CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01960673Updated Nov 13, 2015

The Influence of Head and Neck Position About Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Sealing Between the Laryngeal Mask and Vocal Cord Using Different Types of Supraglottic Airway Device

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of LMA proseal and igel LMA in the Influence of Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Sealing Between the Mask and Vocal Cord During Changing Patient's Head and Neck Position, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-13.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Generally, the laryngeal mask airway is not considered in the surgery which should be changing position in the perioperative period. The shape of the pharynx changes during the head and neck movement and there is probably also a change in the force transmitted to the cuff along the airway tube. Besides, there is evidence that supraglottic airway device can be displaced with rotation. In this article, the investigators want to discuss about that oropharyngeal leak pressure and sealing between the mask and vocal cord while changing head and neck position in perioperative period using different types of supraglottic airway device.

Read the detailed description

The investigators select adult patients,who are 20-80yrs old and ASA physical status I or II, receiving minor surgery, ex: breast surgery or cystoscope, participated in this randomized cross-over trial. Patients were excluded if they were in the above condition. The patient is at high risk of aspiration, ex:obesity, pregnancy upper GI bleeding or not enough fasting time. The patient could not open mouth or upper airway obstruction. The patient receive major surgery, ex: heart, brain, lung, liver, kidney surgery. The patient has abnormal heart and lung function.

The patient received different types of supraglottic airway device like proseal LMA,ambu LMA, air Q LMA or igel LMA by draw, then the patients will be divided into different groups.In the preoperative period, the investigators documented oropharyngeal leak pressure in these selected positions: neutral position( 0 degree),and rotation 15, 30,45, 60 degrees, etc. However, oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at fixed O2 flow 3L/min and 20 cm H2O. If the ambu bag is flattening, the investigators will think the leakage happened between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord. Then the investigators use fiberscope to observe the condition between the epiglottis and the laryngeal mask.

The investigators wanted to compared the mean leak pressure at different head and neck rotation position,ex:neutral,30,45,60 degrees,by using many different types of supraglottic airway device.

The observers define the relationship between epiglottis and vocal cord to describe the condition when the patient is at different degree of head and neck position. Grade I is vocal cord completely visible. Grade IIA is only partially vocal cord visible and epiglottis noted. Grade IIB is no vocal cord visible and only epiglottis noted. Grade III is other condition, ex:trapped epiglottis or no epiglottis visible.

02

Conditions studied

  • the Influence of Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Sealing Between the Mask and Vocal Cord During Changing Patient's Head and Neck Position

Keywords

  • supraglottic airway,igel-LMA, ambu-LMA, changing position, head and neck position, oropharyngeal leak pressure,degree of rotation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,563 studies on the registry; 569 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 20-80 yrs old and ASA physical status I or II,
  • Receiving minor surgery, ex: breast surgery or cystoscope

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • The patient is at high risk of aspiration, ex:obesity, pregnancy upper GI bleeding or not enough fasting time.
  • The patient could not open mouth or upper airway obstruction
  • The patient receive major surgery, ex: heart, brain, lung, liver, kidney surgery.
  • The patient has abnormal heart and lung function.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LMA proseal

    The investigator will use proseal LMA in this study. The cuff of the proseal LMA could be inflation. It is thought to fix the larynx shape. The investigator wants to test the efficacy during 30,45,60 degree of head and neck position.

    Device: LMA proseal

  • Experimental
    igel LMA

    igel LMA did not have cuff. The shape, softness and contours accurately mirror the perilaryngeal anatomy. The investigator want to test the efficacy of the igel at 30,45,60 degree of head and neck position.

    Device: igel LMA

  • Experimental
    air Q LMA

    The air-Q LMA should be used routinely as a classic passive airway. It is user-friendly, placement in patients is easy and air movement is outstanding. It has the added benefit of allowing for intubation using standard ET Tubes. It also has the cuff and the contour of the mask is thought to mimic the the shape of the perilaryngeal region. The investigator want to test the efficacy of the air Q LMA at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position.

    Device: air Q LMA

  • Experimental
    ambu LMA

    ambu LMA is also an cuff device LMA. The investigator wanted to test the efficacy about the leak pressure and the view at 30,45,60 degree of head and neck position.

    Device: ambu LMA

Interventions

  • DeviceLMA proseal

    It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region. The cuff pressure would be kept at 30 cm H20.

  • Deviceigel LMA

    It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region.

  • Deviceair Q LMA

    It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region. The cuff pressure would be kept at 30 cm H20.

  • Deviceambu LMA

    It would be used to observe the leak pressure at 30,45,60 degree of the head and neck position and the condition between the vocal cord and peri-laryngeal region. The cuff pressure would be kept at 30 cm H20.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the leakage happened between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord

    The oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at fixed O2 flow 3L/min and 20 cm H2O. If the ambu bag is flattening, the observers will think the leakage happened between the laryngeal mask and the vocal cord

    Time frame: If the ambu bag is flattening during the surgery, the observers check the leak pressure between the laryngeal mask and our vocal cord

Secondary outcomes

  1. Use fiberscope to observe the sealing between the mask and vocal cord while changing head and neck position in perioperative period using different types of supraglottic airway device.

    The observer uses the fiberscope to observe the sealing between the vocal cord and epiglottis.

    Time frame: During the surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of anesthesiology,National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, Taiwan
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 13, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01960673
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 10, 2013
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Aug 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Last update
Nov 13, 2015

Study contacts

Cihmin Liu
principal investigator · anesthesiology department,National Taiwan University hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion