CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01942135Updated Apr 4, 2024Results posted

Palbociclib (PD-0332991) Combined With Fulvestrant In Hormone Receptor+ HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer After Endocrine Failure (PALOMA-3)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Metastatic Breast Cancer, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 247 sites in 17 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-04.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
521
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The study is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, Phase 3 clinical trial with the primary objective of demonstrating the superiority of palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant (Faslodex®) over fulvestrant alone in prolonging PFS in women with HR+, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer whose disease has progressed after prior endocrine therapy. The safety between the two treatment arms will also be compared. During study treatment, pre- and perimenopausal women must be receiving therapy with the LHRH agonist goserelin (Zoladex® or generic).

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Palbociclib (PD-0332991)
  • Fulvestrant
  • Goserelin
  • Hormone receptor-+
  • HER2-negative
  • Prior Endocrine treatment
  • any menopausal status
  • PALOMA-3
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 521 is above the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Women 18 years or older with metastatic or locally advanced disease, not amenable to curative therapy
  • Confirmed diagnosis of HR+/HER2- breast cancer
  • Any menopausal status
  • Progressed within 12 months from prior adjuvant or progressed within 1 month from prior advanced/metastatic endocrine breast cancer therapy
  • On an LHRH agonist for at least 28 days, if pre-/peri-menopausal, and willing to switch to goserelin (Zoladex ®) at time of randomization.
  • Measurable disease defined by RECIST version 1.1, or bone-only disease
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 0-1
  • Adequate organ and marrow function, resolution of all toxic effects of prior therapy or surgical procedures
  • Patient must agree to provide tumor tissue from metastatic tissue at baseline

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with any CDK inhibitor, fulvestrant, everolimus, or agent that inhibits the PI3K-mTOR pathway
  • Patients with extensive advanced/metastatic, symptomatic visceral disease, or known uncontrolled or symptomatic CNS metastases
  • Major surgery or any anti-cancer therapy within 2 weeks of randomization
  • Prior stem cell or bone marrow transplantation
  • Use of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
521 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A

    Given until objective progression, symptomatic deterioration, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Palbociclib · Drug: Fulvestrant

  • Active comparator
    Arm B

    Given until objective progression, symptomatic deterioration, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Fulvestrant

Interventions

  • DrugPalbociclib

    Palbociclib 125 mg/day orally continuously dosed for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off; repeated at each subsequent cycle.

  • DrugFulvestrant

    Fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1, and then on Day 1 of each subsequent 28 day cycle.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo orally continuously dosed for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off; repeated at each subsequent cycle.

  • DrugFulvestrant

    Fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1, and then on Day 1 of each subsequent 28 day cycle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator

    PFS is the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of disease (PD)or death due to any cause in absence of documented PD. Participants lacking an evaluation of tumor response after randomization had their PFS time censored on the date of randomization with the duration of a day. Participants with documentation of PD or death after a long interval (2 or more incomplete or non-evaluable assessments) since the last tumor assessment were censored at the time of last objective assessment that did not show PD. The length of PFS was calculated as PFS time (months) =\[progression/death date(censor date) - randomization date + 1\]/30.4. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST v1.1) a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions.

    Time frame: From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression or death (assessed up to 12 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)-Number of Participants Who Died

    OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. For participants lacking survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up, the OS time was censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Participants lacking survival data beyond randomization were to have their OS times be censored at randomization. The length of OS was calculated as OS time (months) = \[death date (censor date) - randomization date + 1\]/30.4.

    Time frame: From randomization until death (up to 4.5 years)

  2. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. For participants lacking survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up, the OS time was censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Participants lacking survival data beyond randomization were to have their OS times be censored at randomization. The length of OS was calculated as OS time (months) = \[death date (censor date) - randomization date + 1\]/30.4.

    Time frame: From randomization until death (up to 4.5 years)

  3. Survival Probabilities at Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

    One-, Two- or Three-year Survival Probability is defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Survival time was censored to last date the participant is known to be alive.

    Time frame: From randomization until death (assessed up to 36 months)

  4. Objective Response (OR)

    OR is defined as the overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the RECIST version 1.1 Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (longest for non-nodal and short axis for nodal target lesions); Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

    Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)

  5. Duration of Response (DR)

    DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DR was calculated as \[the date response ended (ie, date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)\]/30.4. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median of the DR is provided below. No inferential statistical analysis were done for DR. The DR was only calculated for the participants with a CR or PR.

    Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)

  6. Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)

    CBR is defined as the overall complete response (CR), partial response (PR) , or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks according to the RECIST version 1.1. Clinical Benefit Response Rate (CBRR) is defined as the proportion of participants with CR, PR, or SD ≥24 weeks relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received antitumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, a best response of SD ≥24 weeks, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD ≥24 weeks was counted as non-responders in the assessment of CBR. Per RECIST v1.1 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: CR, disappearance of all target lesions; PR, ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; OR = CR + PR.

    Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)

  7. Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for Palbociclib

    Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For palbociclib, a steady-state trough was to be defined as a predose plasma concentration following at least 8 consecutive days of 125 mg daily dose without dosing interruption and the time window for the PK collection was to be between 22 and 26 hours after the dose (the day prior to PK collection) and no more than 1 hour post-dose on the day of PK collection.

    Time frame: Cycle 1/Day 15 and Cycle 2/Day 15

  8. Ctrough for Fulvestrant

    Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For fulvestrant, a steady-state trough was to be defined when a patient had received all prior planned doses and the sample was collected predose.

    Time frame: Cycles 2/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1

  9. Ctrough for Goserelin

    Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For goserelin, a steady-state trough was to be defined when a patient had received all prior planned doses and the sample was collected predose.

    Time frame: Cycles 2/ Day 1 and Cycle 3/ Day 1

  10. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional Scale Scores

    The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of five multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive , and social functioning), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global quality of life (QOL) subscale, and six single item symptom scales assessing other cancer-related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items are then converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms. A 10-point or higher change in scores from baseline is considered clinically significant.

    Time frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

  11. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EORTC QLQ-C30 Symptom Scale Scores

    The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of five multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive , and social functioning), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global quality of life (QOL) subscale, and six single item symptom scales assessing other cancer-related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items are then converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms. A 10-point or higher change in scores from baseline is considered clinically significant.

    Time frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

  12. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ BR23) Functional Scale Scores

    The EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). QLQ-BR23 questionnaire employs 4-point scales with responses from 'not at all' to 'very much'. All scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning.

    Time frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

  13. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EORTC QLQ BR23 Symptom Scale Scores

    The EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). QLQ-BR23 questionnaire employs 4-point scales with responses from 'not at all' to 'very much'. All scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represent more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

  14. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D)- Health Index Scores

    The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The first part consists of 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/ depression); a participant is asked to rate each state on a three level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem) with higher levels indicating greater severity/ impairment Published weights are available that allow for the creation of a single summary score called the EQ-5D index, which basically ranges from 0 to 1 with low scores representing a higher level of dysfunction and 1 as perfect health. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

    Time frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

  15. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores Scale

    The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

    Time frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

  16. Time to Deterioration (TTD)

    A time to event analysis was pre-specified for pain. An analysis of TTD in pain defined as time between baseline and first occurrence of increase of ≥10 points in pain. Deterioration will be defined increase in score of 10 points or greater from baseline. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of quartiles (time to deterioration) with 95% CI is mentioned below.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 4, Day 1 of every alternate cycle after that until the end of treatment, as of 05 December 2014

  17. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs; All Causalities)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation patient administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Severity will be graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization up to 28 calendar days (±7 days) after last dose of study intervention (up to 8.4 years).

  18. Participants With Shifts From CTCAE Grade ≤2 at Baseline to CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline for Hematology Results

    Number of participants with shifts from Grade ≤2 at baseline values to post-baseline values (shift to Grade 3 or 4) were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, V4.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/ mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Shifts in lab parameter from Grade ≤2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 postbaseline (for parameters Anemia, Hemoglobin increased, Neutrophil count decreased, Platelet count decreased, and White blood cell count decreased) were reported.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment/withdrawal (up to 4.5 years)

  19. Participants With Shifts From CTCAE Grade ≤2 at Baseline to CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline for Chemistry Results

    Number of participants with shifts from Grade ≤2 at baseline values to post-baseline values (shift to Grade 3 or 4) were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, V4.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/ mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Shifts in lab parameter from Grade ≤2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 postbaseline (for parameters ALT increased, ALP increased, AST increased, Blood bilirubin increased, Creatinine increased, Hypercalcemia, Hyperkalemia, Hypermagnesemia, Hypernatremia, Hypoalbuminemia, Hypocalcemia, Hypokalemia, Hypomagnesemia, and Hyponatremia) were reported.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment/withdrawal (up to 4.5 years)

07

Results

Posted May 23, 2016

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 144 sites in 17 countries that randomized 521 participants. Eligible participants were to have histologically or cytologically proven diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the breast with evidence of recurrent (local or metastatic) disease.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Started347174
Treated345172
Completed00
Not completed347174
Withdrew: Adverse event217
Withdrew: Global deterioration of health status96
Withdrew: Randomized not treated22
Withdrew: Death21
Withdrew: Objective progression or relapse + progressive disease279148
Withdrew: Participant refused to continue treatment for reason other than adverse event103
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject43
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Other194

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator

PFS is the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of disease (PD)or death due to any cause in absence of documented PD. Participants lacking an evaluation of tumor response after randomization had their PFS time censored on the date of randomization with the duration of a day. Participants with documentation of PD or death after a long interval (2 or more incomplete or non-evaluable assessments) since the last tumor assessment were censored at the time of last objective assessment that did not show PD. The length of PFS was calculated as PFS time (months) =\[progression/death date(censor date) - randomization date + 1\]/30.4. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST v1.1) a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions.

Time frame:
From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression or death (assessed up to 12 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator
monthsPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator9.2 (7.5 to NA)3.8 (3.5 to 5.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Stratified Log Rank Test (1-sided) · p = <0.000001 (The overall Type-I error rate was persevered at 1-sided 0.025 level for the analysis of the primary endpoint PFS by the Haybittle-Peto efficacy boundary. The priori threshold for statistical significance was 0.00135.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.422 · 95% CI 0.318 to 0.560Assuming proportional hazards, a hazard ratio less than 1 indicates a reduction in hazard rate in favor of the palbociclib plus fulvestrant arm.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)-Number of Participants Who Died

OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. For participants lacking survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up, the OS time was censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Participants lacking survival data beyond randomization were to have their OS times be censored at randomization. The length of OS was calculated as OS time (months) = \[death date (censor date) - randomization date + 1\]/30.4.

Time frame:
From randomization until death (up to 4.5 years)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Survival (OS)-Number of Participants Who Died
ParticipantsPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Overall Survival (OS)-Number of Participants Who Died201109
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. For participants lacking survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up, the OS time was censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Participants lacking survival data beyond randomization were to have their OS times be censored at randomization. The length of OS was calculated as OS time (months) = \[death date (censor date) - randomization date + 1\]/30.4.

Time frame:
From randomization until death (up to 4.5 years)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Overall Survival (OS)34.9 (28.8 to 40.0)28.0 (23.6 to 34.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Stratified Log Rank Test (1-sided) · p = =0.0429 (1-sided p-value from the log-rank test stratified by the presence of visceral metastases and sensitivity to prior endocrine therapy per randomization.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.814 · 95% CI 0.644 to 1.029Assuming proportional hazards, a hazard ratio less than 1 indicates a reduction in hazard rate in favor of palbociclib plus fulvestrant.
SecondarySurvival Probabilities at Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

One-, Two- or Three-year Survival Probability is defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Survival time was censored to last date the participant is known to be alive.

Time frame:
From randomization until death (assessed up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Number · Survival Probability
Survival Probabilities at Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3
Survival ProbabilityPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Survival Probability at Year 185.5 (81.3 to 88.9)84.8 (78.3 to 89.4)
Survival Probability at Year 265.3 (59.9 to 70.2)57.3 (49.2 to 64.6)
Survival Probability at Year 349.6 (44.0 to 54.9)40.8 (32.9 to 48.5)
SecondaryObjective Response (OR)

OR is defined as the overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the RECIST version 1.1 Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (longest for non-nodal and short axis for nodal target lesions); Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Time frame:
From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Objective Response (OR)
percentage of participantsPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Objective Response (OR)21.0 (16.9 to 25.7)8.6 (4.9 to 13.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Exact test (1-sided) · p = 0.0001 (The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons. The priori threshold for statistical significance is 1-sided, alpha=0.025.) · Odds ratio (or): 2.783 · 95% CI 1.563 to 5.603An Odds Ratio \>1 means better response in favor of the palbociclib plus fulvestrant arm.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DR)

DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DR was calculated as \[the date response ended (ie, date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)\]/30.4. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median of the DR is provided below. No inferential statistical analysis were done for DR. The DR was only calculated for the participants with a CR or PR.

Time frame:
From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Response (DR)
MonthsPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Duration of Response (DR)10.4 (8.3 to NA)9.0 (5.6 to NA)
SecondaryClinical Benefit Response (CBR)

CBR is defined as the overall complete response (CR), partial response (PR) , or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks according to the RECIST version 1.1. Clinical Benefit Response Rate (CBRR) is defined as the proportion of participants with CR, PR, or SD ≥24 weeks relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received antitumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, a best response of SD ≥24 weeks, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD ≥24 weeks was counted as non-responders in the assessment of CBR. Per RECIST v1.1 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: CR, disappearance of all target lesions; PR, ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; OR = CR + PR.

Time frame:
From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)
percentage of participantsPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)66.3 (61.0 to 71.2)39.7 (32.3 to 47.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Exact test (1-sided) · p = <0.0001 (The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons. The priori threshold for statistical significance is 1-sided, alpha=0.025.) · Odds ratio (or): 3.016 · 95% CI 2.046 to 4.565An odds ratio \> 1 means better clinical benefit response in favor of palbociclib plus fulvestrant arm.
SecondaryObserved Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for Palbociclib

Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For palbociclib, a steady-state trough was to be defined as a predose plasma concentration following at least 8 consecutive days of 125 mg daily dose without dosing interruption and the time window for the PK collection was to be between 22 and 26 hours after the dose (the day prior to PK collection) and no more than 1 hour post-dose on the day of PK collection.

Time frame:
Cycle 1/Day 15 and Cycle 2/Day 15
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for Palbociclib
nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Palbociclib + Fulvestrant
Cycle 1/Day 1570.70 ± 44
Cycle 2/Day 1575.29 ± 44
SecondaryCtrough for Fulvestrant

Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For fulvestrant, a steady-state trough was to be defined when a patient had received all prior planned doses and the sample was collected predose.

Time frame:
Cycles 2/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Ctrough for Fulvestrant
ng/mLPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Cycle 2/Day 111.75 ± 419.31 ± 52
Cycle 3/Day 19.90 ± 427.60 ± 72
SecondaryCtrough for Goserelin

Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For goserelin, a steady-state trough was to be defined when a patient had received all prior planned doses and the sample was collected predose.

Time frame:
Cycles 2/ Day 1 and Cycle 3/ Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Ctrough for Goserelin
picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Palbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Cycle 2/Day 1295.1 ± 153302.5 ± 74
Cycle 3/Day 1344.8 ± 64288.5 ± 40
SecondaryChange From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional Scale Scores

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of five multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive , and social functioning), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global quality of life (QOL) subscale, and six single item symptom scales assessing other cancer-related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items are then converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms. A 10-point or higher change in scores from baseline is considered clinically significant.

Time frame:
From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional Scale Scores
Units on a scalePalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Global health status / QoL-0.9 ± 64.5-4.0 ± 26.25
Physical functioning-0.7 ± 22.76-1.7 ± 21.24
Role functioning-1.8 ± 30.70-3.7 ± 28.04
Emotional functioning2.7 ± 25.97-1.9 ± 21.19
Cognitive functioning-1.7 ± 20.97-2.9 ± 20.22
Social functioning-0.5 ± 32.07-0.6 ± 32.27
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.0313 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 3.1 · 95% CI 0.3 to 6.0Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.4000 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 1.0 · 95% CI -1.4 to 3.5Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.2615 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 1.9 · 95% CI -1.5 to 5.3Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.0016 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 4.6 · 95% CI 1.7 to 7.4Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.3650 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 1.2 · 95% CI -1.4 to 3.8Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.9615 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.1 · 95% CI -3.4 to 3.5Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EORTC QLQ-C30 Symptom Scale Scores

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of five multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive , and social functioning), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global quality of life (QOL) subscale, and six single item symptom scales assessing other cancer-related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items are then converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms. A 10-point or higher change in scores from baseline is considered clinically significant.

Time frame:
From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EORTC QLQ-C30 Symptom Scale Scores
Units on a scalePalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Fatigue1.8 ± 26.123.3 ± 24.82
Nausea and vomiting1.7 ± 26.064.2 ± 19.71
Pain-3.3 ± 29.022.0 ± 30.04
Dyspnoea2.8 ± 30.323.3 ± 24.98
Insomnia-2.4 ± 29.81-0.4 ± 29.30
Appetite loss1.1 ± 36.431.7 ± 29.61
Constipation3.5 ± 32.052.8 ± 26.05
Diarrhoea1.9 ± 18.972.4 ± 26.12
Financial difficulties-3.7 ± 28.87-4.0 ± 26.30
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.3200 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): -1.5 · 95% CI -4.5 to 1.5Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.0369 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): -2.5 · 95% CI -4.8 to -0.2Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.0011 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): -5.3 · 95% CI -8.5 to -2.1Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.7699 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.5 · 95% CI -3.7 to 2.8Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.2721 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): -2.0 · 95% CI -5.5 to 1.6Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.7334 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.6 · 95% CI -4.1 to 2.9Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.6491 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.7 · 95% CI -2.5 to 3.9Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.6293 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.6 · 95% CI -2.8 to 1.7Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.8812 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.3 · 95% CI -3.1 to 3.6Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ BR23) Functional Scale Scores

The EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). QLQ-BR23 questionnaire employs 4-point scales with responses from 'not at all' to 'very much'. All scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning.

Time frame:
From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ BR23) Functional Scale Scores
Units on a scalePalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Body image1.9 ± 28.07-0.3 ± 20.33
Sexual functioning-1.1 ± 16.08-0.4 ± 18.23
Sexual enjoyment-5.2 ± 20.80-6.6 ± 25.49
Future perspective8.1 ± 30.634.5 ± 30.00
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.1386 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 2.3 · 95% CI -0.7 to 5.2Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.5235 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.8 · 95% CI -3.1 to 1.6Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.6271 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 1.4 · 95% CI -4.4 to 7.3Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.0845 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 3.6 · 95% CI -0.5 to 7.6Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EORTC QLQ BR23 Symptom Scale Scores

The EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). QLQ-BR23 questionnaire employs 4-point scales with responses from 'not at all' to 'very much'. All scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represent more severe symptoms.

Time frame:
From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EORTC QLQ BR23 Symptom Scale Scores
Units on a scalePalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Systemic therapy side effects3.8 ± 15.193.4 ± 14.31
Breast symptoms-2.2 ± 21.32-1.3 ± 17.49
Arm symptoms-2.2 ± 20.59-2.0 ± 20.08
Upset by hair loss2.9 ± 30.19-6.0 ± 20.91
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.7273 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.4 · 95% CI -1.6 to 2.3Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.2671 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.9 · 95% CI -2.6 to 0.7Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.8750 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.2 · 95% CI -2.6 to 2.2Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.0255 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 8.9 · 95% CI 1.1 to 16.6Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D)- Health Index Scores

The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The first part consists of 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/ depression); a participant is asked to rate each state on a three level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem) with higher levels indicating greater severity/ impairment Published weights are available that allow for the creation of a single summary score called the EQ-5D index, which basically ranges from 0 to 1 with low scores representing a higher level of dysfunction and 1 as perfect health. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

Time frame:
From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D)- Health Index Scores
Units on a scalePalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D)- Health Index Scores0.006 (-0.01 to 0.03)-0.031 (-0.06 to 0.00)
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.0308 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.037 · 95% CI 0.00 to 0.07Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores Scale

The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

Time frame:
From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores Scale
Units on a scalePalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores Scale-1.8 ± 19.00-2.6 ± 23.09
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Mixed Model Analysis (2-sided) · p = 0.5523 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 2-sided alpha=0.05. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.8 · 95% CI -1.9 to 3.5Analysis based on repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate.
SecondaryTime to Deterioration (TTD)

A time to event analysis was pre-specified for pain. An analysis of TTD in pain defined as time between baseline and first occurrence of increase of ≥10 points in pain. Deterioration will be defined increase in score of 10 points or greater from baseline. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of quartiles (time to deterioration) with 95% CI is mentioned below.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 4, Day 1 of every alternate cycle after that until the end of treatment, as of 05 December 2014
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Deterioration (TTD)
MonthsPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
25% quartile1.9 (1.2 to 2.2)1.0 (1.0 to 1.9)
50% quartile8.0 (5.6 to NA)2.8 (2.3 to 5.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant vs Placebo + Fulvestrant · Unstratified log-rank test (1-sided) · p = <0.001 (The priori threshold for statistical significance is 1-sided alpha=0.025. The p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.642 · 95% CI 0.487 to 0.846Assuming proportional hazards, a hazard ratio less than 1 indicates a reduction in hazard rate in favor of the palbociclib plus fulvestrant arm.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs; All Causalities)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation patient administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Severity will be graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization up to 28 calendar days (±7 days) after last dose of study intervention (up to 8.4 years).
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs; All Causalities)
percentage of participantsPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
With AEs98.893.6
With SAEs22.619.2
With Grade 3 or 4 AEs80.626.7
With Grade 5 AEs2.31.7
Discontinued palbociclib/placebo due to AEs7.54.7
SecondaryParticipants With Shifts From CTCAE Grade ≤2 at Baseline to CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline for Hematology Results

Number of participants with shifts from Grade ≤2 at baseline values to post-baseline values (shift to Grade 3 or 4) were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, V4.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/ mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Shifts in lab parameter from Grade ≤2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 postbaseline (for parameters Anemia, Hemoglobin increased, Neutrophil count decreased, Platelet count decreased, and White blood cell count decreased) were reported.

Time frame:
From baseline to end of treatment/withdrawal (up to 4.5 years)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants With Shifts From CTCAE Grade ≤2 at Baseline to CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline for Hematology Results
ParticipantsPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Anemia163
Hemoglobin increased10
Neutrophil count decreased2391
Platelet count decreased100
White blood cell count decreased1670
SecondaryParticipants With Shifts From CTCAE Grade ≤2 at Baseline to CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline for Chemistry Results

Number of participants with shifts from Grade ≤2 at baseline values to post-baseline values (shift to Grade 3 or 4) were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, V4.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/ mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Shifts in lab parameter from Grade ≤2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 postbaseline (for parameters ALT increased, ALP increased, AST increased, Blood bilirubin increased, Creatinine increased, Hypercalcemia, Hyperkalemia, Hypermagnesemia, Hypernatremia, Hypoalbuminemia, Hypocalcemia, Hypokalemia, Hypomagnesemia, and Hyponatremia) were reported.

Time frame:
From baseline to end of treatment/withdrawal (up to 4.5 years)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants With Shifts From CTCAE Grade ≤2 at Baseline to CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline for Chemistry Results
ParticipantsPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
ALT increased101
ALP increased22
AST increased137
Blood bilirubin increased23
Creatinine increased50
Hypercalcemia10
Hyperkalemia22
Hypermagnesemia72
Hypernatremia01
Hypoalbuminemia01
Hypocalcemia22
Hypokalemia00
Hypomagnesemia00
Hyponatremia124

Adverse events

Collected over From the date of randomization up to 28 calendar days (±7 days) after last dose of study intervention (up to 8.4 years).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant201/347 (57.9%)78/345 (22.6%)341/345 (98.8%)
Placebo + Fulvestrant109/174 (62.6%)33/172 (19.2%)161/172 (93.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 122
Most frequent serious events
EventPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/3453/172
PyrexiaGeneral disorders5/3451/172
AscitesGastrointestinal disorders0/3452/172
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/3452/172
Pathological fractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/3452/172
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/3450/172
Disease progressionGeneral disorders4/3450/172
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/3450/172
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/3450/172
Deep vein thrombosisVascular disorders3/3450/172
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 65
Most frequent other events
EventPalbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + Fulvestrant
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders231/3454/172
FatigueGeneral disorders151/34556/172
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders126/34551/172
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders113/3452/172
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders108/34523/172
White blood cell count decreasedInvestigations107/3457/172
HeadacheNervous system disorders102/34538/172
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders95/34535/172
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders90/34542/172
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations84/3452/172

Baseline characteristics

The intent-to-treat (ITT) population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study intervention assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study intervention or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Palbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + FulvestrantTotal
Mean56.9 ± 11.756.8 ± 10.456.9 ± 11.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Palbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + FulvestrantTotal
Female347174521
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Palbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + FulvestrantTotal
Hispanic or Latino171128
Not Hispanic or Latino329161490
Unknown or Not Reported123
Menopausal Status
Menopausal Status(Participants)Palbociclib + FulvestrantPlacebo + FulvestrantTotal
Postmenopausal275138413
Pre/Perimenopausal7236108
08

Study locations

247 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham, The Kirklin Clinic
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • UAB Hospital-Investigational Drug Service
    Birmingham, Alabama 35249, United States
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35249, United States
  • Southern Cancer Center, PC
    Daphne, Alabama 36526, United States
  • Southern Cancer Center, PC
    Mobile, Alabama 36607, United States
  • Southern Cancer Center, PC
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Southern Cancer Center,PC
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Arizona Center for Cancer Care
    Avondale, Arizona 85323, United States
  • Ironwood Physicians P.C dba Ironwood Cancer & Research Centers
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Arizona Oncology Associates, PC- HAL
    Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, United States
  • Ironwood Physicians P.C dba Ironwood Cancer & Research Centers
    Gilbert, Arizona 85297, United States
  • Palo Verde Hematology Oncology
    Glendale, Arizona 85304, United States
  • Arizona Center for Cancer Care
    Glendale, Arizona 85306, United States
  • Western Regional Medical Center, Inc.
    Goodyear, Arizona 85338, United States
  • Ironwood Physicians P.C dba Ironwood Cancer & Research Centers
    Mesa, Arizona 85202, United States
  • Ironwood Physicians P.C dba Ironwood Cancer & Research Centers
    Mesa, Arizona 85206, United States
  • Arizona Oncology Associates, PC- HAL
    Prescott Valley, Arizona 86314, United States
  • Arizona Oncology Associates, PC- HAL
    Sedona, Arizona 86336, United States
  • Arizona Center for Cancer Care
    Surprise, Arizona 85374, United States
  • The University of Arizona Cancer Center- North Campus
    Tucson, Arizona 85719, United States
  • The University of Arizona Cancer Center
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • CBCC Global Research Inc. at Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center
    Bakersfield, California 93309, United States
  • Administrative Management Only: Translational Research Management
    Culver City, California 90232, United States
  • City of Hope
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
  • St. Jude Hospital Yorba Linda DBA St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare
    Fullerton, California 92835, United States
  • Global Research Management
    Glendale, California 91204, United States
  • UC San Diego Medical Center-La Jolla
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
    La Jolla, California 92093, United States
  • Keck Hospital of USC
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • LAC & USC Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • UCLA Hematology Oncology
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Breastlink Medical Group, Inc.
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • Hematology Oncology Medical Group of Orange County, Inc. (HOMG)
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • The Center for Cancer Prevention and Treatment at St. Joseph Hospital of Orange
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • UCLA Hematology/Oncology - Pasadena
    Pasadena, California 91105, United States
  • UC San Diego Medical Center-Hillcrest
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • University of California, San Francisco: Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • San Luis Obispo Oncology and Hematology Health Center/Pacific Central Coast Health Centers
    San Luis Obispo, California 93401, United States
  • Breastlink Medical Group, Inc.
    Santa Ana, California 92705, United States
  • Central Coast Medical Oncology Corporation
    Santa Maria, California 93454, United States
  • UCLA Hematology/Oncology - Santa Monica
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • City of Hope
    South Pasadena, California 91030, United States
  • Torrance Health Association, DBA Torrance Memorial Physician Network/Cancer Care Associates
    Torrance, California 90505, United States
  • Torrance Memorial Physician Network-Cancer Care
    Torrance, California 90505, United States
  • Wellness Oncology & Hematology
    West Hills, California 91307, United States
  • UCLA Hematology - Oncology Clinic - Westlake Village
    Westlake Village, California 91361, United States
  • ATTN - Research Pharmacist
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • University of Colorado Hospital - Anschutz Cancer Pavilion (ACP)
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • University of Colorado Hospital - Anschutz Outpatient Pavilion (AOP)
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center- Aventura
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Deerfield Beach
    Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442, United States
  • University of Miami Hospitals and Clinics (UHMC) Sylvester at Deerfield Beach
    Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442, United States
  • Holy Cross Hospital/Michael and Dianne Bienes Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308, United States
  • Memorial Breast Cancer Center at Memorial Regional Hospital
    Hollywood, Florida 33021, United States
  • Memorial Cancer Institute at Memorial Regional Hospital
    Hollywood, Florida 33021, United States
  • Memorial Regional Hospital
    Hollywood, Florida 33021, United States
  • Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Miami Beach, Florida 33140, United States
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    Miami Beach, Florida 33140, United States
  • University of Miami Hospitals & Clinics
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Orlando Health
    Ocoee, Florida 34761, United States
  • Orlando Health Cancer Institute
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Memorial Breast Cancer Center at Memorial Hospital West
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33028, United States
  • Memorial Cancer Institute at Memorial Hospital West
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33028, United States
  • Memorial Hospital West
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33028, United States
  • Sylvester at Plantation
    Plantation, Florida 33324, United States
  • Piedmont Cancer Institute, PC
    Atlanta, Georgia 30318, United States
  • Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, a Service of Wellstar Cobb Hospital
    Austell, Georgia 30106, United States
  • Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, a Service of WellStar Cobb Hospital
    Cartersville, Georgia 30121, United States
  • Piedmont Cancer Institute, PC
    Fayetteville, Georgia 30214, United States
  • Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, a Service of WellStar Cobb Hospital
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, PC
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Cancer Treatment Centers of America at Midwestern Regional Medical Center
    Zion, Illinois 60099, United States
  • Maine Center for Cancer Medicine, dba: New England Cancer Specialists
    Brunswick, Maine 04011, United States
  • Maine Center for Cancer Medicine, dba: New England Cancer Specialists
    Kennebunk, Maine 04043, United States
  • Maine Center for Cancer Medicine, dba: New England Cancer Specialists
    Scarborough, Maine 04074, United States
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (SKCCC) at Johns Hopkins
    Baltimore, Maryland 21231, United States
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (SKCCC) at Johns Hopkins, Green Spring Station
    Lutherville, Maryland 21093, United States
  • University of Michigan Health System/Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Cancer and Hematology Centers of Western Michigan
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Fairview Southdale Oncology Clinic
    Edina, Minnesota 55435, United States
  • University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • University of Minnesota Physicians, Masonic Cancer Center
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Mercy Clinic St. Louis Cancer and Breast Institute
    Ballwin, Missouri 63011, United States
  • Mercy Ministry Office
    Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, United States
  • Mercy Clinic St. Louis Cancer and Breast Institute
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63109, United States
  • Mercy Hospital St. Louis
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Mercy Hospital St.Louis- David C. Pratt Cancer Center
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
    Henderson, Nevada 89052, United States
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
    Henderson, Nevada 89074, United States
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89052, United States
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89128, United States
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89169, United States
  • Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, United States
  • CareMount Medical
    Brewster, New York 10509, United States
  • ProHEALTHCARE Associates, LLP
    Lake Success, New York 11042, United States
  • CareMount Medical
    Mount Kisco, New York 10549, United States
  • Northern Westchester Hospital
    Mount Kisco, New York 10549, United States
  • Hope Women's Cancer Centers
    Asheville, North Carolina 28806, United States

Showing the first 100 of 247 sites across 17 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhu Z, Turner NC, Loi S, Andre F, Martin M, Dieras V, Gelmon KA, Harbeck N, Zhang C, Cao JQ, Yan Z, Lu DR, Wei P, VanArsdale TL, Rejto PA, Huang X, Rugo HS, Loibl S, Cristofanilli M, Finn RS, Liu Y. Comparative biomarker analysis of PALOMA-2/3 trials for palbociclib. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022 Aug 16;6(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41698-022-00297-1. PubMed 35974168 ↗
  • Rugo HS, Cristofanilli M, Loibl S, Harbeck N, DeMichele A, Iwata H, Park YH, Brufsky A, Theall KP, Huang X, McRoy L, Bananis E, Turner NC. Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: Analyses From PALOMA-3. Oncologist. 2021 Aug;26(8):e1339-e1346. doi: 10.1002/onco.13833. Epub 2021 Jun 12. PubMed 34037282 ↗
  • Iwata H, Umeyama Y, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Schnell P, Mori Y, Fletcher O, Marshall JC, Johnson JG, Wood LS, Toi M, Finn RS, Turner NC, Bartlett CH, Cristofanilli M. Evaluation of the Association of Polymorphisms With Palbociclib-Induced Neutropenia: Pharmacogenetic Analysis of PALOMA-2/-3. Oncologist. 2021 Jul;26(7):e1143-e1155. doi: 10.1002/onco.13811. Epub 2021 Jun 7. PubMed 33955129 ↗
  • Finn RS, Rugo HS, Gelmon KA, Cristofanilli M, Colleoni M, Loi S, Schnell P, Lu DR, Theall KP, Mori A, Gauthier E, Bananis E, Turner NC, Dieras V. Long-Term Pooled Safety Analysis of Palbociclib in Combination with Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Updated Analysis with up to 5 Years of Follow-Up. Oncologist. 2021 May;26(5):e749-e755. doi: 10.1002/onco.13684. Epub 2021 Mar 10. PubMed 33486783 ↗
  • Finn RS, Cristofanilli M, Ettl J, Gelmon KA, Colleoni M, Giorgetti C, Gauthier E, Liu Y, Lu DR, Zhang Z, Bartlett CH, Slamon DJ, Turner NC, Rugo HS. Treatment effect of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy by prognostic and intrinsic subtype and biomarker analysis in patients with bone-only disease: a joint analysis of PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 clinical trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(1):23-35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05782-4. Epub 2020 Aug 11. PubMed 32783178 ↗
  • Ettl J, Im SA, Ro J, Masuda N, Colleoni M, Schnell P, Bananis E, Lu DR, Cristofanilli M, Rugo HS, Finn RS. Hematologic adverse events following palbociclib dose reduction in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: pooled analysis from randomized phase 2 and 3 studies. Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Mar 12;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01263-0. PubMed 32164785 ↗
  • Masuda N, Mukai H, Inoue K, Rai Y, Ohno S, Mori Y, Hashigaki S, Muramatsu Y, Umeyama Y, Iwata H, Toi M. Neutropenia management with palbociclib in Japanese patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2019 Sep;26(5):637-650. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00970-7. Epub 2019 May 24. Erratum In: Breast Cancer. 2019 Sep;26(5):651. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00984-1. PubMed 31127500 ↗
  • Turner NC, Liu Y, Zhu Z, Loi S, Colleoni M, Loibl S, DeMichele A, Harbeck N, Andre F, Bayar MA, Michiels S, Zhang Z, Giorgetti C, Arnedos M, Huang Bartlett C, Cristofanilli M. Cyclin E1 Expression and Palbociclib Efficacy in Previously Treated Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1169-1178. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00925. Epub 2019 Feb 26. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2956. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02416. PubMed 30807234 ↗
  • Masuda N, Inoue K, Nakamura R, Rai Y, Mukai H, Ohno S, Hara F, Mori Y, Hashigaki S, Muramatsu Y, Nagasawa T, Umeyama Y, Huang X, Iwata H. Palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: PALOMA-3 subgroup analysis of Japanese patients. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;24(3):262-273. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1359-3. Epub 2018 Nov 3. PubMed 30392115 ↗
  • Turner NC, Slamon DJ, Ro J, Bondarenko I, Im SA, Masuda N, Colleoni M, DeMichele A, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Harbeck N, Loibl S, Andre F, Puyana Theall K, Huang X, Giorgetti C, Huang Bartlett C, Cristofanilli M. Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1926-1936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810527. Epub 2018 Oct 20. PubMed 30345905 ↗
  • Cristofanilli M, DeMichele A, Giorgetti C, Turner NC, Slamon DJ, Im SA, Masuda N, Verma S, Loi S, Colleoni M, Theall KP, Huang X, Liu Y, Bartlett CH. Predictors of prolonged benefit from palbociclib plus fulvestrant in women with endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer in PALOMA-3. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;104:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 8. PubMed 30308388 ↗
  • Rugo HS, Turner NC, Finn RS, Joy AA, Verma S, Harbeck N, Masuda N, Im SA, Huang X, Kim S, Sun W, Iyer S, Schnell P, Bartlett CH, Johnston S. Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in older women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a pooled analysis of randomised PALOMA clinical studies. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 25. PubMed 30053671 ↗
  • Dieras V, Rugo HS, Schnell P, Gelmon K, Cristofanilli M, Loi S, Colleoni M, Lu DR, Mori A, Gauthier E, Huang Bartlett C, Slamon DJ, Turner NC, Finn RS. Long-term Pooled Safety Analysis of Palbociclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Apr 1;111(4):419-430. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy109. PubMed 30032196 ↗
  • Wedam SB, Beaver JA, Amiri-Kordestani L, Bloomquist E, Tang S, Goldberg KB, Sridhara R, Ibrahim A, Kim G, Kluetz P, McKee A, Pazdur R. US Food and Drug Administration Pooled Analysis to Assess the Impact of Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer on Clinical Trial Outcomes and Radiographic Assessments. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1225-1231. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.6917. Epub 2018 Mar 9. PubMed 29522361 ↗
  • Turner NC, Finn RS, Martin M, Im SA, DeMichele A, Ettl J, Dieras V, Moulder S, Lipatov O, Colleoni M, Cristofanilli M, Lu DR, Mori A, Giorgetti C, Iyer S, Bartlett CH, Gelmon KA. Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases. Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):669-680. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx797. PubMed 29342248 ↗
  • Loibl S, Turner NC, Ro J, Cristofanilli M, Iwata H, Im SA, Masuda N, Loi S, Andre F, Harbeck N, Verma S, Folkerd E, Puyana Theall K, Hoffman J, Zhang K, Bartlett CH, Dowsett M. Palbociclib Combined with Fulvestrant in Premenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer and Prior Progression on Endocrine Therapy: PALOMA-3 Results. Oncologist. 2017 Sep;22(9):1028-1038. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0072. Epub 2017 Jun 26. PubMed 28652278 ↗
  • Verma S, Bartlett CH, Schnell P, DeMichele AM, Loi S, Ro J, Colleoni M, Iwata H, Harbeck N, Cristofanilli M, Zhang K, Thiele A, Turner NC, Rugo HS. Palbociclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer: Detailed Safety Analysis From a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study (PALOMA-3). Oncologist. 2016 Oct;21(10):1165-1175. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0097. Epub 2016 Jul 1. PubMed 27368881 ↗
  • Fribbens C, O'Leary B, Kilburn L, Hrebien S, Garcia-Murillas I, Beaney M, Cristofanilli M, Andre F, Loi S, Loibl S, Jiang J, Bartlett CH, Koehler M, Dowsett M, Bliss JM, Johnston SR, Turner NC. Plasma ESR1 Mutations and the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):2961-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3061. Epub 2016 Jun 6. PubMed 27269946 ↗
  • Harbeck N, Iyer S, Turner N, Cristofanilli M, Ro J, Andre F, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Bhattacharyya H, Puyana Theall K, Bartlett CH, Loibl S. Quality of life with palbociclib plus fulvestrant in previously treated hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the PALOMA-3 trial. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1047-1054. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw139. Epub 2016 Mar 30. PubMed 27029704 ↗
  • Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I, Ro J, Im SA, Masuda N, Colleoni M, DeMichele A, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Harbeck N, Zhang K, Theall KP, Jiang Y, Bartlett CH, Koehler M, Slamon D. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):425-439. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00613-0. Epub 2016 Mar 3. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):e136. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00155-8. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):e270. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30222-4. PubMed 26947331 ↗
  • Turner NC, Ro J, Andre F, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Harbeck N, Loibl S, Huang Bartlett C, Zhang K, Giorgetti C, Randolph S, Koehler M, Cristofanilli M; PALOMA3 Study Group. Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):209-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505270. Epub 2015 Jun 1. PubMed 26030518 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 20, 2015
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jan 10, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01942135
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Collaborators
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2013
Start date
Sep 26, 2013
Primary completion
Dec 5, 2014
Completion
Sep 28, 2022
Results posted
May 23, 2016
Last update
Apr 4, 2024

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion