A Phase 4 interventional study of corticotrophin 80 units in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Gaylis, Norman B., M.D.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-18.
Sponsored by Gaylis, Norman B., M.D. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of the utilization of two doses of corticotrophin ( ACTH) as a treatment in patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis as an alternative to conventional steroid therapy by evaluating the change from baseline in the clinical findings as well as the structural findings on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Corticotrophin (ACTH) may prevent the well documented structural progression damage in RA patients using disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy alone.
This is a Phase II 24-week open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of H.P. Acthar Gel Respository Injection, Corticotrophin( ACTH) administered to newly diagnosed patients with rheumatoid arthritis in conjunction with methotrexate, folllowed by a 24 week follow-up period. There will be a total of twenty (20) patients and two (2) treatment groups with 10 patients in each treatment group
3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 318 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.
Browse Arthritis studies →Gaylis, Norman B., M.D. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion criteria:
Patients have received prohibited medication:
Ten (10) patients will receive 80 units of corticotrophin Subcutaneous (SC) weekly
Drug: corticotrophin 80 units
Ten (10) patients will receive 80 units of corticotrophin Subcutaneous (SC) twice a week
Drug: corticotrophin 80 units
Comparison of different dosages of the drug. Ten patients will receive 80 units of corticotrophin weekly. Ten patients will receive 80 units bi-weekly of corticotrophin
Also known as: Acthar, Corticotrophin, ACTH
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score
To evaluate the effect of the use of 2 doses of corticotrophin (ACTH) as a treatment in patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis as an alternative to conventional steroid therapy by evaluating the change from baseline in the clinical findings as measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores. The CDAI is calculated at the specified time points using the formula: CDAI = SJC(28) + TJC(28) + PGA + EGA SJC(28): Swollen 28-Joint Count (shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCPs, PIPs including thumb IP, knees) Interpretation: A lower CDAI score from Baseline would mean improvement in disease activity and an increase in CDAI score from Baseline would mean an increase in disease activity or a worsening in disease activity. Scores: 0.0-2.8 = Range for Remission; 2.9-10.0 = Range for Low disease activity; 10.1-22.0 Range for Moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 Range for High disease activity.Total range is from 0-100, with the high scores representing high disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6
Evaluation of MRI Structural Improvements
To compare the number of patients who have synovitis, oseitis and erosions at Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6. Normal range for synovitis, osteitis and erosions is zero (0)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Number of Participants With Increased or Decreased Erosions of the Hand and Wrist
Comparison of the change in the number of erosions seen in the joints of the hand and wrist as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. Regression indicates improvement in the number of erosions seen from Baseline and Progression indicates worsening in the number of erosions seen from Baseline. Normal range is zero (0).
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6
Comparison of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores to Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings
Comparison of the clinical findings as measured by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) versus the structural findings as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Improvement is measured as a reduction in CDAI score from Baseline to Month 6 and improvement in MRI is regression of erosions, oseitis and synovitis at month 6. Norman MRI score is zero (0). CDAI: 0.0-2.8 remission; 2.9-10.0 low disease activity; 10.1-22 moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 high disease activity. A decrease in CDAI score is improvement
Time frame: Month 6
Participants With Increased and Decreased C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates (ESR)
comparisons not statistical analysis will be made from Baseline and Month 6 of the C- reactive Protein (CRP) values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) to determine the number of patients whose test result improved or worsenedCRP value (normal range \<1.0 mg/dl). ESR (normal range 0-28 mm/hr) . If the value is increased, the disease activity worsened. If the value is reduced the disease activity is improved.
Time frame: Month 6
| Milestone | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 10 | 10 |
| Completed | 8 | 9 |
| Not completed | 2 | 1 |
To evaluate the effect of the use of 2 doses of corticotrophin (ACTH) as a treatment in patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis as an alternative to conventional steroid therapy by evaluating the change from baseline in the clinical findings as measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores. The CDAI is calculated at the specified time points using the formula: CDAI = SJC(28) + TJC(28) + PGA + EGA SJC(28): Swollen 28-Joint Count (shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCPs, PIPs including thumb IP, knees) Interpretation: A lower CDAI score from Baseline would mean improvement in disease activity and an increase in CDAI score from Baseline would mean an increase in disease activity or a worsening in disease activity. Scores: 0.0-2.8 = Range for Remission; 2.9-10.0 = Range for Low disease activity; 10.1-22.0 Range for Moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 Range for High disease activity.Total range is from 0-100, with the high scores representing high disease activity.
| Participants | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline — remission | 0 | 0 |
| Baseline — low disease activity | 0 | 0 |
| Baseline — moderate disease activity | 0 | 0 |
| Baseline — high disease activity | 9 | 8 |
| Month 3 — remission | 3 | 1 |
| Month 3 — low disease activity | 2 | 4 |
| Month 3 — moderate disease activity | 4 | 2 |
| Month 3 — high disease activity | 0 | 1 |
| Month 6 — remission | 2 | 3 |
| Month 6 — low disease activity | 4 | 3 |
| Month 6 — moderate disease activity | 2 | 2 |
| Month 6 — high disease activity | 1 | 0 |
To compare the number of patients who have synovitis, oseitis and erosions at Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6. Normal range for synovitis, osteitis and erosions is zero (0)
| participants | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline : synovitis | 8 | 7 |
| Baseline : osteitis | 8 | 4 |
| Baseline : erosions | 9 | 8 |
| Month 3 : synovitis | 6 | 7 |
| Month 3 : osteitis | 6 | 6 |
| Month 3 : erosions | 9 | 8 |
| Month 6 : synovitis | 5 | 7 |
| Month 6 : osteitis | 4 | 4 |
| Month 6 : erosions | 7 | 8 |
Comparison of the change in the number of erosions seen in the joints of the hand and wrist as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. Regression indicates improvement in the number of erosions seen from Baseline and Progression indicates worsening in the number of erosions seen from Baseline. Normal range is zero (0).
| participants | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Month 3 : Progressed erosions | 1 | 3 |
| Month 3 : Regressed erosions | 0 | 2 |
| Month 6 : Progressed erosions | 2 | 2 |
| Month 6 : Regressed erosions | 1 | 2 |
Comparison of the clinical findings as measured by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) versus the structural findings as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Improvement is measured as a reduction in CDAI score from Baseline to Month 6 and improvement in MRI is regression of erosions, oseitis and synovitis at month 6. Norman MRI score is zero (0). CDAI: 0.0-2.8 remission; 2.9-10.0 low disease activity; 10.1-22 moderate disease activity; 22.1-76 high disease activity. A decrease in CDAI score is improvement
| participants | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|---|---|---|
| # of patients whose CDAI score improved | 8 | 8 |
| # of patients whose overall MRI improved | 6 | 5 |
comparisons not statistical analysis will be made from Baseline and Month 6 of the C- reactive Protein (CRP) values and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) to determine the number of patients whose test result improved or worsenedCRP value (normal range \<1.0 mg/dl). ESR (normal range 0-28 mm/hr) . If the value is increased, the disease activity worsened. If the value is reduced the disease activity is improved.
| Participants | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|---|---|---|
| CRP Values — # of patient with Decreased values | 8 | 7 |
| CRP Values — # of patients with Increased values | 1 | 1 |
| ESR Values — # of patient with Decreased values | 9 | 8 |
| ESR Values — # of patients with Increased values | 0 | 0 |
Collected over all adverse events were collected from the date of signing Informed Consent and Discontinuation or Completion of the trial. There were no adverse events either serious or non-serious to be reported.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | — | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) |
| Group 2 | — | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Corticotrophin 80 Units | Corticotrophin 80 Units Twice a Week | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| >=65 years | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Corticotrophin 80 Units | Corticotrophin 80 Units Twice a Week | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 60 (49 to 77) | 57 (36 to 78) | 59 (36 to 78) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Corticotrophin 80 Units | Corticotrophin 80 Units Twice a Week | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 9 | 10 | 19 |
| Male | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Corticotrophin 80 Units | Corticotrophin 80 Units Twice a Week | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 10 | 20 |
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Gaylis, Norman B., M.D.