CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01928940Updated Jul 24, 2017Results posted

Japan PhI/II of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 Combination in Subjects With BRAF V600E/K Mutation Positive Advanced Solid Tumors (Phase I Part) or Cutaneous Melanoma (Phase II Part)

A Phase 2 interventional study of dabrafenib and trametinib in Solid Tumours, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 2 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-24.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Japanese Phase I/II, open-label, non-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile, and efficacy of the combination of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 in subjects with BRAF V600E/K mutation positive advanced solid tumors (Phase I part) and BRAF V600E/K mutation positive cutaneous melanoma (Phase II part).

Read the detailed description

This is a Japanese Phase I/II, open-label, non-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile, and efficacy of the combination of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 in subjects with BRAF V600E/K mutation positive advanced solid tumors (Phase I part) and BRAF V600E/K mutation positive cutaneous melanoma (Phase II part). Phase I part is designed to primarily assess the safety and tolerability of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 combination therapy in subjects with BRAF V600E/K mutation positive advanced solid tumors. Six evaluable subjects will be enrolled into Phase I part and receive the combination therapy of GSK2118436 (150 mg, twice daily) and GSK1120212 (2 mg, once daily). A decision for starting Phase II part will be made by careful review based on available safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic data in Phase I part. Phase II part is designed to primarily evaluate ORR of the combination as first-line therapy in subjects with unresectable (Stage IIIC) or metastatic (Stage IV) BRAF V600E/K mutation positive cutaneous melanoma. Subjects who have had prior systemic anti-cancer treatment in the advanced or metastatic setting will not be eligible for Phase II part although prior systemic treatment in the adjuvant setting will be allowed. Six evaluable subjects will be enrolled in Phase II part.

02

Conditions studied

  • Solid Tumours

Keywords

  • Advanced solid tumors
  • BRAF
  • Melanoma
03

In context

Melanoma

3,005 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 519 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 38 across 2,350 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.

Browse Melanoma studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,562 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 258 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 232 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Capable of given written informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form.
  • Male or female age 20 years or greater; able to swallow and retain oral medication.
  • BRAF mutation positive advanced solid tumor ( Phase I part). BRAF mutation positive melanoma (Phase II part).
  • Measurable disease according to RECIST version 1.1.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1
  • Agree to contraception requirements.
  • Adequate organ system function.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving cancer therapy (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or biologic therapy).
  • Phase II part ONLY: Prior systemic anti-cancer treatment (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, biologic therapy, vaccine therapy, or investigational treatment) for Stage IIIC (unresectable) or Stage IV (metastatic) melanoma. Prior systemic treatment in the adjuvant setting is allowed.
  • Any major surgery, extensive radiotherapy, chemotherapy with delayed toxicity, biologic therapy, or immunotherapy within 28 days prior to the study treatment (6 weeks for prior nitrosourea or mitomycin C), or daily or weekly chemotherapy without the potential for delayed toxicity within 14 days prior to the study treatment. Limited radiotherapy within the last 2 weeks. (Note: Ipilimumab treatment must end at least 8 weeks prior to the study treatment.)
  • Taken an investigational drug within 28 days or 5 half-lives (minimum 14 days), whichever is shorter, prior to the study treatment.
  • Current use of a prohibited medication or requires any of these medications during treatment with the study drugs.
  • A history of another malignancy. Subjects who have been disease-free for 5 years, or subjects with a history of completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer, or successfully treated in situ carcinoma are eligible.
  • Any serious or unstable pre-existing medical conditions (aside from malignancy exceptions specified above), psychiatric disorders, or other conditions that could interfere with the subject's safety, obtaining informed consent, or compliance with study procedures (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes).
  • Presence of active gastrointestinal disease or other condition that will interfere significantly with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs.
  • History of pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease.
  • Known HIV infection.
  • Certain cardiac abnormality
  • A history or current evidence/risk of retinal vein occlusion or central serous retinopathy.
  • Pregnant or lactating female.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    dabrafenib + trametinib

    Combination therapy of dabrafenib and trametinib

    Drug: dabrafenib · Drug: trametinib

Interventions

  • Drugdabrafenib

    150 mg twice daily

  • Drugtrametinib

    2 mg once daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase I: Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence (MO) in a part. temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with its use. SAE is defined as any untoward MO that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect and protocol-specific SAEs:ALT\>=3xupper limit of normal(ULN) and bilirubin\>=2xULN(\>35% direct) (or ALT\>=3xULN, international normalized ratio\>1.5), any new primary cancers, treatment emergent malignancies except basal cell carcinoma, symptomatic or asymptomatic LVEF decrease, retinal pigment epithelial detachment or retinal vein occlusion, pyrexia with hypotension,or dehydration or renal insufficiency,or severe (\>=G3) rigor/chills.

    Time frame: From the start of study treatment until 30 days after study treatment discontinuation (average of 1.38 year)

  2. Phase I: Number of Participants With a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)

    A DLT was defined as an event occurred during the first 21 days after the first dose of study drugs and met any of the following criteria, according to National Cancer Institutes (NCI) common terminology criteria for AE (CTCAE) grade (G) version 4.0: G4 hematological toxicity; G3 or G4 non-hematologic toxicity (including rash, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea only if uncontrolled with supportive therapy); rash \>=G3 that required dose reduction despite supportive care; a G2 or greater non-hematological toxicity that in the judgment of the investigator and medical monitor; dose interruption of greater than 14 consecutive days due to unresolved toxicity; any new G2 or greater valvular heart disease and significant alteration in cardiac valve morphology from Baseline.

    Time frame: From the start of study treatment until 21 days

  3. Phase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline (BL) in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters (CCPs)

    CCPs were graded according to NCI CTCAE grade version 4.0 as: G1, Mild; G2, Moderate; G3, Severe; G4, Life-threatening or disabling; G5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters (para) for which an increase to G3 or G4 from BL G occurred. CCPs that were not G according to NCI CTCAE criteria, were categorized as High and Low with respect to the normal range. Data are presented only for those para for which the category decreased to Low or increased to High relative to the BL category. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. CCPs included: albumin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, inorganic phosphorus, chloride, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total protein, urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and uric acid.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)

  4. Phase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameters

    Hematology parameters were summarized according to NCI CTCAE G, version 4.0 as: G1, Mild; G2, Moderate; G3, Severe; G4, Life-threatening or disabling; G5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase to G3 or G4 from Baseline G occurred. For hematology parameters that were not graded according to NCI CTCAE criteria, were categorized as High and Low with respect to the normal range. Data are presented only for those parameters for which the category decreased to Low or increased to High relative to the Baseline category. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count, white blood cell (WBC) counts, basophils, eosinophils, hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), monocytes and red blood cell (RBC) count.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)

  5. Phase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters

    Urine samples were collected for urine dipstick analysis at Baseline and at the post-treatment Visit. The number of participants with negative (absence) and positive (presence: trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+ or 5+) results for urine occult blood (UOB), urine glucose (UGLU), urine ketones (UKET), urine protein (UP) and urine urobilinogen (UUBIL) were summarized. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)

  6. Phase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance (Pef) Status

    The ECOG pef status 5-point scale is used to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, to assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the par. and to determine appropriate treatment and prognosis: G0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease pef without restriction. G1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, example, light house work, office work. G2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about \>50 percent (%) of waking hrs. G3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hrs. G4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. G5, dead. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. Number of par. who improved, had no change, or deteriorated in pef status from BL is summarized.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)

  7. Phase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure to Grade 2 or Grade 3

    Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values were graded using (NCI CTCAE version 4.0). SBP was categorized as: G1 (Increase to \>=120 to 140 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]), G2 (Increase to \>=140 to \<160 mmHg), and G3 (Increase to \>=160 mmHg). DBP was categorized as: G1 (Increase to \>=80 to \<90 mmHg), G2 (Increase to \>=90 to \<100 mmHg), and G3 (Increase to \>=100 mmHg). The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. An increase is defined as an increase in the CTCAE grade relative to the Baseline grade. Participants with missing Baseline values were assumed to have a Baseline value of G0.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)

  8. Phase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

    Change from Baseline in heart rate is categorized as decrease to \<60 beats per minute (bpm), change to normal or no change, and increase to \>100 bpm relative to the Baseline value. Participants with a missing Baseline value are assumed to have a normal Baseline value. Participants were counted twice if the participant's heart rate value decreased to \<60 bpm and increased to \>100 bpm post-Baseline. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)

  9. Phase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Temperature

    Change from Baseline in temperature is categorized as a decrease to \<=35 degrees celsius (C), change to normal or no change as 35-38 degrees C, and increase to \>=38 degrees C relative to the Baseline value. Participants with a missing Baseline value are assumed to have a normal Baseline value. Participants were counted twice if the participant temperature value decreased to \<=35 degrees C and increased to \>=38 degrees C post-Baseline. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  10. Phase I: Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Measured Via Pulse Oxymetry at the Indicated Time Points

    Oxygen saturation measures the capacity of blood to transport oxygen to other parts of the body. Oxygen binds to hemoglobin in red blood cells when moving through the lungs. A pulse oximeter uses two frequencies of light (red and infrared) to determine the percentage of hemoglobin in the blood that is saturated with oxygen,that is called as blood oxygen saturation or SpO2. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value (Days 8,15; Weeks 3 to 136 and post-treatment Visit) minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)

  11. Phase I: Change From Baseline in Weight at the Indicated Time Points

    Mean change in body weight from Baseline was determined. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value (Weeks 3 to 136 and post-treatment Visit) minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit ( average of 1.38 year)

  12. Phase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at the Indicated Time Points

    Single twelve (12)-lead ECGs were perfomred at Baseline, Weeks 3 to 132 and post-treatment Visit. ECG findings were categorized as: normal, abnormal - clinically significant (CS), or abnormal - not clinically significant (NCS), as determined by the investigator.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)

  13. Phase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as Assessed by Echocardiogram (ECHO)

    Absolute change from Baseline in LVEF were summarized at each scheduled assessment time and in the worst-case post Baseline. Only the post Baseline assessments that used the same method (ECHO or Multi Gated Acquisition Scan \[MUGA\]) as the Baseline assessments were used to derive the change from Baseline. The change from Baseline was categorized as: any increase; no change; 0-\<10 Decrease, 10-19 Decrease, \>=20 Decrease, \>=10 Decrease and \>= lower limit of normal (LLN), \>=10 Decrease and below LLN, \>=20 Decrease and \>=LLN and \>=20 Decrease and below LLN. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  14. Phase II: Number of Participant With Confirmed Overall Response

    Confirmed overall response (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. RECIST is a set of rules that define when tumors in cancer participants improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stabilize"), or worsen ("progress") during treatment. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions after treatment from Baseline (before study drug administration). ORR was assessed by investigator and blinded independent central review (BICR).

    Time frame: Every 8 weeks from start of the treatment until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent (average of 1.38 years)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase I: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After Single and Repeat Dose

    Blood samples were collected from each par. at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr post-dose on Day 21 (repeat dose) for PK analysis. GSK2118436 metabolites included GSK2285403, GSK2298683, and GSK2167542. AUC from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (concn) (AUC\[0-t\]) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concn and the logarithmic trapezoidal rule for decreasing. The AUC from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC\[0-inf\] was calculated, where data permit, as the sum of AUC(0-t) and Ct/z, where Ct is the observed plasma concn obtained from the log-linear regression analysis of the last quantifiable time-point and z is the terminal phase rate constant. Area under the concentration-time curve over 12 hr and 24 hr dosing interval is called AUC\[0-12\] and AUC\[0-24\]. AUC(0-inf) was calculated only at Day 1.

    Time frame: At pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr on Day 21 (repeat dose)

  2. Phase I: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After a Single and Repeat Dose

    Blood samples were collected from each participant at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr post-dose on Day 21 (repeat dose) for PK analysis. GSK2118436 metabolites included GSK2285403, GSK2298683 and GSK2167542. Cmax was determined from the raw concentration-time data.

    Time frame: At pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr on Day 21 (repeat dose)

  3. Phase I: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctau) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After a Single and Repeat Dose

    Trough concentration is the lowest level that a drug is present in the body. Pre-dose (trough) blood samples were collected on Day 8, Day 15, Weeks 3, 8, 16 and 24 for estimating plasma trough concentration. GSK2118436 metabolites included GSK2285403, GSK2298683, and GSK2167542. Ctau was determined from the raw concentration-time data.

    Time frame: At pre-dose on Day 8, Day 15, Weeks 3, 8, 16 and 24

  4. Phase I: Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) and Terminal Phase Half Life (t1/2) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After a Single and Repeat Dose

    Blood samples were collected from each participant at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr post-dose on Day 21 (repeat dose) for PK analysis. GSK2118436 metabolites included GSK2285403, GSK2298683, and GSK2167542. Tmax is defined as the time of occurrence of Cmax. Tmax was determined directly from the raw concentration-time data. The apparent terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) obtained as the ratio of ln2/lamdaz, where lamdaz is the terminal phase rate constant estimated by linear regression analysis of the log transformed concentration-time data. . T1/2 was calculated only at Day 1.

    Time frame: At pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr on Day 21 (repeat dose)

  5. Phase I: Number of Participants With Confirmed Overall Response Rate

    Confirmed ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST, version 1.1. RECIST is a set of rules that define when tumors in cancer participants improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stabilize"), or worsen ("progress") during treatment. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions after treatment from Baseline (before study drug administration). ORR was assessed by investigator and BICR.

    Time frame: Every 8 weeks from start of the treatment until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent (average of 1.38 years)

  6. Phase I: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Overall Response Rate

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with an unconfirmed CR or PR according to RECIST version 1.1. RECIST is a set of rules that define when tumors in cancer participants improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stabilize"), or worsen ("progress") during treatment. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions after treatment from Baseline (before study drug administration). Unconfirmed ORR was assessed by investigator and BICR.

    Time frame: Every 8 weeks from start of the treatment until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent (average of 1.38 years)

  7. Phase I: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause. The length of this interval is estimated as the date of death or disease progression minus the date of first dose plus one day. The date of documented disease progression is defined as the date of disease progression based on radiologic evidence. Participants with documented date of disease progresssion or death and who had not received subsequent anticancer treatment prior to the date of documented disease progression or death were included in the analysis of PFS. PFS was assessed by investigator and BICR. Please note the values of the Full Range (min, max) are described irregardless of censoring at data cut-off.

    Time frame: From start of the treatment until disease progression or death (average of 1.38 years)

  8. Phase I: Duration of Response

    Duration of response is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause among participants with confirmed CR or PR. The participant who showed a CR or PR was included in the analysis of duration of response. Duration of response was assessed by investigator and BICR. Please note the values of the Full Range (min, max) are described irregardless of censoring at data cut-off.

    Time frame: From start of the treatment until disease progression or death (average of 1.38 years)

  9. Phase II: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Overall Response

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with an unconfirmed CR or PR according to RECIST version 1.1. RECIST is a set of rules that define when tumors in cancer participants improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stabilize"), or worsen ("progress") during treatment. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions after treatment from Baseline (before study drug administration). Unconfirmed ORR was assessed by investigator and BICR.

    Time frame: Every 8 weeks from start of the treatment until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent (average of 1.38 years)

  10. Phase II: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause. The length of this interval is estimated as the date of death or disease progression minus the date of first dose plus one day. The date of documented disease progression is defined as the date of disease progression based on radiologic evidence. Participants with documented date of disease progresssion or death and who had not received subsequent anticancer treatment prior to the date of documented disease progression or death were included in the analysis of PFS. PFS was assessed by investigator and BICR. Please note the values of the Full Range (min, max) are described irregardless of censoring at data cut-off.

    Time frame: From start of the treatment until disease progression or death (average of 1.38 years)

  11. Phase II: Duration of Response

    Duration of response is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause among participants with confirmed CR or PR. The participant who showed a CR or PR was included in the analysis of duration of response. Duration of response was assessed by investigator and BICR. Please note the values of the Full Range (min, max) are described irregardless of censoring at data cut-off.

    Time frame: From start of the treatment until disease progression or death (average of 1.38 years)

  12. Phase II: Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event and Any Serious Adverse Event

    An AE is defined as any untoward MO in a part. temporally associated with the use of a MP, whether or not considered related to the MP and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with its use. SAE is defined as any untoward MO that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect and protocol-specific SAEs:ALT\>=3xULN and bilirubin\>=2xULN(\>35% direct) (or ALT\>=3xULN, international normalized ratio\>1.5), any new primary cancers, treatment emergent malignancies except basal cell carcinoma, symptomatic or asymptomatic LVEF decrease, retinal pigment epithelial detachment or retinal vein occlusion, pyrexia with hypotension,or dehydration or renal insufficiency,or severe (\>=G3) rigor/chills.

    Time frame: From the start of study treatment until 30 days after study treatment discontinuation (average of 1.38 years)

  13. Phase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters

    CCPs were graded according to NCI CTCAE garde version 4.0 as: G1, Mild; G2, Moderate; G3, Severe; G4, Life-threatening or disabling; G5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase to G3 or G4 from Baseline grade occurred. CCPs that were not graded according to NCI CTCAE criteria, were categorized as High and Low with respect to the normal range. Data are presented only for those parameters for which the category decreased to Low or increased to High relative to the Baseline category. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. CCPs included: albumin, alkaline phosphatase, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, inorganic phosphorus, chloride, LDH, total protein, urea/BUN and uric acid.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  14. Phase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameters

    Hematology parameters were summarized according to NCI CTCAE G, version 4.0 as: G1, Mild; G2, Moderate; G3, Severe; G4, Life-threatening or disabling; G5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase to G3 or G4 from Baseline G occurred. For hematology parameters that were not graded according to NCI CTCAE criteria, were categorized as High and Low with respect to the normal range. Data are presented only for those parameters for which the category decreased to Low or increased to High relative to the Baseline category. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count, WBC counts, basophils, eosinophils, hematocrit, MCHC, MCH, MCV, monocytes and RBC count.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  15. Phase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Urinalysis Results

    Urine samples were collected for urine dipstick analysis at Baseline and at the post-treatment Visit. The number of participants with negative (absence) and positive (presence: trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+ or 5+) results for UOB, UGLU, UKET, UP and UUBIL were summarized. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  16. Phase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in ECOG Perormance Status

    The ECOG pef status 5-point scale is used to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, to assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the par. and to determine appropriate treatment and prognosis: G0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease pef without restriction. G1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, example, light house work, office work. G2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about \>50% of waking hrs. G3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hrs. G4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. G5, dead. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. Number of par. who improved, had no change, or deteriorated in pef status from BL is summarized.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  17. Phase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure to Grade 2 or Grade 3

    SBP and DBP values were graded using (NCI CTCAE version 4.0). SBP was categorized as: G1 (Increase to \>=120 to 140 mmHg), G2 (Increase to \>=140 to \<160 mmHg), and G3 (Increase to \>=160 mmHg). DBP was categorized as: G1 (Increase to \>=80 to \<90 mmHg), G2 (Increase to \>=90 to \<100 mmHg), and G3 (Increase to \>=100 mmHg). The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. An increase is defined as an increase in the CTCAE grade relative to the Baseline grade. Participants with missing Baseline values were assumed to have a Baseline value of G0.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  18. Phase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

    Change from Baseline in heart rate is categorized as decrease to \<60 bpm, change to normal or no change, and increase to \>100 bpm relative to the Baseline value. Participants with a missing Baseline value are assumed to have a normal Baseline value. Participants were counted twice if the participant's heart rate value decreased to \<60 bpm and increased to \>100 bpm post-Baseline. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  19. Phase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Temperature

    Change from Baseline in temperature is categorized as a decrease to \<=35 degrees C, change to normal or no change as 35-38 degrees C, and increase to \>=38 degrees C relative to the Baseline value. Participants with a missing Baseline value are assumed to have a normal Baseline value. Participants were counted twice if the participant temperature value decreased to \<=35 degrees C and increased to \>=38 degrees C post-Baseline. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  20. Phase II: Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation Measured Via Pulse Oxymetry at the Indicated Time Points

    Oxygen saturation measures the capacity of blood to transport oxygen to other parts of the body. Oxygen binds to hemoglobin in red blood cells when moving through the lungs. A pulse oximeter uses two frequencies of light (red and infrared) to determine the percentage of hemoglobin in the blood that is saturated with oxygen, that is called as blood oxygen saturation, or SpO2. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value (Days 8 and 15; Weeks 3 to 132 and post-treatment Visit) minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  21. Phase II: Change From Baseline in Weight at the Indicated Time Points

    Mean change in body weight from baseline was determined. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value (Weeks 3 to 132 and post-treatment Visit) minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  22. Phase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram Findings at the Indicated Time Points

    Single 12-lead ECGs were performed at Baseline, Weeks 3 to 132 and post-treatment Visit. ECG findings were categorized as: normal, abnormal - CS, or abnormal - NCS, as determined by the investigator.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

  23. Phase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as Assessed by Echocardiogram

    Absolute change from Baseline in LVEF were summarized at each scheduled assessment time and in the worst-case post Baseline. Only the post Baseline assessments that used the same method (ECHO or MUGA) as the Baseline assessments were used to derive the change from Baseline. The change from Baseline was categorized as: any increase; no change; 0-\<10 Decrease, 10-19 Decrease, \>=20 Decrease, \>=10 Decrease and \>= LLN, \>=10 Decrease and below LLN, \>=20 Decrease and \>=LLN and \>=20 Decrease and below LLN. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

    Time frame: From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)

07

Results

Posted Oct 2, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mgPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Started66
Completed65
Not completed01
Withdrew: Adverse event01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence (MO) in a part. temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with its use. SAE is defined as any untoward MO that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect and protocol-specific SAEs:ALT\>=3xupper limit of normal(ULN) and bilirubin\>=2xULN(\>35% direct) (or ALT\>=3xULN, international normalized ratio\>1.5), any new primary cancers, treatment emergent malignancies except basal cell carcinoma, symptomatic or asymptomatic LVEF decrease, retinal pigment epithelial detachment or retinal vein occlusion, pyrexia with hypotension,or dehydration or renal insufficiency,or severe (\>=G3) rigor/chills.

Time frame:
From the start of study treatment until 30 days after study treatment discontinuation (average of 1.38 year)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Any AEs6
Any SAEs1
PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)

A DLT was defined as an event occurred during the first 21 days after the first dose of study drugs and met any of the following criteria, according to National Cancer Institutes (NCI) common terminology criteria for AE (CTCAE) grade (G) version 4.0: G4 hematological toxicity; G3 or G4 non-hematologic toxicity (including rash, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea only if uncontrolled with supportive therapy); rash \>=G3 that required dose reduction despite supportive care; a G2 or greater non-hematological toxicity that in the judgment of the investigator and medical monitor; dose interruption of greater than 14 consecutive days due to unresolved toxicity; any new G2 or greater valvular heart disease and significant alteration in cardiac valve morphology from Baseline.

Time frame:
From the start of study treatment until 21 days
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Phase I: Number of Participants With a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)0
PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline (BL) in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters (CCPs)

CCPs were graded according to NCI CTCAE grade version 4.0 as: G1, Mild; G2, Moderate; G3, Severe; G4, Life-threatening or disabling; G5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters (para) for which an increase to G3 or G4 from BL G occurred. CCPs that were not G according to NCI CTCAE criteria, were categorized as High and Low with respect to the normal range. Data are presented only for those para for which the category decreased to Low or increased to High relative to the BL category. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. CCPs included: albumin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, inorganic phosphorus, chloride, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total protein, urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and uric acid.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline (BL) in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters (CCPs)
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Alkaline Phosphatase, G31
ALT, G31
Inorganic Phosphorous, G41
Chloride, Low2
LDH, Low1
LDH, High3
Total Protein, Low2
Urea/BUN, Low1
Urea/BUN, High2
Uric acid, Low1
Uric acid, High1
PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameters

Hematology parameters were summarized according to NCI CTCAE G, version 4.0 as: G1, Mild; G2, Moderate; G3, Severe; G4, Life-threatening or disabling; G5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase to G3 or G4 from Baseline G occurred. For hematology parameters that were not graded according to NCI CTCAE criteria, were categorized as High and Low with respect to the normal range. Data are presented only for those parameters for which the category decreased to Low or increased to High relative to the Baseline category. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count, white blood cell (WBC) counts, basophils, eosinophils, hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), monocytes and red blood cell (RBC) count.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameters
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Lymphocytes, G31
Total Neutrophils, G31
Basophils, High1
Eosinophils, High1
Hematocrit, Low3
MCHC, Low1
MCH, Low2
MCV, Low1
Monocytes, Low2
Monocytes, High3
RBC count, Low4
PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters

Urine samples were collected for urine dipstick analysis at Baseline and at the post-treatment Visit. The number of participants with negative (absence) and positive (presence: trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+ or 5+) results for urine occult blood (UOB), urine glucose (UGLU), urine ketones (UKET), urine protein (UP) and urine urobilinogen (UUBIL) were summarized. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
UOB, Baseline, Negative6
UOB, Baseline, Positive0
UOB, Post-Treatment, Negative2
UOB, Post-Treatment, Positive1
UGLU, Baseline, Negative6
UGLU, Baseline, Positive0
UGLU, Post-Treatment, Negative3
UGLU, Post-Treatment, Positive0
UKET, Baseline, Negative6
UKET, Baseline, Positive0
UKET, Post-Treatment, Negative3
UKET, Post-Treatment, Positive0
UP, Baseline, Negative5
UP, Baseline, Positive1
UP, Post-Treatment, Negative2
UP, Post-Treatment, Positive0
UUBIL, Baseline, Negative0
UUBIL, Baseline, Positive6
UUBIL, Post-Treatment, Negative0
UUBIL, Post-Treatment, Positive3
PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance (Pef) Status

The ECOG pef status 5-point scale is used to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, to assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the par. and to determine appropriate treatment and prognosis: G0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease pef without restriction. G1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, example, light house work, office work. G2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about \>50 percent (%) of waking hrs. G3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hrs. G4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. G5, dead. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. Number of par. who improved, had no change, or deteriorated in pef status from BL is summarized.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance (Pef) Status
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Improved1
No change4
Deteriorated1
PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure to Grade 2 or Grade 3

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values were graded using (NCI CTCAE version 4.0). SBP was categorized as: G1 (Increase to \>=120 to 140 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]), G2 (Increase to \>=140 to \<160 mmHg), and G3 (Increase to \>=160 mmHg). DBP was categorized as: G1 (Increase to \>=80 to \<90 mmHg), G2 (Increase to \>=90 to \<100 mmHg), and G3 (Increase to \>=100 mmHg). The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. An increase is defined as an increase in the CTCAE grade relative to the Baseline grade. Participants with missing Baseline values were assumed to have a Baseline value of G0.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure to Grade 2 or Grade 3
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
SBP, Increase to Grade 23
SBP, Increase to Grade 30
DBP, Increase to Grade 22
DBP, Increase to Grade 31
PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

Change from Baseline in heart rate is categorized as decrease to \<60 beats per minute (bpm), change to normal or no change, and increase to \>100 bpm relative to the Baseline value. Participants with a missing Baseline value are assumed to have a normal Baseline value. Participants were counted twice if the participant's heart rate value decreased to \<60 bpm and increased to \>100 bpm post-Baseline. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Decrease to <60 bpm1
Change to normal or no change3
Increase to >100 bpm3
PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Temperature

Change from Baseline in temperature is categorized as a decrease to \<=35 degrees celsius (C), change to normal or no change as 35-38 degrees C, and increase to \>=38 degrees C relative to the Baseline value. Participants with a missing Baseline value are assumed to have a normal Baseline value. Participants were counted twice if the participant temperature value decreased to \<=35 degrees C and increased to \>=38 degrees C post-Baseline. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Temperature
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Decrease to <=35 degrees C2
Change to normal or no change2
Increase to >=38 degrees C3
PrimaryPhase I: Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Measured Via Pulse Oxymetry at the Indicated Time Points

Oxygen saturation measures the capacity of blood to transport oxygen to other parts of the body. Oxygen binds to hemoglobin in red blood cells when moving through the lungs. A pulse oximeter uses two frequencies of light (red and infrared) to determine the percentage of hemoglobin in the blood that is saturated with oxygen,that is called as blood oxygen saturation or SpO2. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value (Days 8,15; Weeks 3 to 136 and post-treatment Visit) minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of oxygen in blood
Phase I: Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Measured Via Pulse Oxymetry at the Indicated Time Points
Percentage of oxygen in bloodPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Day 8, n=61.0 ± 0.89
Day 15, n=60.8 ± 0.75
Week 3, n=60.2 ± 0.75
Week 8, n=60.7 ± 1.21
Week 12, n=51.4 ± 1.67
Week 16, n=61.2 ± 2.14
Week 20, n=50.4 ± 1.14
Week 24, n=50.8 ± 1.92
Week 28, n=50.8 ± 1.92
Week 32, n=50.6 ± 1.14
Week 36, n=50.8 ± 1.30
Week 40, n=40.5 ± 1.00
Week 44, n=40.5 ± 2.38
Week 48, n=40.5 ± 2.08
Week 52, n=2-0.5 ± 2.12
Week 56, n=20.0 ± 0.00
Week 60, n=2-0.5 ± 0.71
Week 64, n=20.0 ± 0.00
Week 68, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 72, n=11.0 ± NA
Week 76, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 80, n=11.0 ± NA
Week 84, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 88, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 92, n=1-2.0 ± NA
Week 96, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 100, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 104, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 108, n=1-1.0 ± NA
Week 112, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 116, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 120, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 124, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 128, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 132, n=10.0 ± NA
Week 136, n=10.0 ± NA
Post-Treatment, n=40.8 ± 0.96
PrimaryPhase I: Change From Baseline in Weight at the Indicated Time Points

Mean change in body weight from Baseline was determined. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value (Weeks 3 to 136 and post-treatment Visit) minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit ( average of 1.38 year)
Reported as:
Mean · Kilogram (Kg)
Phase I: Change From Baseline in Weight at the Indicated Time Points
Kilogram (Kg)Phase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Week 3, n=6-4.87 ± 6.046
Week 8, n=6-4.43 ± 6.274
Week 12, n=6-4.13 ± 6.436
Week 16, n=6-4.00 ± 6.801
Week 20, n=5-0.62 ± 2.295
Week 24, n=5-0.70 ± 1.402
Week 28, n=5-0.36 ± 1.850
Week 32, n=5-0.38 ± 1.809
Week 36, n=5-0.78 ± 1.821
Week 40, n=4-1.43 ± 1.305
Week 44, n=4-0.68 ± 1.759
Week 48, n=4-1.03 ± 2.081
Week 52, n=20.15 ± 2.475
Week 56, n=2-0.30 ± 1.556
Week 60, n=2-0.35 ± 2.475
Week 64, n=2-0.05 ± 2.475
Week 68, n=1-2.60 ± NA
Week 72, n=1-2.10 ± NA
Week 76, n=1-1.20 ± NA
Week 80, n=1-0.70 ± NA
Week 84, n=1-0.70 ± NA
Week 88, n=1-1.20 ± NA
Week 92, n=1-0.80 ± NA
Week 96, n=1-0.80 ± NA
Week 100, n=1-0.80 ± NA
Week 104, n=1-0.50 ± NA
Week 108, n=1-1.00 ± NA
Week 112, n=1-1.00 ± NA
Week 116, n=1-0.50 ± NA
Week 120, n=1-0.60 ± NA
Week 124, n=1-0.70 ± NA
Week 128, n=1-0.60 ± NA
Week 132, n=1-0.80 ± NA
Week 136, n=1-0.50 ± NA
Post-Treatment, n=4-0.05 ± 1.457
PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at the Indicated Time Points

Single twelve (12)-lead ECGs were perfomred at Baseline, Weeks 3 to 132 and post-treatment Visit. ECG findings were categorized as: normal, abnormal - clinically significant (CS), or abnormal - not clinically significant (NCS), as determined by the investigator.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 year)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at the Indicated Time Points
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Baseline, Normal, n=64
Baseline, Abnormal-NCS, n=62
Baseline, Abnormal-CS, n=60
Week 3, Normal, n=65
Week 3, Abnormal-NCS, n=61
Week 3, Abnormal-CS, n=60
Week 12, Normal, n=65
Week 12, Abnormal-NCS, n=61
Week 12, Abnormal-CS, n=60
Week 24, Normal, n=54
Week 24, Abnormal-NCS, n=51
Week 24, Abnormal-CS, n=50
Week 36, Normal, n=54
Week 36, Abnormal-NCS, n=51
Week 36, Abnormal-CS, n=50
Week 48, Normal, n=42
Week 48, Abnormal-NCS, n=42
Week 48, Abnormal-CS, n=40
Week 60, Normal, n=22
Week 60, Abnormal-NCS, n=20
Week 60, Abnormal-CS, n=20
Week 72, Normal, n=11
Week 72, Abnormal-NCS, n=10
Week 72, Abnormal-CS, n=10
Week 84, Normal, n=11
Week 84, Abnormal-NCS, n=10
Week 84, Abnormal-CS, n=10
Week 96, Normal, n=11
Week 96, Abnormal-NCS, n=10
Week 96, Abnormal-CS, n=10
Week 108, Normal, n=11
Week 108, Abnormal-NCS, n=10
Week 108, Abnormal-CS, n=10
Week 120, Normal, n=11
Week 120, Abnormal-NCS, n=10
Week 120, Abnormal-CS, n=10
Week 132, Normal, n=11
Week 132, Abnormal-NCS, n=10
Week 132, Abnormal-CS, n=10
Post-Treatment, Normal, n=33
Post-Treatment, Abnormal-NCS, n=30
Post-Treatment, Abnormal-CS, n=30
PrimaryPhase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as Assessed by Echocardiogram (ECHO)

Absolute change from Baseline in LVEF were summarized at each scheduled assessment time and in the worst-case post Baseline. Only the post Baseline assessments that used the same method (ECHO or Multi Gated Acquisition Scan \[MUGA\]) as the Baseline assessments were used to derive the change from Baseline. The change from Baseline was categorized as: any increase; no change; 0-\<10 Decrease, 10-19 Decrease, \>=20 Decrease, \>=10 Decrease and \>= lower limit of normal (LLN), \>=10 Decrease and below LLN, \>=20 Decrease and \>=LLN and \>=20 Decrease and below LLN. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as Assessed by Echocardiogram (ECHO)
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Any Increase0
No change0
0-<10 Decrease5
10-19 Decrease1
>=20 Decrease0
>=10 Decrease and >=LLN1
>=10 Decrease and below LLN0
>=20 Decrease and >=LLN0
>=20 Decrease and below LLN0
PrimaryPhase II: Number of Participant With Confirmed Overall Response

Confirmed overall response (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. RECIST is a set of rules that define when tumors in cancer participants improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stabilize"), or worsen ("progress") during treatment. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions after treatment from Baseline (before study drug administration). ORR was assessed by investigator and blinded independent central review (BICR).

Time frame:
Every 8 weeks from start of the treatment until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participant With Confirmed Overall Response
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Investigator-Assessed5
BICR-Assessed5
Statistical analysis
  • Phase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg · Exact binomial test · p = <0.0001 · Percentage: 83 · 95% CI 35.9 to 99.6For Investigator Assessed ORR
  • Phase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg · Exact binomial test · p = <0.0001 · Percentage: 83 · 95% CI 35.9 to 99.6BICR Assessed ORR
SecondaryPhase I: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After Single and Repeat Dose

Blood samples were collected from each par. at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr post-dose on Day 21 (repeat dose) for PK analysis. GSK2118436 metabolites included GSK2285403, GSK2298683, and GSK2167542. AUC from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (concn) (AUC\[0-t\]) was determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concn and the logarithmic trapezoidal rule for decreasing. The AUC from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC\[0-inf\] was calculated, where data permit, as the sum of AUC(0-t) and Ct/z, where Ct is the observed plasma concn obtained from the log-linear regression analysis of the last quantifiable time-point and z is the terminal phase rate constant. Area under the concentration-time curve over 12 hr and 24 hr dosing interval is called AUC\[0-12\] and AUC\[0-24\]. AUC(0-inf) was calculated only at Day 1.

Time frame:
At pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr on Day 21 (repeat dose)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · hr*nanogram (ng)/mL
Phase I: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After Single and Repeat Dose
hr*nanogram (ng)/mLPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
GSK2118436, AUC[0-t], Day 1, n=612850.5346 ± 37.3
GSK2118436, AUC[0-t], Day 21, n=610075.3530 ± 32.4
GSK2118436, AUC[0-12], Day 1, n=611414.9211 ± 41.3
GSK2118436, AUC[0-12], Day 21, n=610138.0887 ± 33.1
GSK2118436, AUC[0-inf], Day 1, n=613485.6357 ± 36.9
GSK2285403, AUC[0-t], Day 1, n=610530.0297 ± 39.4
GSK2285403, AUC[0-t], Day 21, n=67199.9862 ± 29.9
GSK2285403, AUC[0-12], Day 1, n=67929.4506 ± 64.3
GSK2285403, AUC[0-12], Day 21, n=67273.0445 ± 30.6
GSK2285403, AUC[0-inf], Day 1, n=613903.4979 ± 67.9
GSK2298683, AUC[0-t], day 1, n=650834.2106 ± 106.0
GSK2298683, AUC[0-t], Day 21, n=6108578.495 ± 36.1
GSK2298683, AUC[0-12], Day 1, n=618963.4767 ± 255.7
GSK2298683, AUC[0-12], Day 21, n=6113205.044 ± 36.8
GSK2298683, AUC[0-inf], Day 1, n=5125748.810 ± 41.8
GSK2167542, AUC[0-t], Day 1, n=6571.5619 ± 170.4
GSK2167542, AUC[0-t], Day 21, n=62503.0667 ± 92.7
GSK2167542, AUC[0-12], Day 1, n=6116.1860 ± 269.6
GSK2167542, AUC[0-12], Day 21, n=42755.2522 ± 122.0
GSK2167542, AUC[0-inf], Day 1, n=14628.4351 ± NA
GSK1120212, AUC[0-t], Day 1, n=669.3090 ± 50.2
GSK1120212, AUC[0-t], Day 21, n=6261.2787 ± 20.9
GSK1120212, AUC[0-24], Day 1, n=582.5215 ± 23.1
GSK1120212, AUC[0-24], Day 21, n=6447.9452 ± 25.5
GSK1120212, AUC[0-inf], Day 1, n=5375.5275 ± 23.1
SecondaryPhase I: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After a Single and Repeat Dose

Blood samples were collected from each participant at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr post-dose on Day 21 (repeat dose) for PK analysis. GSK2118436 metabolites included GSK2285403, GSK2298683 and GSK2167542. Cmax was determined from the raw concentration-time data.

Time frame:
At pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr on Day 21 (repeat dose)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Phase I: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After a Single and Repeat Dose
ng/mLPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
GSK2118436, Day 12497.383 ± 69.7
GSK2118436, Day 213431.280 ± 12.0
GSK2285403, Day 11336.296 ± 70.1
GSK2285403, Day 211995.847 ± 14.8
GSK2298683, Day 13689.039 ± 75.5
GSK2298683, Day 2112303.403 ± 32.5
GSK2167542, Day 150.405 ± 149.7
GSK2167542, Day 21323.863 ± 82.4
GSK1120212, Day 17.824 ± 112.1
GSK1120212, Day 2132.522 ± 20.2
SecondaryPhase I: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctau) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After a Single and Repeat Dose

Trough concentration is the lowest level that a drug is present in the body. Pre-dose (trough) blood samples were collected on Day 8, Day 15, Weeks 3, 8, 16 and 24 for estimating plasma trough concentration. GSK2118436 metabolites included GSK2285403, GSK2298683, and GSK2167542. Ctau was determined from the raw concentration-time data.

Time frame:
At pre-dose on Day 8, Day 15, Weeks 3, 8, 16 and 24
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Phase I: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctau) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After a Single and Repeat Dose
ng/mLPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
GSK2118436, Day 8, n=6118.36 ± 188.3
GSK2118436, Day 15, n=684.25 ± 136.2
GSK2118436, Week 3, n=678.14 ± 149.3
GSK2118436, Week 8, n=678.29 ± 591.4
GSK2118436, Week 16, n=6105.05 ± 206.4
GSK2118436, Week 24, n=5121.85 ± 183.9
GSK2285403, Day 8, n=6149.61 ± 111.9
GSK2285403, Day 15, n=6106.09 ± 72.8
GSK2285403, Week 3, n=693.87 ± 82.0
GSK2285403, Week 8, n=689.12 ± 239.4
GSK2285403, Week 16, n=6100.10 ± 121.8
GSK2285403, Week 24, n=5117.93 ± 121.4
GSK2298683, Day 8, n=66011.00 ± 39.8
GSK2298683, Day 15, n=65141.38 ± 39.5
GSK2298683, Week 3, n=66210.90 ± 51.8
GSK2298683, Week 8, n=64408.24 ± 65.0
GSK2298683, Week 16, n=64022.93 ± 39.4
GSK2298683, Week 24, n=54294.86 ± 51.9
GSK2167542, Day 8, n=6217.73 ± 46.7
GSK2167542, Day 15, n=6161.11 ± 107.5
GSK2167542, Week 3, n=6224.32 ± 83.6
GSK2167542, Week 8, n=6220.93 ± 52.2
GSK2167542, Week 16, n=6270.15 ± 107.5
GSK2167542, Week 24, n=5227.75 ± 101.5
GSK1120212, Day 8, n=611.36 ± 43.0
GSK1120212, Day 15, n=612.47 ± 22.4
GSK1120212, Week 3, n=613.80 ± 25.6
GSK1120212, Week 8, n=614.52 ± 65.0
GSK1120212, Week 16, n=613.47 ± 39.4
GSK1120212, Week 24, n=513.72 ± 41.3
SecondaryPhase I: Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) and Terminal Phase Half Life (t1/2) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After a Single and Repeat Dose

Blood samples were collected from each participant at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr post-dose on Day 21 (repeat dose) for PK analysis. GSK2118436 metabolites included GSK2285403, GSK2298683, and GSK2167542. Tmax is defined as the time of occurrence of Cmax. Tmax was determined directly from the raw concentration-time data. The apparent terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) obtained as the ratio of ln2/lamdaz, where lamdaz is the terminal phase rate constant estimated by linear regression analysis of the log transformed concentration-time data. . T1/2 was calculated only at Day 1.

Time frame:
At pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hr after administration of GSK2118436 + GSK1120212 on Day 1 (single dose) and at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hr on Day 21 (repeat dose)
Reported as:
Median · hr
Phase I: Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) and Terminal Phase Half Life (t1/2) of GSK2118436 and Metabolites, and GSK1120212 After a Single and Repeat Dose
hrPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
GSK2118436, t1/2, Day 1, n=64.5398 (2.776 to 9.645)
GSK2118436, tmax, Day 1, n=62.425 (1.43 to 3.85)
GSK2118436, tmax, Day 21, n=61.685 (0.97 to 1.97)
GSK2285403, t1/2, Day 1, n=64.2086 (3.574 to 55.294)
GSK2285403, tmax, Day 1, n=63.410 (2.93 to 11.93)
GSK2285403, tmax, Day 21, n=61.950 (1.47 to 2.93)
GSK2298683, t1/2, Day 1, n=515.5414 (11.652 to 21.159)
GSK2298683, tmax, Day 1, n=69.840 (7.92 to 23.82)
GSK2298683, tmax, Day 21, n=64.955 (2.75 to 5.98)
GSK2167542, t1/2, Day 1, n=155.8643 (55.8643 to 55.8643)
GSK2167542, tmax, Day 1, n=623.885 (11.65 to 24.28)
GSK2167542, tmax, Day 21, n=64.505 (1.97 to 9.92)
GSK1120212, t1/2, Day 1, n=589.5954 (39.029 to 126.331)
GSK1120212, tmax, Day 1, n=60.965 (0.92 to 23.82)
GSK1120212, tmax, Day 21, n=61.210 (0.92 to 5.93)
SecondaryPhase I: Number of Participants With Confirmed Overall Response Rate

Confirmed ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST, version 1.1. RECIST is a set of rules that define when tumors in cancer participants improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stabilize"), or worsen ("progress") during treatment. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions after treatment from Baseline (before study drug administration). ORR was assessed by investigator and BICR.

Time frame:
Every 8 weeks from start of the treatment until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With Confirmed Overall Response Rate
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Investigator-Assessed5
BICR-Assessed3
Statistical analysis
  • Phase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg · Exact binomial test · p = <0.0001 · Percentage: 83 · 95% CI 35.9 to 99.6For Investigator Assessed ORR
  • Phase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg · Exact binomial test · p = 0.0158 · Percentage: 50 · 95% CI 11.8 to 82.2BICR Assessed ORR
SecondaryPhase I: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Overall Response Rate

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with an unconfirmed CR or PR according to RECIST version 1.1. RECIST is a set of rules that define when tumors in cancer participants improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stabilize"), or worsen ("progress") during treatment. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions after treatment from Baseline (before study drug administration). Unconfirmed ORR was assessed by investigator and BICR.

Time frame:
Every 8 weeks from start of the treatment until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase I: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Overall Response Rate
ParticipantsPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Investigator-Assessed5
BICR-Assessed3
Statistical analysis
  • Phase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg · Exact binomial test · p = <0.0001 · Percentage: 83 · 95% CI 35.9 to 99.6For Investigator Assessed ORR
  • Phase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg · Exact binomial test · p = 0.0158 · Percentage: 50 · 95% CI 11.8 to 88.2BICR Assessed ORR
SecondaryPhase I: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause. The length of this interval is estimated as the date of death or disease progression minus the date of first dose plus one day. The date of documented disease progression is defined as the date of disease progression based on radiologic evidence. Participants with documented date of disease progresssion or death and who had not received subsequent anticancer treatment prior to the date of documented disease progression or death were included in the analysis of PFS. PFS was assessed by investigator and BICR. Please note the values of the Full Range (min, max) are described irregardless of censoring at data cut-off.

Time frame:
From start of the treatment until disease progression or death (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Phase I: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
WeeksPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Investigator-Assessed, n=6NA (16 to 65.1)
BICR-Assessed, n=6NA (9 to 65.1)
SecondaryPhase I: Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause among participants with confirmed CR or PR. The participant who showed a CR or PR was included in the analysis of duration of response. Duration of response was assessed by investigator and BICR. Please note the values of the Full Range (min, max) are described irregardless of censoring at data cut-off.

Time frame:
From start of the treatment until disease progression or death (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Phase I: Duration of Response
WeeksPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Investigator-Assessed, n=5NA (17.4 to 57.1)
BICR-Assessed, n=3NA (32.1 to 57.1)
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Overall Response

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with an unconfirmed CR or PR according to RECIST version 1.1. RECIST is a set of rules that define when tumors in cancer participants improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stabilize"), or worsen ("progress") during treatment. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions after treatment from Baseline (before study drug administration). Unconfirmed ORR was assessed by investigator and BICR.

Time frame:
Every 8 weeks from start of the treatment until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Overall Response
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Investigator-Assessed5
BICR-Assessed5
Statistical analysis
  • Phase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg · Exact binomial test · p = <0.0001 · Percentage: 83 · 95% CI 35.9 to 99.6For Investigator Assessed ORR
  • Phase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg · Exact binomial test · p = <0.0001 · Percentage: 83 · 95% CI 35.9 to 99.6BICR Assessed ORR
SecondaryPhase II: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause. The length of this interval is estimated as the date of death or disease progression minus the date of first dose plus one day. The date of documented disease progression is defined as the date of disease progression based on radiologic evidence. Participants with documented date of disease progresssion or death and who had not received subsequent anticancer treatment prior to the date of documented disease progression or death were included in the analysis of PFS. PFS was assessed by investigator and BICR. Please note the values of the Full Range (min, max) are described irregardless of censoring at data cut-off.

Time frame:
From start of the treatment until disease progression or death (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Phase II: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
WeeksPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Investigator-Assessed, n=6NA (19.0 to 128.4)
BICR-Assessed, n=6NA (19.0 to 128.4)
SecondaryPhase II: Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause among participants with confirmed CR or PR. The participant who showed a CR or PR was included in the analysis of duration of response. Duration of response was assessed by investigator and BICR. Please note the values of the Full Range (min, max) are described irregardless of censoring at data cut-off.

Time frame:
From start of the treatment until disease progression or death (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Phase II: Duration of Response
WeeksPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Investigator-Assessed, n=5NA (16 to 120.1)
BICR-Assessed, n=5NA (11.1 to 120.1)
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event and Any Serious Adverse Event

An AE is defined as any untoward MO in a part. temporally associated with the use of a MP, whether or not considered related to the MP and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with its use. SAE is defined as any untoward MO that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect and protocol-specific SAEs:ALT\>=3xULN and bilirubin\>=2xULN(\>35% direct) (or ALT\>=3xULN, international normalized ratio\>1.5), any new primary cancers, treatment emergent malignancies except basal cell carcinoma, symptomatic or asymptomatic LVEF decrease, retinal pigment epithelial detachment or retinal vein occlusion, pyrexia with hypotension,or dehydration or renal insufficiency,or severe (\>=G3) rigor/chills.

Time frame:
From the start of study treatment until 30 days after study treatment discontinuation (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event and Any Serious Adverse Event
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Any AE6
Any SAE0
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters

CCPs were graded according to NCI CTCAE garde version 4.0 as: G1, Mild; G2, Moderate; G3, Severe; G4, Life-threatening or disabling; G5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase to G3 or G4 from Baseline grade occurred. CCPs that were not graded according to NCI CTCAE criteria, were categorized as High and Low with respect to the normal range. Data are presented only for those parameters for which the category decreased to Low or increased to High relative to the Baseline category. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. CCPs included: albumin, alkaline phosphatase, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, inorganic phosphorus, chloride, LDH, total protein, urea/BUN and uric acid.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Inorganic Phosphorous, G32
Chloride, High2
LDH, High5
Total Protein, Low2
Urea/BUN, High1
Uric acid, Low1
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameters

Hematology parameters were summarized according to NCI CTCAE G, version 4.0 as: G1, Mild; G2, Moderate; G3, Severe; G4, Life-threatening or disabling; G5, Death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase to G3 or G4 from Baseline G occurred. For hematology parameters that were not graded according to NCI CTCAE criteria, were categorized as High and Low with respect to the normal range. Data are presented only for those parameters for which the category decreased to Low or increased to High relative to the Baseline category. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count, WBC counts, basophils, eosinophils, hematocrit, MCHC, MCH, MCV, monocytes and RBC count.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Hematology Parameters
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Total Neutrophils, G31
Eosinophils, High1
Hematocrit, Low2
MCHC, Low1
MCH, Low1
MCV, Low1
MCV, High1
Monocytes, Low3
Monocytes, High4
RBC count, Low1
RBC count, High1
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Urinalysis Results

Urine samples were collected for urine dipstick analysis at Baseline and at the post-treatment Visit. The number of participants with negative (absence) and positive (presence: trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+ or 5+) results for UOB, UGLU, UKET, UP and UUBIL were summarized. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Urinalysis Results
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
UOB, Baseline, Negative6
UOB, Baseline, Positive0
UOB, Post-Treatment, Negative3
UOB, Post-Treatment, Positive0
UGLU, Baseline, Negative6
UGLU, Baseline, Positive0
UGLU, Post-Treatment, Negative2
UGLU, Post-Treatment, Positive1
UKET, Baseline, Negative5
UKET, Baseline, Positive1
UKET, Post-Treatment, Negative2
UKET, Post-Treatment, Positive1
UP, Baseline, Negative6
UP, Baseline, Positive0
UP, Post-Treatment, Negative2
UP, Post-Treatment, Positive1
UUBIL, Baseline, Negative0
UUBIL, Baseline, Positive6
UUBIL, Post-Treatment, Negative0
UUBIL, Post-Treatment, Positive3
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in ECOG Perormance Status

The ECOG pef status 5-point scale is used to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, to assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the par. and to determine appropriate treatment and prognosis: G0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease pef without restriction. G1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, example, light house work, office work. G2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about \>50% of waking hrs. G3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hrs. G4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. G5, dead. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. Number of par. who improved, had no change, or deteriorated in pef status from BL is summarized.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in ECOG Perormance Status
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Improved0
No change4
Deteriorated2
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure to Grade 2 or Grade 3

SBP and DBP values were graded using (NCI CTCAE version 4.0). SBP was categorized as: G1 (Increase to \>=120 to 140 mmHg), G2 (Increase to \>=140 to \<160 mmHg), and G3 (Increase to \>=160 mmHg). DBP was categorized as: G1 (Increase to \>=80 to \<90 mmHg), G2 (Increase to \>=90 to \<100 mmHg), and G3 (Increase to \>=100 mmHg). The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments. An increase is defined as an increase in the CTCAE grade relative to the Baseline grade. Participants with missing Baseline values were assumed to have a Baseline value of G0.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure to Grade 2 or Grade 3
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
SBP, Increase to Grade 23
SBP, Increase to Grade 30
DBP, Increase to Grade 25
DBP, Increase to Grade 30
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

Change from Baseline in heart rate is categorized as decrease to \<60 bpm, change to normal or no change, and increase to \>100 bpm relative to the Baseline value. Participants with a missing Baseline value are assumed to have a normal Baseline value. Participants were counted twice if the participant's heart rate value decreased to \<60 bpm and increased to \>100 bpm post-Baseline. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Decrease to <60 bpm1
Change to normal or no change4
Increase to >100 bpm1
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Temperature

Change from Baseline in temperature is categorized as a decrease to \<=35 degrees C, change to normal or no change as 35-38 degrees C, and increase to \>=38 degrees C relative to the Baseline value. Participants with a missing Baseline value are assumed to have a normal Baseline value. Participants were counted twice if the participant temperature value decreased to \<=35 degrees C and increased to \>=38 degrees C post-Baseline. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Temperature
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Decrease to <=35 degrees C2
Change to normal or no change4
Increase to >=38 degrees C0
SecondaryPhase II: Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation Measured Via Pulse Oxymetry at the Indicated Time Points

Oxygen saturation measures the capacity of blood to transport oxygen to other parts of the body. Oxygen binds to hemoglobin in red blood cells when moving through the lungs. A pulse oximeter uses two frequencies of light (red and infrared) to determine the percentage of hemoglobin in the blood that is saturated with oxygen, that is called as blood oxygen saturation, or SpO2. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value (Days 8 and 15; Weeks 3 to 132 and post-treatment Visit) minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of oxygen in blood
Phase II: Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation Measured Via Pulse Oxymetry at the Indicated Time Points
Percentage of oxygen in bloodPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Day 8, n=6-0.2 ± 0.98
Day 15, n=60.3 ± 1.51
Week 3, n=60.5 ± 0.84
Week 8, n=60.5 ± 1.05
Week 12, n=6-0.2 ± 0.98
Week 16, n=60.3 ± 1.51
Week 20, n=5-1.0 ± 1.58
Week 24, n=50.2 ± 1.64
Week 28, n=5-0.2 ± 0.84
Week 32, n=5-0.6 ± 1.14
Week 36, n=5-0.4 ± 1.34
Week 40, n=50.0 ± 1.58
Week 44, n=4-1.3 ± 2.22
Week 48, n=41.0 ± 1.41
Week 52, n=31.0 ± 1.73
Week 56, n=3-0.7 ± 0.58
Week 60, n=3-0.3 ± 1.15
Week 64, n=3-0.3 ± 0.58
Week 68, n=30.0 ± 1.00
Week 72, n=3-0.7 ± 1.53
Week 76, n=3-1.0 ± 0.00
Week 80, n=30.0 ± 1.00
Week 84, n=3-0.3 ± 1.53
Week 88, n=3-0.3 ± 1.53
Week 92, n=30.3 ± 0.58
Week 96, n=3-0.3 ± 0.58
Week 100, n=3-0.7 ± 1.15
Week 104, n=3-0.3 ± 1.53
Week 108, n=30.0 ± 1.00
Week 112, n=30.0 ± 1.00
Week 116, n=3-0.7 ± 0.58
Week 120, n=2-0.5 ± 0.71
Week 124, n=1-2.0 ± NA
Week 128, n=11.0 ± NA
Week 132, n=1-2.0 ± NA
Post-Treatment, n=31.3 ± 0.58
SecondaryPhase II: Change From Baseline in Weight at the Indicated Time Points

Mean change in body weight from baseline was determined. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value (Weeks 3 to 132 and post-treatment Visit) minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Mean · Kg
Phase II: Change From Baseline in Weight at the Indicated Time Points
KgPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Week 3, n=6-0.68 ± 0.538
Week 8, n=6-0.22 ± 0.553
Week 12, n=6-0.30 ± 1.273
Week 16, n=60.05 ± 1.947
Week 20, n=5-0.32 ± 2.318
Week 24, n=50.06 ± 2.243
Week 28, n=50.18 ± 2.500
Week 32, n=50.42 ± 2.607
Week 36, n=50.98 ± 3.016
Week 40, n=50.62 ± 2.734
Week 44, n=40.80 ± 3.790
Week 48, n=40.68 ± 3.527
Week 52, n=31.27 ± 3.993
Week 56, n=32.23 ± 3.932
Week 60, n=32.83 ± 3.879
Week 64, n=32.70 ± 4.246
Week 68, n=32.87 ± 4.143
Week 72, n=32.87 ± 4.165
Week 76, n=33.63 ± 2.793
Week 80, n=33.43 ± 4.007
Week 84, n=34.37 ± 4.008
Week 88, n=33.80 ± 3.905
Week 92, n=34.13 ± 3.496
Week 96, n=34.13 ± 3.630
Week 100, n=33.53 ± 3.219
Week 104, n=34.00 ± 4.557
Week 108, n=33.93 ± 4.800
Week 112, n=33.60 ± 4.649
Week 116, n=34.20 ± 4.859
Week 120, n=25.95 ± 2.192
Week 124, n=17.50 ± NA
Week 128, n=15.80 ± NA
Week 132, n=15.30 ± NA
Post-Treatment, n=30.13 ± 2.155
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram Findings at the Indicated Time Points

Single 12-lead ECGs were performed at Baseline, Weeks 3 to 132 and post-treatment Visit. ECG findings were categorized as: normal, abnormal - CS, or abnormal - NCS, as determined by the investigator.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram Findings at the Indicated Time Points
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Baseline, Normal, n=65
Baseline, Abnormal-NCS, n=61
Baseline, Abnormal-CS, n=60
Week 3, Normal, n=64
Week 3, Abnormal-NCS, n=62
Week 3, Abnormal-CS, n=60
Week 12, Normal, n=64
Week 12, Abnormal-NCS, n=62
Week 12, Abnormal-CS, n=60
Week 24, Normal, n=53
Week 24, Abnormal-NCS, n=52
Week 24, Abnormal-CS, n=50
Week 36, Normal, n=52
Week 36, Abnormal-NCS, n=53
Week 36, Abnormal-CS, n=50
Week 48, Normal, n=43
Week 48, Abnormal-NCS, n=41
Week 48, Abnormal-CS, n=40
Week 60, Normal, n=32
Week 60, Abnormal-NCS, n=31
Week 60, Abnormal-CS, n=30
Week 72, Normal, n=32
Week 72, Abnormal-NCS, n=31
Week 72, Abnormal-CS, n=30
Week 84, Normal, n=31
Week 84, Abnormal-NCS, n=32
Week 84, Abnormal-CS, n=30
Week 96, Normal, n=31
Week 96, Abnormal-NCS, n=32
Week 96, Abnormal-CS, n=30
Week 108, Normal, n=31
Week 108, Abnormal-NCS, n=32
Week 108, Abnormal-CS, n=30
Week 120, Normal, n=21
Week 120, Abnormal-NCS, n=21
Week 120, Abnormal-CS, n=20
Week 132, Normal, n=10
Week 132, Abnormal-NCS, n=11
Week 132, Abnormal-CS, n=10
Post-Treatment, Normal, n=33
Post-Treatment, Abnormal-NCS, n=30
Post-Treatment, Abnormal-CS, n=30
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as Assessed by Echocardiogram

Absolute change from Baseline in LVEF were summarized at each scheduled assessment time and in the worst-case post Baseline. Only the post Baseline assessments that used the same method (ECHO or MUGA) as the Baseline assessments were used to derive the change from Baseline. The change from Baseline was categorized as: any increase; no change; 0-\<10 Decrease, 10-19 Decrease, \>=20 Decrease, \>=10 Decrease and \>= LLN, \>=10 Decrease and below LLN, \>=20 Decrease and \>=LLN and \>=20 Decrease and below LLN. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

Time frame:
From Baseline until the post-treatment Visit (average of 1.38 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Phase II: Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as Assessed by Echocardiogram
ParticipantsPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
Any Increase1
No change0
0-<10 Decrease3
10-19 Decrease2
>=20 Decrease0
>=10 Decrease and >=LLN2
>=10 Decrease and below LLN0
>=20 Decrease and >=LLN0
>=20 Decrease and below LLN0

Adverse events

Collected over On treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of investigational product (IP) until 30 days after the last dose of IP (average of 1.38 years).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg—1/6 (16.7%)6/6 (100%)
Phase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg—0/6 (0%)6/6 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mgPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/60/6
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 81
Most frequent other events
EventPhase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mgPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mg
PyrexiaGeneral disorders5/64/6
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders2/64/6
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations4/64/6
ErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/61/6
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/60/6
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations4/62/6
Blood alkaline phosphatase increasedInvestigations3/62/6
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders2/63/6
Dermatitis acneiformSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/61/6
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/60/6

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Phase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mgPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mgTotal
Mean52.2 ± 19.8359.0 ± 10.9955.6 ± 15.70
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Phase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mgPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mgTotal
Female527
Male145
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Phase I: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mgPhase II: GSK2118436 150 mg + GSK1120212 2 mgTotal
Asian - Japanese Heritage6612
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01928940
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2013
Start date
Aug 15, 2013
Primary completion
Sep 18, 2014
Completion
Jul 4, 2016
Results posted
Oct 2, 2015
Last update
Jul 24, 2017

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion