cerebral desaturation events during shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position: patient risk factors and neurocognitive effects. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Sep;22(9):1228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.036. Epub 2013 Feb 15. PubMed 23415820 ↗
  • Smith JJ, Porth CM, Erickson M. Hemodynamic response to the upright posture. J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 May;34(5):375-86. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1994.tb04977.x. PubMed 8089249 ↗
  • Kwak HJ, Lee JS, Lee DC, Kim HS, Kim JY. The effect of a sequential compression device on hemodynamics in arthroscopic shoulder surgery using beach-chair position. Arthroscopy. 2010 Jun;26(6):729-33. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.10.001. Epub 2010 Mar 3. PubMed 20511029 ↗
  • Hamdan A. Management of varicose veins and venous insufficiency. JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2612-21. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.111352. PubMed 23268520 ↗
  • Pollard V, Prough DS, DeMelo AE, Deyo DJ, Uchida T, Stoddart HF. Validation in volunteers of a near-infrared spectroscope for monitoring brain oxygenation in vivo. Anesth Analg. 1996 Feb;82(2):269-77. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199602000-00010. PubMed 8561326 ↗
  • Tauchen AJ, Salazar D, Barton GJ, Francois A, Tonino P, Garbis NG, Evans D. The Effect of Compression Stockings on Cerebral Desaturation Events in Obese Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy in the Beach-Chair Position. Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec;31(12):2352-64. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Aug 3. PubMed 26248495 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 31, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01996813
Lead sponsor
Loyola University
Responsible party
Doug Evans (MD, Loyola University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 27, 2013
Start date
Mar 28, 2013
Primary completion
Jul 27, 2015
Completion
Jul 27, 2015
Results posted
Jul 2, 2014
Last update
Aug 31, 2018

Study contacts

Douglas Evans, MD
principal investigator · Loyola University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion