ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01981070Updated Jun 7, 2016

Parent Supports Intervention Project

An interventional study of Mindfulness Intervention for Parents and Support and Information for Parents in Stress, sponsored by Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-07.

Sponsored by Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of two community based interventions for parents of adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD) who are requesting services.

The two interventions will include:

  1. Support and Information Intervention - provides parents with support and information about services for their sons and daughters
  2. Mindfulness Intervention - empowers parents through teaching them mindfulness skills

We hypothesize that:

  1. Parents in both types of interventions will report benefits (reductions in psychological distress) maintained at follow-up.
  2. Parents in mindfulness intervention group will report improvements in mindful parenting, self compassion, positive gain, empowerment, and reduced burden. Parents in support and information intervention group will report improvements in empowerment, positive gain, and reduced burden.
  3. Parents in mindfulness intervention group will show greater improvements by 3 months follow-up than parents in the support and information group.
Read the detailed description

Parents report many positive dimensions of raising a child with IDD, yet at the same time, being a parent to an individual with IDD is associated with increased stress and poorer psychological wellbeing. Through the MAPS (see www.mapsresearch.ca) program, we have been studying the experience of parents of adults with IDD to better understand what contributes to their difficulties, and factors associated with their wellbeing. This research, combined with our recent systematic review on the experience of parents needing services, highlights the need for psychological supports to empower parents and to enhance their ability to care for their children. With the appropriate psychological supports, parents may be able to support their sons/daughters for longer. It is crucial that we invest in researching interventions and promising practices that may enhance the capacity of parents. However, limited research has considered what types of support make a difference in parental well-being.

Parent empowerment, mindfulness and psychological acceptance are key psychological variables related to positive parent outcomes, including the ability to more effectively care for others. Parent empowerment refers to active attempts to change situations through the application of knowledge and skill. Empowerment is possible when parents feel more familiar with services, and more able to advocate and plan for their child. Person directed planning, orientation to services, practical tips and planning are all helpful for empowerment. Psychological acceptance is a process that involves embracing current difficulties without actively attempting to directly change them, thus facilitating positive action in line with an individual's or family's values. Such acceptance can be particularly helpful for parents when stressful events cannot be immediately resolved or addressed.

Mindfulness is related to psychological acceptance, and is defined as the awareness that emerges through paying attention, on purpose, in the present moment, nonjudgementally to the unfolding of experience moment by moment. These latter processes may help parents preserve their emotional energy and reduce those thoughts, attitudes and judgments that can interfere with addressing their needs and the needs of their child. In this way, we expect that increasing psychological acceptance and mindfulness will facilitate parental and family empowerment. Mindfulness is an innovative support that shows particular promise because it may serve to strengthen parent capacity to care in times of stress, may fundamentally alter how parents spend time with their children, and it may help to make parents more effective advocates for their children. There is an emerging evidence base demonstrating the benefits of mindfulness and acceptance based interventions for a host of medical and psychological issues. Recent attention has been paid to teaching mindfulness to caregivers to help them with caregiving. Studies have included caregivers of patients with cancer, adults with dementia, youth with behavioural difficulties, and most recently, children with IDD.

Preliminary research from the UK and the US has demonstrated the benefits that mindfulness based interventions have on parent ability to care for their young children and youth with IDD. Singh and colleagues published case series teaching parents of children with IDD the philosophy and practice of mindfulness. These papers demonstrated that with 12 training sessions, parents reported decreases in child behaviour problems and increased parenting satisfaction. Blackledge and Hayes applied Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to a group of 20 parents of youth with autism and demonstrated significant improvement in general distress, depression, and maternal acceptance immediately following the therapy as well as 3 months later.

Most recently, Dykens and colleagues demonstrated improved mood and reductions in in a cohort of 287 parents of children with IDD participating in Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction in Tennessee, compared to parents participating in a Positive Psychology Support Program. Neece and colleagues reported similar improvements in a group of 100 parents with preschool age children with IDD in California. Most impressive in both studies was the high attendance rate of parents, attributed in part to onsite childcare. A similar group, using a modification of Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT), developed by team member Zindel Segal and colleagues is currently being evaluated in Wales by team member Richard Hastings and colleagues.

We will evaluate the impact of two community based interventions for parents of adults with IDD who are requesting services. The first intervention is considered current best practice (active control), which will offer parents support and information about services to enhance parent empowerment ("support and information for parents"). This will be compared to an intervention that will target both parent empowerment and psychological acceptance/mindfulness by blending parent support with mindfulness training ("mindfulness intervention for parents"). The idea of adding a psychological intervention to a more practical intervention has been explored in mindfulness research previously and also in the parent training literature more generally. We will compare this intervention to an "active control" so that we can determine the unique contribution of the mindfulness component of the intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stress

Keywords

  • parent support
  • mindfulness
  • intellectual disability
  • developmental disability
  • empowerment
  • psychological acceptance
  • parental stress
  • parental depression
03

In context

Intellectual Disability

371 studies on the registry are indexed under Intellectual Disability; 104 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 52 across 239 interventional studies indexed under Intellectual Disability.

Browse Intellectual Disability studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health is the lead sponsor of 339 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parent applied to Disability Services Ontario (DSO) Toronto Region for services for their adult child
  • Adult child determined eligible for services but not yet completed the standardized assessment of need
  • Child age 17.5 and up and living at home
  • Parent proficient in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parent has not applied for DSO Toronto Region for services for their adult child
  • Adult child determined ineligible for services
  • Child age under 17.5 or not living at home
  • Parent not proficient in English
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Mindfulness Intervention for Parents

    The mindfulness intervention program incorporates the same structure as the Support and Information for Parents intervention (orientation session, six 2-hour sessions over 6 weeks, co-facilitated by two leaders) but different content. Instead of presentations by experts and open-ended discussions and peer support, sessions will offer experiential training in meditation practice (sitting meditation, gentle yoga, and walking meditation), as outlined in the MBCT Program (Segal et al., 2012). Each week, parents will be required to practice a mindfulness skill, and also participate in a "mindful parenting" exercise as homework, such as joining their child in an activity of the child's choice.

    Behavioral: Mindfulness Intervention for Parents

  • Active comparator
    Support and Information for Parents

    This 6-week program includes orientation session, six 2-hour sessions, held weekly. Parents will be provided with information on existing services in the region, and strategies to be strong advocates and plan and access services for their child. Each session will include a presentation by an expert, with a question answer period, a break, and facilitated discussion with other parents. The sessions will be co-facilitated by clinicians from the Disability Services Ontario (DSO) and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH).

    Behavioral: Support and Information for Parents

Interventions

  • BehavioralMindfulness Intervention for Parents

    See Study Arms

  • BehavioralSupport and Information for Parents

    See Study Arms

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Depression Stress Anxiety Scale

    The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS; Lovibond \& Lovibond, 1995) is a 21-item scale assessing the severity of a range of symptoms across depression, anxiety, and stress. Parents will be asked to rate each item (statement) on a 4-point Likert scale, with 0 being "did not apply to me at all" and 3 being "applied to me very much, or most of the time." Only two subscales, 7-items each, will be used: depression and stress. The DASS generates a total score for each of the two subscales.

    Time frame: 21 weeks following Randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Family Empowerment Scale

    The Family Empowerment Scale (FES; Koren et al., 1992) is a 34-item measure that assesses feelings of empowerment. The FES is comprised of 3 subscales: Family, Service System and Community/Political and responses are given on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being "never" and 5 being "very often." Only two subscales, 12 items each, will be used: Family and Service System.

    Time frame: 21 weeks following Randomization

  2. Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form

    The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire- Short Form (FFMQ-SF; Bohlmeijer, et al, 2011) measures day-to-day mindfulness through 24 items on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being "never or very rarely true" and 5 being "very often or always true." It is commonly used in mindfulness research studies.

    Time frame: 21 weeks following Randomization

  3. Bangor Mindful Parenting Scale

    The Bangor Mindful Parenting Scale (BMPS; Jones, et al., in press) is a 15-item measure that assesses mindfulness explicitly in the parenting role and was developed for parents of children with developmental disabilities in the UK. Responses are given on a 4-point Likert scale, with 0 being "never true" and 3 being "always true."

    Time frame: 21 weeks following Randomization

  4. Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form

    The Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF, Raes, et al., 2011) is a 12-item questionnaire that measures participant levels of self-compassion. Caregivers will be asked to rate each statement on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being "almost never" and 5 being "almost always."

    Time frame: 21 weeks following Randomization

  5. Positive Gains Scale

    The Positive Gains Scale (PGS; Pit-ten Cate, 2003) is 7-item measure that assesses caregivers' perceptions of positive contributions their child has made to their lives. The measure utilizes a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 being "strongly agree" to 5 being "strongly disagree."

    Time frame: 21 weeks following Randomization

  6. Burden Scale

    The Caregiver Burden scale measures subjective feelings of caregiver burden using the 9-item burden subscale of the Revised Caregiver Appraisal Scale (Lawton, Kleban, Moss, Rovine \& Glicksman, 2000). Items measure caregiver's perception of the negative impacts caregiving has had on his or her health, well-being, social life and personal relationships. The items utilize a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 5 being "agree a lot" to 1 being "disagree a lot." Total scores range from 9 to 45, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived burden.

    Time frame: 21 weeks following Randomization

  7. Brief Family Distress Scale

    The Brief Family Distress Scale (BFDS; Weiss \& Lunsky, 2011) measures family distress. Parents will be asked to select one of ten statements that best represents where their families are in terms of crisis. Each of the 10 statements corresponds to a number, with 0 being "no stress" and 10 being "crisis." This measure will only be given at baseline to match families on distress.

    Time frame: 21 weeks following Randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CAMH
    Toronto, Ontario M5V 2B4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45. doi: 10.1177/1073191105283504. PubMed 16443717 ↗
  • Blackledge, J.T., & Hayes, S.C.. Using acceptance and commitment training in the support of parents of children diagnosed with autism. Child and Behaviour Therapy, 28, 1-18, 2006.
  • Bohlmeijer E, ten Klooster PM, Fledderus M, Veehof M, Baer R. Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):308-20. doi: 10.1177/1073191111408231. Epub 2011 May 17. PubMed 21586480 ↗
  • Carlson LE, Ursuliak Z, Goodey E, Angen M, Speca M. The effects of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction program on mood and symptoms of stress in cancer outpatients: 6-month follow-up. Support Care Cancer. 2001 Mar;9(2):112-23. doi: 10.1007/s005200000206. PubMed 11305069 ↗
  • Duncan LG, Coatsworth JD, Greenberg MT. A model of mindful parenting: implications for parent-child relationships and prevention research. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2009 Sep;12(3):255-70. doi: 10.1007/s10567-009-0046-3. PubMed 19412664 ↗
  • Dykens, E. (2012, July). Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction: Overall Findings from the Parent-Stress Intervention Project (PSIP). Paper presented at 2012 IASSID World Congress, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
  • Epstein-Lubow, G., McBee, L., Darling, E., Armey, M., & Miller, M.. A pilot investigation of mindfulness-based stress reduction for caregivers of frail elderly. Mindfulness,2(2),95-102, 2011.
  • Ferraioli, S. J., & Harris, S. L.. Comparative effects of mindfulness and skills-based parent training programs for parents of children with autism: feasibility and preliminary outcome data. Mindfulness, 1-13, 2013.
  • Gutierrez, L. M.. Beyond coping: An empowerment perspective on stressful life events. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 21: 201-219, 1994.
  • Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006. PubMed 16300724 ↗
  • Jones L, Hastings RP, Totsika V, Keane L, Rhule N. Child behavior problems and parental well-being in families of children with autism: the mediating role of mindfulness and acceptance. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014 Mar;119(2):171-85. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-119.2.171. PubMed 24679352 ↗
  • Kabat-Zinn, J.. Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Context: Past, Present, and Future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2): 144-156, 2003.
  • Koren, P., Dechillo, N., & Friesen, B.. Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: A brief questionnaire. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37(4): 305-321, 1992.
  • Lawton MP, Moss M, Hoffman C, Perkinson M. Two transitions in daughters' caregiving careers. Gerontologist. 2000 Aug;40(4):437-48. doi: 10.1093/geront/40.4.437. PubMed 10961033 ↗
  • Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F.. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation, 1995.
  • Lunsky, Y., Tint, A., Robinson, S., Vickar, M., Ouelette-Kuntz, H.. System-wide information about family caregivers of adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities - a scoping review of the literature. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. Submitted.
  • Neece, C.. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Parents of Children with Developmental Delays: A Pilot Study. Paper presented at 2012 IASSID World Congress, Halifax, Nova Scotia. 2012, July.
  • Pit-ten Cate, I.. Positive gain in mothers of children with physical disabilities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southampton, UK, 2003.
  • Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702. Epub 2010 Jun 8. PubMed 21584907 ↗
  • Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Winton, A. S. W., Fisher, B. C., Wahler, R. G., McAleavey, K., Singh, J. & Sabaawi, M.. Mindful parenting decreases aggression, noncompliance, and self-injury in children with autism. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14: 169-177, 2006.
  • Singh NN, Lancioni GE, Winton AS, Singh J, Curtis WJ, Wahler RG, McAleavey KM. Mindful parenting decreases aggression and increases social behavior in children with developmental disabilities. Behav Modif. 2007 Nov;31(6):749-71. doi: 10.1177/0145445507300924. PubMed 17932234 ↗
  • Weiss, J., & Lunsky, Y.. The brief family distress scale: A measure of crisis in caregivers of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(4): 521-528, 2011.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2013, a primary completion of Jul 2015 and a completion of Jul 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 24, 2013
First posted
Nov 11, 2013
Start
Oct 2013
Primary completionActual
Jul 2015
CompletionActual
Jul 2015
Last update
Jun 7, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 7, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01981070
Collaborators
Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services
Responsible party
Yona Lunsky (Clinician Scientist, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 11, 2013
Start date
Oct 2013
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Jul 2015
Last update
Jun 7, 2016

Study contacts

Yona Lunsky, PhD CPsych
principal investigator · Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion