CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01995968REPEREUpdated Aug 4, 2015

Antenatal Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction and Stillbirths Rate.

An observational study in Stillbirth, Intrauterine Growth Retardation and Infant, Small for Gestational Age, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Status unknown at 21 sites in France. Open to participants aged 24 Weeks to 42 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-08-04.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2014), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
480
Ages
24 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective is to assess the role of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR) on stillbirth, by a case-control study in a population-based sample of small for gestational age (SGA) livebirths and stillbirths in 3 French counties (Isère, Savoie and Haute-Savoie). SGA births will be defined as a birthweight below the 10th percentile of French customised birth weight curves.

Our secondary objectives are

  • to identify determinants of antenatal detection of FGR among a representative sample of SGA births, with a special interest in the definition of FGR. Our hypothesis is that births who are SGA by customised birthweight curves and non-SGA by population birthweight curves, are not detected antenatally, despite the current strategy including the use of umbilical Doppler.
  • to analyse prenatal care of a subsample of SGA stillbirths with and without detection of FGR by a confidential enquiry.
Read the detailed description

Stillbirths will be identified by the RHEOP (Registre des Handicaps de l'Enfant et Observatoire Périnatal).

The RHEOP was created in 1988 in the Isère district in the Rhône-Alpes region of France. The area covered by the registry was enlarged to include two contiguous districts in 2005 (Savoie and Haute-Savoie). This registry includes all cases of childhood disability as well as all stillbirths to residents in these districts. Its objective is to monitor the trends in stillbirth and chid disability, and to identify conditions associated with these events. The three participating districts constitute a population-based sample of 30 000 births per year. The RHEOP registry uses the WHO definition of a stillbirth, i.e., "the birth of a baby with a birth weight of 500 g or 22 or more completed weeks of gestation who died before or during labor and birth". Its completeness is checked by matching its database with three data sources : results of placental examination and fetal autopsy, adjacent register of fetal anomalies, and regional reference center for prenatal diagnosis.

Stillbirths are identified in maternity hospitals thanks to collaborating midwifes and routinely collected data. Several specific investigators, who are trained nurses, midwives or physicians, complete a standardized form based on the medical record for each case.

For the purpose of the project, additional data will be collected allowing to describe prenatal care including ultrasound and Doppler examinations, and obstetrical management. Healthcare professionals (GP, midwife, obstetricians and gynecologists) will be solicited if data are missing in maternity medical records. SGA stillbirths in 2012 and 2013 will be included.

Consecutive SGA livebirths to residents in Isère, Savoie and Haute-Savoie, will be identified by the same way. Two months (probably october and november 2013)are approximately needed to record the sample size of controls.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stillbirth
  • Intrauterine Growth Retardation
  • Infant, Small for Gestational Age

Keywords

  • Stillbirth
  • Fetal growth restriction
  • Small for gestational age
  • Antenatal detection
  • Prenatal Care
  • Mass Screening
03

In context

Fetal Growth Retardation

264 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetal Growth Retardation; 66 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 480 is above the median of 161 across 142 observational studies indexed under Fetal Growth Retardation.

Browse Fetal Growth Retardation studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 815 studies on the registry; 205 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
24 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

SGA births to mothers residents in 3 French districts (Isère, Savoie and Haute-Savoie)

Inclusion criteria

Births:

  • Stillbirths (antepartum or intrapartum fetal death) (=Cases) or livebirths (=Controls)
  • at or after 24 completed weeks of gestational age
  • singletons
  • to mothers residents in 1 of the 3 districts (Isère, Savoie, Haute-Savoie) of the RHEOP register
  • SGA: birthweight below the 10th percentile of French customised birthweight curves)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fetal deaths with date of death estimated being older than date of birth by at least 1 week
  • Lethal congenital anomalies
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
480 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Week
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • SGA stillbirths (Cases)

    Stillbirths, SGA births (below the 10th percentile of French customised birthweight curves), born in 2012-13, at or after 24 completed weeks of gestational age, without lethal congenital anomalies, to mothers residents in Isère, Savoie or Haute-Savoie

    Other: Antenatal identification of fetal growth restriction

  • SGA livebirths (Controls)

    Livebirths, SGA births (below the 10th percentile of French customised birthweight curves), born in 2013, at or after 24 completed weeks of gestational age, without lethal congenital anomalies, to mothers residents in Isère, Savoie or Haute-Savoie

    Other: Antenatal identification of fetal growth restriction

Interventions

  • OtherAntenatal identification of fetal growth restriction

    FGR is considered as "identified" if: * FGR was mentioned in medical charts * OR at least one ultrasound fetometry had indicated an estimated fetal weight or an abdominal diameter below the 10th percentile (whatever the reference curve used) * OR no (or insufficient) weight gain between two ultrasounds mentioned in medical charts * OR pathological Doppler examination of the umbilical artery (absent or reversed blood flow at the end of diastole) * OR utero-placental Doppler ultrasound indicated for suspicion of growth failure

    Also known as: Antenatal detection, Antenatal recognition, Antenatal suspicion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of antenatal detection of FGR

    Crude and adjusted OR of stillbirth according to antenatal detection of FGR

    Time frame: baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Factors associated with lack of antenatal detection of FGR in a representative sample of SGA births

    Crude and adjusted OR and 95% confidence intervals

    Time frame: baseline

  2. fetal deaths of SGA newborns with and without antenatal detection of FGR

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

21 sites
  • CH Albertville-Moutiers
    Albertville, 73200, France
  • Clinique Générale Annecy
    Annecy, 74000, France
  • CH Annecy
    Annecy, 74374, France
  • Polyclinique de Savoie Annemasse
    Annemasse, 74100, France
  • CHI Annemasse Bonneville
    Bonneville, 74107, France
  • CH Bourg Saint Maurice
    Bourg Saint Maurice, 73704, France
  • Clinique Saint Vincent de Paul Bourgoin Jallieu
    Bourgoin Jallieu, 38300, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Bourgoin Jallieu
    Bourgoin-Jallieu, 38300, France
  • Hopital Femme Mere Enfant
    Bron, 69677, France
  • CH Chambéry
    Chambéry, 73000, France
  • Clinique des Cèdres
    Echirolles, 38432, France
  • Chu Grenoble
    Grenoble, 38000, France
  • Clinique Mutualiste Eaux Claires
    Grenoble, 38000, France
  • Hopital Croix rousse
    Lyon, 69317, France
  • Clinique Belledonne
    Saint Martin d Hères, 38400, France
  • CH Saint Jean de Maurienne
    Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne, 73303, France
  • CH Sud Léman Valserine
    Saint-Julien-en-Genevois, 74164, France
  • Hôpitaux du Mont Blanc
    Sallanches, 74700, France
  • Hôpitaux du Léman
    Thonon-les-Bains, 74203, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Vienne
    Vienne, 38209, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Voiron
    Voiron, 38506, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Altman DG, Hytten FE. Intrauterine growth retardation: let's be clear about it. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Oct;96(10):1127-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03185.x. No abstract available. PubMed 2590650 ↗
  • Pardi G, Marconi AM, Cetin I. Placental-fetal interrelationship in IUGR fetuses--a review. Placenta. 2002 Apr;23 Suppl A:S136-41. doi: 10.1053/plac.2002.0802. PubMed 11978072 ↗
  • Kaufmann P SI. Placental development. In: Polin RA FW, eds, editor. Fetal and neonatal physiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998:59-70.
  • Baschat AA. Pathophysiology of fetal growth restriction: implications for diagnosis and surveillance. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 Aug;59(8):617-27. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000133943.54530.76. PubMed 15277896 ↗
  • Hecher K, Snijders R, Campbell S, Nicolaides K. Fetal venous, intracardiac, and arterial blood flow measurements in intrauterine growth retardation: relationship with fetal blood gases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;173(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90161-2. PubMed 7631665 ↗
  • Severi FM, Bocchi C, Visentin A, Falco P, Cobellis L, Florio P, Zagonari S, Pilu G. Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):225-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00652.x. PubMed 11896941 ↗
  • Haws RA, Yakoob MY, Soomro T, Menezes EV, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA. Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 May 7;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-S1-S5. PubMed 19426468 ↗
  • Imdad A, Yakoob MY, Siddiqui S, Bhutta ZA. Screening and triage of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in general population and high risk pregnancies: a systematic review with a focus on reduction of IUGR related stillbirths. BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 13;11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S1. PubMed 21501426 ↗
  • Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP. Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 May;172(5):1379-87. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90466-2. PubMed 7755042 ↗
  • Bricker L, Neilson JP. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451. PubMed 10796263 ↗
  • Bricker L, Neilson JP, Dowswell T. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD001451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub3. PubMed 18843617 ↗
  • Neilson JP AZ. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies (Cochrane review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, Oxford:Update software, 2002.
  • GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG. 2003 Jan;110(1):27-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02014.x. PubMed 12504932 ↗
  • Thornton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A, Spiegelhalter DJ, Levene M; GRIT study group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004 Aug 7-13;364(9433):513-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16809-8. PubMed 15302194 ↗
  • Bais JM, Eskes M, Pel M, Bonsel GJ, Bleker OP. Effectiveness of detection of intrauterine growth retardation by abdominal palpation as screening test in a low risk population: an observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Oct 15;116(2):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.037. PubMed 15358457 ↗
  • Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P. Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Jul;77(6):643-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770611.x. PubMed 9688242 ↗
  • Mattioli KP, Sanderson M, Chauhan SP. Inadequate identification of small-for-gestational-age fetuses at an urban teaching hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 May;109(2):140-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.023. Epub 2010 Feb 2. PubMed 20129608 ↗
  • Lindqvist PG, Molin J. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;25(3):258-64. doi: 10.1002/uog.1806. PubMed 15717289 ↗
  • Ogundipe EM, Wolfe CD, Seed P, Gamsu HR. Does the antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age babies influence their two-year outcomes? Am J Perinatol. 2000;17(2):73-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9273. PubMed 11023165 ↗
  • Fretts RC, Boyd ME, Usher RH, Usher HA. The changing pattern of fetal death, 1961-1988. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jan;79(1):35-9. PubMed 1727582 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01995968
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Collaborators
Registre de Handicap de l'Enfant et Observatoire Périnatal (RHEOP) Isère, Savoie et Haute-Savoie, UMRS 953, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women's and Children's Health, INSERM
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 27, 2013
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Dec 2015 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 4, 2015

Study contacts

Anne Ego, MD PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Grenoble
Christine CANS, MD PHD
study chair · Registre Handicaps de l'Enfant et Observatoire Périnatal
Jennifer Zeitlin, MD PHD
study director · INSERM U953

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion