CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01986582NOPARUpdated Sep 23, 2015

NoAL (HPMC) in Combination With Oxymetazoline in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Oxymetazoline and Hydroxyl-propyl-methyl cellulose powder in Allergic Rhinitis, sponsored by Association Asthma, Bulgaria. Completed at 1 site in Bulgaria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-09-23.

Sponsored by Association Asthma, Bulgaria · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Allergic rhinitis is treated with a variety of systemic and locally applied drugs. The effectiveness of the intranasally applied formulations is diminished by the cleaning mechanisms of the nose, rhinorrhea in particular. Slowing down of the clearance of the nasal mucosa and prolonging the contact time of locally applied drugs with the nasal mucosa would improve their efficacy. One method is creating dosage forms containing mucoadhesive polymers. We have demonstrated that a mucoadhesive solution containing HPMC enhances the clinical efficacy of oxymetazoline. However, the industrial development of fixed combinations of pharmaceutical compound and mucoadhesive carrier requires substantial investments, escalating manifold if different pharmaceutical compounds have to be rendered mucoadhesive.

NoAl is a cellulose derivative powder, which forms a gel layer on contact with the mucosal surface of the nose blocking the contact of the pollen grains with the nasal mucosa in seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, there is another potential benefit of applying NoAl (HPMC) along with other commercially available drugs for local treatment of rhinitis, as the formation of a gel layer can substantially delay their clearance from the nose and thus increase their effectiveness. This hypothesis needs to be substantiated clinically.

Read the detailed description

The main objective of the trial is to test the synergy between HPMC and oxymetazoline (both applied nasally) on the increase of peak nasal inspiratory flow in patients suffering from moderately severe / severe persistent allergic rhinitis.

The design of the trial is parallel-groups, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, single centre study.

Forty patients are randomly assigned to receive either oxymetazoline followed by HPMC (Group A) or oxymetazoline followed by placebo (Group B).

Each patient is followed up for 15 days. Day 1 is the screening and inclusion visit. Data will then be collected on day 8 \& 15. Patients will fill in diaries their everyday symptoms, adverse events and applied medications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

  • Allergic Rhinitis
  • Congestion
  • Mucoadhesive Treatment
  • Nasal Decongestant
03

In context

Rhinitis

1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 89 across 906 interventional studies indexed under Rhinitis.

Browse Rhinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Association Asthma, Bulgaria is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients
  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 50 years
  • Moderately severe / severe persistent allergic rhinitis
  • Positive skin prick test for perennial aero-allergens
  • Active symptoms with prominent congestion at the time of inclusion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with pollen sensitization during the respective pollen season
  • Subjects with arterial hypertension, arrhythmia or evidence of heart ischemia
  • Subjects with other serious chronic comorbidities and bad therapeutic control
  • Subjects with nasal polyposis
  • Flu-like episode during the past 30 days
  • Subjects unable to give informed consent
  • Subjects with any of the contra-indications of oxymetazoline or NoAL
  • Pregnant or lactating women
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A

    One puff of oxymetazoline immediately followed by one puff of hydroxyl-propyl-methyl cellulose powder, morning \& evening, for 8 days.

    Drug: Oxymetazoline · Other: Hydroxyl-propyl-methyl cellulose powder

  • Placebo comparator
    Group B

    One puff of oxymetazoline immediately followed by one puff of placebo, morning \& evening, for 8 days.

    Drug: Oxymetazoline · Other: Placebo (lactose powder)

Interventions

  • DrugOxymetazoline

    Intranasal application

    Also known as: Afrin

  • OtherHydroxyl-propyl-methyl cellulose powder

    Intranasal application

    Also known as: NoAl

  • OtherPlacebo (lactose powder)

    Intranasal application

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) area under the curve (AUC) change between the placebo and active NoAl treatment on day 1

    Time frame: PNIF on Day 1, 8 and 15

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference between the PNIF AUC D1-D8 differences between the two groups

    Time frame: PNIF on D1 and D8

  2. Differences in nasal mucociliary clearance (Saccharine test) between both groups.

    Time frame: Performed on D1, D8 and D15

  3. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for the separate rhinitis symptoms between the two groups

    Time frame: On D1, D8 and D15

  4. Change of each symptom score for congestion over 8 days

    Time frame: From D1 to D8

  5. Change of total rhinitis symptom score (TRSS) over 8 days

    Time frame: From D1 to D8

  6. Difference in the applied rescue decongestant (total number of additional puffs of oxymetazoline or any other medications indicated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis) as needed between the two groups

    Time frame: For 15 days

  7. Number and severity of adverse events

    Time frame: 15 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University Sofia, University Hospital "Alexandrovska", Clinic of Allergy and Asthma
    Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tzachev CT, Mandajieva M, Minkov EH, Popov TA. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of standard and mucoadhesive-based nasal decongestants. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Jan;53(1):107-9. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01525.x. PubMed 11849202 ↗
  • Valerieva A, Popov TA, Staevska M, Kralimarkova T, Petkova E, Valerieva E, Mustakov T, Lazarova T, Dimitrov V, Church MK. Effect of micronized cellulose powder on the efficacy of topical oxymetazoline in allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):e134-9. doi: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3879. Epub 2015 Jun 29. PubMed 26133030 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01986582
Lead sponsor
Association Asthma, Bulgaria
Collaborators
Nasaleze
Responsible party
Prof. Todor Popov (Professor, Association Asthma, Bulgaria) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 18, 2013
Start date
Oct 2013
Primary completion
Feb 2014
Completion
Feb 2014
Last update
Sep 23, 2015

Study contacts

Todor A Popov, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Medical University Sofia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion