ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01962909Updated Mar 18, 2016

Phase 0 Biodistribution of Novel Imaging for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of PTP-01 in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by University of Virginia. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-18.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
From preliminary imaging data, the study was stopped due to futility.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to study an experimental drug called PTP-01 that is being used as an imaging agent to diagnosis pancreatic cancer. Currently, pancreatic cancer is diagnosed using CT or MRI scans which miss small pancreatic cancers, particularly early stage disease. Researchers at the University of Virginia have identified a biomarker for pancreatic cancer called plectin, which is very specific for pancreatic cancer and not other, non-cancerous conditions involving the pancreas. These researchers have also developed PTP-01, an experimental drug that may be used with SPECT imaging to detect pancreatic cancer cells in humans.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Keywords

  • Pancreatic Resection
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 672 studies on the registry; 138 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • subject is undergoing resection of pancreas for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
  • subject must have adequate renal function
  • ECOG performance status of 0-2
  • women of child-bearing age and men must agree to use contraception prior to and during the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subjects receiving any other investigational agents
  • significant history of uncontrolled cardiac disease or central nervous system (CNS) disease
  • pregnant or breastfeeding women
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PTP-01

    single IV bolus dose 24 hours prior to surgery

    Drug: PTP-01

Interventions

  • DrugPTP-01

    Dose level 1 is 10mCi (50ug of peptide)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ability of PTP-01 to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

    requires a signal to background ratio of greater than or equal to 2:1 following a single intravenous bolus of PTP-01

    Time frame: up to 72 hours post dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Biodistribution and Binding Characteristics of PTP-01

    Assessments will be made from imaging (whole body planar and SPECT/CT) and blood draws following PTP-01 dose. Tissue samples will also be retained for pathology.

    Time frame: up to 7 days post dose

  2. Clearance of PTP-01

    Blood and urine samples will be collected to measure the level of radioactivity at specified intervals following PTP-01 dose.

    Time frame: up to 7 days post dose

  3. Safety and Tolerability of PTP-01

    Clincial labs, ECGs, vital signs and physical exams will be performed up to 7 days post dose. Adverse events will be collected up to 30 days post dose.

    Time frame: up to 30 days post dose

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Virginia
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2013, a primary completion of Jan 2016 and a completion of Jan 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 19, 2013
First posted
Oct 14, 2013
Start
Nov 2013
Primary completionActual
Jan 2016
CompletionActual
Jan 2016
Last update
Mar 18, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01962909
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 14, 2013
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Jan 2016
Completion
Jan 2016
Last update
Mar 18, 2016

Study contacts

Reid Adams, MD
principal investigator · University of Virginia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion