ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01981590MAPsUpdated Mar 16, 2020Results posted

Mapping for Acute Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Study

An interventional study of Stimulating the phrenic nerve intravenously using high frequency electrical pulses using an EP catheter connected to external pulse stimulator. in Sleep Apnea, sponsored by Medtronic BRC. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-16.

Sponsored by Medtronic BRC (part of Medtronic) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Mapping for Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Study (MAPS) is being conducted to evaluate the feasibility of transvascular stimulation of phrenic nerves via an electrophysiology (EP) catheter advanced into the great veins.

Read the detailed description

Purpose The Mapping for Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Study (MAPS) is being conducted to evaluate the feasibility of transvascular stimulation of phrenic nerves via an EP catheter advanced into the great veins.

Study Design This is a prospective, non-randomized, acute feasibility study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Apnea

Keywords

  • breathing, heart failure, sleep apnea
03

In context

Sleep Apnea Syndromes

2,183 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea Syndromes; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 53 across 1,400 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Apnea Syndromes.

Browse Sleep Apnea Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Medtronic BRC is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects older than 18 years of age
  • Subject is undergoing a cardiac catheterization involving right heart catheterization and/or EP procedures and/or device implant.
  • Subjects willing and able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject with a previously implanted transvenous lead, which is still present in the veins under study.
  • Subject with evidence of phrenic nerve palsy.
  • Subject with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  • Subject with a spinal cord stimulator.
  • Subject needs to receive drugs that might interfere with patient perception.
  • Subjects with medical conditions that would prevent study participation
  • Subjects who are pregnant, nursing, or of child bearing potential and are not on a reliable form of birth control
  • Subjects enrolled in concurrent studies which could confound the results of this study
  • Subject is unable or unwilling to participate with study procedures
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    All enrolled patients

    All enrolled patients that underwent a scheduled cardiac catheterization involving an atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure as per clinical practice

    Device: Stimulating the phrenic nerve intravenously using high frequency electrical pulses using an EP catheter connected to external pulse stimulator.

Interventions

  • DeviceStimulating the phrenic nerve intravenously using high frequency electrical pulses using an EP catheter connected to external pulse stimulator.

    Intravenously stimulating the phrenic nerve with an EP catheter using high frequency electrical pulses as generated by the model 19039 external neurostimulator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Response to Stimulation (Diaphragmatic Movement Achieved)

    Number of Patients With Response to Stimulation, defined by Presence of Movement of the Diaphragm Induced by a Pacing Stimulus With Pulse Amplitude of 10 V or Less

    Time frame: one hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Response to Stimulation (Tidal Volume)

    Number of Patients With Response to Stimulation, defined by measured tidal volume of 200 ml or more induced by a pacing stimulus with pulse amplitude of 4 V or less

    Time frame: one hour

  2. Number of Patients With Observed Side Effects

    Number of patients with observed side effects like potential physiologic changes or side effects associated with transvenous nerve stimulation

    Time frame: From procedure to 2-4 weeks post-procedure

  3. Number of Observed Side Effects

    All observed side effects like potential physiologic changes or side effects associated with transvenous nerve stimulation such as pain, hiccup, skeletal muscular tremor, nausea, and sinus node activation

    Time frame: From procedure to 2-4 weeks post-procedure

07

Results

Posted Mar 16, 2020

Participant flow

15 subjects have been enrolled, in Sweden (Karolinska University Hospital, Solna in Stockholm) and in The Netherlands (Catherina Hospital in Eindhoven). All the 15 subjects enrolled underwent the study procedure and performed the 2-4 weeks post-procedure assessment follow-up

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhrenic Nerve Stimulation
Started15
Completed15
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients With Response to Stimulation (Diaphragmatic Movement Achieved)

Number of Patients With Response to Stimulation, defined by Presence of Movement of the Diaphragm Induced by a Pacing Stimulus With Pulse Amplitude of 10 V or Less

Time frame:
one hour
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Response to Stimulation (Diaphragmatic Movement Achieved)
ParticipantsPatients With Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Achieved
Number of Patients With Response to Stimulation (Diaphragmatic Movement Achieved)15
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Response to Stimulation (Tidal Volume)

Number of Patients With Response to Stimulation, defined by measured tidal volume of 200 ml or more induced by a pacing stimulus with pulse amplitude of 4 V or less

Time frame:
one hour
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Response to Stimulation (Tidal Volume)
ParticipantsPatients With Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Achieved
Number of Patients With Response to Stimulation (Tidal Volume)9
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Observed Side Effects

Number of patients with observed side effects like potential physiologic changes or side effects associated with transvenous nerve stimulation

Time frame:
From procedure to 2-4 weeks post-procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Observed Side Effects
ParticipantsPatients With Observed Side Effects
Number of Patients With Observed Side Effects6
SecondaryNumber of Observed Side Effects

All observed side effects like potential physiologic changes or side effects associated with transvenous nerve stimulation such as pain, hiccup, skeletal muscular tremor, nausea, and sinus node activation

Time frame:
From procedure to 2-4 weeks post-procedure
Reported as:
Number · Side Effect
Number of Observed Side Effects
Side EffectPatients With Observed Side Effects
Number of Observed Side Effects7

Adverse events

Collected over From procedure to 2-4 weeks post-procedure. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phrenic Nerve Stimulation0/15 (0%)3/15 (20%)4/15 (26.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPhrenic Nerve Stimulation
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/15
Sinus node dysfunctionCardiac disorders1/15
Peripheral artery aneurysmVascular disorders1/15
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPhrenic Nerve Stimulation
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders2/15
Supraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders1/15
Sinus node dysfunctionCardiac disorders1/15

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Phrenic Nerve Stimulation
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years10
>=65 years5
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Phrenic Nerve Stimulation
Mean60 ± 8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Phrenic Nerve Stimulation
Female6
Male9
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Phrenic Nerve Stimulation
Sweden7
Netherlands8
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Stichting Catharina Ziekenhuis
    Eindhoven, EJ 5623, Netherlands
  • Karolinska University Hospital, Solna
    Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01981590
Lead sponsor
Medtronic BRC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 11, 2013
Start date
Aug 2013
Primary completion
Sep 2015
Completion
Sep 2015
Results posted
Mar 16, 2020
Last update
Mar 16, 2020

Study contacts

Frieder Braunschweig, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Karolinska Institute, department of Cardiology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion