CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01933373Updated Sep 2, 2013

A Prospective Study Comparing Two Reconstructive Operation Techniques After Myotomy of Achalasia

An interventional study of Toupet and Dor in Achalasia, sponsored by Karolinska University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-09-02.

Sponsored by Karolinska University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Achalasia is a rare motor disorder of the gastroesophageal junction which is associated with an increased pressure of the esophageal sphincter. This leads to impairment to swallow and heartburn. Esophageal myotomy, which is a surgical longitudinal incision of the esophageal muscle layer extending over to the gastroesophageal junction is the treatment of choice for achalasia. In order to prevent reflux of stomach content into the esophagus this has to be combined with an antireflux procedure where the upper part of the stomach (fundus) is wrapped around the esophagus (fundoplication). This procedure can be performed with the wrapped fundus either in front of the esophagus (Dor procedure) or behind (Toupet). The latter introduces an angulation of the esophagus, which possibly may lead to an impairment of swallowing ability and passage of food to the stomach. On the other hand, the Toupet procedure may give a better control of reflux. The primary endpoint of the study is symptoms of impaired swallowing 1 year after treatment. Secondary outcomes include reflux (pH measurements in the esophagus), radiological imaging of swallowing and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

By the end of 2012 40 patients have been enrolled and passed the one year follow up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Achalasia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Randomized
  • Toupet
  • Dor
  • Achalasia
03

In context

Esophageal Achalasia

140 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal Achalasia; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 60 across 93 interventional studies indexed under Esophageal Achalasia.

Browse Esophageal Achalasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 275 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • >18 years of age
  • Typical achalasia according to manometry
  • Eckhardt score >3
  • Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe comorbidity precluding surgery
  • Pseudo achalasia
  • Inability to participate in follow-up
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Toupet

    Laparoscopic Myotomy + Toupet 180 degree partial posterior fundoplication.

    Procedure: Toupet

  • Experimental
    Dor

    Laparoscopic Myotomy + Dor anterior partial fundoplication. 90 degree partial fundoplication being the standard of care.

    Procedure: Dor

Interventions

  • ProcedureToupet

    Laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication plus myotomy.

    Also known as: Laparascopic posterior partial fundoplication plus myotomy.

  • ProcedureDor

    Anterior partial fundoplication plus myotomy.

    Also known as: Anterior partial fundoplication plus myotomy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dysphagia symptoms according to Eckhardt

    Time frame: up to five years follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ambulatory esophageal PH

    Time frame: One and five years follow up

  2. Health-related quality of life according to Velanovich

    Time frame: One and five years follow up

  3. Timed barium esophagogram at 1, 2 and 5 minutes

    Time frame: One and five years follow up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Karolinska University Hospital
    Stockholm, 14186, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kumagai K, Kjellin A, Tsai JA, Thorell A, Granqvist S, Lundell L, Hakanson B. Toupet versus Dor as a procedure to prevent reflux after cardiomyotomy for achalasia: results of a randomised clinical trial. Int J Surg. 2014;12(7):673-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.077. Epub 2014 Jun 2. PubMed 24892729 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01933373
Lead sponsor
Karolinska University Hospital
Collaborators
Ersta Hospital, Sweden
Responsible party
Lars Lundell (Professor, Karolinska University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 2, 2013
Start date
May 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2011
Completion
Dec 2012
Last update
Sep 2, 2013

Study contacts

Lars R Lundell, Professor
principal investigator · Gastrocentrum Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm Sweden

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion