CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01948388Updated Jan 18, 2019Results posted

The Effect of Corticotrophin (ACTH) in Combination With Methotrexate in Newly Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of corticotrophin 80 units in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Gaylis, Norman B., M.D.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-18.

Sponsored by Gaylis, Norman B., M.D. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of the utilization of two doses of corticotrophin ( ACTH) as a treatment in patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis as an alternative to conventional steroid therapy by evaluating the change from baseline in the clinical findings as well as the structural findings on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Corticotrophin (ACTH) may prevent the well documented structural progression damage in RA patients using disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy alone.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase II 24-week open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of H.P. Acthar Gel Respository Injection, Corticotrophin( ACTH) administered to newly diagnosed patients with rheumatoid arthritis in conjunction with methotrexate, folllowed by a 24 week follow-up period. There will be a total of twenty (20) patients and two (2) treatment groups with 10 patients in each treatment group

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • Rheumatoid arthritis
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Gaylis, Norman B., M.D. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient must be at least 18 years old at the screening visit.
  2. Patient must be able to understand the information provided to them and to give written Informed Consent.
  3. Female patients must be either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, surgically incapable of childbearing, or effectively practicing an acceptable method of contraception (oral/parenteral/implantable hormonal contraceptives, Intrauterine Device (IUD), or barrier and spermicide). Abstinence only is not an acceptable method. Patients must agree to use adequate contraception during the study and for 4 weeks after their last dose of corticotrophin (ACTH). Male patients must agree to ensure they or their female partner(s) are using adequate contraception during the study and for 4 weeks after the patient receives their last dose of corticotrophin (ACTH).
  4. Patients must have a new diagnosis of adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as defined by the 2010 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria and who have had symptoms for \<1 year.
  5. Patients must be experiencing mild to moderate rheumatoid arthritis ( RA), have at least 6 tender and 6 swollen joints at screening and a clinical disease activity index (CDAI) score of > 6.0
  6. A Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging ( MRI) must show the presence of osteitis or erosions in the hand or wrist.
  7. Patients must be able and willing to comply with the requirements of the study protocol.
  8. Patients must have a C-reactive Protein (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) > upper limits of normal

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients who have a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis (e.g., psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis).
  2. Patients with exposure to any disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), Biologic, Non-biologic or experimental medication for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
  3. Patients with a non-inflammatory type of arthritis (e.g. osteoarthritis or fibromyalgia) that in the Investigator's opinion is symptomatic enough to interfere with evaluation of the effect of study drug on the patient's primary diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
  4. Patients with history of an infected joint prosthesis at any time with that prosthesis still in situ.
  5. Patients have received prohibited medication:

    • non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs /COX-2 inhibitors) (any change in dose regimen in the 7 days prior to baseline)
    • Oral corticosteroids within 4 weeks of baseline
    • Intra-muscular, intra-venous, intra-articular (IM/IV/IA) corticosteroids/ Intra-articular (IA) Hyaluronic acid (any dose 28 days prior to baseline)
  6. Female patients who are breast-feeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the trial or within twelve weeks following last dose of study drug.
  7. Patients with a history of chronic infection due to fungal, parasitic or mycotic pathogens during the preceding year, recent serious or life-threatening infection within 6 months (including herpes zoster), or any current sign or symptom that may indicate an infection.
  8. Patients with active Tuberculosis (TB) (or history of active TB), positive chest X-ray for TB, or positive (defined as induration of ≥ 5mm) purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test, positive QuantiFERON, or patients having close contact with an individual with active TB. Patients having a PPD skin test ≥ 5 mm or a positive QuantiFERON test can enter the study, provided that active TB is excluded and provided that they are adequately treated for latent TB (e.g., isonicotinic acid hydrazide [INH therapy] for 9 months [with vitamin B6]) and provided that appropriate treatment is initiated simultaneously with the first administration of ACTH.
  9. Patients at a high risk of infection (e.g. leg ulcers, indwelling urinary catheter and persistent or recurrent chest infections and patients who are permanently bedridden or wheelchair bound).
  10. Patients with a known allergy or intolerance to steroids 11 Concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy (other than carcinoma of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma successfully treated more than 5 years prior to screening).
  1. Patients with a current or recent history of severe, progressive, and/or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological or cerebral disease.
  1. Patients with class III or IV congestive heart failure according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) 1964 classification criteria.
  1. Patients with a history of, or suspected, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (e.g. multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis).
  1. Patients with any other condition (e.g. clinically significant laboratory values) which in the Investigator's judgment would make the patient unsuitable for inclusion in the study.
  1. Patients who have a metal device affected by MRI (e.g., any type of electronic, mechanical, or magnetic implant; cardiac pacemaker; aneurysm clip(s); implanted cardioverter defibrillator; or a cochlear implant) 17. Patients who have a potential ferromagnetic foreign body (metal slivers, metal shavings, other metal objects) for which they have sought medical attention.
  1. Concurrent steroid use for any concomitant disease. 19. Subjects who are known to be Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C positive
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    corticotrophin 80 units

    Ten (10) patients will receive 80 units of corticotrophin Subcutaneous (SC) weekly

    Drug: corticotrophin 80 units

  • Active comparator
    corticotrophin 80 units twice a week

    Ten (10) patients will receive 80 units of corticotrophin Subcutaneous (SC) twice a week

    Drug: corticotrophin 80 units

Interventions

  • Drugcorticotrophin 80 units

    Comparison of different dosages of the drug. Ten patients will receive 80 units of corticotrophin weekly. Ten patients will receive 80 units bi-weekly of corticotrophin

    Also known as: Acthar, Corticotrophin, ACTH

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score

    To evaluate the effect of the use of 2 doses of corticotrophin (ACTH) as a treatment in patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis as an alternative to conventional steroid therapy by evaluating the change from baseline in the clinical findings as measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores. The CDAI is calculated at the specified time points using the formula: CDAI = SJC(28) + TJC(28) + PGA + EGA SJC(28): Swollen 28-Joint Count (shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCPs, PIPs including thumb IP, knees) Interpretation: A lower CDAI score from Baseline would mean improvement in disease activity and an increase in CDAI score from Baseline would mean an increase in disease activity or a worsening in disease activity. Scores: 0.0-2.8 = Range for Remission; 2.9-10.0 = Range for Low disease activity; 10.1-22.0 Range for Moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 Range for High disease activity.Total range is from 0-100, with the high scores representing high disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of MRI Structural Improvements

    To compare the number of patients who have synovitis, oseitis and erosions at Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6. Normal range for synovitis, osteitis and erosions is zero (0)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  2. Number of Participants With Increased or Decreased Erosions of the Hand and Wrist

    Comparison of the change in the number of erosions seen in the joints of the hand and wrist as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. Regression indicates improvement in the number of erosions seen from Baseline and Progression indicates worsening in the number of erosions seen from Baseline. Normal range is zero (0).

    Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

  3. Comparison of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores to Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings

    Comparison of the clinical findings as measured by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) versus the structural findings as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Improvement is measured as a reduction in CDAI score from Baseline to Month 6 and improvement in MRI is regression of erosions, oseitis and synovitis at month 6. Norman MRI score is zero (0). CDAI: 0.0-2.8 remission; 2.9-10.0 low disease activity; 10.1-22 moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 high disease activity. A decrease in CDAI score is improvement

    Time frame: Month 6

Other outcomes

  1. Participants With Increased and Decreased C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates (ESR)

    comparisons not statistical analysis will be made from Baseline and Month 6 of the C- reactive Protein (CRP) values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) to determine the number of patients whose test result improved or worsenedCRP value (normal range \<1.0 mg/dl). ESR (normal range 0-28 mm/hr) . If the value is increased, the disease activity worsened. If the value is reduced the disease activity is improved.

    Time frame: Month 6

07

Results

Posted Jan 18, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1Group 2
Started1010
Completed89
Not completed21

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score

To evaluate the effect of the use of 2 doses of corticotrophin (ACTH) as a treatment in patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis as an alternative to conventional steroid therapy by evaluating the change from baseline in the clinical findings as measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores. The CDAI is calculated at the specified time points using the formula: CDAI = SJC(28) + TJC(28) + PGA + EGA SJC(28): Swollen 28-Joint Count (shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCPs, PIPs including thumb IP, knees) Interpretation: A lower CDAI score from Baseline would mean improvement in disease activity and an increase in CDAI score from Baseline would mean an increase in disease activity or a worsening in disease activity. Scores: 0.0-2.8 = Range for Remission; 2.9-10.0 = Range for Low disease activity; 10.1-22.0 Range for Moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 Range for High disease activity.Total range is from 0-100, with the high scores representing high disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score
ParticipantsGroup 1Group 2
Baseline — remission00
Baseline — low disease activity00
Baseline — moderate disease activity00
Baseline — high disease activity98
Month 3 — remission31
Month 3 — low disease activity24
Month 3 — moderate disease activity42
Month 3 — high disease activity01
Month 6 — remission23
Month 6 — low disease activity43
Month 6 — moderate disease activity22
Month 6 — high disease activity10
SecondaryEvaluation of MRI Structural Improvements

To compare the number of patients who have synovitis, oseitis and erosions at Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6. Normal range for synovitis, osteitis and erosions is zero (0)

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Evaluation of MRI Structural Improvements
participantsGroup 1Group 2
Baseline : synovitis87
Baseline : osteitis84
Baseline : erosions98
Month 3 : synovitis67
Month 3 : osteitis66
Month 3 : erosions98
Month 6 : synovitis57
Month 6 : osteitis44
Month 6 : erosions78
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Increased or Decreased Erosions of the Hand and Wrist

Comparison of the change in the number of erosions seen in the joints of the hand and wrist as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. Regression indicates improvement in the number of erosions seen from Baseline and Progression indicates worsening in the number of erosions seen from Baseline. Normal range is zero (0).

Time frame:
Month 3 and Month 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Increased or Decreased Erosions of the Hand and Wrist
participantsGroup 1Group 2
Month 3 : Progressed erosions13
Month 3 : Regressed erosions02
Month 6 : Progressed erosions22
Month 6 : Regressed erosions12
SecondaryComparison of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores to Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings

Comparison of the clinical findings as measured by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) versus the structural findings as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Improvement is measured as a reduction in CDAI score from Baseline to Month 6 and improvement in MRI is regression of erosions, oseitis and synovitis at month 6. Norman MRI score is zero (0). CDAI: 0.0-2.8 remission; 2.9-10.0 low disease activity; 10.1-22 moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 high disease activity. A decrease in CDAI score is improvement

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Comparison of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores to Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings
participantsGroup 1Group 2
# of patients whose CDAI score improved88
# of patients whose overall MRI improved65
Other pre-specifiedParticipants With Increased and Decreased C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates (ESR)

comparisons not statistical analysis will be made from Baseline and Month 6 of the C- reactive Protein (CRP) values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) to determine the number of patients whose test result improved or worsenedCRP value (normal range \<1.0 mg/dl). ESR (normal range 0-28 mm/hr) . If the value is increased, the disease activity worsened. If the value is reduced the disease activity is improved.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants With Increased and Decreased C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates (ESR)
ParticipantsGroup 1Group 2
CRP Values — # of patient with Decreased values87
CRP Values — # of patients with Increased values11
ESR Values — # of patient with Decreased values98
ESR Values — # of patients with Increased values00

Adverse events

Collected over all adverse events were collected from the date of signing Informed Consent and Discontinuation or Completion of the trial. There were no adverse events either serious or non-serious to be reported.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 1—0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Group 2—0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Corticotrophin 80 UnitsCorticotrophin 80 Units Twice a WeekTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7714
>=65 years336
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Corticotrophin 80 UnitsCorticotrophin 80 Units Twice a WeekTotal
Mean60 (49 to 77)57 (36 to 78)59 (36 to 78)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Corticotrophin 80 UnitsCorticotrophin 80 Units Twice a WeekTotal
Female91019
Male101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Corticotrophin 80 UnitsCorticotrophin 80 Units Twice a WeekTotal
United States101020
08

Study locations

1 site
  • AARDS Research, Inc
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01948388
Lead sponsor
Gaylis, Norman B., M.D.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 23, 2013
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Results posted
Jan 18, 2019
Last update
Jan 18, 2019

Study contacts

Norman B Gaylis, MD
principal investigator · AARDS Research, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion