ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01936870Updated Jun 11, 2021Results posted

Drug Use Investigation for Toviaz

An observational study in Overactive Bladder (OAB), sponsored by Pfizer. Completed. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-11.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,521
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to collect effectiveness and safety information of fesoterodine related to their appropriate use in daily practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder (OAB)

Keywords

  • Toviaz
  • Fesoterodine
  • Post marketing surveillance
  • Japanese
  • Overactive Bladder
  • OAB
  • Good post marketing practice
  • Regulatory Post Marketing Commitment Plan
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

864 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 125 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,521 is above the median of 109 across 167 observational studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,323 studies on the registry; 145 are open to participants now.

Of its 597 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 391 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients prescribed fesoterodine (Toviaz) by investigators involved in protocol A0221096.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients prescribed fesoterodine (Toviaz).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are no exclustion criteria
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,521 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Fesoterodine (Toviaz)

    Drug: Fesoterodine (Toviaz)

Interventions

  • Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg orally. Toviaz will be dosed according to labeling. The administration and duration of therapy will be determined by the treating physician to meet the patient's needs for treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events

    A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  2. Clinical Efficacy Rate

    Clinical efficacy rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Overall effectiveness of fesoterodine fumarate was determined by the investigator based on clinical symptoms and examinations. Clinical effectiveness was assessed according to the following categories: (1) effective, (2) ineffective, or (3) unassessable at week 12 of the treatment.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events

    A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. A treatment-related serious adverse event was a treatment-related adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; lifethreatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Unexpected From Japanese Package Insert

    A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Expectedness of the adverse event was determined according to the Japanese package insert. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  3. Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Cognitive Function Disorder

    An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Adverse events related to cognitive function disorder were identified by broad searches on the Standard MedDRA Queries (SMQ).

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  4. Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at 12 Weeks

    Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, concentration, naming, repetition, comprehension, and ability to create a sentence and to copy two intersecting polygons. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. Mean change from baseline in the MMSE score at 12 weeks was presented along with the corresponding standard deviation.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whom Received Concomitant CYP3A4 Inhibitors

    Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors included atazanavir, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and telithromycin.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  6. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whom Received Concomitant CYP2D6 Inhibitors

    Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) inhibitors included quinidine and paroxetine. A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  7. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whose Dose Was Increased From 4 mg to 8 mg

    A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  8. Satisfaction Rate

    Satisfaction rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who were satisfied by fesoterodine fumarate treatment over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Satisfaction scale was assessed by the participants according to the following categories: (1) satisfied, (2) unsatisfied, (3) uncertain, or (4) unconfirmed.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  9. Change From Baseline in the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 12 Weeks

    Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) was defined as the sum score (0 to 15) of the following four OAB symptoms: daytime frequency (2 at maximum), nighttime frequency (3 at maximum), urgency (5 at maximum), and urgency incontinence (5 at maximum). Higher score indicates worse symptoms. Mean change from baseline in the OABSS at 12 weeks was presented along with the corresponding standard deviation.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Apr 7, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFesoterodine Fumarate
Started2492
Completed2303
Not completed189
Withdrew: No visit after treatment176
Withdrew: Protocol violation12
Withdrew: No drug administration1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events

A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events
ParticipantsFesoterodine Fumarate
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events415
PrimaryClinical Efficacy Rate

Clinical efficacy rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Overall effectiveness of fesoterodine fumarate was determined by the investigator based on clinical symptoms and examinations. Clinical effectiveness was assessed according to the following categories: (1) effective, (2) ineffective, or (3) unassessable at week 12 of the treatment.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Clinical Efficacy Rate
Percentage of participantsFesoterodine Fumarate
Clinical Efficacy Rate74.8 (73.0 to 76.5)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events

A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. A treatment-related serious adverse event was a treatment-related adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; lifethreatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events
ParticipantsFesoterodine Fumarate
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events8
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Unexpected From Japanese Package Insert

A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Expectedness of the adverse event was determined according to the Japanese package insert. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Unexpected From Japanese Package Insert
ParticipantsFesoterodine Fumarate
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Unexpected From Japanese Package Insert27
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Cognitive Function Disorder

An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Adverse events related to cognitive function disorder were identified by broad searches on the Standard MedDRA Queries (SMQ).

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Cognitive Function Disorder
ParticipantsFesoterodine Fumarate
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Cognitive Function Disorder2
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at 12 Weeks

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, concentration, naming, repetition, comprehension, and ability to create a sentence and to copy two intersecting polygons. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. Mean change from baseline in the MMSE score at 12 weeks was presented along with the corresponding standard deviation.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Scale
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at 12 Weeks
ScaleFesoterodine Fumarate
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at 12 Weeks0.4 ± 1.29
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whom Received Concomitant CYP3A4 Inhibitors

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors included atazanavir, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and telithromycin.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whom Received Concomitant CYP3A4 Inhibitors
ParticipantsFesoterodine Fumarate
Received Concomitant CYP3A4 Inhibitors6
Not Received Concomitant CYP3A4 Inhibitors409
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whom Received Concomitant CYP2D6 Inhibitors

Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) inhibitors included quinidine and paroxetine. A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whom Received Concomitant CYP2D6 Inhibitors
ParticipantsFesoterodine Fumarate
Received Concomitant CYP2D6 Inhibitors11
Not Received Concomitant CYP2D6 Inhibitors404
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whose Dose Was Increased From 4 mg to 8 mg

A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whose Dose Was Increased From 4 mg to 8 mg
ParticipantsFesoterodine Fumarate
From 4 mg to 8 mg53
4 mg330
8 mg32
SecondarySatisfaction Rate

Satisfaction rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who were satisfied by fesoterodine fumarate treatment over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Satisfaction scale was assessed by the participants according to the following categories: (1) satisfied, (2) unsatisfied, (3) uncertain, or (4) unconfirmed.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Satisfaction Rate
Percentage of participantsFesoterodine Fumarate
Satisfaction Rate59.0 (57.0 to 61.0)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 12 Weeks

Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) was defined as the sum score (0 to 15) of the following four OAB symptoms: daytime frequency (2 at maximum), nighttime frequency (3 at maximum), urgency (5 at maximum), and urgency incontinence (5 at maximum). Higher score indicates worse symptoms. Mean change from baseline in the OABSS at 12 weeks was presented along with the corresponding standard deviation.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Scale
Change From Baseline in the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 12 Weeks
ScaleFesoterodine Fumarate
Change From Baseline in the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 12 Weeks-3.4 ± 3.04

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 1.0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fesoterodine Fumarate—12/2,303 (0.5%)361/2,303 (15.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventFesoterodine Fumarate
Urinary retentionRenal and urinary disorders3/2303
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/2303
Loss of consciousnessNervous system disorders1/2303
Cerebral infarctionNervous system disorders1/2303
Respiratory arrestRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/2303
Pneumonia aspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/2303
Acute abdomenGastrointestinal disorders1/2303
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/2303
Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders1/2303
DysuriaRenal and urinary disorders1/2303
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFesoterodine Fumarate
ThirstGeneral disorders166/2303
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders72/2303
DysuriaRenal and urinary disorders63/2303
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders36/2303
Urinary retentionRenal and urinary disorders24/2303

Baseline characteristics

A total of 2492 participants completed this study. Of the 2492 participants, 189 participants were excluded from the baseline analysis due to following reasons: no visit after treatment (176 participants), protocol violation (12 participants), and no drug administration (1 participant).

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Fesoterodine Fumarate
<15 years1
>=15 and <65 years529
˃=65 years1773
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Fesoterodine Fumarate
Female1228
Male1075
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2013 to primary completion in May 2016, 31 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2017, 10 months after primary completion.

Of 56 observational studies under Urinary Bladder, Overactive, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 53. This study's 31 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 3, 2013
First posted
Sep 6, 2013
StartActual
Oct 1, 2013
Primary completionActual
May 19, 2016
CompletionActual
May 19, 2016
Results first posted
Apr 7, 2017
Last update
Jun 11, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01936870
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 6, 2013
Start date
Oct 1, 2013
Primary completion
May 19, 2016
Completion
May 19, 2016
Results posted
Apr 7, 2017
Last update
Jun 11, 2021

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion