CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01932372Updated Oct 26, 2024Results posted

Tofacitinib (Xeljanz) Special Investigation for Rheumatoid Arthritis

An observational study in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 1 site in Japan. Open to participants aged 0 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-26.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
9,968
Ages
0 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this Surveillance is to verify the following subject matters concerning Tofacitinib (Xeljanz) under general practice.

  1. Occurrence of adverse reactions, factors that may potentially affect safety and efficacy 2) Long-term safety (particularly, malignant tumors and serious infections) and efficacy

Occurrences of malignant tumors and serious infections will be compared with a control group.

Read the detailed description

All the patients whom an investigator prescribes the Xeljanz or Standard of Care for rheumatoid arthritis should be registered consecutively until the number of subjects reaches target number in order to extract patients enrolled into the investigation at random.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Good Post Marketing Study Practice
  • Tofacitinib
  • Xeljanz
  • Regulatory Post Marketing Commitment Plan
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9,968 is above the median of 155 across 1,057 observational studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to over 8 mg Methotrexate for 3 months treatment.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients receiving Tofacitinib (Xeljanz)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Not Applicable

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
9,968 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Tofacitinib (Xeljanz)

    Tablets 5 mg BID

    Drug: Tofacitinib (Xeljanz)

  • Standard of Care

    Standard of Care for Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Drug: Etanercept, other Biologics, Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), etc

Interventions

  • DrugTofacitinib (Xeljanz)

    5 mg Tablet BID

  • DrugEtanercept, other Biologics, Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), etc

    Etanercept: 10 to 25 mg twice weekly, or 25 to 50 mg once weekly

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events or Serious Treatment-related Adverse Events in Participants Who Received XELJANZ

    An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to XELJANZ in a participant who received XELJANZ. A serious adverse event/adverse drug reaction (SADR) was a treatment-related adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Relatedness to XELJANZ was assessed by the physician.

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. Change in Disease Activity Based on Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)

    The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (PGA) assessed on 0-10 cm VAS, and C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL). SDAI is defined as follows: ≤3.3, disease remission; \>3.3 to ≤11, low disease activity, \>11 to ≤26, moderate disease activity; and \>26, high disease activity. SDAI was assessed at each evaluation time point and mean change from the start of XELJANZ was calculated with the 95% CI.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, 12, 24, 36 months

  3. Change in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28)

    DAS28 is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]). DAS28 is defined as follows: \<2.6, disease remission; ≥2.6 to \<3.2, low disease activity, ≥3.2 to ≤5.1, moderate disease activity; and \>5.1, high disease activity. DAS28 was assessed at each evaluation time point and mean change from the start of XELJANZ was calculated with the 95% CI.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, 12, 24, 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of Serious Infection Events

    Comparison of time to serious infection between XELJANZ group and control group. Hazard ratio (unadjusted): Baseline characteristics are unadjusted Hazard ratio (adjusted 1): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by logistic regression Hazard ratio (adjusted 2): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by random forest Hazard ratio (adjusted 3): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by logistic regression (with upper limit of weighting) Hazard ratio (adjusted 4): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by random forest (with upper limit of weighting)

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Occurrence of Malignancy

    Comparison of time to malignancy between XELJANZ group and control group. The standard incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated using the general Japanese population as the reference population. Hazard ratio (unadjusted): Baseline characteristics are unadjusted Hazard ratio (adjusted 1): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by logistic regression Hazard ratio (adjusted 2): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by random forest Hazard ratio (adjusted 3): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by logistic regression (with upper limit of weighting) Hazard ratio (adjusted 4): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by random forest (with upper limit of weighting)

    Time frame: 36 months

  3. Occurrence of Death

    Comparison of time to death between XELJANZ group and control group. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated using the general Japanese population as the reference population. Hazard ratio (unadjusted): Baseline characteristics are unadjusted

    Time frame: 36 months

07

Results

Posted Oct 26, 2024
Limitations and caveats
According to the protocol, only three events, Serious Infection, Malignancy, and Death were collected in the control group for comparison with the Xeljanz group and other serious AEs or non-serious AEs were not to be collected although all AEs were collected in Xeljanz group. However several serious and non-serious AEs other than three events were incidentally reported by the investigators in the control group. Note that these AEs do not represent all AEs occurred in the control group.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneXELJANZ (Safety Analysis Set)Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)
Started70542598
Xeljanz (safety analysis set)70212419
Xeljanz (mtx adherent safety analysis set)45740
Xeljanz (mtx adherent comparative safety analysis set)37310
Completed70212419
Not completed33179
Withdrew: Not meeting eligibility criteria33179

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events or Serious Treatment-related Adverse Events in Participants Who Received XELJANZ

An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to XELJANZ in a participant who received XELJANZ. A serious adverse event/adverse drug reaction (SADR) was a treatment-related adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Relatedness to XELJANZ was assessed by the physician.

Time frame:
36 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events or Serious Treatment-related Adverse Events in Participants Who Received XELJANZ
Percentage of ParticipantsXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Safety Analysis Set)
ADR41.60
Serious ADR12.88
SecondaryOccurrence of Serious Infection Events

Comparison of time to serious infection between XELJANZ group and control group. Hazard ratio (unadjusted): Baseline characteristics are unadjusted Hazard ratio (adjusted 1): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by logistic regression Hazard ratio (adjusted 2): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by random forest Hazard ratio (adjusted 3): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by logistic regression (with upper limit of weighting) Hazard ratio (adjusted 4): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by random forest (with upper limit of weighting)

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · Incidence rate; participants /100 PY
Occurrence of Serious Infection Events
Incidence rate; participants /100 PYXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)
Occurrence of Serious Infection Events6.86 (5.96 to 7.86)1.42 (0.97 to 2.00)
Statistical analysis
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Incidence rate ratio (unadjusted): 4.85 · 95% CI 3.34 to 7.03
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (unadjusted): 4.80 · 95% CI 3.31 to 6.96
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (adjusted 1): 2.07 · 95% CI 0.95 to 4.51
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (adjusted 2): 3.81 · 95% CI 2.24 to 6.47
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (adjusted 3): 3.55 · 95% CI 2.08 to 6.09
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (adjusted 4): 3.80 · 95% CI 2.31 to 6.25
SecondaryOccurrence of Malignancy

Comparison of time to malignancy between XELJANZ group and control group. The standard incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated using the general Japanese population as the reference population. Hazard ratio (unadjusted): Baseline characteristics are unadjusted Hazard ratio (adjusted 1): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by logistic regression Hazard ratio (adjusted 2): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by random forest Hazard ratio (adjusted 3): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by logistic regression (with upper limit of weighting) Hazard ratio (adjusted 4): Adjusted by propensity score estimated by random forest (with upper limit of weighting)

Time frame:
36 months
Reported as:
Number · Incidence rate; participants /100 PY
Occurrence of Malignancy
Incidence rate; participants /100 PYXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)
Incidence rate1.40 (1.18 to 1.66)0.88 (0.66 to 1.15)
SIR1.38 (1.16 to 1.62)0.98 (0.73 to 1.28)
Statistical analysis
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Incidence rate ratio (unadjusted): 1.60 · 95% CI 1.16 to 2.19
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (unadjusted): 1.55 · 95% CI 1.12 to 2.13
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (adjusted 1): 1.86 · 95% CI 1.16 to 2.99
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (adjusted 2): 1.61 · 95% CI 1.06 to 2.43
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (adjusted 3): 1.53 · 95% CI 1.00 to 2.35
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (adjusted 4): 1.51 · 95% CI 1.03 to 2.22
SecondaryOccurrence of Death

Comparison of time to death between XELJANZ group and control group. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated using the general Japanese population as the reference population. Hazard ratio (unadjusted): Baseline characteristics are unadjusted

Time frame:
36 months
Reported as:
Number · Mortality rate; participants /100 PY
Occurrence of Death
Mortality rate; participants /100 PYXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)
Mortality rate0.89 (0.72 to 1.10)0.26 (0.15 to 0.43)
SMR1.02 (0.82 to 1.26)0.39 (0.23 to 0.64)
Statistical analysis
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Mortality rate ratio (unadjusted): 3.39 · 95% CI 1.99 to 5.78
  • XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) vs Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set) · Hazard ratio (unadjusted): 3.29 · 95% CI 1.93 to 5.61
PrimaryChange in Disease Activity Based on Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)

The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (PGA) assessed on 0-10 cm VAS, and C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL). SDAI is defined as follows: ≤3.3, disease remission; \>3.3 to ≤11, low disease activity, \>11 to ≤26, moderate disease activity; and \>26, high disease activity. SDAI was assessed at each evaluation time point and mean change from the start of XELJANZ was calculated with the 95% CI.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 6, 12, 24, 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change in Disease Activity Based on Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)
Scores on a scaleXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Efficacy Analysis Set) At 1 Month From BaselineXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Efficacy Analysis Set) At 6 Months From BaselineXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Efficacy Analysis Set) At 12 Months From BaselineXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Efficacy Analysis Set) At 24 Months From BaselineXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Efficacy Analysis Set) At 36 Months From Baseline
Change in Disease Activity Based on Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)-10.16 (-10.69 to -9.62)-14.59 (-15.10 to -14.07)-15.97 (-16.62 to -15.32)-16.88 (-17.64 to -16.12)-17.37 (-18.21 to -16.53)
PrimaryChange in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28)

DAS28 is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]). DAS28 is defined as follows: \<2.6, disease remission; ≥2.6 to \<3.2, low disease activity, ≥3.2 to ≤5.1, moderate disease activity; and \>5.1, high disease activity. DAS28 was assessed at each evaluation time point and mean change from the start of XELJANZ was calculated with the 95% CI.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 6, 12, 24, 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28)
Scores on a scaleXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Efficacy Analysis Set) At 1 Month From BaselineXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Efficacy Analysis Set) At 6 Months From BaselineXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Efficacy Analysis Set) At 12 Months From BaselineXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Efficacy Analysis Set) At 24 Months From BaselineXELJANZ (MTX Adherent Efficacy Analysis Set) At 36 Months From Baseline
Change in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28)-0.98 (-1.04 to -0.92)-1.52 (-1.58 to -1.46)-1.67 (-1.75 to -1.59)-1.82 (-1.91 to -1.73)-1.86 (-1.96 to -1.76)

Adverse events

Collected over 36 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
XELJANZ (Safety Analysis Set)188/7,021 (2.7%)1,351/7,021 (19.2%)1,340/7,021 (19.1%)
XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)98/3,731 (2.6%)773/3,731 (20.7%)814/3,731 (21.8%)
Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)16/2,419 (0.7%)112/2,419 (4.6%)28/2,419 (1.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 602
Most frequent serious events
EventXELJANZ (Safety Analysis Set)XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)
Herpes zosterInfections and infestations132/702182/37315/2419
PneumoniaInfections and infestations140/702173/37319/2419
Interstitial lung diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders83/702139/37316/2419
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications64/702135/37310/2419
CellulitisInfections and infestations33/702129/37312/2419
Pneumonia bacterialInfections and infestations47/702128/37314/2419
Rheumatoid arthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders48/702126/37310/2419
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumoniaInfections and infestations32/702123/373110/2419
Colon cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)30/702121/37313/2419
Spinal compression fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications37/702118/37310/2419
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventXELJANZ (Safety Analysis Set)XELJANZ (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)
Herpes zosterInfections and infestations547/7021325/373115/2419
Hepatic function abnormalHepatobiliary disorders284/7021194/37313/2419
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations203/7021124/37311/2419
Upper respiratory tract inflammationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders214/7021124/37317/2419
BronchitisInfections and infestations167/702198/37312/2419
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations170/702195/37310/2419

Baseline characteristics

Of the participants who were confirmed completed the study, those who met the eligibility criteria were included in the following analysis sets: XELJANZ safety analysis set, n=7021; Xeljanz MTX adherent safety analysis set, n=4574; Xeljanz MTX adherent comparative safety analysis set, n=3731; and Control MTX adherent comparative safety analysis set, n=2419.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)XELJANZ (Safety Analysis Set)Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)Total
<50 years11127281840
≥50 and <65 years22849053189
≥65 years36257864411
XELJANZ (MTX adherent safety analysis set) <50 years8590859
XELJANZ (MTX adherent safety analysis set) ≥50 and <65 years163201632
XELJANZ (MTX adherent safety analysis set) ≥65 years208302083
XELJANZ (MTX adherent comparative safety analysis set) <50 years7050705
XELJANZ (MTX adherent comparative safety analysis set) ≥50 and <65 years136001360
XELJANZ (MTX adherent comparative safety analysis set) ≥65 years166601666
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)XELJANZ (Safety Analysis Set)Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)Total
XELJANZ (Safety analysis set) and Control (MTX adherent comparative safety analysis set) — Female559818367434
XELJANZ (Safety analysis set) and Control (MTX adherent comparative safety analysis set) — Male14235832006
XELJANZ (MTX adherent safety analysis set) — Female361503615
XELJANZ (MTX adherent safety analysis set) — Male9590959
XELJANZ (MTX adherent comparative safety analysis set) — Female293502935
XELJANZ (MTX adherent comparative safety analysis set) — Male7960796
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)XELJANZ (Safety Analysis Set)Control (MTX Adherent Comparative Safety Analysis Set)Total
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Tokyo, Japan
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 27, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 6, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01932372
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2013
Start date
Jul 26, 2013
Primary completion
Aug 24, 2021
Completion
Aug 24, 2021
Results posted
Oct 26, 2024
Last update
Oct 26, 2024

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion