CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01972568ADDRESS IIUpdated Jan 2, 2018Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Atacicept in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A Phase 2 interventional study of Atacicept 75 milligram (mg) and Atacicept 150 mg in Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, sponsored by EMD Serono. Completed at 138 sites in 18 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-02.

Sponsored by EMD Serono · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
306
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, Phase 2b trial to evaluate the efficacy of atacicept in subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

02

Conditions studied

  • Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Keywords

  • Atacicept
  • Placebo
03

In context

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

1,202 studies on the registry are indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; 399 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 306 is above the median of 50 across 867 interventional studies indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic.

Browse Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic studies →

Lead sponsor

EMD Serono is the lead sponsor of 88 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligible male and female subjects, aged 18 years or older
  • Must have at least moderately active SLE, as defined as SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score greater than or equal to [>=] 6 at screening visit
  • At least 4 of the 11 American college of rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE (diagnosed >= 6 months prior to the screening visit)
  • Be seropositive for anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and/or anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (anti-dsDNA) antibodies
  • Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects have demyelinating disorder
  • Severe central nervous system SLE
  • Use of cyclophosphamide within 3 months of the screening visit
  • Urine protein:creatinine ratio (UPCr) >= 2 milligram per milligram (mg/mg) per day
  • Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
306 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Atacicept 75 mg

    Drug: Atacicept 75 milligram (mg)

  • Experimental
    Atacicept 150 mg

    Drug: Atacicept 150 mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugAtacicept 75 milligram (mg)

    Atacicept 75 mg will be administered as subcutaneous injection once weekly for 24 weeks.

  • DrugAtacicept 150 mg

    Atacicept 150 mg will be administered as subcutaneous injection once weekly for 24 weeks.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo matched to atacicept will be administered as subcutaneous injection once weekly for 24 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) Response at Week 24 Using Screening Visit as Baseline

    SRI response, a composite measure of reduced SLE disease activity, was defined as a reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 points; no significant worsening in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score (\<10 % increase, defined as \<0.3 point increase for statistical analyses); no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A organ domain scores and \<=1 (defined as no more than one) new BILAG B organ domain score.

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Percentage of Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) Response at Week 24 Using Day 1 as Baseline

    SRI response, a composite measure of reduced SLE disease activity, was defined as a reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 points; no significant worsening in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score (\<10 % increase, defined as \<0.3 point increase for statistical analyses); no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A organ domain scores and \<=1 (defined as no more than one) new BILAG B organ domain score.

    Time frame: Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects at Week 24 Whose Prednisone-Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose Reduced From Screening by >=25% and to a Dose of =<7.5mg/Day, and no British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or 2B Flare in Disease Activity

    BILAG A or 2B flare is defined by 1 new BILAG A organ domain score and/or 2 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared to the Screening Visit. The BILAG disease activity index evaluates systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) activity in 8 organ systems, using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows. BILAG A: Disease sufficiently active requiring disease-modifying treatment (prednisone \>20 mg daily or immunosuppressants); BILAG B: moderate disease activity requiring treatment with systemic low-dose oral glucocorticoids, intramuscular or intra-articular or soft tissue CS injection, topical CS or immunosuppressants, or symptomatic therapy such as antimalarials or NSAIDs. BILAG C: mild disease; BILAG D: system previously affected but now inactive and BILAG E: system never involved.

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Percentage of Subjects With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Categories at Week 24

    The PGIC is self-rated scale that asks the subject to describe the change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall Quality of life (QoL) related to the subject's painful condition on the following scale: 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse). Percentage of subjects in the PGIC categories of very much or much improved (1 or 2), minimally improved or no change or minimally worse (3 or 4 or 5) and much or very much worse (6 or 7) at Week 24 were presented.

    Time frame: Week 24

  3. Change From Screening in Prednisolone-Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose at Week 24

    Change From screening visit to Week 24 of prednisolone-equivalent CS daily dose was presented.

    Time frame: Screening and Week 24

  4. Time From Randomization to First SRI Response During Treatment Period

    SRI response, a composite measure of reduced SLE disease activity, was defined as a reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 points; no significant worsening in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score (\<10 % increase, defined as \<0.3 point increase for statistical analyses); no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A organ domain scores and \<=1 (defined as no more than one) new BILAG B organ domain score. Time to first SRI response during treatment period was presented.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 24 Weeks

  5. Percentage of Subjects With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24

    The BICLA response is defined as BILAG-2004 improvement (all screening visit BILAG A improving to B/C/D, all screening visit BILAG B to C/D, and \<=1 new BILAG B and no new BILAG A); no deterioration in SLEDAI total score; PGA increase by \<10% (defined as \<0.3 point increase for the statistical analyses) and no nonpermitted medication/treatment.

    Time frame: Week 24

  6. Percentage of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

    An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 48 weeks. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 24 weeks after last dose of study drug (assessed up to maximum of 48 weeks)

  7. Change From Week 0 (Day 1) in SF-36 Components at Week 24

    The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical and mental component summary scores. Total of 10 variables were analyzed (8 aspects, 2 component summary scores). The score for each of the 8 aspects and 2 component summary scores was scaled from 0 to 100, where 0 = lowest level of functioning and 100 = highest level of functioning.

    Time frame: Week 0 (Day 1) and Week 24

07

Results

Posted Oct 26, 2017

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 136 sites in 18 countries in Asia, Europe, North America, Central America, and South America.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Started102104100
Completed869284
Not completed161216
Withdrew: Other events300
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy012
Withdrew: Protocol violation122
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject637
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up100
Withdrew: Adverse event565

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) Response at Week 24 Using Screening Visit as Baseline

SRI response, a composite measure of reduced SLE disease activity, was defined as a reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 points; no significant worsening in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score (\<10 % increase, defined as \<0.3 point increase for statistical analyses); no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A organ domain scores and \<=1 (defined as no more than one) new BILAG B organ domain score.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) Response at Week 24 Using Screening Visit as Baseline
percentage of subjectsAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) Response at Week 24 Using Screening Visit as Baseline57.853.844.0
Statistical analysis
  • Atacicept 150 mg vs Placebo · Logistic regression model · p = 0.1208 · Odds ratio (or): 1.56 · 95% CI 0.89 to 2.72
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects at Week 24 Whose Prednisone-Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose Reduced From Screening by >=25% and to a Dose of =<7.5mg/Day, and no British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or 2B Flare in Disease Activity

BILAG A or 2B flare is defined by 1 new BILAG A organ domain score and/or 2 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared to the Screening Visit. The BILAG disease activity index evaluates systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) activity in 8 organ systems, using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows. BILAG A: Disease sufficiently active requiring disease-modifying treatment (prednisone \>20 mg daily or immunosuppressants); BILAG B: moderate disease activity requiring treatment with systemic low-dose oral glucocorticoids, intramuscular or intra-articular or soft tissue CS injection, topical CS or immunosuppressants, or symptomatic therapy such as antimalarials or NSAIDs. BILAG C: mild disease; BILAG D: system previously affected but now inactive and BILAG E: system never involved.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects at Week 24 Whose Prednisone-Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose Reduced From Screening by >=25% and to a Dose of =<7.5mg/Day, and no British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or 2B Flare in Disease Activity
percentage of subjectsAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Subjects at Week 24 Whose Prednisone-Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose Reduced From Screening by >=25% and to a Dose of =<7.5mg/Day, and no British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or 2B Flare in Disease Activity17.911.318.9
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Categories at Week 24

The PGIC is self-rated scale that asks the subject to describe the change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall Quality of life (QoL) related to the subject's painful condition on the following scale: 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse). Percentage of subjects in the PGIC categories of very much or much improved (1 or 2), minimally improved or no change or minimally worse (3 or 4 or 5) and much or very much worse (6 or 7) at Week 24 were presented.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Categories at Week 24
percentage of subjectsAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Very much or much improved57.853.846.0
Minimally improved or no change or minimally worse39.244.246.0
Much or very much worse2.01.06.0
Missing1.01.02.0
SecondaryChange From Screening in Prednisolone-Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose at Week 24

Change From screening visit to Week 24 of prednisolone-equivalent CS daily dose was presented.

Time frame:
Screening and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · mg per day
Change From Screening in Prednisolone-Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose at Week 24
mg per dayAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Change From Screening in Prednisolone-Equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose at Week 24-2.64 ± 6.106-1.87 ± 4.653-1.89 ± 5.588
SecondaryTime From Randomization to First SRI Response During Treatment Period

SRI response, a composite measure of reduced SLE disease activity, was defined as a reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 points; no significant worsening in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score (\<10 % increase, defined as \<0.3 point increase for statistical analyses); no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A organ domain scores and \<=1 (defined as no more than one) new BILAG B organ domain score. Time to first SRI response during treatment period was presented.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 24 Weeks
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time From Randomization to First SRI Response During Treatment Period
weeksAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Time From Randomization to First SRI Response During Treatment Period12.4 (12.1 to 16.7)16.1 (12.0 to 16.4)16.1 (12.1 to 20.1)
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24

The BICLA response is defined as BILAG-2004 improvement (all screening visit BILAG A improving to B/C/D, all screening visit BILAG B to C/D, and \<=1 new BILAG B and no new BILAG A); no deterioration in SLEDAI total score; PGA increase by \<10% (defined as \<0.3 point increase for the statistical analyses) and no nonpermitted medication/treatment.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24
percentage of subjectsAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Subjects With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 2453.449.045.2
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 48 weeks. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 24 weeks after last dose of study drug (assessed up to maximum of 48 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
percentage of subjectsAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
TEAEs81.480.872.0
Serious TEAEs8.85.812.0
SecondaryChange From Week 0 (Day 1) in SF-36 Components at Week 24

The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical and mental component summary scores. Total of 10 variables were analyzed (8 aspects, 2 component summary scores). The score for each of the 8 aspects and 2 component summary scores was scaled from 0 to 100, where 0 = lowest level of functioning and 100 = highest level of functioning.

Time frame:
Week 0 (Day 1) and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Week 0 (Day 1) in SF-36 Components at Week 24
units on a scaleAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Physical Component Summary4.7 ± 7.953.4 ± 7.573.5 ± 10.33
Mental Component Summary1.9 ± 12.011.8 ± 9.080.7 ± 11.44
Physical Functioning3.5 ± 9.303.8 ± 8.423.3 ± 8.62
Role-Physical4.3 ± 10.262.3 ± 8.643.9 ± 9.51
Bodily Pain6.0 ± 10.224.4 ± 9.305.6 ± 10.72
General Health2.9 ± 8.433.0 ± 7.724.4 ± 8.00
Vitality3.9 ± 9.863.7 ± 9.763.5 ± 9.57
Social Functioning3.8 ± 11.452.2 ± 10.064.3 ± 11.08
Role-Emotional2.5 ± 12.711.0 ± 10.432.3 ± 10.99
Mental Health2.3 ± 12.302.8 ± 8.872.1 ± 10.60
Post-hocHigh Disease Activity Subpopulation (SLEDAI-2K >=10 at Screening): Logistic Regression of Percentage of Subjects With SRI-6 Response at Week 24

SRI-6 response, a composite measure of reduced SLE disease activity, was defined as a reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 6 points; no significant worsening in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score (\<10 % increase, defined as \<0.3 point increase for statistical analyses); no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A organ domain scores and \<=1 (defined as no more than one) new BILAG B organ domain score. Logistic regression of number of subjects with SRI-6 response was analyzed by using Logistic regression model.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
High Disease Activity Subpopulation (SLEDAI-2K >=10 at Screening): Logistic Regression of Percentage of Subjects With SRI-6 Response at Week 24
percentage of subjectsAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
High Disease Activity Subpopulation (SLEDAI-2K >=10 at Screening): Logistic Regression of Percentage of Subjects With SRI-6 Response at Week 2443.654.928.8
Statistical analysis
  • Atacicept 150 mg vs Placebo · Logistic regression model · p = 0.0048 · Odds ratio (or): 3.31 · 95% CI 1.44 to 7.61
PrimaryPercentage of Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) Response at Week 24 Using Day 1 as Baseline

SRI response, a composite measure of reduced SLE disease activity, was defined as a reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 points; no significant worsening in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score (\<10 % increase, defined as \<0.3 point increase for statistical analyses); no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A organ domain scores and \<=1 (defined as no more than one) new BILAG B organ domain score.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) Response at Week 24 Using Day 1 as Baseline
percentage of subjectsAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) Response at Week 24 Using Day 1 as Baseline55.955.841.0
Statistical analysis
  • Atacicept 150 mg vs Placebo · Logistic regression model · p = 0.0202 · Odds ratio (or): 1.96 · 95% CI 1.11 to 3.46

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline up to 24 weeks after last dose of study drug (assessed up to maximum of 48 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Atacicept 75 mg—9/102 (8.8%)83/102 (81.4%)
Atacicept 150 mg—6/104 (5.8%)84/104 (80.8%)
Placebo—12/100 (12%)72/100 (72%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 53
Most frequent serious events
EventAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Systemic lupus erythematosusMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1020/1042/100
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders0/1020/1042/100
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1020/1041/100
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders0/1020/1041/100
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders0/1020/1041/100
Mitral valve prolapseCardiac disorders0/1020/1041/100
Right ventricular dilatationCardiac disorders0/1020/1041/100
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders0/1020/1041/100
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/1020/1041/100
BronchitisInfections and infestations1/1020/1041/100
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAtacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlacebo
Injection site reactionGeneral disorders42/10243/10419/100
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations12/10212/10417/100
HeadacheNervous system disorders11/10215/1048/100
Injection site painGeneral disorders12/10214/1047/100
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations10/10213/1043/100
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders8/10212/1045/100
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders9/1025/1041/100
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/1023/1047/100
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations6/1027/1045/100
FatigueGeneral disorders6/1023/1042/100

Baseline characteristics

Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set included all randomized subjects who had received at least 1 dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Atacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean37 ± 11.239 ± 11.640 ± 13.039 ± 11.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Atacicept 75 mgAtacicept 150 mgPlaceboTotal
Female939790280
Male971026
08

Study locations

138 sites
  • Pinnacle Research Group LLC
    Anniston, Alabama 36207, United States
  • Achieve Clinical Research, LLC
    Birmingham, Alabama 35216, United States
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham - (UAB)
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • Southern California Permanente Medical Group
    Anaheim, California 92806, United States
  • Wallace Rheumatic Study Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group, Inc.
    San Leandro, California 94578, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Florida - Corporate
    Dunedin, Florida 34698, United States
  • Center for Rheumatology, Immunology & Arthritis
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309, United States
  • University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
    Tampa, Florida 33603, United States
  • Goldpoint Clinical Research, LLC
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, United States
  • AA MRC LLC Ahmed Arif Medical Research Center
    Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • North MS Medical Clinics, Inc.
    Tupelo, Mississippi 38801, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
    Newark, New Jersey 07103, United States
  • The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
    Manhasset, New York 11031, United States
  • Hospital for Special Surgery
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Box Arthritis & Rheumatology of the Carolinas PLLC
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28210, United States
  • MetroHealth System
    Cleveland, Ohio 44109, United States
  • Ohio State University Medical Center
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • STAT Research, Inc.
    Dayton, Ohio 45417, United States
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology Center of Oklahoma
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103, United States
  • OMRF
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • Lynn Health Science Institute
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, United States
  • Clinical Research Center of Reading LLC
    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • UTMB Pathology Clinical Services
    Galveston, Texas 77555, United States
  • Arthritis & Osteoporosis Clinic
    Waco, Texas 76708, United States
  • Danville Orthopedic Clinic, Inc.
    Danville, Virginia 24541, United States
  • APRILLUS
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos aires, Argentina
  • Atencion Integral en Reumatologia (AIR)
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Hospital Italiano
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Organizacion Medica de Investigacion (OMI)
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Policlìnica Red Omip S.A - Ensayos Clinicos GC
    Mar De Plata, Argentina
  • Centro de Investigacion Pergamino SA
    Pergamino, Argentina
  • Cordis S.A.
    Salta, Argentina
  • Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica CER
    San Juan, Argentina
  • Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia
    San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina
  • Investigaciones Clinicas Tucuman
    San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina
  • Centro Integral de Reumatologia
    San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
  • CPD - Centro de Pesquisas em Diabetes
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • CLION - Clínica de Oncologia da Bahia
    Salvador, Brazil
  • Clínica de Neoplasias Litoral Ltda.
    Santa Catarina, Brazil
  • Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto
    São José do Rio Preto, Brazil
  • MHAT "Eurohospital" - Plovdiv, OOD
    Plovdiv, Bulgaria
  • Medical Center "Teodora", EOOD
    Ruse, Bulgaria
  • DCC "Sveta Anna", EOOD
    Sofia, Bulgaria
  • UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski", EAD
    Sofia, Bulgaria
  • Medical Center "Nov Rehabilitatsionen Tsentar", EOOD
    Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
  • MHAT-Targovishte, AD
    Targovishte, Bulgaria
  • Biomedica
    Santiago, Chile
  • Centro de Estudios Reumatologicos
    Santiago, Chile
  • Centro Medico Prosalud
    Santiago, Chile
  • SOMEAL
    Santiago, Chile
  • CINVEC - Centro de Investigacion Clinica V Region
    Vina del Mar, Chile
  • A-Shine, s.r.o.
    Plzen, Czechia
  • Revmatologicky Ustav
    Praha 2, Czechia
  • Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
    Praha 2, Czechia
  • MEDICAL PLUS s.r.o.
    Uherske Hradiste, Czechia
  • Kerckhoff-Klinik gGmbH
    Bad Nauheim, Germany
  • Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin - Campus Charite Mitte
    Berlin, Germany
  • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
    Freiburg, Germany
  • Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
    Herne, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel
    Kiel, Germany
  • Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
    Mainz, Germany
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Pol. di Bari
    Bari, Italy
  • Presidio Ospedaliero Vittorio Emanuele
    Catania, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi
    Firenze, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino
    Genova, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
    Milano, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, Italy
  • St. Luke's International Hospital
    Chuo-ku, Japan
  • NHO Kyushu Medical Center
    Fukuoka-shi, Japan
  • Toho University Ohashi Medical Center
    Meguro-ku, Japan
  • Okayama University Hospital
    Okayama-shi, Japan
  • Kitasato University Hospital
    Sagamihara-shi, Japan
  • Hokkaido University Hospital
    Sapporo-shi, Japan
  • Sapporo City General Hospital
    Sapporo-shi, Japan
  • Hakujujikai Sasebochuo Hospital
    Sasebo-shi, Japan
  • Tohoku University Hospital
    Sendai-shi, Japan
  • Jichi Medical University Hospital
    Shimotsuke-shi, Japan
  • National Center for Global Health and Medicine Hospital
    Shinjuku, Japan
  • Yuaikai Tomishiro Chuo Hospital
    Tomigusuku-shi, Japan
  • Tsukuba University Hospital
    Tsukuba-shi, Japan
  • Gachon University Gil Medical Center
    Incheon, Korea, Republic of
  • Konkuk University Medical Center
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Kyung Hee University Hospital
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Ajou University Hospital
    Suwon-si, Korea, Republic of
  • Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua, S.C.
    Chihuahua, Mexico
  • Icle S.C.
    Guadalajara, Mexico
  • Unidad de Investigacion en Enfermedades Cronico Degenerativas SC
    Guadalajara, Mexico
  • Investigacion Clinica de Leon S.C.
    Leon, Mexico
  • Morales Vargas Centro de Investigacion, S.C.
    Leon, Mexico
  • Centro de Estudios Clinicos Especializados
    Merida, Mexico
  • Accelerium S. de R.L. de C.V.
    Monterrey, Mexico
  • ALIVIA Clínica de Alta Especialidad S.A. de C.V.
    Monterrey, Mexico
  • Clinica de Enfermedades Cronicas y de Procedimientos Especiales, S.C.
    Morelia, Mexico

Showing the first 100 of 138 sites across 18 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Morand EF, Isenberg DA, Wallace DJ, Kao AH, Vazquez-Mateo C, Chang P, Pudota K, Aranow C, Merrill JT. Attainment of treat-to-target endpoints in SLE patients with high disease activity in the atacicept phase 2b ADDRESS II study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Oct 1;59(10):2930-2938. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa029. PubMed 32107560 ↗
  • Merrill JT, Wallace DJ, Wax S, Kao A, Fraser PA, Chang P, Isenberg D; ADDRESS II Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Atacicept in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Twenty-Four-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Arm, Phase IIb Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Feb;70(2):266-276. doi: 10.1002/art.40360. Erratum In: Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Mar;70(3):467. doi: 10.1002/art.40464. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;73(11):2043. doi: 10.1002/art.41995. PubMed 29073347 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01972568
Lead sponsor
EMD Serono
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 30, 2013
Start date
Dec 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Results posted
Oct 26, 2017
Last update
Jan 2, 2018

Study contacts

Medical Responsible
study director · EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland MA, a subsidiary of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion