CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01980004Updated Oct 12, 2015

Potassium Citrate Supplementation vs. Dietary Counseling

A Phase 2 interventional study of Potassium Citrate Supplementation and Dietary Education in Kidney Stone, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-12.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was withdrawn
closure due to failure to recruit any patients that met study criteria
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the role of potassium citrate supplementation with dietary education versus dietary education alone in the reduction of stone risks and events in patients with predominantly calcium phosphate kidney stones.

Read the detailed description

The prevalence of kidney stone disease in the United States is increasing. Concurrently, an increase in calcium phosphate stone composition is also being observed. Recurrence of kidney stone disease has been reported as high as 50% at five years. Citrate supplementation is widely considered as one of the primary medical cornerstones to decrease kidney stone recurrence. Urinary citrate is a potent inhibitor of calcium stone formation by binding ionic urinary calcium as well as direct inhibition of calcium oxalate formation. Additionally, increased citrate, an alkali, raises urine pH which alters the solubility of certain stone types including uric acid and cystine stones. Potassium citrate supplementation is the primary proven approach to increasing urinary citrate and is a well-established preventive option in stone disease. However, medication treatment can cause epigastric discomfort, frequent large bowel movements and add to the patient's prescription financial burden. Dietary education including lemonade therapy provides natural dietary sources of citrate and may be an alternative to pharmacologic therapy without the associated gastrointestinal symptoms or costs.

The utility of citrate supplementation has not been previously evaluated prospectively in the calcium phosphate stone former. Calcium phosphate stone formation occurs in a more alkaline urine environment. It has been postulated that citrate supplementation could promote calcium phosphate stone occurrence due to its ability to raise urine pH despite the inhibitory effects of increasing urinary citrate. However, this finding has not been observed in limited retrospective studies. The purpose of this investigation is to prospectively evaluate the benefit of citrate supplementation either through potassium citrate treatment with dietary education vs. dietary education alone to reduce stone recurrence in calcium phosphate stone formers with risk factors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Stone

Browse trials for

03

In context

Kidney Calculi

597 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Calculi; 162 are open to participants now.

Browse Kidney Calculi studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients ≥ 18 years old, being seen at UNC Chapel Hill or Vanderbilt Urology Clinics
  2. Documented stone analysis with ≥ 50% calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite and/or brushite) composition
  3. 24 hour urine citrate (≤ 500) on initial evaluation of at least one 24-hour urine study
  4. 24 hour urine pH ≥ 6.0 on initial evaluation of at least one 24-hour urine study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Documented stone analysis with any calcium carbonate or magnesium ammonium phosphate composition
  2. Systemic cause for stone disease (primary hyperparathyroidism, complete distal renal tubular acidosis, systemic acidosis, active urinary tract infection)
  3. 24 hour urine calcium/kg (> 4) or 24 hour urine calcium/Cr (>140) on initial evaluation of at least one 24-hour urine study
  4. Concurrent medication therapy (potassium citrate, sodium citrate, sodium bicarbonate, diuretic, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor antagonist, topiramate, acetazolamide)
  5. Renal insufficiency (GFR ≤ 60)
  6. Elevated serum potassium level (≥ 4.5) or hyperkalemia
  7. Low serum bicarbonate level (\< 24)
  8. High serum calcium level (>10)
  9. Pregnancy
  10. Inability to obtain informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dietary Education

    Participants in this treatment arm will undergo dietary counseling for the prevention of kidney stone formation.

    Other: Dietary Education

  • Experimental
    Potassium Citrate and Dietary Education

    Participants in this treatment arm will undergo potassium citrate supplementation and dietary counseling for the prevention of kidney stone formation.

    Dietary Supplement: Potassium Citrate Supplementation · Other: Dietary Education

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementPotassium Citrate Supplementation

    20 mEq taken twice daily

  • OtherDietary Education

    Dietary counseling will include both a verbal discussion in the clinic regarding increased fluid intake, a moderate calcium rich diet and lemonade therapy as well as receiving a written handout on these topics.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in 24-hour urine parameters

    Time frame: 4-6 weeks from baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • North Carolina Memorial Hospital
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052. Epub 2012 Mar 31. PubMed 22498635 ↗
  • Parks JH, Worcester EM, Coe FL, Evan AP, Lingeman JE. Clinical implications of abundant calcium phosphate in routinely analyzed kidney stones. Kidney Int. 2004 Aug;66(2):777-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00803.x. PubMed 15253733 ↗
  • Mandel N, Mandel I, Fryjoff K, Rejniak T, Mandel G. Conversion of calcium oxalate to calcium phosphate with recurrent stone episodes. J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2026-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000065592.55499.4e. PubMed 12771710 ↗
  • Preminger GM. Renal calculi: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and medical therapy. Semin Nephrol. 1992 Mar;12(2):200-16. PubMed 1561497 ↗
  • Chow K, Dixon J, Gilpin S, Kavanagh JP, Rao PN. Citrate inhibits growth of residual fragments in an in vitro model of calcium oxalate renal stones. Kidney Int. 2004 May;65(5):1724-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00566.x. PubMed 15086911 ↗
  • Pattaras JG, Moore RG. Citrate in the management of urolithiasis. J Endourol. 1999 Nov;13(9):687-92. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.687. PubMed 10608522 ↗
  • Robinson MR, Leitao VA, Haleblian GE, Scales CD Jr, Chandrashekar A, Pierre SA, Preminger GM. Impact of long-term potassium citrate therapy on urinary profiles and recurrent stone formation. J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):1145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.014. Epub 2009 Jan 18. PubMed 19152932 ↗
  • Penniston KL, Steele TH, Nakada SY. Lemonade therapy increases urinary citrate and urine volumes in patients with recurrent calcium oxalate stone formation. Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):856-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1115. Epub 2007 Oct 24. PubMed 17919696 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 12, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01980004
Lead sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
Vanderbilt University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 8, 2013
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Aug 2015
Completion
Aug 2015
Last update
Oct 12, 2015

Study contacts

Davis J Viprakasit, MD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion